Tessa M. Bosch

Genetic Polymorphisms of Drug-Metabolising Enzymes and Drug Transporters in the Chemotherapeutic Treatment of Cancer

There is wide variability in the response of individuals to standard doses of drug therapy. This is an important problem in clinical practice, where it can lead to therapeutic failures or adverse drug reactions. Polymorphisms in genes coding for metabolising enzymes and drug transporters can affect drug efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenetics aims to identify individuals predisposed to a high risk of toxicity and low response from standard doses of anti-cancer drugs. This review focuses on the clinical significance of polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase [UGT] 1A1, glutathione S-transferase, sulfotransferase [SULT] 1A1, N-acetyltransferase [NAT], thiopurine methyltransferase [TPMT]) and drug transporters (P-glycoprotein [multidrug resistance 1], multidrug resistance protein 2 [MRP2], breast cancer resistance protein [BCRP]) in influencing efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy.The most important example to demonstrate the influence of pharmacogenetics on anti-cancer therapy is TPMT. A decreased activity of TPMT, caused by genetic polymorphisms in the TPMT gene, causes severe toxicity with mercaptopurine. Dosage reduction is necessary for patients with heterozygous or homozygous mutation in this gene.Other polymorphisms showing the influence of pharmacogenetics in the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer are discussed, such as UGT1A1*28. This polymorphism is associated with an increase in toxicity with irinotecan. Also, polymorphisms in the DPYD gene show a relation with fluorouracil-related toxicity; however, in most cases no clear association has been found for polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters, and pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of anti-cancer drugs. The studies discussed evaluate different regimens and tumour types and show that polymorphisms can have different, sometimes even contradictory, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in different tumours in response to different drugs.The clinical application of pharmacogenetics in cancer treatment will therefore require more detailed information of the different polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters. Larger studies, in different ethnic populations, and extended with haplotype and linkage disequilibrium analysis, will be necessary for each anti-cancer drug separately.

Pharmacogenetic Screening of CYP3A and ABCB1 in Relation to Population Pharmacokinetics of Docetaxel

Purpose: Despite the extensive clinical experience with docetaxel, unpredictable interindividual variability in efficacy and toxicity remain important limitations associated with the use of this anticancer drug. Large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability has been associated with variation in toxicity profiles. Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters could possibly explain the observed pharmacokinetic variability. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes on the population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Experimental Design: Whole blood samples were obtained from patients with solid tumors and treated with docetaxel to quantify the exposure to docetaxel. DNA was collected to determine polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes with DNA sequencing. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel was done using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Results: In total, 92 patients were assessable for pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel. A three-compartmental model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Several polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes were found, with allele frequencies of 0.54% to 48.4%. The homozygous C1236T polymorphism in the ABCB1 gene (ABCB1*8) was significantly correlated with a decreased docetaxel clearance (−25%; P = 0.0039). No other relationships between polymorphisms and pharmacokinetic variables reached statistical significance. Furthermore, no relationship between haplotypes of CYP3A and ABCB1 and the pharmacokinetics could be identified. Conclusions: The polymorphism C1236T in the ABCB1 gene was significantly related to docetaxel clearance. Our current finding may provide a meaningful tool to explain interindividual differences in docetaxel treatment in daily practice.

Detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the ABCG2 gene in a Dutch population

BackgroundABCG2 is a drug transporter involved in the protection of tissues by actively transporting toxic substances and xenobiotics out of cells. Cancer cells overexpressing the ABCG2 gene show multidrug resistance to mitoxantrone-, methotrexate-, doxorubicin-, and camptothecin-based anticancer drugs, such as topotecan and SN-38. Large interindividual differences have been shown in oral availability and clearance of drugs that are substrates for ABCG2. Variation in the ABCG2 gene, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), can possibly explain the variability in pharmacokinetics of ABCG2 substrates.AimThis study was performed to screen for SNPs in the ABCG2 gene to determine the frequencies of currently known and previously unknown SNPs in a Dutch population.MethodsBlood samples were obtained from 100 healthy volunteers to isolate genomic DNA. PCR amplification was performed, followed by DNA sequencing. The population, of which the ethnicity was 93% Caucasian, consisted of 79 female individuals and 21 males.ResultsIn total, 19 SNPs were found in the ABCG2 gene, of which 7 were previously unknown. The SNPs G8883A in exon 5 and C44168T in exon 14 cause an amino acid change of R160Q and R575X, respectively. Most of the previously unknown SNPs were found in introns.ConclusionsThe results will be used in future studies to explore the influence of the different SNPs on ABCG2 protein expression, activity, and substrate specificity. In addition, the results can be used to study the effects of genetic polymorphisms in the ABCG2 gene on the pharmacokinetic profile of anticancer drugs.

Pharmacogenetic screening for polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters in a Dutch population.

AbstractBackground: A possible explanation for the wide interindividual variability in toxicity and efficacy of drug therapy is variation in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. The allelic frequency of these genetic variants, linkage disequilibrium (LD), and haplotype of these polymorphisms are important parameters in determining the genetic differences between patients. The aim of this study was to explore the frequencies of polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes (CYP1A1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, DPYD, UGT1A1, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1) and drug transporters (ABCB1[MDR1] and ABCC2[MRP2]), and to investigate the LD and perform haplotype analysis of these polymorphisms in a Dutch population. Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 100 healthy volunteers and genomic DNA was isolated and amplified by PCR. The amplification products were sequenced and analyzed for the presence of polymorphisms by sequence alignment. Results: In the study population, we identified 13 new single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Caucasians and three new SNPs in non-Caucasians, in addition to previously recognized SNPs. Three of the new SNPs were found within exons, of which two resulted in amino acid changes (A428T in CYP2C9 resulting in the amino acid substitution D143V; and C4461T in ABCC2 in a non-Caucasian producing the amino acid change T1476M). Several LDs and haplotypes were found in the Caucasian individuals. Conclusion: In this Dutch population, the frequencies of 16 new SNPs and those of previously recognized SNPs were determined in genes coding for drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. Several LDs and haplotypes were also inferred. These data are important for further research to help explain the interindividual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability in response to drug therapy.

Rapid Detection of the DPYD IVS14+1G>A Mutation for Screening Patients to Prevent Fluorouracil-Related Toxicity

AbstractBackground: Deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) has been linked to severe or lethal fluorouracil (FU)-related toxicity. The most prominent mutation in the DPYD gene is the IVS14+1G>A mutation, which causes skipping of exon 14 in the messenger RNA (mRNA) and results in DPD enzyme deficiency. Several methods have been described to detect this mutation, but all are labor intensive and low throughput. Objective Our aim was to develope a high-throughput real-time PCR assay to screen patients for the IVS14+1G>A mutation. Methods: Primers and probes were developed and several reaction conditions were tested. In total, 165 individuals were screened for this mutation, with DNA sequencing as a reference method. Results: Results of the real-time PCR assay and DNA sequencing were 100% identical. In total, eight heterozygous individuals were identified, of which six were patients with severe FU-related toxicity after FU or capecitabine treatment and two were healthy volunteers. Conclusion: This new real-time PCR assay with a high throughput is particularly suitable for large-scale screening for the IVS14+1G>A mutation in patients selected for treatment with fluoropyrimidines in order to prevent severe FU-related toxicity.

Effects of cyclosporine a on single-dose pharmacokinetics of intravenous itraconazole in patients with hematologic malignancies.

An open-label, clinical pilot study was performed to study the effect of cyclosporine A (CsA) on single-dose pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in patients with a hematologic malignancy. Patients (n = 10), admitted for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, received a single dose of 200 mg itraconazole in a 1-hour intravenous infusion during their treatment period before initiation of CsA. This was repeated during the period that CsA was administered and a steady-state concentration of CsA was achieved (trough whole blood level 200-400 ng/mL). After both administrations of itraconazole, serum pharmacokinetics of itraconazole and hydroxy (OH) itraconazole were determined during 24 hours. The results were compared with each patient acting as his or her own control. Exposure to itraconazole, as measured by the AUC[0-24h], was not significantly altered when combined with CsA. Large interindividual variations were observed in area under the concentration curve values among patients. In contrast, exposure to OH-itraconazole was significantly increased when itraconazole was coadministered with CsA (median increase of AUC[0-24h] 49%) with significant prolongation of Tmax and T1/2 (median increase of Tmax 37% and T1/2 176%). These differences may be the result of variability in affinity of itraconazole, OH-itraconazole, and CsA for the cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolic system and the occurrence of P-glycoprotein polymorphisms. In conclusion, exposure to OH-itraconazole, but not to itraconazole, is increased when itraconazole is coadministered with CsA. Although the interaction profile of itraconazole and CsA remains complex, these findings may be of importance in patients in whom monitoring of itraconazole serum levels is warranted, for example, in those with life-threatening fungal infections or in those who receive concurrent cytochrome inducers or inhibitors.