V. D. Doodeman
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by V. D. Doodeman.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2011
Maarten J. Deenen; Jolien Tol; Artur M. Burylo; V. D. Doodeman; A. de Boer; Andrew Vincent; H.-J. Guchelaar; Paul Smits; Jos H. Beijnen; C.J.A. Punt; Jan H. M. Schellens; Annemieke Cats
Purpose: To explore the effect of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and haplotypes on outcome of capecitabine. Experimental Design: Germline DNA was available from 568 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer participating in the CAIRO2 trial, assigned to capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab ± cetuximab. The coding region of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) was sequenced in 45 cases with grade 3 or more capecitabine-related toxicity and in 100 randomly selected controls (cohort). Most discriminating (P < 0.1) or frequently occurring (>1%) nonsynonymous SNPs were analyzed in all 568 patients. SNPs and haplotypes were associated with toxicity, capecitabine dose modifications, and survival. Results: A total of 29 SNPs were detected in the case–cohort analysis, of which 8 were analyzed in all 568 patients. Of the patients polymorphic for DPYD IVS14+1G>A, 2846A>T, and 1236G>A, 71% (5 of 7), 63% (5 of 8), and 50% (14 of 28) developed grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, respectively, compared with 24% in the overall population. All patients polymorphic for IVS14+1G>A developed any grade 3 to 4 toxicity, including one possibly capecitabine-related death. Because of toxicity, a mean capecitabine dose reduction of 50% was applied in IVS14+1G>A and 25% in 2846A>T variant allele carriers. Patients were categorized into six haplotype groups: one predicted for reduced (10%), and two for increased risks (41% and 33%) for severe diarrhea. Individual SNPs were not associated with overall survival, whereas one haplotype was associated with overall survival [HR (95% CI) = 0.57 (0.35–0.95)]. Conclusions: DPYD IVS14+1G>A and 2846A>T predict for severe toxicity to capecitabine, for which patients require dose reductions. Haplotypes assist in selecting patients at risk for toxicity to capecitabine. Clin Cancer Res; 17(10); 3455–68. ©2011 AACR.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2006
Tessa M. Bosch; Alwin D. R. Huitema; V. D. Doodeman; Robert S. Jansen; Els Witteveen; W. M. Smit; Rob L. H. Jansen; C.M.L. van Herpen; M. Soesan; Jos H. Beijnen; Jan H. M. Schellens
Purpose: Despite the extensive clinical experience with docetaxel, unpredictable interindividual variability in efficacy and toxicity remain important limitations associated with the use of this anticancer drug. Large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability has been associated with variation in toxicity profiles. Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters could possibly explain the observed pharmacokinetic variability. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes on the population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Experimental Design: Whole blood samples were obtained from patients with solid tumors and treated with docetaxel to quantify the exposure to docetaxel. DNA was collected to determine polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes with DNA sequencing. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel was done using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Results: In total, 92 patients were assessable for pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel. A three-compartmental model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Several polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes were found, with allele frequencies of 0.54% to 48.4%. The homozygous C1236T polymorphism in the ABCB1 gene (ABCB1*8) was significantly correlated with a decreased docetaxel clearance (−25%; P = 0.0039). No other relationships between polymorphisms and pharmacokinetic variables reached statistical significance. Furthermore, no relationship between haplotypes of CYP3A and ABCB1 and the pharmacokinetics could be identified. Conclusions: The polymorphism C1236T in the ABCB1 gene was significantly related to docetaxel clearance. Our current finding may provide a meaningful tool to explain interindividual differences in docetaxel treatment in daily practice.
Pharmacogenetics and Genomics | 2008
Corine Ekhart; V. D. Doodeman; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Paul Smits; Jos H. Beijnen; Alwin D. R. Huitema
Purpose The anticancer agent, cyclophosphamide, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) enzymes. Polymorphisms of these enzymes may affect the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and thereby its toxicity and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of known allelic variants in the CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, GSTA1, GSTP1, ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 genes on the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer agent, cyclophosphamide, and its active metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. Experimental design A cohort of 124 Caucasian patients received a high-dose chemotherapy combination consisting of cyclophosphamide (4–6 g/m2), thiotepa (320–480 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 13–20 mg×min/ml) as intravenous infusions over 4 consecutive days. Genomic DNA was analysed using PCR and sequencing. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure plasma concentrations of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. The relationship between allelic variants and the elimination pharmacokinetic parameters noninducible cyclophosphamide clearance (CLnonind), inducible cyclophosphamide clearance (CLind) and elimination rate constant of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (k4OHCP) were evaluated using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Results The interindividual variability in the noninducible cyclophosphamide clearance, inducible cyclophosphamide clearance and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide clearance was 23, 27 and 31%, respectively. No effect of the allelic variants investigated on the clearance of cyclophosphamide or 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide could be demonstrated. Conclusion This study indicates that the presently evaluated variant alleles in the CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, GSTA1, GSTP1, ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 genes do not explain the interindividual variability in cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and are, probably, not the cause of the observed variability in toxicity.
Cancer | 2012
Markus Joerger; Sjaak Burgers; Paul Baas; Egbert F. Smit; Tjeerd Haitjema; Martin P. L. Bard; V. D. Doodeman; Paul Smits; Andrew Vincent; Alwin D. R. Huitema; Jos H. Beijnen; Jan H. M. Schellens
The authors assessed the impact of germline polymorphisms on clinical outcome in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received platinum‐gemcitabine (PG) chemotherapy.
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy | 2006
Tessa M. Bosch; V. D. Doodeman; Paul Smits; Irma Meijerman; Jan H. M. Schellens; Jos H. Beijnen
AbstractBackground: A possible explanation for the wide interindividual variability in toxicity and efficacy of drug therapy is variation in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. The allelic frequency of these genetic variants, linkage disequilibrium (LD), and haplotype of these polymorphisms are important parameters in determining the genetic differences between patients. The aim of this study was to explore the frequencies of polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes (CYP1A1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, DPYD, UGT1A1, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1) and drug transporters (ABCB1[MDR1] and ABCC2[MRP2]), and to investigate the LD and perform haplotype analysis of these polymorphisms in a Dutch population. Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 100 healthy volunteers and genomic DNA was isolated and amplified by PCR. The amplification products were sequenced and analyzed for the presence of polymorphisms by sequence alignment. Results: In the study population, we identified 13 new single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Caucasians and three new SNPs in non-Caucasians, in addition to previously recognized SNPs. Three of the new SNPs were found within exons, of which two resulted in amino acid changes (A428T in CYP2C9 resulting in the amino acid substitution D143V; and C4461T in ABCC2 in a non-Caucasian producing the amino acid change T1476M). Several LDs and haplotypes were found in the Caucasian individuals. Conclusion: In this Dutch population, the frequencies of 16 new SNPs and those of previously recognized SNPs were determined in genes coding for drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. Several LDs and haplotypes were also inferred. These data are important for further research to help explain the interindividual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability in response to drug therapy.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2009
Corine Ekhart; V. D. Doodeman; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Paul Smits; Jos H. Beijnen; Alwin D. R. Huitema
AIMS Thiotepa is widely used in high-dose chemotherapy. Previous studies have shown relations between exposure and severe organ toxicity. Thiotepa is metabolized by cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferase enzymes. Polymorphisms of these enzymes may affect elimination of thiotepa and tepa, its main metabolite. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effects of known allelic variants in CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, GSTA1 and GSTP1 genes on pharmacokinetics of thiotepa and tepa. METHODS White patients (n = 124) received a high-dose regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin as intravenous infusions. Genomic DNA was analysed using polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Plasma concentrations of thiotepa and tepa were determined using validated GC and LC-MS/MS methods. Relations between allelic variants and elimination pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (nonmem). RESULTS The polymorphisms CYP2B6 C1459T, CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, GSTA1 (C-69T, G-52A) and GSTP1 C341T had a significant effect on clearance of thiotepa or tepa. Although significant, most effects were generally not large. Clearance of thiotepa and tepa was predominantly affected by GSTP1 C341T polymorphism, which had a frequency of 9.3%. This polymorphism increased non-inducible thiotepa clearance by 52% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41, 64, P < 0.001] and decreased tepa clearance by 32% (95% CI 29, 35, P < 0.001) in heterozygous patients, which resulted in an increase in combined exposure to thiotepa and tepa of 45% in homozygous patients. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that the presently evaluated variant alleles explain only a small part of the substantial interindividual variability in thiotepa and tepa pharmacokinetics. Patients homozygous for the GSTP1 C341T allele may have enhanced exposure to thiotepa and tepa.
Molecular Neurodegeneration | 2006
Suzanne V. Frankfort; V. D. Doodeman; Remco Bakker; Linda R. Tulner; Jos P. C. M. van Campen; Paul Smits; Jos H. Beijnen
Amyloid β is an in vitro substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), an efflux pump at the blood brain barrier (BBB). The Multi Drug Resistance (ABCB1) gene, encoding for P-gp, is highly polymorphic and this may result in a changed function of P-gp and may possibly interfere with the pathogenesis of Alzheimers disease. This study investigates to what extent ABCB1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs; C1236T in exon 12, G2677T/A in exon 21 and C3435T in exon 26) and inferred haplotypes exist in an elderly population and if these SNPs and haplotypes differ between patients with dementia and age-matched non-demented control patients. ABCB1 genotype, allele and haplotype frequencies were neither significantly different between patients with dementia and age-matched controls, nor between subgroups of different types of dementia nor age-matched controls. This study shows ABCB1 genotype frequencies to be comparable with described younger populations. To our knowledge this is the first study on ABCB1 genotypes in dementia. ABCB1 genotypes are presently not useful as a biomarker for dementia, as they were not significantly different between demented patients and age-matched control subjects.
Annals of Oncology | 2014
M. Joerger; Alwin D. R. Huitema; Henk Boot; Annemieke Cats; V. D. Doodeman; Paul Smits; Liia D. Vainchtein; Hilde Rosing; Irma Meijerman; M. Zueger; Thomas Cerny; J.H.M. Beijnen; Jan H. M. Schellens
ABSTRACT Aim: Germline gene polymorphisms may impact clinical outcome in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, but there are no data on the interaction between chemotherapy pharmacokinetics (PK) and gene polymorphisms, to assess their independent predictive value. Methods: Two studies prospectively assessed 44 gene polymorphisms in 16 genes (TYMS, MTHFR, GSTP1, -M1, -T1, DPYD, XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, ERCC1, RECQ1, RAD54L, ABCB1, ABCC2, ABCG2, UGT2B7) by Sanger sequencing in 64 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving capecitabine/oxaliplatin chemotherapy, and 76 patients with advanced gastroesophageal (GE) cancer receiving epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine (ECC) chemotherapy, respectively. Plasma concentrations of all anticancer drugs were sampled for up to 24 hours, analyzed using validated LC-MS/MS (capecitabine), HPLC (epirubicin) and flameless atomic absorption spectrometry (platinum), and results submitted to population PK analysis using non-linear mixed effects modeling. We calculated the association between gene polymorphisms, anticancer drug exposure, radiological tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and chemotherapy-related toxicity using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Patients with a low clearance of the active metabolite 5FU had an increased risk of neutropenia in both groups (p A and A2846T were associated with diarrhea (p Conclusions: Carriers of the TYMS high-expression genotype have a markedly inferior outcome when receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced colorectal or gastroesophageal cancer. Therapeutic targeting of this molecularly-defined subgroup of patients should be explored to improve their prognosis. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Cancer Cell | 2005
Floris Foijer; Rob M. F. Wolthuis; V. D. Doodeman; René H. Medema; Hein te Riele
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2006
Markus Joerger; Tessa M. Bosch; V. D. Doodeman; Jos H. Beijnen; Paul Smits; Jan H. M. Schellens