Tetsu Kimura

Determination of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal intubation and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in adults.

The purpose of this study was to determine both the concentration of sevoflurane required for tracheal intubation (MACEI) and its minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) in adults. The study group consisted of 86 elective surgical patients, ASA physical status I or II, aged 16–59 yr. There was no premedication administered. For MACEI determination, after establishing and maintaining the predetermined end-tidal concentration for 20 min, tracheal intubation was attempted using a cuffed tracheal tube without muscle relaxant or other adjuvants. Each concentration at which tracheal intubation was attempted was predetermined as follows: 2.5%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0%, 5.5%, 6.0%, 6.5%, and 7.0%. For MAC determination, the patients examined were basically the same as those for MACEI determination, except for those who received muscle relaxant or other adjuvants because they were “not intubated smoothly.” After establishing and maintaining the predetermined end-tidal concentration at which skin incision was attempted was concentration at which skin incision was attempted was predetermined as follows: 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, and 3.0%. The MACEI of sevoflurane was 4.52% (95% confidence limits, 3.91%-5.21%), and the ED95 for tracheal intubation was 8.07%. The MAC of sevoflurane was 1.58% (95% confidence limits, 1.14%-1.98%), and the AD95 (anesthetic ED95) was 2.96%. The MACEI/ MAC ratio was 2.86 (95% confidence limits, 2.63–3.43). Anesthesia induction followed by tracheal intubation can be accomplished in adults when sevoflurane is administered as a sole anesthetic, but in excess of 8% end-tidal concentration.

Oral Clonidine Preanesthetic Medication Augments the Pressor Responses to Intravenous Ephedrine in Awake or Anesthetized Patients

To evaluate the possible interaction between clonidine and ephedrine, the authors studied hemodynamic responses to intravenous ephedrine in 80 patients who received either clonidine pre-anesthetic medication of approximately 5 micrograms.kg-1 orally (n = 40) or no medication (n = 40). The patients were studied while they were either awake (n = 40) or anesthetized with enflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen (n = 40). Hemodynamic measurements were made at 1-min intervals for 10 min after ephedrine 0.1 mg.kg-1 was injected as a bolus. Although the responses to ephedrine were always greater in anesthetized patients, the magnitudes of mean blood pressure increases in patients who received clonidine (10 +/- 8% for awake and 27 +/- 11% for anesthetized subjects, mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) were significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than in patients not receiving clonidine (4 +/- 5% for awake and 17 +/- 11% for anesthetized subjects). The enhanced pressor responses to ephedrine observed in both awake and anesthetized patients in the presence of clonidine may be attributed to increased catecholamine storage at sympathetic nerve endings due to clonidine, enhanced sensitivity of tissue receptors to which ephedrine binds, potentiation of alpha-adrenoceptor mediated vasoconstriction of both agents, or all of these. It is concluded that oral clonidine preanesthetic medication of 5 micrograms.kg-1 does augment rather than attenuate the pressor responses to intravenous ephedrine in patients both prior to and during general anesthesia.

Neuroprotective effects of a combination of dexmedetomidine and hypothermia after incomplete cerebral ischemia in rats.

Background: Dexmedetomidine and hypothermia are known to reduce neuronal injury following cerebral ischemia. We examined whether a combination of dexmedetomidine and hypothermia reduces brain injury after transient forebrain ischemia in rats to a greater extent than either treatment alone.

β-adrenoreceptor Antagonists Attenuate Brain Injury After Transient Focal Ischemia in Rats

&bgr;-adrenoreceptor antagonists experimentally reduce cardiac and renal injury after ischemia and are also clinically useful for myocardial infarction and severe burns. In addition, &bgr;-adrenoreceptor antagonists provide neuroprotective effects after focal cerebral ischemia in experimental settings. We conducted the present study to compare the neuroprotective effects of several &bgr;-adrenoreceptor antagonists in rat transient focal cerebral ischemia. Halothane-anesthetized normothermic adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to 2 h of middle cerebral artery occlusion using the intraluminal suture technique confirmed by laser Doppler flowmetry. Rats received an IV infusion of saline 0.5 mL/h, propranolol 100 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1, carvedilol 4 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1, esmolol 200 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1, or landiolol 50 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1 (n = 6 in each group). Infusion was initiated 30 min before middle cerebral artery occlusion and continued for 24 h. Additional rats received esmolol 50 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1 or landiolol 10 &mgr;g · kg−1 · min−1 intrathecally (IT) via the cisterna magna (n = 5 in each group), according to the same experimental protocol. The neurological deficit score was evaluated at 22 h after reperfusion, and the brains were removed and stained with triphenyltetrazolium chloride for evaluation of infarct volume. Additional rats that received saline, esmolol, and landiolol IV (n = 6 in each group) were allowed to survive for 7 days followed by measurement of infarct size. Neurological deficit scores were smaller in rats treated with propranolol-IV, carvedilol-IV, esmolol-IV, landiolol-IV, esmolol-IT, and landiolol-IT compared with saline-treated rats (P < 0.05). Cortical and striatum infarct volumes were less in the rats receiving &bgr;-adrenoreceptor antagonists via either IV or IT than in saline-treated rats (P < 0.05). We conclude that &bgr;-adrenoreceptor antagonists improve neurological and histological outcomes after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats independent of administration route.

The efficacy of simulated intravascular test dose in sedated patients

Sedation usually decreases the reliability of subjectively detecting an intravascular test dose, but the efficacies of objective hemodynamic and T-wave criteria remain undetermined. Sixty healthy patients were randomly assigned to receive IV midazolam in 1-mg increments until they were lightly sedated, fentanyl 2 &mgr;g/kg followed by incremental midazolam until they were similarly sedated, or no sedative (n = 20 each). Then, normal saline 3 mL was administered IV, followed 4 min later by 1.5% lidocaine 3 mL plus epinephrine 15 &mgr;g (1:200,000) in all subjects. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured by a radial arterial catheter, and lead II of the electrocardiogram were continuously recorded for 4 min after the saline and test dose injections. An IV test dose produced significant increases in HR and SBP and decreases in T-wave amplitude in all subjects. However, the mean maximum increase in HR in patients sedated with midazolam plus fentanyl (31 ± 14 bpm [mean ± sd]) was significantly less than in those administered midazolam alone or no sedative (42 ± 12 and 44 ± 10 bpm, respectively;P < 0.05). A sensitivity of 100% was obtained on the basis of the traditional HR criterion (positive if ≥20 bpm increase) in patients sedated with midazolam or no sedative, but it was 70% in those with midazolam plus fentanyl (P < 0.05 versus the other two groups). Irrespective of the treatment, sensitivities and specificities of 100% were obtained according to the SBP (positive if ≥15 mm Hg increase) and T-wave (positive if ≥25% decrease in amplitude) criteria. An increase in SBP and a decrease in T-wave amplitude are more reliable than an HR response for detecting accidental intravascular injection of the epinephrine-containing test dose in subjects sedated with midazolam and fentanyl.

Reexpansion pulmonary edema after mediastinal tumor removal

udden evacuation of pneumothorax or pulmonary effusion may cause edema of ipsilateral S lung (reexpansion pulmonary edema, RPE) (1). Other reports described a more acute form of RPE associated with lung reexpansion after several hours of atelectasis (2,3). Can lung reexpansion after onelung ventilation cause the edema formation of the nondependent lung? We describe a case of RPE that developed immediately after the removal of a mediastinal tumor during one-lung ventilation anesthesia in a young patient.

The Effects of Cervical and Lumbar Epidural Anesthesia on Heart Rate Variability and Spontaneous Sequence Baroreflex Sensitivity

A high level of neuroaxial block may produce profound bradycardia and hypotension, possibly as a result of an imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic control of heart rate. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that cervical epidural anesthesia would increase the high-frequency (HF) component of heart rate variability (HRV) as a result of cardiac sympathectomy, whereas lumbar epidural anesthesia would cause sympathetic predominance. HRV and spontaneous baroreflex (SBR) sensitivity were assessed before and after cervical and lumbar epidural anesthesia by using plain 1.5% lidocaine (median upper/lower sensory block: C3/T8 for cervical and T11/L5 for lumbar) in healthy patients (n = 10 each). Electrocardiogram and noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure were monitored. HRV was analyzed by using fast Fourier transformation. Least-square regression analysis relating R-R interval and systolic blood pressure during spontaneous fluctuation was performed to obtain SBR sensitivities. Cervical epidural group patients were significantly older (P < 0.01) and taller (P < 0.01). Cervical epidural anesthesia attenuated HF (0.15–0.4 Hz) and low-frequency (0.04–0.15 Hz) power of HRV with concomitant reductions in up- and down-sequence SBR sensitivities, suggesting decreased vagal modulation of heart rate. Lumbar epidural anesthesia resulted in a significant increase in the low-frequency/HF ratio of HRV and unchanged SBR indices, suggesting sympathetic predominance. HF power correlated well with SBR sensitivities under most of our study conditions. Respiratory rates and PaCO2 were unchanged by either epidural technique. Our results indicate that cervical, but not lumbar, epidural anesthesia depresses phasic and tonic dynamic modulation of the cardiac cycle by the vagal nerve in conscious humans.

Evaluating hemodynamic and T wave criteria of simulated intravascular test doses using bupivacaine or isoproterenol in anesthetized children

UNLABELLED An increase in T wave amplitude > or =25% is a reliable indicator for detecting intravascular injection of lidocaine-epinephrine test dose in anesthetized children. We examined whether a simulated IV test dose containing bupivacaine instead of lidocaine, and isoproterenol instead of epinephrine, produces reliable changes in heart rate (HR) and T wave morphology. One hundred healthy infants and children (6-72 mo) were randomized to one of five groups (n = 20 each) during 1.0 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration sevoflurane and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen: atropine pretreatment (0.01 mg/kg IV) followed by 0.25% bupivacaine containing epinephrine 0.5 microg/kg IV, atropine followed by normal saline, atropine followed by 1% lidocaine containing isoproterenol 0.1 microg/kg, saline pretreatment followed by the lidocaine-isoproterenol test dose, and saline followed by saline. HR was recorded every 20 s and T wave amplitude of lead II was continuously recorded. All patients receiving the bupivacaine-epinephrine test dose and none receiving saline met the HR (positive if > or =10 bpm increase) and T wave criteria (positive if > or =25% increase in amplitude). The isoproterenol-containing test dose produced positive responses based only on the HR criterion with or without atropine pretreatment. Our results indicate that HR and T wave changes are useful if a bupivacaine-epinephrine test dose is used and that HR is the only useful indicator if an isoproterenol-containing test dose is used in sevoflurane-anesthetized children. IMPLICATIONS To determine if an epidurally administered local anesthetic has been unintentionally injected into a blood vessel, a small dose of epinephrine or isoproterenol may be added to a local anesthetic. We found that an increase in heart rate > or =10 bpm and an increase in T wave amplitude of lead II >or =25% are useful indicators for detecting accidental intravascular injection of an epinephrine-containing test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized children, whereas only a heart rate change is a reliable diagnostic tool if an isoproterenol-containing test dose is used.

The efficacy of hemodynamic and T wave criteria for detecting intravascular injection of epinephrine test doses in anesthetized adults: a dose-response study.

Recent studies have shown that an epidural test dose containing 15 &mgr;g of epinephrine has a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for detecting intravascular injection based on the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (positive if ≥15-mm Hg increase) and the T wave criteria (positive if ≥0.1 mV and 25% decrease in amplitude), whereas the modified heart rate (HR) criterion (positive if ≥10-bpm increase) produced uncertain results in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults. Because a fractional dose of the test dose may be injected intravascularly in actual clinical situations, we designed this study to determine, in a dose-related manner, the efficacy and minimum effective dose of epinephrine based on those hemodynamic and the T wave criteria. Eighty healthy adult patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups according to a simulated IV test dose under 2% end-tidal sevoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia after endotracheal intubation (n = 20 each). The saline group received 3 mL of normal saline IV; the epinephrine-15 group received 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine containing 15 &mgr;g of epinephrine (1); and the epinephrine-10 and -5 groups received 2 and 1 mL of the test dose of the identical components, respectively. HR, SBP, and lead II of the electrocardiograph were recorded continuously for 5 min after the IV injection of the study drug. Sensitivities and specificities of 100% were obtained based on the HR and the SBP criteria only if 15 &mgr;g of epinephrine was injected IV, whereas sensitivities and specificities of 100% were obtained based on both T wave criteria after 15 and 10 &mgr;g of epinephrine was injected IV. Two blinded observers were able to detect all T wave changes in patients who received 15, 10, and 5 &mgr;g of epinephrine IV, resulting in 100% efficacy (P < 0.05 versus HR and SBP criteria). We conclude that minimum effective epinephrine doses for detecting accidental intravascular injection are 15 &mgr;g on the HR and the SBP criteria, and 10 &mgr;g on both T wave criteria, and that observing T wave changes may detect even smaller (5 &mgr;g) doses of epinephrine injected IV in adult patients anesthetized with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Implications To determine whether an epidural catheter is in a blood vessel, an epidural test dose containing 15 &mgr;g of epinephrine is used. We found that a decrease in T wave amplitude appears to be more sensitive than heart rate and systolic blood pressure change for detecting accidental intravascular injection of a small dose of epinephrine-containing test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized patients.

Determination of the distance between the laryngoscope blade and the upper incisors during direct laryngoscopy : comparisons of a curved, an angulated straight, and two straight blades

We compared visibility and dental complications from a variety of blades during tracheal intubation. Ninety-eight patients who received tracheal intubation were enrolled. They were divided into two groups: Study 1 (n = 50) and Study 2 (n = 48). Four laryngoscopic evaluations were planned for each patient using Miller and Wisconsin straight blades with different heel heights, a Macintosh curved blade, and a Belscope angulated straight blade (Study 1: Miller No. 3, Wisconsin No. 3, Macintosh No. 4, and Belscope medium; and Study 2 Miller No. 2, Wisconsin No. 2, Macintosh No. 3, and Belscope medium, respectively). All laryngoscopies were performed by the same anesthesiologist. The distance between the blade and the upper central incisors was measured when the optimum visibility of the glottis was obtained. The visibility was determined according to the Cormack and Lehane grading. Analysis of the distance between the blade and upper incisors was performed using the results of the 44 patients (166 distances) in Study 1 and the 48 patients (181 distances) in Study 2 who had a visibility of two or better. The Belscope blade provided a significantly greater visual field than the other types of blade. Two patients sustained a fracture of the central incisor and subluxation of the central incisor, respectively, during laryngoscopy in which a Wisconsin blade was used. The average incidence of dental injury was 1/191. The Belscope blade may contribute to a reduced likelihood of upper dental injuries during laryngoscopy.