Theresa A. Guise

A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone

We investigated the molecular basis for osteolytic bone metastasis by selecting human breast cancer cell line subpopulations with elevated metastatic activity and functionally validating genes that are overexpressed in these cells. These genes act cooperatively to cause osteolytic metastasis, and most of them encode secreted and cell surface proteins. Two of these genes, interleukin-11 and CTGF, encode osteolytic and angiogenic factors whose expression is further increased by the prometastatic cytokine TGF beta. Overexpression of this bone metastasis gene set is superimposed on a poor-prognosis gene expression signature already present in the parental breast cancer population, suggesting that metastasis requires a set of functions beyond those underlying the emergence of the primary tumor.

Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

ONJ has been increasingly suspected to be a potential complication of bisphosphonate therapy in recent years. Thus, the ASBMR leadership appointed a multidisciplinary task force to address key questions related to case definition, epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic imaging, clinical management, and future areas for research related to the disorder. This report summarizes the findings and recommendations of the task force.

TGF-β signaling blockade inhibits PTHrP secretion by breast cancer cells and bone metastases development

Breast cancer frequently metastasizes to the skeleton, and the associated bone destruction is mediated by the osteoclast. Growth factors, including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), released from bone matrix by the action of osteoclasts, may foster metastatic growth. Because TGF-beta inhibits growth of epithelial cells, and carcinoma cells are often defective in TGF-beta responses, any role of TGF-beta in metastasis is likely to be mediated by effects on the surrounding normal tissue. However, we present evidence that TGF-beta promotes breast cancer metastasis by acting directly on the tumor cells. Expression of a dominant-negative mutant (TbetaRIIDeltacyt) of the TGF-beta type II receptor rendered the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 unresponsive to TGF-beta. In a murine model of bone metastases, expression of TbetaRIIDeltacyt by MDA-MB-231 resulted in less bone destruction, less tumor with fewer associated osteoclasts, and prolonged survival compared with controls. Reversal of the dominant-negative signaling blockade by expression of a constitutively active TGF-beta type I receptor in the breast cancer cells increased tumor production of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), enhanced osteolytic bone metastasis, and decreased survival. Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells that expressed the dominant-negative TbetaRIIDeltacyt with the cDNA for PTHrP resulted in constitutive tumor PTHrP production and accelerated bone metastases. These data demonstrate an important role for TGF-beta in the development of breast cancer metastasis to bone, via the TGF-beta receptor-mediated signaling pathway in tumor cells, and suggest that the bone destruction is mediated by PTHrP.

Evidence for a causal role of parathyroid hormone-related protein in the pathogenesis of human breast cancer-mediated osteolysis.

Breast cancer almost invariably metastasizes to bone in patients with advanced disease and causes local osteolysis. Much of the morbidity of advanced breast cancer is a consequence of this process. Despite the importance of the problem, little is known of the pathophysiology of local osteolysis in the skeleton or its prevention and treatment. Observations in patients with bone metastases suggest that breast cancer cells in bone express parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) more frequently than in soft tissue sites of metastasis or in the primary tumor. Thus, the role of PTHrP in the causation of breast cancer metastases in bone was examined using human breast cancer cell lines. Four of eight established human breast cancer cell lines expressed PTHrP and one of these cell lines, MDA-MB-231, was studied in detail using an in vivo model of osteolytic metastases. Mice inoculated with MDA-MB-231 cells developed osteolytic bone metastasis without hypercalcemia or increased plasma PTHrP concentrations. PTHrP concentrations in bone marrow plasma from femurs affected with osteolytic lesions were increased 2.5-fold over corresponding plasma PTHrP concentrations. In a separate experiment, mice were treated with either a monoclonal antibody directed against PTHrP(1-34), control IgG, or nothing before tumor inoculation with MDA-MB-231 and twice per week for 26 d. Total area of osteolytic lesions was significantly lower in mice treated with PTHrP antibodies compared with mice receiving control IgG or no treatment. Histomorphometric analysis of bone revealed decreased osteoclast number per millimeter of tumor/bone interface and increased bone area, as well as decreased tumor area, in tumor-bearing animals treated with PTHrP antibodies compared with respective controls. These results indicate that tumor-produced PTHrP can cause local bone destruction in breast cancer metastatic to bone, even in the absence of hypercalcemia or increased circulating plasma concentrations of PTHrP. Thus, PTHrP may have an important pathogenetic role in the establishment of osteolytic bone lesions in breast cancer. Neutralizing antibodies to PTHrP may reduce the development of destructive bone lesions as well as the growth of tumor cells in bone.

Cancer to bone: a fatal attraction

When cancer metastasizes to bone, considerable pain and deregulated bone remodelling occurs, greatly diminishing the possibility of cure. Metastasizing tumour cells mobilize and sculpt the bone microenvironment to enhance tumour growth and to promote bone invasion. Understanding the crucial components of the bone microenvironment that influence tumour localization, along with the tumour-derived factors that modulate cellular and protein matrix components of bone to favour tumour expansion and invasion, is central to the pathophysiology of bone metastases. Basic findings of tumour–bone interactions have uncovered numerous therapeutic opportunities that focus on the bone microenvironment to prevent and treat bone metastases.

Basic Mechanisms Responsible for Osteolytic and Osteoblastic Bone Metastases

Certain solid tumors metastasize to bone and cause osteolysis and abnormal new bone formation. The respective phenotypes of dysregulated bone destruction and bone formation represent two ends of a spectrum, and most patients will have evidence of both. The mechanisms responsible for tumor growth in bone are complex and involve tumor stimulation of the osteoclast and the osteoblast as well as the response of the bone microenvironment. Furthermore, factors that increase bone resorption, independent of tumor, such as sex steroid deficiency, may contribute to this vicious cycle of tumor growth in bone. This article discusses mechanisms and therapeutic implications of osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases.

A causal role for endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of osteoblastic bone metastases

Osteoblastic bone metastases are common in prostate and breast cancer patients, but mechanisms by which tumor cells stimulate new bone formation are unclear. We identified three breast cancer cell lines that cause osteoblastic metastases in a mouse model and secrete endothelin-1. Tumor-produced endothelin-1 stimulates new bone formation in vitro and osteoblastic metastases in vivo via the endothelin A receptor. Treatment with an orally active endothelin A receptor antagonist dramatically decreased bone metastases and tumor burden in mice inoculated with ZR-75-1 cells. Tumor-produced endothelin-1 may have a major role in the establishment of osteoblastic bone metastases, and endothelin A receptor blockade represents effective treatment.

Breast cancer metastasis to bone: Mechanisms of osteolysis and implications for therapy

The most common skeletal complication of breast cancer is osteolytic bone metastasis. Bone metastases are present in 80% of patients with advanced disease and cause significant morbidity. They are most often osteolytic, but can be osteoblastic or mixed. Tumor cells, osteoblasts, osteoclasts and bone matrix are the four components of a vicious cycle necessary for the initiation and development of bone metastases. Tumor cell gene expression is modified by interaction with bone-derived factors. For example, parathyroid hormone related protein (PTHrP), a tumor cell factor, is upregulated by bone-derived transforming growth factor β (TGFβ). Tumor cell factors, in turn, act upon bone cells to cause dysregulated bone destruction and formation. PTHrP increases osteoblast expression of RANK (receptor activator of NFκB) ligand which, in turn, activates osteoclasts. PTHrP-independent osteolytic factors, such as interleukin [IL]-11 and IL-8, also contribute to the vicious cycle. Other tumor-bone interactions, such as stimulation of tumor-homing through the CXCR4 chemokine receptor by its bone-derived ligand stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), may be responsible for the site-specific predilection of breast cancer for bone. These factors and their roles in fueling the vicious cycle may identify novel targets for therapies to prevent metastasis.

Interleukin-6 enhances hypercalcemia and bone resorption mediated by parathyroid hormone-related protein in vivo.

Tumors frequently induce the multifunctional cytokine IL-6, which has been linked to several paraneoplastic syndromes, most notably cachexia. IL-6 stimulates osteoclast formation, causes mild hypercalcemia, and is produced by bone cells in vitro upon exposure to systemic hormones. Since IL-6 is produced together with parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) in some patients with cancer, we tested the hypothesis that production of IL-6 potentiates the effects of PTH-rP on Ca2+ homeostasis and osteoclastic bone resorption and examined potential mechanisms for these interactions in vivo. Chinese hamster ovarian (CHO) cells stably transfected with cDNAs for IL-6 (CHO/IL-6) and PTH-rP sense (CHO/PTH-rP) or antisense (CHO/PTH-rP AS) were inoculated intramuscularly into nude mice. Experimental groups included CHO/IL-6 plus CHO/PTH-rP; CHO/IL-6 plus CHO/PTH-rP AS; CHO/IL-6 alone; and CHO/PTH-rP alone. Blood ionized Ca2+ was measured on days 0, 7, 10, 12, and 13. Three different developmental stages in the osteoclast lineage were examined at day 13: the early multipotential precursor, granulocyte macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM); more mature mononuclear osteoclast precursors, assessed by their capacity to form tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive multinucleated cells in marrow cultures; and mature osteoclasts, assessed by histomorphometry. IL-6 increased CFU-GM but not bone resorption or Ca2+. In contrast, PTH-rP induced hypercalcemia and bone resorption and increased multinucleated osteoclasts and more mature precursors cells, but not CFU-GM. However, mice treated with both IL-6 and PTH-rP had very marked hypercalcemia and osteoclastosis as well as an increase in the number of both CFU-GM and mature osteoclast precursors. These data demonstrate that IL-6 enhances PTH-rP-mediated hypercalcemia and bone resorption, most likely by increasing the pool of early osteoclast precursors that in turn can differentiate to mature osteoclasts. We conclude that IL-6 stimulatory effects on osteoclast precursors may enhance the effects of other bone resorption factors that act at later stages in the osteoclast lineage.

Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss

BACKGROUND Recent studies indicate that women with breast cancer are at increased risk of fracture compared with their age-matched peers. Current treatment guidelines are inadequate for averting fractures in osteopenic women, especially those receiving aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Therefore, we sought to identify clinically relevant risk factors for fracture that can be used to assess overall fracture risk and to provide practical guidance for preventing and treating bone loss in women with breast cancer receiving AI therapy. METHODS Systematic review of pertinent information from published literature and meeting abstracts through December 2007 was carried out to identify factors contributing to fracture risk in women with breast cancer. An evidence-based medicine approach was used to select risk factors that can be used to determine when to initiate bisphosphonate treatment of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL). RESULTS Fracture risk factors were chosen from large, well-designed, controlled, population-based trials in postmenopausal women. Evidence from multiple prospective clinical trials in women with breast cancer was used to validate AI therapy as a fracture risk factor. Overall, eight fracture risk factors were validated in women with breast cancer: AI therapy, T-score <-1.5, age >65 years, low body mass index (BMI <20 kg/m(2)), family history of hip fracture, personal history of fragility fracture after age 50, oral corticosteroid use >6 months, and smoking. Treatment recommendations were derived from randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend the following for preventing and treating AIBL in women with breast cancer. All patients initiating AI therapy should receive calcium and vitamin D supplements. Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with a T-score >/=-2.0 and no additional risk factors should be monitored every 1-2 years for change in risk status and bone mineral density (BMD). Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with a T-score <-2.0 should receive bisphosphonate therapy. Any patient initiating or receiving AI therapy with any two of the following risk factors-T-score <-1.5, age >65 years, low BMI (<20 kg/m(2)), family history of hip fracture, personal history of fragility fracture after age 50, oral corticosteroid use >6 months, and smoking-should receive bisphosphonate therapy. BMD should be monitored every 2 years, and treatment should continue for at least 2 years and possibly for as long as AI therapy is continued. To date, the overwhelming majority of clinical evidence supports zoledronic acid 4 mg every 6 months to prevent bone loss in women at high risk. Although there is a trend towards fewer fractures with zoledronic acid, studies completed to date have not been designed to capture significant differences in fracture rate, and longer follow-up is needed.