Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Theresa Pape is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Theresa Pape.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2010

Assessment Scales for Disorders of Consciousness: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Clinical Practice and Research

Ronald T. Seel; Mark Sherer; John Whyte; Douglas I. Katz; Joseph T. Giacino; Amy M. Rosenbaum; Flora M. Hammond; Kathleen Kalmar; Theresa Pape; Ross Zafonte; Rosette C. Biester; Darryl Kaelin; Jacob Kean; Nathan D. Zasler

OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic review of behavioral assessment scales for disorders of consciousness (DOC); provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical use based on their content validity, reliability, diagnostic validity, and ability to predict functional outcomes; and provide research recommendations on DOC scale development and validation. DATA SOURCES Articles published through March 31, 2009, using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Biomedical Reference Collection, and PsycINFO. Thirteen primary terms that defined DOC were paired with 30 secondary terms that defined aspects of measurement. Scale names, abbreviations, and authors were also used as search terms. Task force members identified additional articles by using personal knowledge and examination of references in reviewed articles. STUDY SELECTION Primary criteria included the following: (1) provided reliability, diagnostic validity, and/or prognostic validity data; (2) examined a cohort, case control, or case series sample of persons with DOC who were age older than or equal to 18 years; and (3) assessed in an acute care or rehabilitation setting. Articles were excluded if peer review was not conducted, original data were not reported, or an English language article was not available. The initial search yielded 580 articles. After paired rater review of study abstracts, guideline development was based on 37 articles representing 13 DOC scales. DATA EXTRACTION Rater pairs classified studies addressing diagnostic and prognostic validity by using the American Academy of Neurology 4-tier level of evidence scheme, and reliability by using a task force-developed 3-tier evidence scheme. An independent quality review of ratings was conducted, and corrections were made. DATA SYNTHESIS The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), Sensory Stimulation Assessment Measure (SSAM), Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM), Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile (WNSSP), Sensory Modality Assessment Technique (SMART), Disorders of Consciousness Scale (DOCS), and Coma/Near-Coma Scale (CNC) have acceptable standardized administration and scoring procedures. The CRS-R has excellent content validity and is the only scale to address all Aspen Workgroup criteria. The SMART, SSAM, WHIM, and WNSSP demonstrate good content validity, containing items that could distinguish persons who are in a vegetative state, are in a minimally conscious state (MCS), or have emerged from MCS. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score (FOUR), WNSSP, CRS-R, Comprehensive Levels of Consciousness Scale (CLOCS), and Innsbruck Coma Scale (INNS) showed substantial evidence of internal consistency. The FOUR and the CRS-R showed substantial evidence of good interrater reliability. Evidence of diagnostic validity and prognostic validity in brain injury survivor samples had very high levels of potential bias because of methodologic issues such as lack of rater masking. CONCLUSIONS The CRS-R may be used to assess DOC with minor reservations, and the SMART, WNSSP, SSAM, WHIM, and DOCS may be used to assess DOC with moderate reservations. The CNC may be used to assess DOC with major reservations. The FOUR, INNS, Glasgow-Liege Coma Scale, Swedish Reaction Level Scale-1985, Loewenstein Communication Scale, and CLOCS are not recommended at this time for bedside behavioral assessment of DOC because of a lack of content validity, lack of standardization, and/or unproven reliability.


Brain Stimulation | 2009

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-associated neurobehavioral gains during coma recovery

Theresa Pape; Joshua M. Rosenow; Gwyn N. Lewis; Ghada Ahmed; Matthew T. Walker; Ann Guernon; Heidi Roth; Vijaya Patil

BACKGROUND Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method to induce changes in cortical neural excitability. This report presents findings from the first participant of a safety and efficacy study that examined a therapeutic rTMS protocol for persons with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVE The primary hypothesis was that there will be no adverse events related to the provision of a 6-week rTMS protocol for persons with severe TBI who remain, at best, in a minimally conscious state for longer than 3 months. The secondary hypothesis was that the rTMS protocol would induce significant neurobehavioral gains during treatment and that these gains would persist at 6-week follow-up. METHODS A 6-week rTMS protocol (30 sessions) was delivered to a 26-year-old man who remained in a vegetative state 287 days after severe TBI. Stimulation was directed over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Repeated safety measures, neurobehavioral assessments, clinical examinations, and evoked potentials (EP) were obtained at baseline, every fifth rTMS session (weekly), and at a 6-week follow-up. RESULTS There were no adverse events related to the provision of rTMS treatment. A trend toward significant (P = .066) neurobehavioral gains was temporally related to provision of rTMS. Left-sided brain stem auditory EP wave V latencies and waves I to V interpeak latencies improved along with neurobehavioral gains during provision of rTMS, suggesting that improved neural conduction in the pathway mediated the neurobehavioral improvements. CONCLUSIONS Repetitive TMS merits further investigation as a safe therapeutic intervention to alter neural activity, to modulate neural activity, and/or to facilitate recovery in persons with disordered consciousness subsequent to severe TBI.


Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development | 2005

A measure of neurobehavioral functioning after coma. Part I: Theory, reliability, and validity of the Disorders of Consciousness Scale

Theresa Pape; Allen W. Heinemann; James P. Kelly; Anita Giobbie Hurder; Sandra Lundgren

This is longitudinal validation study describes the psychometric properties of the Disorders of Consciousness Scale (DOCS). This is Part I of a two-part series. Part II illustrates and describes the clinical and scientific implementation of the DOCS measure. The study was conducted at one intensive care unit, two acute rehabilitation hospitals, and one long-term acute chronic care hospital. Participants were unconscious after severe brain injury (BI). We conducted interrater reliability analyses using ratings from interdisciplinary pairs. Results indicated a higher-than-expected level of agreement and no significant difference between any pairs ( chi-square = 8(5df), p = 0.15) (df = degrees of freedom). Examinations of ratings by discipline groups indicated that the DOCS is impacted minimally by discipline. Validity analyses demonstrate that 23 of 34 test stimuli remain stable over time with no floor or ceiling effect. DOCS measures obtained within 94 days of injury predicted recovery of consciousness up to 1 year after injury (c-indices of 0.70 and 0.86). Positive (0.71) and negative (0.68) predictive values indicate that the DOCS predicts recovery and lack of recovery. Twenty-three of the DOCS test stimuli produce a reliable, valid, and stable measure of neurobehavioral recovery after severe BI that predicts recovery and lack of recovery of consciousness 1 year after injury.


Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development | 2006

Employment issues and assistive technology use for persons with spinal cord injury

Brad Hedrick; Theresa Pape; Allen W. Heinemann; Jennifer L. Ruddell; Janet Reis

In this study, we examined associations between assistive technology (AT) cost, underwriting, ownership, use, employment, and employer accommodations for two groups (civilian and veteran) of working age adults (18-64 yr) with spinal cord injury or dysfunction (SCI/D). The project included the development of a survey instrument, and initial findings indicate that AT is important for the employment success of individuals with SCI/D. The majority of the AT devices owned by the respondents were characterized as important to work, and these devices were 3.5 times more expensive. The mean cost of assistive devices was 68% to 124% greater for persons who were self-employed compared with persons employed by others. Education was related to employment status for both groups. In addition, satisfaction with assistive devices was very high regardless of employment status or history.


Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation | 2006

Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a possible treatment for TBI.

Theresa Pape; Joshua M. Rosenow; Gwyn N. Lewis

The purpose of this article is to outline the principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), to summarize the existing use of TMS as a prognostic indicator and as a therapeutic device in clinical populations, and to highlight the potential of repetitive TMS (rTMS) as an intervention for traumatic brain injury. TMS is a painless method to stimulate the human brain. Repeated applications of TMS can influence brain plasticity and cortical reorganization through stimulation-induced alterations in neuronal excitability. Existing evidence has demonstrated positive outcomes in people with motor disorders and psychiatric conditions who have received rTMS as a therapeutic intervention. These findings suggest that rTMS may be a promising treatment for people with traumatic brain injury.


Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development | 2005

A measure of neurobehavioral functioning after coma. Part II: Clinical and scientific implementation

Theresa Pape; Ricardo G. Senno; Ann Guernon; James P. Kelly

This is a longitudinal validation study that is Part II of a two-part series. Part I focuses on the methods used to construct the neurobehavioral measure derived from the Disorders of Consciousness Scale (DOCS) as well as the evidence of reliability and validity. Part II illustrates, through a series of selected case reports, the clinical use of repeated DOCS measures to enhance and complement medical rehabilitation management. The use of repeated DOCS measures in scientific investigations of mechanisms of injury is also described. Participants included patients at rehabilitation hospitals who were 18 years of age and older and unconscious after severe brain injury. Medical decision making regarding short-term effects of pharmacological intervention was augmented and improved through the examination of individual neurobehavioral recovery patterns. We identified medications to treat secondary medical complications and successfully determined effective dosage, presumably improving prognosis for recovery. We facilitated and enhanced development and refinement of individualized rehabilitation programs. Two investigations of treatment effectiveness during coma recovery and examination of the relationship between behavioral changes and neural adaptation are also described. By systematically tracking and mapping individual patterns of neurobehavioral recovery, we show that medical and rehabilitation management after coma can be enhanced. In addition, we also show that by examining the relationship between the DOCS neurobehavioral measure with mechanistic indicators of neurological recovery such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, scientific investigations of treatment and rehabilitation effectiveness can be enhanced.


Journal of Neurotrauma | 2015

The Effects of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Combined Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder on Returning Veterans.

Hannah L. Combs; David T. R. Berry; Theresa Pape; Judith Babcock-Parziale; Bridget Smith; Randal E. Schleenbaker; Anne L. Shandera-Ochsner; Jordan P. Harp; Walter M. High

United States veterans of the Iraqi (Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF]) and Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF]) conflicts have frequently returned from deployment after sustaining mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and enduring stressful events resulting in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A large number of returning service members have been diagnosed with both a history of mTBI and current PTSD. Substantial literature exists on the neuropsychological factors associated with mTBI and PTSD occurring separately; far less research has explored the combined effects of PTSD and mTBI. The current study employed neuropsychological and psychological measures in a sample of 251 OIF/OEF veterans to determine whether participants with a history of mTBI and current PTSD (mTBI+PTSD) have poorer cognitive and psychological outcomes than participants with mTBI only (mTBI-o), PTSD only (PTSD-o), or veteran controls (VC), when groups are comparable on intelligence quotient, education, and age. The mTBI+PTSD group performed more poorly than VC, mTBI-o, and PTSD-o groups on several neuropsychological measures. Effect size comparisons suggest small deleterious effects for mTBI-o on measures of processing speed and visual attention and small effects for PTSD-o on measures of verbal memory, with moderate effects for mTBI+PTSD on the same variables. Additionally, the mTBI+PTSD group was significantly more psychologically distressed than the PTSD-o group, and PTSD-o group was more distressed than VC and mTBI-o groups. These findings suggest that veterans with mTBI+PTSD perform significantly lower on neuropsychological and psychiatric measures than veterans with mTBI-o or PTSD-o. The results also raise the possibility of mild but persisting cognitive changes following mTBI sustained during deployment.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2013

Medical Comorbidities in Disorders of Consciousness Patients and Their Association With Functional Outcomes

Shanti Ganesh; Ann Guernon; Laura Chalcraft; Brett Harton; Bridget Smith; Theresa Pape

OBJECTIVE To identify, for patients in states of seriously impaired consciousness, comorbid conditions present during inpatient rehabilitation and their association with function at 1 year. DESIGN Abstracted data from a prospective cross-sectional observational study with data collection occurring January 1996 through December 2007. SETTING Four inpatient rehabilitation facilities in metropolitan areas. PARTICIPANTS The study sample of 68 participants is abstracted from a database of 157 patients remaining in states of seriously impaired consciousness for at least 28 days. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE One-year cognitive, motor, and total FIM score. RESULTS The most common medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation for the study sample are active seizures (46%), spasticity (57%), urinary tract infections (47%), and hydrocephalus with and without shunt (38%). Presence of ≥3 medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation, controlling for injury severity, is significantly (P<.05) associated with poorer total FIM and FIM motor scores 1 year after injury. The presence of hydrocephalus with and without shunt (r=-.20, -.21, -.18; P ≤.15), active seizures (r=-.31, -.22, -.42), spasticity (r=-.38, -.28, -.40), and urinary tract infections (r=-.25, -.24, -.26) were significantly (P<.10) associated with total FIM, FIM cognitive, and FIM motor scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Reported findings indicate that persons in states of seriously impaired consciousness with higher numbers of medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation are more likely to have lower functional levels 1-year postinjury. The findings indicate that persons with ≥3 medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation are at a higher risk for poorer functional outcomes at 1 year. It is, therefore, prudent to evaluate these patients for indications of these complications during inpatient rehabilitation.


Headache | 2011

Prevalence and Treatment of Headaches in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Vijaya Patil; Justin R. St. Andre; Elena Crisan; Bridget Smith; Charlesnika T. Evans; Monica Steiner; Theresa Pape

(Headache 2011;51:1112‐1121)


Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development | 2013

Healthcare Utilization and Costs of Veterans Screened and Assessed for Traumatic Brain Injury

Kevin T. Stroupe; Bridget Smith; Timothy P. Hogan; Justin R. St. Andre; Theresa Pape; Monica Steiner; Eric Proescher; Zhiping Huo; Charlesnika T. Evans

Approximately 15% of casualties in the Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF]) and Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF]) conflicts received mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). To identify Veterans who may benefit from treatment, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented a national clinical reminder in 2007 to screen for TBI. Veterans who screen positive are referred for a comprehensive TBI evaluation. We conducted a national retrospective study of OIF/OEF Veterans receiving care at VA facilities between 2007 and 2008. We examined the association of the TBI screen with healthcare costs over a 12 mo period following the initial evaluation. Of the Veterans, 164,438 met inclusion criteria: 31,627 screened positive, 118,545 screened negative, and 14,266 received no TBI screening. Total healthcare costs of Veterans who screened positive, screened negative, or had no TBI screening were

Collaboration


Dive into the Theresa Pape's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann Guernon

Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital and Clinics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trudy Mallinson

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brett Harton

United States Department of Veterans Affairs

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Brady

Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital and Clinics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Walter M. High

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen L. Saban

Loyola University Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandra Lundgren

Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital and Clinics

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge