Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas C. Terwilliger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas C. Terwilliger.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2010

PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution

Paul D. Adams; Pavel V. Afonine; Gábor Bunkóczi; Vincent B. Chen; Ian W. Davis; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J. Headd; Li-Wei Hung; Gary J. Kapral; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Robert D. Oeffner; Randy J. Read; David C. Richardson; Jane S. Richardson; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Peter H. Zwart

The PHENIX software for macromolecular structure determination is described.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2002

PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination

Paul D. Adams; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Li-Wei Hung; Thomas R. Ioerger; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Randy J. Read; James C. Sacchettini; Nicholas K. Sauter; Thomas C. Terwilliger

Structural genomics seeks to expand rapidly the number of protein structures in order to extract the maximum amount of information from genomic sequence databases. The advent of several large-scale projects worldwide leads to many new challenges in the field of crystallographic macromolecular structure determination. A novel software package called PHENIX (Python-based Hierarchical ENvironment for Integrated Xtallography) is therefore being developed. This new software will provide the necessary algorithms to proceed from reduced intensity data to a refined molecular model and to facilitate structure solution for both the novice and expert crystallographer.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 1999

Automated MAD and MIR structure solution.

Thomas C. Terwilliger; Joel Berendzen

A fully automated procedure for solving MIR and MAD structures has been developed using a scoring scheme to convert the structure-solution process into an optimization problem.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2012

Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine.

Pavel V. Afonine; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J. Headd; Nigel W. Moriarty; Marat Mustyakimov; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Alexandre Urzhumtsev; Peter H. Zwart; Paul D. Adams

phenix.refine is a program within the PHENIX package that supports crystallographic structure refinement against experimental data with a wide range of upper resolution limits using a large repertoire of model parameterizations. This paper presents an overview of the major phenix.refine features, with extensive literature references for readers interested in more detailed discussions of the methods.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2000

Maximum-likelihood density modification

Thomas C. Terwilliger

A likelihood-based density modification approach is developed that can incorporate expected electron-density information from a wide variety of sources.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2008

Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard

Thomas C. Terwilliger; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V. Afonine; Nigel W. Moriarty; Peter H. Zwart; Li-Wei Hung; Randy J. Read; Paul D. Adams

The highly automated PHENIX AutoBuild wizard is described. The procedure can be applied equally well to phases derived from isomorphous/anomalous and molecular-replacement methods.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2003

Automated main-chain model building by template matching and iterative fragment extension

Thomas C. Terwilliger

A method for automated macromolecular main-chain model building is described.


Methods in Enzymology | 2003

SOLVE and RESOLVE: Automated structure solution and density modification

Thomas C. Terwilliger

SOLVE and RESOLVE have shown that it is possible to automate a significant part of the macromolecular X-ray structure determination process. The key elements of seamless and compatible subprograms, scoring algorithms, and error-tolerant software systems have been important in implementing these programs. The principles used in SOLVE and RESOLVE can be applied to other aspects of structure determination as well, suggesting that full automation of the entire structure determination process from scaling diffraction data to a refined model will be possible in the near future.


Nature Biotechnology | 2005

Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein

Stéphanie Cabantous; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Geoffrey S. Waldo

Existing protein tagging and detection methods are powerful but have drawbacks. Split protein tags can perturb protein solubility or may not work in living cells. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions can misfold or exhibit altered processing. Fluorogenic biarsenical FLaSH or ReASH substrates overcome many of these limitations but require a polycysteine tag motif, a reducing environment and cell transfection or permeabilization. An ideal protein tag would be genetically encoded, would work both in vivo and in vitro, would provide a sensitive analytical signal and would not require external chemical reagents or substrates. One way to accomplish this might be with a split GFP, but the GFP fragments reported thus far are large and fold poorly, require chemical ligation or fused interacting partners to force their association, or require coexpression or co-refolding to produce detectable folded and fluorescent GFP. We have engineered soluble, self-associating fragments of GFP that can be used to tag and detect either soluble or insoluble proteins in living cells or cell lysates. The split GFP system is simple and does not change fusion protein solubility.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2009

Decision-making in structure solution using Bayesian estimates of map quality: the PHENIX AutoSol wizard

Thomas C. Terwilliger; Paul D. Adams; Randy J. Read; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V. Afonine; Peter H. Zwart; Li-Wei Hung

Ten measures of experimental electron-density-map quality are examined and the skewness of electron density is found to be the best indicator of actual map quality. A Bayesian approach to estimating map quality is developed and used in the PHENIX AutoSol wizard to make decisions during automated structure solution.

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas C. Terwilliger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul D. Adams

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Li-Wei Hung

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pavel V. Afonine

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Geoffrey S. Waldo

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chang-Yub Kim

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nigel W. Moriarty

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge