Thomas C. Terwilliger
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas C. Terwilliger.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2010
Paul D. Adams; Pavel V. Afonine; Gábor Bunkóczi; Vincent B. Chen; Ian W. Davis; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J. Headd; Li-Wei Hung; Gary J. Kapral; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Robert D. Oeffner; Randy J. Read; David C. Richardson; Jane S. Richardson; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Peter H. Zwart
The PHENIX software for macromolecular structure determination is described.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2002
Paul D. Adams; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Li-Wei Hung; Thomas R. Ioerger; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Randy J. Read; James C. Sacchettini; Nicholas K. Sauter; Thomas C. Terwilliger
Structural genomics seeks to expand rapidly the number of protein structures in order to extract the maximum amount of information from genomic sequence databases. The advent of several large-scale projects worldwide leads to many new challenges in the field of crystallographic macromolecular structure determination. A novel software package called PHENIX (Python-based Hierarchical ENvironment for Integrated Xtallography) is therefore being developed. This new software will provide the necessary algorithms to proceed from reduced intensity data to a refined molecular model and to facilitate structure solution for both the novice and expert crystallographer.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 1999
Thomas C. Terwilliger; Joel Berendzen
A fully automated procedure for solving MIR and MAD structures has been developed using a scoring scheme to convert the structure-solution process into an optimization problem.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2012
Pavel V. Afonine; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J. Headd; Nigel W. Moriarty; Marat Mustyakimov; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Alexandre Urzhumtsev; Peter H. Zwart; Paul D. Adams
phenix.refine is a program within the PHENIX package that supports crystallographic structure refinement against experimental data with a wide range of upper resolution limits using a large repertoire of model parameterizations. This paper presents an overview of the major phenix.refine features, with extensive literature references for readers interested in more detailed discussions of the methods.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2000
Thomas C. Terwilliger
A likelihood-based density modification approach is developed that can incorporate expected electron-density information from a wide variety of sources.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2008
Thomas C. Terwilliger; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V. Afonine; Nigel W. Moriarty; Peter H. Zwart; Li-Wei Hung; Randy J. Read; Paul D. Adams
The highly automated PHENIX AutoBuild wizard is described. The procedure can be applied equally well to phases derived from isomorphous/anomalous and molecular-replacement methods.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2003
Thomas C. Terwilliger
A method for automated macromolecular main-chain model building is described.
Methods in Enzymology | 2003
Thomas C. Terwilliger
SOLVE and RESOLVE have shown that it is possible to automate a significant part of the macromolecular X-ray structure determination process. The key elements of seamless and compatible subprograms, scoring algorithms, and error-tolerant software systems have been important in implementing these programs. The principles used in SOLVE and RESOLVE can be applied to other aspects of structure determination as well, suggesting that full automation of the entire structure determination process from scaling diffraction data to a refined model will be possible in the near future.
Nature Biotechnology | 2005
Stéphanie Cabantous; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Geoffrey S. Waldo
Existing protein tagging and detection methods are powerful but have drawbacks. Split protein tags can perturb protein solubility or may not work in living cells. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions can misfold or exhibit altered processing. Fluorogenic biarsenical FLaSH or ReASH substrates overcome many of these limitations but require a polycysteine tag motif, a reducing environment and cell transfection or permeabilization. An ideal protein tag would be genetically encoded, would work both in vivo and in vitro, would provide a sensitive analytical signal and would not require external chemical reagents or substrates. One way to accomplish this might be with a split GFP, but the GFP fragments reported thus far are large and fold poorly, require chemical ligation or fused interacting partners to force their association, or require coexpression or co-refolding to produce detectable folded and fluorescent GFP. We have engineered soluble, self-associating fragments of GFP that can be used to tag and detect either soluble or insoluble proteins in living cells or cell lysates. The split GFP system is simple and does not change fusion protein solubility.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2009
Thomas C. Terwilliger; Paul D. Adams; Randy J. Read; Airlie J. McCoy; Nigel W. Moriarty; Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V. Afonine; Peter H. Zwart; Li-Wei Hung
Ten measures of experimental electron-density-map quality are examined and the skewness of electron density is found to be the best indicator of actual map quality. A Bayesian approach to estimating map quality is developed and used in the PHENIX AutoSol wizard to make decisions during automated structure solution.