Thomas Foulke
University of Wyoming
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas Foulke.
Rangeland Ecology & Management | 2013
Jordan R. Steele; Benjamin S. Rashford; Thomas Foulke; John A. Tanaka; David T. Taylor
Abstract Growing wolf (Canis lupus L.) populations in the US Rocky Mountain Region have increased conflicts between livestock production and wolf conservation. Given that the costs of large carnivore conservation are disproportionately borne by local livestock producers, the United States uses compensation for wolf damage to reduce conflicts and mediate negative attitudes toward the predators. Current compensation programs, however, only consider the direct effects of wolf predation. Indirect effects, such as wolf effects on weaning weights, and conception rates, may also reduce profitability. By not including indirect wolf effects, compensation programs may systematically undercompensate ranchers. We use a stochastic budget model of a representative cow–calf ranch in northwest Wyoming to estimate the economic impact of both direct (death loss and injured calves) and indirect effects (decreased weaning weights, decreased conception rates, and increased cattle sickness) of wolf predation. Our results suggest that short-run (i.e., year-to-year) financial impacts of wolf indirect effects may be as large as or larger than the direct effects. Including indirect effects implies that the compensation ratio (i.e., number of calves compensated per confirmed depredation) necessary to fully offset the financial impacts of wolves would need to be two to three times larger than current 7:1 compensation ratio used in Wyoming.
Rangelands | 2010
Benjamin S. Rashford; Thomas Foulke; David T. Taylor
Predation can impose signifi cant costs on agricultural producers in range livestock systems. Livestock producers in the western United States have experienced predation on their herds since domestic livestock were introduced into the region. Early efforts to control predators were often initiated by individual ranchers or small local groups. The fi rst federal involvement in wildlife damage control in the United States occurred in 1885. By 1915, Congress was appropriating funds for federal predator control operations directed at wolves and coyotes. In 1931, Congress passed the Animal Damage Control Act authorizing the control of injurious animals. This act is still in effect today. Today, USDA’s Wildlife Services, state and local agencies, and livestock producers work cooperatively to manage predators. Despite predator control efforts, Western livestock producers still experience signifi cant predations losses. Wyoming’s agricultural sector lost 4,000 cattle and calves
Energy Procedia | 2011
Katta J. Reddy; Sanil John; Hollis Weber; Morris D. Argyle; Pradip Bhattacharyya; David T. Taylor; Mikol Christensen; Thomas Foulke; Paul Fahlsing
Nature Precedings | 2010
Katta J. Reddy; Hollis Weber; Pradip Bhattacharyya; Argyle Morris; David T. Taylor; Mikol Christensen; Thomas Foulke; Paul Fahlsing
Industrial Crops and Products | 2015
Henry Y. Sintim; Valtcho D. Zheljazkov; Augustine K. Obour; Axel Garcia y Garcia; Thomas Foulke
Agronomy Journal | 2016
Henry Y. Sintim; Valtcho D. Zheljazkov; Augustine K. Obour; Axel Garcia y Garcia; Thomas Foulke
Archive | 2004
David T. Taylor; Roger Coupal; Thomas Foulke; James G. Thompson
Archive | 2013
Amy M. Nagler; Christopher T. Bastian; David T. Taylor; Thomas Foulke
Western Economics Forum | 2012
David T. Taylor; Thomas Foulke; Archie Reeve
Western Economics Forum | 2013
Amy M. Nagler; Christopher T. Bastian; David T. Taylor; Thomas Foulke