Thomas J. Harrison
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas J. Harrison.
Archive | 2013
Thomas J. Harrison; Richard Edward Hale; Rebecca J. Moses
This report describes the work performed to generate the model for SMR economic analysis. The model is based on the G4-ECONS calculation tool developed for the Generation IV International Forum (GIF).
49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference | 2013
Michael P. Trammell; Brian C. Jolly; James Henry Miller; A L Qualls; Thomas J. Harrison
ORNL is currently recapturing graphite based fuel forms for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP). This effort involves research and development on materials selection, extrusion, and coating processes to produce fuel elements representative of historical ROVER and NERVA fuel. Initially, lab scale specimens were fabricated using surrogate oxides to develop processing parameters that could be applied to full length NTP fuel elements. Progress toward understanding the effect of these processing parameters on surrogate fuel microstructure is presented. I. Introduction HE research presented in this report is a collaborative effort between Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and NASA to recapture manufacturing technology for full length ROVER/NERVA graphite composite fuel elements. Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) fuel development has been intermittently ongoing since the late 1950’s and many of the original materials used in the early fuel development are no longer available. Also, the processing capability and the art associated with the production of full-length elements have been lost. The focus of the collaboration is to recapture the capability and expertise to produce representative fuel element test samples and iteratively scale up to full-length elements. To maximize efficiency, the work was separated into two tasks, extrusion development and coating development, which were conducted in parallel. At this stage in the program, the extrusion development task is focused on recreating a representative blend of materials, evaluating blending methods, and establishing an extrusion capability. The coating task is focused on developing processing conditions and equipment to establish ZrC coating capability. This report summarizes the accomplishments and progression toward these goals. It is important to note that the results and analyses presented here are in the early stages of research (TRL 3) and should be considered preliminary.
Archive | 2016
Sacit M. Cetiner; Michael Scott Greenwood; Thomas J. Harrison; A L Qualls; Askin Guler Yigitoglu; David W. Fugate
A nuclear hybrid system uses a nuclear reactor as the basic power generation unit. The power generated by the nuclear reactor is utilized by one or more power customers as either thermal power, electrical power, or both. In general, a nuclear hybrid system will couple the nuclear reactor to at least one thermal power user in addition to the power conversion system. The definition and architecture of a particular nuclear hybrid system is flexible depending on local markets needs and opportunities. For example, locations in need of potable water may be best served by coupling a desalination plant to the nuclear system. Similarly, an area near oil refineries may have a need for emission-free hydrogen production. A nuclear hybrid system expands the nuclear power plant from its more familiar central power station role by diversifying its immediately and directly connected customer base. The definition, design, analysis, and optimization work currently performed with respect to the nuclear hybrid systems represents the work of three national laboratories. Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is the lead lab working with Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Each laboratory is providing modeling and simulation expertise for the integration of the hybrid system.
Archive | 2014
Thomas J. Harrison; Rebecca J. Moses; George F. Flanagan
In summary, this preliminary WBS serves as an initial basis for the capital cost component of the economic analysis of SMRs. This preliminary WBS comes from the known WBS for existing, large nuclear power plants and develops the methodology for accounting for the anticipated differences between the current large plants and the projected SMR designs.
Applied Energy | 2012
Olufemi A. Omitaomu; Brandon R. Blevins; Warren C. Jochem; Gary T Mays; Randy Belles; Stanton W. Hadley; Thomas J. Harrison; Budhendra L. Bhaduri; Bradley S. Neish; Amy N. Rose
Archive | 2011
Jess C Gehin; David Eugene Holcomb; George F. Flanagan; Bruce W. Patton; Rob L Howard; Thomas J. Harrison
Archive | 2012
Gary T Mays; Randy Belles; Brandon R. Blevins; Stanton W. Hadley; Thomas J. Harrison; Warren C. Jochem; Bradley S. Neish; Olufemi A. Omitaomu; Amy N. Rose
Annals of Nuclear Energy | 2017
A. Louis Qualls; Benjamin R. Betzler; Nicholas R. Brown; Juan J. Carbajo; M. Scott Greenwood; Richard Edward Hale; Thomas J. Harrison; Jeffrey J. Powers; Kevin R Robb; Jerry W. Terrell; Aaron J. Wysocki; Jess C Gehin; Andrew Worrall
Archive | 2013
Jeffrey J. Powers; Thomas J. Harrison; Jess C Gehin
Archive | 2016
A L Qualls; Nicholas R. Brown; Benjamin R. Betzler; Juan J. Carbajo; Richard Edward Hale; Thomas J. Harrison; Jeffrey J. Powers; Kevin R Robb; Jerry W. Terrell; Aaron J. Wysocki