Thomas Lanni
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas Lanni.
Aerosol Science and Technology | 2004
Manjula R. Canagaratna; John T. Jayne; David A. Ghertner; Scott C. Herndon; Q. Shi; Jose L. Jimenez; Philip J. Silva; P. I. Williams; Thomas Lanni; Frank Drewnick; Kenneth L. Demerjian; Charles E. Kolb; Douglas R. Worsnop
Emissions from motor vehicles are a significant source of fine particulate matter (PM) and gaseous pollutants in urban environments. Few studies have characterized both gaseous and PM emissions from individual in-use vehicles under real-world driving conditions. Here we describe chase vehicle studies in which on-road emissions from individual vehicles were measured in real time within seconds of their emission. This work uses an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) to provide size-resolved and chemically resolved characterization of the nonrefractory portion of the emitted PM; refractory materials such as elemental carbon (EC) were not measured in this study. The AMS, together with other gas-phase and particle instrumentation, was deployed on the Aerodyne Research Inc. (ARI) mobile laboratory, which was used to “chase” the target vehicles. Tailpipe emission indices of the targeted vehicles were obtained by referencing the measured nonrefractory particulate mass loading to the instantaneous CO2 measured simultaneously in the plume. During these studies, nonrefractory PM1.0 (NRPM1) emission indices for a representative fraction of the New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) bus fleet were determined. Diesel bus emissions ranged from 0.10 g NRPM1/kg fuel to 0.23 g NRPM1/kg, depending on the type of engine used by the bus. The average NRPM1 emission index of diesel-powered buses using Continuously Regenerating Technology (CRT™) trap systems was 0.052 g NRPM1/kg fuel. Buses fueled by compressed natural gas (CNG) had an average emission index of 0.034 g NRPM1/kg Fuel. The mass spectra of the nonrefractory diesel aerosol components measured by the AMS were dominated by lubricating oil spectral signatures. Mass-weighted size distributions of the particles in fresh diesel exhaust plumes peak at vacuum aerodynamic diameters around 90 nm with a typical full width at half maximum of 60 nm.
Aerosol Science and Technology | 2005
Scott C. Herndon; Timothy B. Onasch; Brian P. Frank; Linsey C. Marr; John T. Jayne; Manjula R. Canagaratna; Jillian Grygas; Thomas Lanni; Bruce E. Anderson; D. R. Worsnop; Richard C. Miake-Lye
Particulate emission indices (per kg fuel) have been determined by sampling the advected plumes of in-use commercial aircraft at two different airports using a novel approach. Differences are observed in the number, magnitude, and composition of the particle emissions between idle and take-off. At the first airport, Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) data indicate that number based emission indices (EI n ) vary by an order of magnitude for take-off plumes from different aircraft. Additionally, EI n values for idle plumes are greater than take-off. At the second airport, EI n values derived from condensation particle counter (CPC) measurements span ∼ an order of magnitude (3–50 × 10 15 particles per kg fuel). The median values of the idle and take-off plumes were 1.8 × 10 16 and 7.6 × 10 15 particles per kg fuel, respectively. For take-off plumes, the magnitude of the particulate emission index is not correlated with NO x at either airport. The surface properties of the particulate emissions in take-off and idle plumes differ significantly as measured by diffusion charging (DC) and photoelectric aerosol sensor (PAS) instruments. Results indicate that take-off plumes are characterized by particles with photoelectric-active surfaces, presumably elemental carbon, whereas idle plumes are composed of non-photoelectric-active constituents and coated soot particles. Measurements of the particulate size distribution (ELPI) show evidence for two modes, one at ∼ 90 nm aerodynamic diameter and a second mode at or below the instrument cutoff ( < 30 nm).
SAE 2002 World Congress & Exhibition | 2001
Sougato Chatterjee; Ray Conway; Thomas Lanni; Brian P. Frank; Shida Tang; Deborah Rosenblatt; Christopher Bush; Dana Lowell; James Evans; Robert McLean; Steven J. Levy
Particulate emission from diesel engines is one of the most important pollutants in urban areas. As a result, particulate emission control from urban bus diesel engines using particle filter technology is being evaluated at several locations in the US. A project entitled “Clean Diesel Demonstration Program” has been initiated by NY City Transit under the supervision of NY State DEC and with active participation from several industrial partners. Under this program, several NY City transit buses with DDC Series 50 engines have been equipped with continuously regenerating diesel particulate filter system and are operating with ultra low sulfur diesel ( 90% reductions in CO, HC and PM with the particulate filter. In addition, >99% reductions in Carbonyls and up to 80% PAH and 94% NO2-PAH destructions were also achieved.
SAE transactions | 2003
Thomas Lanni; Brian P. Frank; Shida Tang; Deborah Rosenblatt; Dana Lowell
The New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) has initiated a program to utilize various diesel emission control, alternative fuel, and hybrid electric drive technologies as part of its ongoing effort to provideenvironmentally friendly bus service. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has joined with the MTA and Environment Canada in evaluating this program, and has established a protocol for measuring both regulated and unregulated emissions, as well as other operational parameters. This paper compares and contrasts the emissions of buses powered by Detroit Diesel Series 50 diesel engines and Series 50G Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) engines. All buses have been tested for regulated emissions at the Emissions Research and Measurement Division of Environment Canada, in Ottawa, Ontario. Unregulated emissions measurements, including particle size distributions and chemical analysis, have been supported by DEC staff. The various measured quantities are presented in order to facilitate useful comparisons among the different transit bus technologies.
Aerosol Science and Technology | 2007
Brian P. Frank; Shida Tang; Thomas Lanni; Jillian Grygas; Greg Rideout; Norman Meyer; Chris Beregszaszy
Two potential strategies for reducing diesel emissions are exhaust aftertreatment and the use of reformulated or alternative fuels. Little is yet known about the impact on ultrafine particle emissions of combining exhaust aftertreatment with such increasingly common fuels. This paper reports ultrafine particle size distribution measurements for a study in which the impact of such fuels on emissions from a heavy duty diesel engine employing different aftertreatment configurations was evaluated. Eight different fuels were tested: Canadian No. 1 and No. 2 diesel; low sulfur diesel fuel; two different ultra low sulfur diesel fuels (< 30 ppm S); Fischer-Tropsch diesel fuel; 20% biodiesel blended with ultra low sulfur diesel fuel; and PuriNOx™. The fuels were tested in combination with four exhaust configurations: engine out, diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), continuously regenerating diesel particle filter (CRDPF), and engine gas recirculation with CRDPF (EGR-DPF). In general, aftertreatment configuration was found to have a greater impact on ultrafine particle size distributions than fuel composition, and the effects of aftertreatment tended to be uniform across the entire particle size distribution. Steady state tests revealed complex behavior based on fuel type, particularly for PuriNOx. This behavior included bimodal particle size distributions with modes as low as 8–10 nm for some fuels. Unlike previous results for gravimetric PM from this study, no significant correlation for ultrafine emissions was found for fuel properties such as sulfur level.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2004
Scott C. Herndon; Joanne H. Shorter; Mark S. Zahniser; David D. Nelson; John T. Jayne; Robert C. Brown; Richard C. Miake-Lye; Ian A. Waitz; Phillip Silva; Thomas Lanni; Ken Demerjian; Charles E. Kolb
Environmental Science & Technology | 2007
Thomas D. Durbin; Kent Johnson; David R. Cocker; J. Wayne Miller; Hector Maldonado; Atul Shah; Carl D. Ensfield; Christopher S. Weaver; Mike Akard; Neal Harvey; James Symon; Thomas Lanni; William D. Bachalo; Greg Payne; Greg Smallwood; Manfred Linke
Environmental Science & Technology | 2007
Shida Tang; Brian P. Frank; Thomas Lanni; Greg Rideout; Norman Meyer; Chris Beregszaszy
Environmental Science & Technology | 2004
Shida Tang; Lisa Graham; Ling Shen; Xianliang Zhou; Thomas Lanni
Atmospheric Environment | 2004
Fangqun Yu; Thomas Lanni; Brian P. Frank