Thorsten Hofmann
Carl Zeiss AG
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thorsten Hofmann.
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B | 2004
Klaus Edinger; Hans Becht; Johannes Bihr; Volker Boegli; Michael Budach; Thorsten Hofmann; Hans W. P. Koops; Peter Kuschnerus; Jens Oster; Petra Spies; Bernd Weyrauch
High-resolution electron-beam-assisted deposition and etching is an enabling technology for current and future generation photomask repair. NaWoTec in collaboration with Carl Zeiss NTS (formerly LEO Electron Microscopy) has developed a mask repair tool capable of processing a wide variety of mask types, such as quartz binary masks, phase shift masks, extreme ultraviolet masks, and e-beam projection stencil masks. Specifications currently meet the 65nm device node requirements, and tool performance is extendible to 45nm and below. The tool combines LEO’s ultra-high-resolution Supra scanning electron microscope platform with NaWoTec’s proprietary e-beam deposition and etching technology, gas delivery system, and mask repair software. In this article, we focus on tool performance results; that is, the reproducibility and accuracy of repair of clear and opaque programmed defects on Cr binary and MoSi phase shift masks. These masks have in the past been difficult to repair due to beam position instability caus...
27th European Mask and Lithography Conference | 2011
Rik Jonckheere; Dieter Van den Heuvel; Tristan Bret; Thorsten Hofmann; John Magana; Israel Aharonson; Doron Meshulach; Eric Hendrickx; Kurt G. Ronse
In this follow-up paper for our contribution at BACUS 2010, first evidence is shown that also the more advanced Lasertec M7360 has missed a few printing reticle defects caused by an imperfection of its EUV mirror, a so-called multilayer defect (ML-defect). This work continued to use a combination of blank inspection (BI), patterned mask inspection (PMI) and wafer inspection (WI) to find as many as possible printing defects on EUV reticles. The application of more advanced wafer inspection, combined with a separate repeater analysis for each of the multiple focus conditions used for exposure on the ASML Alpha Demo Tool (ADT) at IMEC, has allowed to increase the detectability of printing MLdefects. The latter uses the previous finding that ML-defects may have a through-focus printing behavior, i.e., they cause a different grade of CD impact on the pattern in their neighborhood, depending on the focus condition. Subsequent reticle review is used on the corresponding locations with both SEM (Secondary Electron Microscope) and AFM (Atomic Force Microscope). This review methodology has allowed achieving clear evidence of printing ML defects missed by this BI tool, despite of an unacceptable nuisance rate reported before. This is a next step in the investigation if it is possible to avoid actinic blank inspection (ABI) at all, the only presently known technique that is expected to be independent from the presence of a (residual) topography of the ML-defect at the top of the EUV mirror, in detecting those defects. This is considered an important asset of blank inspection, because the printability of a ML-defect on the EUV scanner and its detectability by ABI is determined by the distortion throughout the multilayer, not that at the surface.
Photomask Technology 2011 | 2011
Rik Jonckheere; Dieter Van den Heuvel; Tristan Bret; Thorsten Hofmann; John Magana; Israel Aharonson; Doron Meshulach; Eric Hendrickx; Kurt G. Ronse
First experimental evidence is given that a second generation blank inspection tool has missed a number of printing reticle defects caused by an imperfection of its EUV mirror, i.e., so-called multi-layer defects (ML-defects). This work continued to use a combination of blank inspection (BI), patterned mask inspection (PMI) and wafer inspection (WI) to find as many as possible printing defects on EUV reticles. The application of more advanced wafer inspection, combined with a separate repeater analysis for each of the multiple focus conditions used for exposure on the ASML Alpha Demo Tool (ADT) at IMEC, has allowed to increase the detection capability for printing ML-defects. It exploits the previous finding that ML-defects may have a through-focus printing behavior. They cause a different grade of CD impact on the pattern in their neighborhood, depending on the focus condition. Subsequent reticle review is done on the corresponding locations with both SEM (Secondary Electron Microscope) and AFM (Atomic Force Microscope). This review methodology has allowed achieving clear evidence of printing ML defects missed by this BI tool, despite of a too high nuisance rate, reported before. This establishes a next step in the investigation how essential actinic blank inspection (ABI) is. Presently it is the only known technique whose detection capability is considered independent from the presence of a (residual) distortion of the multi-layer at the top surface. This is considered an important asset for blank inspection, because the printability of a ML-defect in EUV lithography is determined by the distortion throughout the multilayer, not that at the top surface.
SPIE Optical Systems Design | 2011
Andreas Erdmann; Peter Evanschitzky; Feng Shao; Tim Fühner; Gian F. Lorusso; Eric Hendrickx; Mieke Goethals; Rik Jonckheere; Tristan Bret; Thorsten Hofmann
Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) - lithography at a wavelength around 13.5 nm is considered as the most promising successor of optical projection lithography. This paper reviews simulation models for EUV lithography. Resist model parameters are calibrated with experimental data. The models are applied for the investigation of the impact of mask multilayer defects on the lithographic process.
23rd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology | 2003
Klaus Edinger; Hans Becht; Rainer Becker; Volker Bert; Volker Boegli; Michael Budach; Susanne G÷hde; Jochen Guyot; Thorsten Hofmann; Ottmar Hoinkis; Alexander Kaya; Hans W. P. Koops; Petra Spies; Bernd Weyrauch; Johannes Bihr
High-resolution electron-beam assisted deposition and etching is an enabling technology for current and future generation photo mask repair. NaWoTec in collaboration with LEO Electron Microscopy has developed a mask repair beta tool capable of processing a wide variety of mask types, such as quartz binary masks, phase shift masks, EUV masks, and e-beam projection stencil masks. Specifications currently meet the 65 nm device node requirements, and tool performance is extendible to 45 nm and below. The tool combines LEOs ultra-high resolution Supra SEM platform with NaWoTecs e-beam deposition and etching technology, gas supply and pattern generation hardware, and repair software. It is expected to ship to the first customer in October this year. In this paper, we present the tool platform, its work flow oriented repair software, and associated deposition and etch processes. Unique features are automatic drift compensation, critical edge detection, and arbitrary pattern copy with automatic placement. Repair of clear and opaque programmed defects on Cr, TaN, and MoSi quartz masks, as well as on SiC and Si stencil masks is demonstrated. We show our development roadmap towards a production tool, which will be available by the end of this year.
Photomask Technology 2014 | 2014
Klaus Edinger; K. Wolff; H. Steigerwald; N. Auth; Petra Spies; Jens Oster; H. Schneider; Michael Budach; Thorsten Hofmann; M. Waiblinger
Mask repair is an essential step in the mask manufacturing process as the extension of 193nm technology and the insertion of EUV are drivers for mask complexity and cost. The ability to repair all types of defects on all mask blank materials is crucial for the economic success of a mask shop operation. In the future mask repair is facing several challenges. The mask minimum features sizes are shrinking and require a higher resolution repair tool. At the same time mask blanks with different new mask materials are introduced to optimize optical performance and long term durability. For EUV masks new classes of defects like multilayer and phase defects are entering the stage. In order to achieve a high yield, mask repair has to cover etch and deposition capabilities and must not damage the mask. These challenges require sophisticated technologies to bring mask repair to the next level. For high end masks ion-beam based and e-based repair technologies are the obvious choice when it comes to the repair of small features. Both technologies have their pro and cons. The scope of this paper is to review and compare the performance of ion-beam based mask repair to e-beam based mask repair. We will analyze the limits of both technologies theoretically and experimentally and show mask repair related performance data. Based on this data, we will give an outlook to future mask repair tools.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2006
Christian Ehrlich; Klaus Edinger; Thorsten Hofmann; Wolfgang Degel
With the continuing decrease of feature sizes in conjunction with both the enormous costs for current masks and projections for future generations the area of mask repair has often been highlighted. Clearly, a viable repair methodology going forward has the potential to significantly influence and reduce production costs for the complete mask set. Carl Zeiss SMS had, in a concerted development effort with other Zeiss daughter companies, succeeded to develop and deploy a novel mask repair tool capable of repairing specifically all types of advanced masks, such as quartz binary masks, phase shift masks, EUV masks and S-FIL imprint templates. In addition to the pure technical capability of the e-beam based approach a strong emphasis has been made towards the user friendliness and automation features of the repair process as such.
Archive | 2005
Klaus Edinger; Josef Sellmair; Thorsten Hofmann
Archive | 2004
Hans W. P. Koops; Klaus Edinger; Sergey Babin; Thorsten Hofmann; Petra Spies
Archive | 2011
Tristan Bret; Petra Spies; Thorsten Hofmann