Timothy M. Sullivan

Most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm are not suitable for endovascular repair using currently approved bifurcated stent-grafts.

Strict morphologic criteria must be used for patient selection to achieve durable success with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The goal of this study was to assess morphologic suitability (MS) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) for 2 currently approved bifurcated stent grafts and identify reasons for exclusion from EVAR. The authors reviewed the electronic charts of 1,795 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having AAA between January 1999 and July 2001 at their institution. Three hundred and twenty patients had an AAA with a diameter of =5.0 cm, measured on computed tomography (CT). The records of 301 patients, 254 men, 47 women, with a mean age of 74 years were available for review, and these patients constituted the study cohort. Criteria used for MS included a proximal neck length =15 mm; neck diameter between 18 and 26 mm; neck angulation =60°; common or external iliac artery (CIA or EIA) diameters of 7–16 mm and 8–13 mm, respectively, for AneuRx (Medtronic Ave, Santa Rosa, CA) and Ancure (Guidant Cardiac and Vascular Division, Menlo Park, CA) bifurcated grafts. AAAs were suitable for AneuRx device in 14% of patients (43 of 301; 95% CI = 11–19%) and for Ancure in 5% (16 of 301; 95% CI = 3.1–9%). The main reason for exclusion was an inadequate proximal aortic neck (73%). The neck was too short in 49.5%, too wide in 64% and badly angulated in 12% of the patients. Iliac artery morphology precluded EVAR with AneuRx and Ancure devices in 52% and 80%. Both CIAs were too wide for EVAR in 43% and 77%, respectively. When iliac artery diameter =20 mm was accepted, iliac suitability for AneuRx increased from 49% to 70% and overall suitability increased from 14% to 20%. When more permissive criteria were used for MS (neck length =10 mm, neck diameter =30 mm, CIA =20), 39% of patients became candidates for EVAR. More than three fourths of the patients with an AAA =5.0 cm in size, seen in a tertiary referral center, are morphologically not suitable for EVAR using 2 currently approved bifurcated endografts. The main reasons for exclusion are a short or wide proximal aortic neck. Considerable changes in size of the devices and in proximal attachment techniques have to occur before most AAAs will be suitable for EVAR.

Open and Endovascular Revascularization for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: Tabular Review of the Literature

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is an uncommon disease in vascular surgery practice worldwide. Open revascularization remains the best treatment for low-risk patients due to durability and efficacy. Endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia was primarily indicated for elderly and higher-risk patients, but this has changed over the past 10 years due to development of more precise devices and lower morbidity and mortality rates despite the higher recurrence and restenosis rates. Our purpose was to summarize the data on endovascular and open revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia in a schematic tabular presentation.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: initial experience with 100 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVEnTo review early results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnThe first 100 patients who underwent endovascular repair of AAA (EVAR) between June 26,1996, and October 31, 2001, at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, were studied retrospectively to evaluate technical success, freedom from reinterventions, and early clinical outcome.nnnRESULTSnA total of 89 men and 11 women (mean +/- SD age, 76 +/- 7 years; range, 47-92 years) underwent EVAR. The procedure was successful in 97 patients. There was no early death. Major complications occurred in 25 patients. The 30-day technical success rate was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77%-92%). The median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (range, 1-15 days), and the median hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-35 days). Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 1-60 months). Endoleak (incomplete seal of the endovascular graft) at discharge was observed in 14 patients; 13 developed endoleak during follow-up. There were 23 reinterventions, 65% of which were percutaneous procedures. One aneurysm ruptured at 5 months, but the patient was successfully treated by open repair. Primary and secondary graft patency rates at 1 year were 83% (95% CI, 74%-93%) and 94% (95% CI, 87 %-99%), respectively. The freedom from reintervention rate at 1 year was 71% (95% CI, 59%-84%), with an overall success rate from EVAR of 92% (95% CI, 84%-100%). There were no differences in early patency, reinterventions, and success rates between unibody and modular devices.nnnCONCLUSIONnEVAR can be performed with high technical success and low mortality rates; however, nonfatal complications and catheter-based reinterventions are frequent, and EVAR may not prevent aneurysm rupture. Although stent graft repair for high-risk patients is appealing, current data are insufficient to support EVAR as the preferred treatment of AAAs.

Carotid Revascularization for Prevention of Stroke: Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been used for the past several decades in patients with carotid occlusive disease. Large randomized controlled trials have documented that CEA is a highly effective stroke preventive among patients with carotid stenosis and recent transient ischemic attack or cerebral infarction. In asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis, clinical trial data suggest that the degree of stroke prevention from CEA is less than among symptomatic patients. However, otherwise healthy men and women with an asymptomatic carotid stenosis of 60% or greater have a lower risk of future cerebral infarction, including disabling cerebral infarction, if treated with CEA compared with those treated with medical management alone. More recently, carotid artery stenting has been performed Increasingly for patients with carotid occlusive disease. As technology has improved, procedural risks have declined and are approaching those reported for CEA. The benefits and durability of CEA compared with carotid artery stenting are still unclear and are being studied in ongoing randomized controlled trials.

a Technique of Extending Small-bowel Mesentery for Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis: Report of a Case

One of the keys to success in proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is obtaining adequate mesenteric length to allow the pouch to reach the anorectum without tension. A multitude of techniques have been described in the literature to gain mesenteric length; however, in most cases these techniques only allow for the correction of a small deficit in the mesenteric length. We encountered a case in which the small-bowel mesentery was severely foreshortened because of a previous small-bowel volvulus just proximal to the loop ileostomy during recovery from the initial stage of his ileal pouch procedure. In this case, the deficit in length required an interposition vein graft to the superior mesenteric artery to facilitate adequate mesenteric length and allow completion of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. We report this technique to add another method of mesenteric lengthening to the armamentarium of surgeons performing ileal pouch-anal anastomoses. This technique should only be used as a last resort.

Endovascular repair of ruptured saccular aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta.

Open repair of ruptured aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) is associated with early mortality rates of 20%-60% and severe morbidity rates exceeding 40%. The present report describes three octogenarian patients and one sexagenarian patient at poor surgical risk admitted with acutely ruptured saccular DTA aneurysms (two of four were anastomotic) unrelated to trauma or infection who underwent successful endovascular therapy, which involved the use of aortic endovascular cuffs in three cases. Mean intensive care unit and total hospital stay durations were 1.75 days (range, 1-4 d) and 6 days (range, 3-13 d), respectively. At 30 days, all patients were alive and free of repeat intervention, with aneurysm exclusion achieved in all cases but one, which featured a marginal type II endoleak. These data support endovascular therapy for ruptured saccular DTA aneurysms enabling short-term outcomes that otherwise would have been unrealistic.