Timothy Ung

Aggressive resection at the infiltrative margins of glioblastoma facilitated by intraoperative fluorescein guidance

OBJECTIVE Extent of resection is an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma (GBM). Recent evidence suggests that intravenously administered fluorescein sodium associates with tumor tissue, facilitating safe maximal resection of GBM. In this study, the authors evaluate the safety and utility of intraoperative fluorescein guidance for the prediction of histopathological alteration both in the contrast-enhancing (CE) regions, where this relationship has been established, and into the non-CE (NCE), diffusely infiltrated margins. METHODS Thirty-two patients received fluorescein sodium (3 mg/kg) intravenously prior to resection. Fluorescence was intraoperatively visualized using a Zeiss Pentero surgical microscope equipped with a YELLOW 560 filter. Stereotactically localized biopsy specimens were acquired from CE and NCE regions based on preoperative MRI in conjunction with neuronavigation. The fluorescence intensity of these specimens was subjectively classified in real time with subsequent quantitative image analysis, histopathological evaluation of localized biopsy specimens, and radiological volumetric assessment of the extent of resection. RESULTS Bright fluorescence was observed in all GBMs and localized to the CE regions and portions of the NCE margins of the tumors, thus serving as a visual guide during resection. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 84% of the patients with an average resected volume of 95%, and this rate was higher among patients for whom GTR was the surgical goal (GTR achieved in 93.1% of patients, average resected volume of 99.7%). Intraoperative fluorescein staining correlated with histopathological alteration in both CE and NCE regions, with positive predictive values by subjective fluorescence evaluation greater than 96% in NCE regions. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative administration of fluorescein provides an easily visualized marker for glioma pathology in both CE and NCE regions of GBM. These findings support the use of fluorescein as a microsurgical adjunct for guiding GBM resection to facilitate safe maximal removal.

Biomarkers for glioma immunotherapy: the next generation

The term “biomarker” historically refers to a single parameter, such as the expression level of a gene or a radiographic pattern, used to indicate a broader biological state. Molecular indicators have been applied to several aspects of cancer therapy: to describe the genotypic and phenotypic state of neoplastic tissue for prognosis, to predict susceptibility to anti-proliferative agents, to validate the presence of specific drug targets, and to evaluate responsiveness to therapy. For glioblastoma (GBM), immunohistochemical and radiographic biomarkers accessible to the clinical lab have informed traditional regimens, but while immunotherapies have emerged as potentially disruptive weapons against this diffusely infiltrating, heterogeneous tumor, biomarkers with strong predictive power have not been fully established. The cancer immunotherapy field, through the recently accelerated expansion of trials, is currently leveraging this wealth of clinical and biological data to define and revise the use of biomarkers for improving prognostic accuracy, personalization of therapy, and evaluation of responses across the wide variety of tumors. Technological advancements in DNA sequencing, cytometry, and microscopy have facilitated the exploration of more integrated, high-dimensional profiling of the disease system—incorporating both immune and tumor parameters—rather than single metrics, as biomarkers for therapeutic sensitivity. Here we discuss the utility of traditional GBM biomarkers in immunotherapy and how the impending transformation of the biomarker paradigm—from single markers to integrated profiles—may offer the key to bringing predictive, personalized immunotherapy to GBM patients.

A Multiparametric Model for Mapping Cellularity in Glioblastoma Using Radiographically Localized Biopsies

Ninety-one localized biopsies were obtained from 36 patients with glioblastoma. Signal intensities corresponding to these samples were derived from T1-postcontrast subtraction, T2-FLAIR, and ADC sequences by using an automated coregistration algorithm. Cell density was calculated for each specimen by using an automated cell-counting algorithm. T2-FLAIR and ADC sequences were inversely correlated with cell density. T1-postcontrast subtraction was directly correlated with cell density. The authors conclude that the model illustrates a quantitative and significant relationship between MR signal and cell density. Applying this relationship over the entire tumor volume allows mapping of the intratumoral heterogeneity for both enhancing core and nonenhancing margins. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The complex MR imaging appearance of glioblastoma is a function of underlying histopathologic heterogeneity. A better understanding of these correlations, particularly the influence of infiltrating glioma cells and vasogenic edema on T2 and diffusivity signal in nonenhancing areas, has important implications in the management of these patients. With localized biopsies, the objective of this study was to generate a model capable of predicting cellularity at each voxel within an entire tumor volume as a function of signal intensity, thus providing a means of quantifying tumor infiltration into surrounding brain tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-one localized biopsies were obtained from 36 patients with glioblastoma. Signal intensities corresponding to these samples were derived from T1-postcontrast subtraction, T2-FLAIR, and ADC sequences by using an automated coregistration algorithm. Cell density was calculated for each specimen by using an automated cell-counting algorithm. Signal intensity was plotted against cell density for each MR image. RESULTS: T2-FLAIR (r = −0.61) and ADC (r = −0.63) sequences were inversely correlated with cell density. T1-postcontrast (r = 0.69) subtraction was directly correlated with cell density. Combining these relationships yielded a multiparametric model with improved correlation (r = 0.74), suggesting that each sequence offers different and complementary information. CONCLUSIONS: Using localized biopsies, we have generated a model that illustrates a quantitative and significant relationship between MR signal and cell density. Projecting this relationship over the entire tumor volume allows mapping of the intratumoral heterogeneity in both the contrast-enhancing tumor core and nonenhancing margins of glioblastoma and may be used to guide extended surgical resection, localized biopsies, and radiation field mapping.

Timing of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients: A Single-Institution Experience With More Than 400 Patients.

BACKGROUND The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the timing of adjuvant RT after surgery affected outcome in patients with GBM. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of GBM at our institution. A total of 447 patients were included in our analysis. Patients were divided into 3 equal groups based on the interval between surgery and RT. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients who began RT less than 21 days after surgery tended to be older, have a lower a Karnofsky Performance Status score, and higher recursive partitioning analysis class. These patients were more likely to have undergone biopsy only and received 3-dimensional conformal RT or 2-dimensional RT. The median OS for patients who started RT less than 21 days after surgery, between 21 and 32 days after surgery, and more than 32 days after surgery was 374, 465, and 478 days, respectively (P = .004). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status score lower than 70, undergoing biopsy only, recursive partitioning analysis classes IV and V/VI, use of less than 36 Gy RT, and lack of TMZ chemotherapy were predictors of worse OS. The interval between surgery and RT was not significantly associated with OS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Patients who begin RT less than 21 days after surgery tend to have worse prognostic factors than those who begin RT later. When accounting for significant covariates, the effect of timing between surgery and RT is not significant.

Convection-enhanced delivery for glioblastoma: targeted delivery of antitumor therapeutics

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults and carries a dismal prognosis despite advancements in treatment. Diffuse tumor infiltration precludes curative surgical resection and necessitates advancements in drug delivery mechanisms. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) enables continuous local drug delivery for a diverse population of antitumor agents. Importantly, CED circumvents therapeutic challenges posed by the blood-brain barrier by facilitating concentrated local therapeutic drug delivery with limited systemic effects. Here, we present a concise review of properties essential for safe and efficient convection-enhanced drug delivery, as well as a focused review of clinical studies evaluating CED in the treatment of glioblastoma.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy versus standard fractionated radiation therapy with concurrent temozolomide in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

PURPOSE Adjuvant hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is a reasonable option compared with standard fractionation radiation therapy (SFRT). Outcomes in patients receiving HRT in the presence of temozolomide (TMZ) compared with SFRT with TMZ are unclear. We examined HRT for GBM with TMZ in comparison to SFRT with TMZ. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥60 years of age with newly diagnosed GBM who received SFRT or HRT from 1994 to 2014 in the postoperative setting. Inclusion criteria included SFRT (60 Gy/30 fractions or 59.4 Gy/33 fractions) versus HRT (40 Gy/15 fractions). RESULTS In this cohort, 158 patients were treated with SFRT versus 26 with HRT. Median survival in patients receiving SFRT compared with HRT was 430 and 475 days (P = .550), respectively. Ninety-five percent of the SFRT patients received TMZ versus 100% of those treated with HRT. Patients receiving HRT were older (median, 72 vs 66 years). All HRT patients were treated with the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique versus SFRT, in which 57% had IMRT. Multivariate Cox regression showed decreased overall survival (OS) associated with patient age >70 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84), lower Karnofsky performance status (HR, 5.25), biopsy versus surgical resection (HR, 4.18), radiation therapy planning technique 3- or 2-dimensional planning versus IMRT (HR, 1.91; HR, 3.40, respectively). Analysis restricted to patients receiving IMRT-based planning showed no difference in OS between HRT and SFRT. For patients receiving TMZ, there was no survival difference between those treated with HRT and those treated with SFRT. CONCLUSIONS Elderly GBM patients receiving HRT and those receiving SFRT had similar OS. Subset analysis patients receiving concurrent TMZ showed no difference in OS between the HRT and SFRT groups.

Sodium Fluorescein Facilitates Guided Sampling of Diagnostic Tumor Tissue in Nonenhancing Gliomas

BACKGROUND Accurate tissue sampling in nonenhancing (NE) gliomas is a unique surgical challenge due to their intratumoral histological heterogeneity and absence of contrast enhancement as a guide for intraoperative stereotactic guidance. Instead, T2/fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity on MRI is commonly used as an imaging surrogate for pathological tissue, but sampling from this region can yield nondiagnostic or underdiagnostic brain tissue. Sodium fluorescein is an intraoperative fluorescent dye that has a high predictive value for tumor identification in areas of contrast enhancement and NE in glioblastomas. However, the underlying histopathological alterations in fluorescent regions of NE gliomas remain undefined. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether fluorescein can identify diagnostic tissue and differentiate regions with higher malignant potential during surgery for NE gliomas, thus improving sampling accuracy. METHODS Thirteen patients who presented with NE, T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions suspicious for glioma received fluorescein (10%, 3 mg/kg intravenously) during surgical resection. RESULTS Patchy fluorescence was identified within the T2/FLAIR hyperintense area in 10 of 13 (77%) patients. Samples taken from fluorescent regions were more likely to demonstrate diagnostic glioma tissue and cytologic atypia (P < .05). Fluorescein demonstrated a 95% positive predictive value for the presence of diagnostic tissue. Samples from areas of fluorescence also demonstrated greater total cell density and higher Ki-67 labeling than nonfluorescent biopsies (P < .05). CONCLUSION Fluorescence in NE gliomas is highly predictive of diagnostic tumor tissue and regions of higher cell density and proliferative activity.

The use of fluorescein sodium in the biopsy and gross-total resection of a tectal plate glioma

Intravenous administration of fluorescein sodium fluoresces glioma burden tissue and can be visualized using the surgical microscope with a specialized filter. Intraoperative guidance afforded through the use of fluorescein may enhance the fidelity of tissue sampling, and increase the ability to accomplish complete resection of tectal lesions. In this report the authors present the case of a 19-year-old man with a tectal anaplastic pilocytic astrocytoma in which the use of fluorescein sodium and a Zeiss Pentero surgical microscope equipped with a yellow 560 filter enabled safe complete resection. In conjunction with neurosurgical navigation, added intraoperative guidance provided by fluorescein may be beneficial in the resection of brainstem gliomas.

A Modern Radiotherapy Series of Survival in Hispanic Patients with Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND Studies have shown racial differences in cancer outcomes. We investigate whether survival differences existed in Hispanic patients with glioblastoma (GBM) compared with other ethnicities from our modern radiotherapy series, because no study to date has focused on outcomes in this group after radiation therapy. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 428 patients diagnosed with GBM from 1996 to 2014 at our institution, divided into 4 groups based on self-report: white, black, Hispanic, and Asian/Indian. The primary outcome was overall survival. We analyzed differences in prognostic factors among the whole cohort compared with the Hispanic cohort alone. RESULTS Baseline characteristics of the 4 racial groups were comparable. With a median follow-up of 387 days, no survival differences were seen by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Median overall survival for Hispanic patients was 355 days versus 450 days for the entire cohort. Factors significant for patient outcomes in the entire cohort differed slightly from those specific to Hispanic patients. Low Karnofsky Performance Status was significant on multivariate analysis in the whole population, but not in Hispanic patients. Extent of resection, recursive partitioning analysis class, and radiation therapy total dose were significant on multivariate analysis in both the whole population and Hispanic patients. CONCLUSIONS We found that Hispanic patients with GBM had no difference in survival compared with other ethnicities in our cohort. Differences exist in factors associated with outcomes on single and multivariate analysis for Hispanic patients with GBM compared with the entire cohort. Additional studies focusing on Hispanic patients will aid in more personalized treatment approaches in this group.