Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tobias Schulze is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tobias Schulze.


Environmental Pollution | 2014

Identification of novel micropollutants in wastewater by a combination of suspect and nontarget screening

Christine Hug; Nadin Ulrich; Tobias Schulze; Werner Brack; Martin Krauss

To detect site-specific, suspected and formerly unknown contaminants in a wastewater treatment plant effluent, we established a screening procedure based on liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) with stepwise identification schemes. Based on automated substructure searches a list of 2160 suspected site-specific and documented water contaminants was reduced to those amenable to LC-HRMS. After searching chromatograms for exact masses of suspects, presumably false positive detections were stepwise excluded by retention time prediction, the evaluation of isotope patterns, ionization behavior, and HRMS/MS spectra. In nontarget analysis, peaks for identification were selected based on distinctive isotope patterns and intensity. The stepwise identification of nontarget compounds was automated by a plausibility check of molecular formulas using the Seven Golden Rules, an exclusion of compounds with presumably low commercial importance and an automated HRMS/MS evaluation. Six suspected and five nontarget chemicals were identified, of which two have not been previously reported as environmental pollutants.


Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2008

How to confirm identified toxicants in effect-directed analysis

Werner Brack; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen; Miroslav Machala; Rikke Brix; Damià Barceló; Emma L. Schymanski; Georg Streck; Tobias Schulze

AbstractDue to the production and use of a multitude of chemicals in modern society, waters, sediments, soils and biota may be contaminated with numerous known and unknown chemicals that may cause adverse effects on ecosystems and human health. Effect-directed analysis (EDA), combining biotesting, fractionation and chemical analysis, helps to identify hazardous compounds in complex environmental mixtures. Confirmation of tentatively identified toxicants will help to avoid artefacts and to establish reliable cause–effect relationships. A tiered approach to confirmation is suggested in the present paper. The first tier focuses on the analytical confirmation of tentatively identified structures. If straightforward confirmation with neat standards for GC–MS or LC–MS is not available, it is suggested that a lines-of-evidence approach is used that combines spectral library information with computer-based structure generation and prediction of retention behaviour in different chromatographic systems using quantitative structure–retention relationships (QSRR). In the second tier, the identified toxicants need to be confirmed as being the cause of the measured effects. Candidate components of toxic fractions may be selected based, for example, on structural alerts. Quantitative effect confirmation is based on joint effect models. Joint effect prediction on the basis of full concentration–response plots and careful selection of the appropriate model are suggested as a means to improve confirmation quality. Confirmation according to the Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) concept of the US EPA and novel tools of hazard identification help to confirm the relevance of identified compounds to populations and communities under realistic exposure conditions. Promising tools include bioavailability-directed extraction and dosing techniques, biomarker approaches and the concept of pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT). FigureToxicity confirmation in EDA as a tiered approach


Science of The Total Environment | 2016

Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments — An in-depth overview

Werner Brack; Selim Ait-Aissa; Robert M. Burgess; Wibke Busch; Nicolas Creusot; Carolina Di Paolo; Beate I. Escher; L. Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Willem Jonker; Jeroen Kool; M.H. Lamoree; Matthias Muschket; Steffen Neumann; Pawel Rostkowski; Christoph Ruttkies; Jennifer E. Schollée; Emma L. Schymanski; Tobias Schulze; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Andrew J. Tindall; Gisela de Aragão Umbuzeiro; Branislav Vrana; Martin Krauss

Aquatic environments are often contaminated with complex mixtures of chemicals that may pose a risk to ecosystems and human health. This contamination cannot be addressed with target analysis alone but tools are required to reduce this complexity and identify those chemicals that might cause adverse effects. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) is designed to meet this challenge and faces increasing interest in water and sediment quality monitoring. Thus, the present paper summarizes current experience with the EDA approach and the tools required, and provides practical advice on their application. The paper highlights the need for proper problem formulation and gives general advice for study design. As the EDA approach is directed by toxicity, basic principles for the selection of bioassays are given as well as a comprehensive compilation of appropriate assays, including their strengths and weaknesses. A specific focus is given to strategies for sampling, extraction and bioassay dosing since they strongly impact prioritization of toxicants in EDA. Reduction of sample complexity mainly relies on fractionation procedures, which are discussed in this paper, including quality assurance and quality control. Automated combinations of fractionation, biotesting and chemical analysis using so-called hyphenated tools can enhance the throughput and might reduce the risk of artifacts in laboratory work. The key to determining the chemical structures causing effects is analytical toxicant identification. The latest approaches, tools, software and databases for target-, suspect and non-target screening as well as unknown identification are discussed together with analytical and toxicological confirmation approaches. A better understanding of optimal use and combination of EDA tools will help to design efficient and successful toxicant identification studies in the context of quality monitoring in multiply stressed environments.


Analytical Chemistry | 2012

Consensus structure elucidation combining GC/EI-MS, structure generation, and calculated properties.

Emma L. Schymanski; Christine Gallampois; Martin Krauss; Markus Meringer; Steffen Neumann; Tobias Schulze; Sebastian Wolf; Werner Brack

This article explores consensus structure elucidation on the basis of GC/EI-MS, structure generation, and calculated properties for unknown compounds. Candidate structures were generated using the molecular formula and substructure information obtained from GC/EI-MS spectra. Calculated properties were then used to score candidates according to a consensus approach, rather than filtering or exclusion. Two mass spectral match calculations (MOLGEN-MS and MetFrag), retention behavior (Lee retention index/boiling point correlation, NIST Kovats retention index), octanol-water partitioning behavior (log K(ow)), and finally steric energy calculations were used to select candidates. A simple consensus scoring function was developed and tested on two unknown spectra detected in a mutagenic subfraction of a water sample from the Elbe River using GC/EI-MS. The top candidates proposed using the consensus scoring technique were purchased and confirmed analytically using GC/EI-MS and LC/MS/MS. Although the compounds identified were not responsible for the sample mutagenicity, the structure-generation-based identification for GC/EI-MS using calculated properties and consensus scoring was demonstrated to be applicable to real-world unknowns and suggests that the development of a similar strategy for multidimensional high-resolution MS could improve the outcomes of environmental and metabolomics studies.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2015

Linking in Vitro Effects and Detected Organic Micropollutants in Surface Water Using Mixture-Toxicity Modeling

Peta A. Neale; Selim Ait-Aissa; Werner Brack; Nicolas Creusot; Michael S. Denison; Bjoern Deutschmann; Klára Hilscherová; Henner Hollert; Martin Krauss; Jiří Novák; Tobias Schulze; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Hélène Serra; Ying Shao; Beate I. Escher

Surface water can contain countless organic micropollutants, and targeted chemical analysis alone may only detect a small fraction of the chemicals present. Consequently, bioanalytical tools can be applied complementary to chemical analysis to detect the effects of complex chemical mixtures. In this study, bioassays indicative of activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), activation of the pregnane X receptor (PXR), activation of the estrogen receptor (ER), adaptive stress responses to oxidative stress (Nrf2), genotoxicity (p53) and inflammation (NF-κB) and the fish embryo toxicity test were applied along with chemical analysis to water extracts from the Danube River. Mixture-toxicity modeling was applied to determine the contribution of detected chemicals to the biological effect. Effect concentrations for between 0 to 13 detected chemicals could be found in the literature for the different bioassays. Detected chemicals explained less than 0.2% of the biological effect in the PXR activation, adaptive stress response, and fish embryo toxicity assays, while five chemicals explained up to 80% of ER activation, and three chemicals explained up to 71% of AhR activation. This study highlights the importance of fingerprinting the effects of detected chemicals.


Environmental Pollution | 2010

Identification of a phytotoxic photo-transformation product of diclofenac using effect-directed analysis

Tobias Schulze; Sara Weiss; Emma L. Schymanski; Peter C. von der Ohe; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen; Rolf Altenburger; Georg Streck; Werner Brack

The pharmaceutical diclofenac (DCF) is released in considerably high amounts to the aquatic environment. Photo-transformation of DCF was reported as the main degradation pathway in surface waters and was found to produce metabolites with enhanced toxicity to the green algae Scenedesmus vacuolatus. We identified and subsequently confirmed 2-[2-(chlorophenyl)amino]benzaldehyde (CPAB) as a transformation product with enhanced toxicity using effect-directed analysis. The EC(50) of CPAB (4.8 mg/L) was a factor of 10 lower than that for DCF (48.1 mg/L), due to the higher hydrophobicity of CPAB (log K(ow) = 3.62) compared with DCF (log D(ow) = 2.04) at pH 7.0.


Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | 2012

Endocrine disrupting, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects of upper Danube River sediments using effect‐directed analysis

Eric Higley; Stefanie Grund; Paul D. Jones; Tobias Schulze; T. B. Seiler; Urte Lübcke-von Varel; Werner Brack; Jan Wölz; Hanno Zielke; John P. Giesy; Henner Hollert; Markus Hecker

Effect-directed analysis (EDA) can be useful in identifying and evaluating potential toxic chemicals in matrixes. Previous investigations of extracts of sediments from the upper Danube River in Germany revealed acute nonspecific and mechanism-specific toxicity as determined by several bioassays. In the present study, EDA was used to further characterize these sediments and identify groups of potentially toxic chemicals. Four extracts of sediments were subjected to a novel fractionation scheme coupled with identification of chemicals to characterize their ability to disrupt steroidogenesis or cause mutagenic and/or teratogenic effects. All four whole extracts of sediment caused significant alteration of steroidogenesis and were mutagenic as well as teratogenic. The whole extracts of sediments were separated into 18 fractions and these fractions were then subjected to the same bioassays as the whole extracts. Fractions 7 to 15 of all four extracts were consistently more potent in both the Ames fluctuation and H295R assays. Much of this toxicity could be attributed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, sterols, and in fraction 7-naphthoic acids. Because the fraction containing polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorodibenzodioxin/furan, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, and several organophosphates did not cause any observable effects on hormone production or a mutagenic response, or were not detected in any of the samples, these compounds could be eliminated as causative agents for the observed effects. These results demonstrate the value of using EDA, which uses multiple bioassays and new fractionation techniques to assess toxicity. Furthermore, to our knowledge this is the first study using the recently developed H295R assay within EDA strategies.


Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | 2016

Micropollutants in European rivers: A mode of action survey to support the development of effect‐based tools for water monitoring

Wibke Busch; Susanne Schmidt; Ralph Kühne; Tobias Schulze; Martin Krauss; Rolf Altenburger

Environmental quality monitoring of water resources is challenged with providing the basis for safeguarding the environment against adverse biological effects from exposure to anthropogenic chemicals originating from diffuse and point sources. Although current regulatory efforts focus on monitoring and assessing a few legacy chemicals, many more anthropogenic chemicals are and will become detected in aquatic resources as a result of progress in analytical techniques. Assessing this type of exposure information based on available standard approaches from prospective risk assessment for single chemicals inevitably leads to indication of risk in most surface water bodies. As an alternative to generic assessment approaches, effect-based monitoring approaches are suggested. This offers the advantage of reducing uncertainties of effect extrapolation and additionally accounts for mixture effects. To become a credible complement to chemical monitoring information, however, a better understanding of the capabilities and gaps of available effect-based tools is needed. The authors therefore undertook to 1) compile organic contaminants detected in freshwater monitoring studies, 2) provide a synopsis of the mode of action knowledge available for the detected compounds, 3) perform a hazard ranking to identify priority mixtures, and 4) reflect on the challenges to make bioassays fit for effect-based monitoring. The present Focus article shows that chemical occurrence in European freshwaters seems to be highly variable in composition and relative abundancies. Further, although the present mode of action knowledge remains limited, the authors already see the need for batteries of effect-based tools if a more comprehensive coverage of prevailing effect qualities for mixtures is to be targeted. Finally, they suggest a list of organic compounds that could serve as a reference list for effect-based tool validation studies. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:1887-1899.


Chemosphere | 2009

Effect-directed analysis of contaminated sediment from the wastewater canal in Pancevo industrial area, Serbia

Sonja Kaisarevic; Urte Lübcke-von Varel; Dejan Orčić; Georg Streck; Tobias Schulze; Kristina Pogrmic; Ivana Teodorovic; Werner Brack; Radmila Kovacevic

Wastewater canal (WWC) in Pancevo industrial area in Serbia, whose main environmental receptor is the River Danube, is a well known hot-spot of contamination. WWC sediments have been assessed by UNEP based on chemical target analysis. However, integrative biological data on exposure to hazardous compounds are only provided by the present study which aims at evaluating whether the monitored compounds sufficiently reflect potential hazards and to suggest additional compounds to include in monitoring and hazard assessment by applying effect-directed analysis (EDA) based on arylhydrocarbon receptor-mediated activity and cytotoxicity. Multistep NP-HPLC fractionation provided 18 fractions co-eluting with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and more polar compounds. PAHs fractions exhibited great potencies to induce ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase (EROD) in H4IIE rat hepatoma cell line expressed as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents (TCDD-EQ) (0.1-34.6 x 10(3) pg g(-1)dry weight). Chemical analysis of the most active fractions revealed great concentrations of PAHs (up to 292 x 10(2)ngg(-1) sediment equivalents (SEQ)), methylated PAHs (up to 900 x 10(2) ng g(-1) SEQ), and other alkyl-substituted PAHs. Only minor portions of biologically derived TCDD-EQs could be attributed to monitored PAHs with known relative potencies (REPs). We hypothesize that a major part of the activity is due to non-monitored alkylated and heterocyclic PAHs. Results of the cell cytotoxicity/proliferation assay on H4IIE cell line suggest the presence of sediment pollutants with pronounced potency to disturb cell growth.


Environment International | 2012

Identification and quantitative confirmation of dinitropyrenes and 3-nitrobenzanthrone as major mutagens in contaminated sediments.

Urte Lübcke-von Varel; Mahmoud Bataineh; Stefanie Lohrmann; Ivonne Löffler; Tobias Schulze; Sini Flückiger-Isler; Jiri Neca; Miroslav Machala; Werner Brack

Polar fractions of a sediment extract of the industrial area of Bitterfeld, Germany, have been subjected for effect-directed identification of mutagens using the Ames fluctuation assay with TA98. Mutagenicity could be well recovered in several secondary and tertiary fractions. Dinitropyrenes and 3-nitrobenzanthrone could be confirmed to contribute great shares of the observed mutagenicity. In addition, a multitude of polar polycyclic aromatic compounds has been tentatively identified in mutagenic fractions including nitro-PAHs, azaarenes, ketones, quinones, hydroxy-compounds, lactones and carboxylic acids although their contribution to mutagenicity could not be quantified due to a lack of standards. Diagnostic Salmonella strains YG1024 and YG1041 were applied to confirm the contribution of nitro-aromatic compounds. We suggest the inclusion of dinitropyrenes and 3-nitrobenzanthrone into sediment monitoring in order to minimize the mutagenic risk to aquatic organisms and to human health.

Collaboration


Dive into the Tobias Schulze's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Werner Brack

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Krauss

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Georg Streck

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emma L. Schymanski

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas-Benjamin Seiler

Springer Science+Business Media

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juliane Hollender

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc J.-F. Suter

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge