Traci L. Johnson
University of Michigan
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Traci L. Johnson.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Keren Sharon; Traci L. Johnson
We present a revised lens model of MACS J1149+2223, in which the first resolved multiply-imaged lensed supernova was discovered. The lens model is based on the model of Johnson et al. (2014) with some modifications. We include more lensing constraints from the host galaxy of the newly discovered supernova, and increase the flexibility of the model in order to better reproduce the lensing signal in the vicinity of this galaxy. The revised model accurately reconstructs the positions of the lensed supernova, provides magnifications, and predicts the time delay between the instances of the supernova. Finally, we reconstruct the source image of the host galaxy, and position the supernova on one of its spiral arms. Products of this lens model are available to the community through MAST.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
Massimo Meneghetti; P. Natarajan; D. Coe; Emanuele Contini; G. De Lucia; Carlo Giocoli; Ana Acebron; Stefano Borgani; Maruša Bradač; J. M. Diego; Austin Hoag; Masafumi Ishigaki; Traci L. Johnson; Eric Jullo; Ryota Kawamata; Daniel Lam; Marceau Limousin; Jori Liesenborgs; Masamune Oguri; Kevin Sebesta; Keren Sharon; Liliya L. R. Williams; Adi Zitrin
Gravitational lensing by clusters of galaxies offers a powerful probe of their structure and mass distribution. Several research groups have developed techniques independently to achieve this goal. While these methods have all provided remarkably high-precision mass maps, particularly with exquisite imaging data from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), the reconstructions themselves have never been directly compared. In this paper, we present for the first time a detailed comparison of methodologies for fidelity, accuracy and precision. For this collaborative exercise, the lens modelling community was provided simulated cluster images that mimic the depth and resolution of the ongoing HST Frontier Fields. The results of the submitted reconstructions with the un-blinded true mass profile of these two clusters are presented here. Parametric, free-form and hybrid techniques have been deployed by the participating groups and we detail the strengths and trade-offs in accuracy and systematics that arise for each methodology. We note in conclusion that several properties of the lensing clusters are recovered equally well by most of the lensing techniques compared in this study. For example, the reconstruction of azimuthally averaged density and mass profiles by both parametric and free-form methods matches the input models at the level of ∼10 per cent. Parametric techniques are generally better at recovering the 2D maps of the convergence and of the magnification. For the best-performing algorithms, the accuracy in the magnification estimate is ∼10 per cent at μ_(true) = 3 and it degrades to ∼30 per cent at μ_(true) ∼ 10.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Jane R. Rigby; Matthew B. Bayliss; Michael D. Gladders; Keren Sharon; Eva Wuyts; H. Dahle; Traci L. Johnson; Maria A. Peña-Guerrero
We measure C III Lambda Lambda 1907, 1909 Angstrom emission lines in eleven gravitationally-lensed star-forming galaxies at zeta at approximately 1.6-3, finding much lower equivalent widths than previously reported for fainter lensed galaxies (Stark et al. 2014). While it is not yet clear what causes some galaxies to be strong C III] emitters, C III] emission is not a universal property of distant star-forming galaxies. We also examine C III] emission in 46 star-forming galaxies in the local universe, using archival spectra from GHRS, FOS, and STIS on HST, and IUE. Twenty percent of these local galaxies show strong C III] emission, with equivalent widths less than 5 Angstrom. Three nearby galaxies show C III] emission equivalent widths as large as the most extreme emitters yet observed in the distant universe; all three are Wolf-Rayet galaxies. At all redshifts, strong C III] emission may pick out low-metallicity galaxies experiencing intense bursts of star formation. Such local C III] emitters may shed light on the conditions of star formation in certain extreme high-redshift galaxies.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
Keren Sharon; Michael D. Gladders; Jane R. Rigby; Eva Wuyts; Matthew B. Bayliss; Traci L. Johnson; Michael K. Florian; H. Dahle
We present the mass distribution at the core of SDSS J1531+3414, a strong-lensing cluster at z=0.335. We find that the mass distribution is well described by two cluster-scale halos with a contribution from cluster-member galaxies. New HST observations of SDSS J1531+3414 reveal a signature of ongoing star formation associated with the two central galaxies at the core of the cluster, in the form of a chain of star forming regions at the center of the cluster. Using the lens model presented here, we place upper limits on the contribution of a possible lensed image to the flux at the center region, and rule out that this emission is coming from a background source.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Traci L. Johnson; Keren Sharon
Until now, systematic errors in strong gravitational lens modeling have been acknowledged but never been fully quantified. Here, we launch an investigation into the systematics induced by constraint selection. We model the simulated cluster Ares 362 times using random selections of image systems with and without spectroscopic redshifts and quantify the systematics using several diagnostics: image predictability, accuracy of model-predicted redshifts, enclosed mass, and magnification. We find that for models with
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Traci L. Johnson; Jane R. Rigby; Keren Sharon; Michael D. Gladders; Michael K. Florian; Matthew B. Bayliss; Eva Wuyts; Katherine E. Whitaker; Rachael Livermore; Katherine T. Murray
>15
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Catherine Cerny; Keren Sharon; Felipe Andrade-Santos; Roberto J. Avila; Maruša Bradač; L. Bradley; Daniela Carrasco; Dan Coe; Nicole G. Czakon; William A. Dawson; Brenda L. Frye; Austin Hoag; Kuang-Han Huang; Traci L. Johnson; Christine Jones; Daniel Lam; Lorenzo Lovisari; Ramesh Mainali; Pascal A. Oesch; Sara Ogaz; Matthew Past; Rachel Paterno-Mahler; Avery Peterson; Adam G. Riess; Steven A. Rodney; Russell E. Ryan; Brett Salmon; Irene Sendra-Server; Daniel P. Stark; Louis-Gregory Strolger
image systems, the image plane rms does not decrease significantly when more systems are added; however the rms values quoted in the literature may be misleading as to the ability of a model to predict new multiple images. The mass is well constrained near the Einstein radius in all cases, and systematic error drops to
The Astronomical Journal | 2018
Jane R. Rigby; Matthew B. Bayliss; Keren Sharon; Michael D. Gladders; J. Chisholm; H. Dahle; Traci L. Johnson; Rachel Paterno-Mahler; Eva Wuyts; Daniel D. Kelson
10
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Jane R. Rigby; Matthew B. Bayliss; J. Chisholm; Rongmon Bordoloi; Keren Sharon; Michael D. Gladders; Traci L. Johnson; Rachel Paterno-Mahler; Eva Wuyts; H. Dahle; A. Acharyya
image systems. Magnification errors are smallest along the straight portions of the critical curve, and the value of the magnification is systematically lower near curved portions. For
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
Nathália Cibirka; Ana Acebron; Adi Zitrin; Dan Coe; I. Agulli; Felipe Andrade-Santos; Maruša Bradač; Brenda L. Frye; Rachael Livermore; Guillaume Mahler; Brett Salmon; Keren Sharon; Michele Trenti; Keiichi Umetsu; Roberto J. Avila; L. Bradley; Daniela Carrasco; Catherine Cerny; Nicole G. Czakon; William A. Dawson; Austin Hoag; Kuang-Han Huang; Traci L. Johnson; Christine Jones; Shotaro Kikuchihara; Daniel Lam; Lorenzo Lovisari; Ramesh Mainali; Pascal A. Oesch; Sara Ogaz
>15