Tsan-Shiun Lin

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience in Taiwan.

Background. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) demonstrates certain survival benefits over deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but there is no consensus on criteria for the use of LDLT for HCC for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) taking into account strategies to improve survival. Methods. Thirty-five patients (89% men) underwent LDLT for HCC. The mean age was 51 years (range, 22–61). The median disease severity scores were B, 11–20, and 2B for Child-Turcotte-Pugh, Model for End-stage Liver Disease, and United Network for Organ Sharing, respectively. The transplant records were retrospectively analyzed. Results. All were within Milan criteria at time of transplantation. A novel approach to downstaging tumors initially beyond the Milan criteria was evaluated using transarterial embolization or percutaneous ethanol injection. Our initial results were encouraging as recipients whose tumors had been downstaged had not had recurrence to date. Seven (20%) patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC before undergoing transplant. The overall mean posttransplant follow-up in this series was 40.3 months (range, 23–75). The overall posttransplant complication rate requiring intervention was 11%. There was only one malignancy recurrence for an overall recurrence rate of 3%. Vascular invasion and small- for-size transplants did not seem to influence tumor recurrence. The nonestimated recipient 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survivals were 98%, 96%, and 90%, respectively. Conclusion. This review emphasizes the need for early disease recognition and prompt intervention when Milan criteria are met to improve survival from HCC after LDLT.

Routine microsurgical biliary reconstruction decreases early anastomotic complications in living donor liver transplantation

Biliary reconstruction using a microsurgical technique in living donor liver transplantation was routinely performed on 88 grafts primarily transplanted into 85 patients. All procedures were performed under a microscope by a single microsurgeon. Except for biliary atresia and Alagille syndrome, duct‐to‐duct reconstruction was performed. Stents were not used. The outcomes with microsurgical biliary reconstruction (MB) were compared with the outcomes of a cohort of 86 grafts in 85 patients that underwent conventional biliary reconstruction (CB). The identification of complications included only up to 12 months of follow‐up for each recipient in both groups. The average graft duct sizes were 2.8 mm for MB and 3.4 mm for CB. Most complications occurred in the first 15 cases with MB, and these cases were considered to constitute the learning curve phase. The MB complication rate was 46.7% in the first 15 cases, 20.0% in the next 15 cases, and 5.4% in the last 55 cases. When the learning curve phase was excluded, the overall complication rate over time with MB (8.9%) was significantly lower than that with CB (21.9%). CB increased the risk of biliary complications by 2.5 times (relative risk: 2.5; attributable risk: 128; odds ratio: 2.9). In conclusion, routine MB is a technical innovation that leads to decreased early anastomotic complications in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 15:1766–1775, 2009.

Intimal dissection of the hepatic artery following transarterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: An intraoperative problem in adult living donor liver transplantation

The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between intimal dissection (ID) in the recipient hepatic artery (HA) and transarterial embolization (TAE) and highlight the reconstructive methods for the different types of ID encountered in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Fifty‐four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent LDLT. ID was classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and this classification was based on the extent of intimal injury. Mild, moderate, or severe ID were defined as ID that was less than one‐quarter of the circumference of the HA, had reached one‐half of the circumference of the HA, or was more than one‐half of the circumference of the HA or involved the entire vessel wall, respectively. The reconstructive methods were based on the severity of ID encountered. Forty patients underwent TAE before LDLT, and 23 of these patients (57.5%) had ID. Nine patients had mild ID, 6 had moderate ID, and 8 had severe ID. In the 14 patients who did not undergo TAE, 4 had ID (28.6%; 3 mild and 1 severe). The other 10 patients (71.4%) had normal HA. In mild and moderate ID, the native HA was used after trimming of the HA until a healthy segment was encountered. In severe ID, the HA was reconstructed with alternative vessels. Two HA thromboses occurred postoperatively. TAE increased the risk of developing ID 2‐fold. There was no graft loss or mortality in this series due to HA complications. In conclusion, ID of the HA is associated with pretransplant TAE among hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing LDLT. Intraoperative recognition of this complication and trimming until good vessel quality is encountered or using alternative vessels are important. Liver Transpl 15:1553–1556, 2009.

Improving hepatic and portal venous flows using tissue expander and Foley catheter in liver transplantation

Abstract:  Background and objective:  Vascular reconstruction is important in liver transplantation because its obstruction causes graft failure and eventual loss. Vascular outflow obstruction may be due to graft malposition. We describe our experience with liver allograft repositioning using tissue expander and Foley catheter to improve hepatic and portal venous outflows.

Early and long-term results of routine microsurgical biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation.

We describe our early and long‐term experience with routine biliary reconstruction via a microsurgical technique in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). One hundred seventy‐seven grafts (including 3 dual grafts) were primarily transplanted into 174 recipients. The minimum follow‐up was 44 months. Biliary reconstructions were based on biliary anatomical variations in graft and recipient ducts. The recipient demographics, graft characteristics, types of biliary reconstruction, biliary complications (BCs), and outcomes were evaluated. There were 130 right lobe grafts and 47 left lobe grafts. There were single ducts in 71.8%, 2 ducts in 26.0%, and 3 ducts in 2.3% of the grafts. The complications were not significantly related to the size and number of ducts, the discrepancy between recipient and donor ducts, the recipient age, the ischemia time, or the type of graft. The overall BC rate was 9.6%. The majority of the complications occurred within the first year, and only 1 patient developed a stricture at 20 months. No new complications were noted after 2 years. When the learning‐curve phase of the first 15 cases was excluded, the overall BC rate was 6.79%, and the rate of complications requiring interventions was 2.5%. In conclusion, the routine use of microsurgical biliary reconstruction decreases the number of early and long‐term anastomotic BCs in LDLT. Liver Transpl 19:207‐214, 2013.

Arterial reconstruction in hepatic artery occlusions in adult living donor liver transplantation using gastric vessels.

BACKGROUND Alternatives to the hepatic artery (HA) are needed in liver transplantation when the native HA cannot be used or when HA complications develop. We describe the indications, technique, and results of our experience using the right gastroepiploic (RGEA) and left gastric (LGA) arteries as alternative HA inflow in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS From January 1999 to June 2006, 130 patients underwent primary adult-to-adult LDLT (excluding dual graft transplantations). Seven patients required an HA alternative due to hepatic arterial complication. The recipient and graft demographic characteristics, arterial complication, and alternate arteries used were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred twenty-six (126) patients received right lobe liver grafts and four received left lobe grafts. Four patients required an HA alternative due to intimal dissection of the recipient HA found during primary transplant, and three patients had salvage during re-operation for HA thrombosis. The RGEA was used in five patients and LGA in two patients. Four patients had no further complication on long-term follow-up. One patient had biliary stricture requiring intervention, and two patients had bile leak. One bile leak recipient had his bile leakage resolved spontaneously without sequelae. One patient with two graft HA reconstructed had graft loss due to bile leak and sepsis following re-operation for HA occlusion. CONCLUSION The RGEA and LGA can be successfully used as alternative HA inflow for hepatic arterial revascularization with good results in LDLT. The method has the advantage of single anastomosis compared to an interposition graft.

Living donor liver transplantation: the Asian perspective.

Preoperative evaluation of donors for living-donor liver transplantation aims to select a suitable donor with optimal graft quality and to ensure donor safety. Hepatic steatosis, a common finding in living liver donors, not only influences the outcome of liver transplantation for the recipient but also affects the recovery of the living donor after partial hepatectomy. Histopathologic analysis is the reference standard to detect and quantify fat in the liver, but it is invasive, and results are vulnerable to sampling error. Imaging can be repeated regularly and allows assessment of the entire liver, thus avoiding sampling error. Selection of appropriate imaging methods demands understanding of their advantages and limitations and the suitable clinical setting. This article describes potential clinical applications for liver fat quantification of imaging methods for fat detection and quantification, with an emphasis on the advantages and limitations of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying liver fat.

Magnetic resonance cholangiography in living donor liver transplantation.

Objective. Exact knowledge of biliary anatomy is essential in living donor liver transplantation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pretransplant magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in depicting the biliary anatomy in comparison with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). Materials and Methods. From May 2006 to July 2009, 451 potential living liver donors underwent pretransplant evaluation at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital–Kaohsiung Medical Center. Two hundred thirty-three donors underwent donor hepatectomy. Of these, only 203 donors with both preoperative MRC and IOC were included in this study. Results. Of the 451 potential donors, 218 (48.3%) were considered unsuitable for liver donation, hence was immediately disqualified after the initial evaluation for various reasons. Six of the 218 unsuitable donors (2.8%) were excluded due to complicated biliary anatomy. The overall accuracy rate of MRC for defining the biliary anatomy was 91.6%, with 84.9% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 88.2% positive predictive value, and 94.7% negative predictive value. There were 14 misidentified cases. The errors in MRC reading was largely attributed to the poor contrast between the biliary ducts and the surrounding tissues and organs. The concurrence between MRC and IOC were commendable (&kgr;=0.9). No significant biliary complications were noted in the mismatch group. Conclusion. MRC is essential for all pretransplantation evaluation with 91.6% accuracy rate.

Suprafascial Anterolateral Thigh Flap Harvest: A Better Way to Minimize Donor-site Morbidity in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and donor-site morbidity between the suprafascial and subfascial harvesting of anterolateral thigh flaps. Methods: Sixty-one patients who underwent free flap reconstruction (30 suprafascial and 31 subfascial anterolateral thigh flaps) were included in this study. The patients assessed the subjective donor-site morbidity and satisfaction with the overall functional result using a self-reported questionnaire. The flap characteristics (i.e., perforator number, flap size, and harvest time) and outcomes (i.e., success rate, partial necrosis, infection, hematoma, and fistula) were compared. Results: The success rates of suprafascial and subfascial anterolateral thigh flaps were 96.7 and 96.8 percent, respectively. There were no significant differences in flap size, harvest time, or overall complication rates. The suprafascial anterolateral thigh flap group experienced fewer abnormal sensations (p < 0.001) and better subjective satisfaction at the donor site than did the subfascial anterolateral thigh flap group (p = 0.03). Conclusions: In terms of reducing donor-site morbidity, the suprafascial anterolateral thigh flap group showed fewer sensory disturbances in donor thighs and exhibited better patient satisfaction than did the subfascial anterolateral thigh flap group, but meticulous dissection of tiny perforators above the fascia is required for the former procedure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Dual grafts in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A single center experience in Taiwan

Volume mismatch is encountered when a single live donor cannot provide adequate graft volume to the recipient with a remnant liver volume which is safe for donation. Our objective is to present our experience in living donor liver transplantation using dual grafts. Record review of 4 dual graft recipients was done. The results were compared with 122 consecutive patients who received a single right lobe. All dual graft recipients were surviving with satisfactory liver function at a median follow-up of 21 months. Two recipients received 1 right and 1 left lobe graft, while the other 2 recipients received 2 left lobe grafts. One donor developed biloma and was managed by percutaneous drainage. The first recipient required re-laparotomy for postoperative bleeding. The second recipient underwent re-laparotomy for bile leak. The third recipient developed grade II decubitus ulcers due to a prolonged sedentary position. When compared with recipients who received a single right lobe, the operative time was prolonged in the dual graft group. There was no apparent increase in the rate of vascular and biliary complications or the incidence of acute cellular rejection. Actuarial patient survivals were comparable in both groups. Dual graft transplantation provides sufficient volume in the recipient without jeopardizing donor safety.