Tullia Battaglioli

ADAMTS13 and anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies as markers for recurrence of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura during remission

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is often due to anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies that inhibit the proteolytic activity of the plasma metallo-protease and/or accelerate its clearance. Survivors of an acute episode of TTP with severely reduced levels of ADAMTS13 and /or with anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies during remission are at high risk of developing another epidode of TTP. Background From 20 to 50% of patients who survive an acute episode of the acquired form of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura relapse but clinical and laboratory markers of recurrence are not well established. Design and Methods In 109 patients enrolled in an international registry we evaluated, in the frame of a retrospective cohort study, the predictive role of the metalloprotease ADAMTS13 as measured in plasma during remission. Anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies and von Willebrand factor were also evaluated in a smaller number of the same patients. Results Median values of ADAMTS13 activity and antigen were significantly lower in patients with recurrent thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura than in those with no recurrence (activity: 12% vs. 41%; p=0.007; antigen: 36% vs. 58%; p=0.003). A severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity (10% or less) was associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.8; p=0.01). Anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies were also more prevalent in patients with recurrent thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (odds ratio 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 7.3; p=0.006). The presence during remission of both severe ADAMTS13 deficiency and anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies increased the likelihood of recurrence 3.6 times (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 9.0; p=0.006). The presence of ultralarge von Willebrand factor multimers and of associated diseases or conditions did not increase recurrence. Conclusions Survivors of an acute episode of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with severely reduced levels of ADAMTS13 and/or with anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies during remission have an approximately three-fold greater likelihood of developing another episode of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura than patients with higher protease activity and no antibody.

Risk factors for thrombophilia in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction

Scant information exists on the role of thrombophilia in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). We studied 65 patients with EHPVO, 500 with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs, and 700 healthy controls referred for thrombophilia screening, including the search for gain‐of‐function mutations in genes encoding coagulation factor V (factor V Leiden) and prothrombin (prothrombin G20210A); antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiency; and hyperhomocysteinemia. At least one abnormality in the thrombophilia screening was found in 40% of patients with either EHPVO or lower limb DVT and in 13% of controls, for odds ratios of 4.0 (95% CI, 2.3–7.0) and 4.4 (95% CI, 3.3–5.9), respectively. Statistically significant associations with EHPVO were observed for the prothrombin G20210A mutation (odds ratio, 8.1; 95% CI, 3.8–17.5) and the deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S taken together (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1–18.0). The odds ratio for the prothrombin G20210A was approximately twice that for lower limb DVT. Patients with factor V Leiden had an odds ratio for EHPVO of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.1–6.4) and for lower limb DVT of 7.5 (95% CI, 4.4–13.0). The odds ratio for EHPVO in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia was 2.0 (95% CI, 0.9–4.9). At variance with lower limb DVT, oral contraceptive use was not associated with an increased risk of EHPVO. Myeloproliferative disorders were diagnosed in 35% of patients with EHPVO. In conclusion, the risk for EHPVO is increased in the presence of thrombophilia resulting from the prothrombin G20210A mutation and from the deficiencies of the naturally occurring anticoagulant proteins, but not from factor V Leiden. (HEPATOLOGY 2005;41:603–608.)

Risk Factors and Recurrence Rate of Primary Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities

Background—One third of cases of upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are primary, ie, they occur in the absence of central venous catheters or cancer. Risk factors for primary upper-extremity DVT are not well established, and the recurrence rate is unknown. Methods and Results—We studied 115 primary upper-extremity DVT patients and 797 healthy controls for the presence of thrombophilia due to factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, antithrombin, protein C, protein S deficiency, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Transient risk factors for venous thromboembolism were recorded. Recurrent upper-extremity DVT was evaluated prospectively over a median of 5.1 years of follow-up. The adjusted odds ratio for upper-extremity DVT was 6.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 15.7) for factor V Leiden, 5.0 (95% CI 2.0 to 12.2) for prothrombin G20210A, and 4.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 22.0) for the anticoagulant protein deficiencies. Hyperhomocysteinemia and oral contraceptives were not associated with upper-extremity DVT. However, in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A who were taking oral contraceptives, the odds ratio for upper-extremity DVT was increased up to 13.6 (95% CI 2.7 to 67.3). The recurrence rate was 4.4% patient-years in patients with thrombophilia and 1.6% patient-years in those without thrombophilia. The hazard ratio for recurrent upper-extremity DVT in patients with thrombophilia compared with those without was 2.7 (95% CI 0.7 to 9.8). Conclusions—Inherited thrombophilia is associated with an increased risk of upper-extremity DVT. Oral contraceptives increase the risk only when combined with inherited thrombophilia. The recurrence rate of primary upper-extremity DVT is low but tends to be higher in patients with thrombophilia than in those without.

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium without antithrombotic prophylaxis

Whether or not pregnant women with a previous episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) should receive antithrombotic prophylaxis is a matter of debate. In order to estimate the rate of recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) during pregnancy and puerperium we retrospectively investigated a cohort of 1104 women with previous VTE; after a single DVT or isolated PE, 88 of them became pregnant at least once without receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis. Overall, 155 pregnancies and 120 puerperium periods without prophylaxis were recorded. There were nine recurrences during pregnancy and 10 during puerperium, with a rate of 5·8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3·0–10·6] and 8·3% (95%CI 4·5–14·6) respectively. In pregnancy, the rate of recurrence was 7·5% (95%CI 4·0–13·7) if the first VTE was unprovoked, related to pregnancy or to oral contraceptive use, whereas no recurrence occurred if the first VTE was related to other transient risk factors. In puerperium, the rate of recurrence was 15·5% (95%CI 7·7–28·7) in women with a pregnancy‐related first VTE, with a risk 3·9‐times higher than in the remaining women. Inherited thrombophilia was not associated with a statistically significant increase in risk of recurrence in pregnancy or in puerperium, yet the rate of recurrence in puerperium was 14·2% (95%CI 5·7–31·4) in overall carriers of factor V Leiden and 30% (95%CI 10·7–60·3) in carriers with a pregnancy‐related first VTE, with a risk 6·8 times higher than in women without thrombophilia and with a non pregnancy‐related first VTE.

Thrombosis in inflammatory bowel diseases : Role of inherited thrombophilia

BACKGROUND:Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are characterized by an increased risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. Although the pathogenetic mechanisms of this predisposition are unclear, a possible role of inherited risk factors for thrombosis in determining this predisposition has been suggested.AIM:To evaluate the role of factor V Leiden (G1691A) and G20210A prothrombin gene mutations in determining the occurrence of thrombosis in IBD patients.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven IBD patients (30 ulcerative colitis and 17 Crohns disease) with a positive history for thrombosis (9 at arterial sites and 38 at venous sites) were enrolled in the study. For each patient, two non-IBD subjects matched for sex and age, type, and site of thrombosis were used as controls. Peripheral blood DNA specimens were amplified by PCR using appropriate primers and analyzed by restriction analysis on agarose gel electrophoresis. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Fishers exact test.RESULTS:The total number of subjects with one or both mutations was significantly lower in IBD patients with thrombosis than in control subjects (12.8%vs 29.8%, respectively; p= 0.035, OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13–0.90). The total frequency of the mutated alleles was also significantly lower in IBD than in controls (7.4%vs 16.5%, respectively; p= 0.041, OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.17–0.96). Prothrombotic mutations were particularly unfrequent in IBD patients with active disease at the time of thrombosis compared with patients with quiescent disease (8.0%vs 36.4%, respectively; p= 0.057, OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02–1.01).CONCLUSIONS:The major inherited risk factors for thrombosis are significantly less frequent in thrombotic IBD patients than in thrombotic non-IBD subjects, suggesting that acquired risk factors play the most relevant role in determining thromboembolic events observed in IBD patients, particularly during active phases of the disease.

High levels of factor VIII and risk of extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS High levels of coagulation factor VIII are a risk factor for lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Their role in extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is not established. METHODS Factor VIII was measured in 85 patients with EHPVO (primary in 58 and complicating liver cirrhosis in 27), in 200 with lower-limb DVT, in 108 with liver cirrhosis without thrombosis and in 200 healthy controls. RESULTS Factor VIII levels were significantly higher in patients with primary EHPVO (138 IU/dL, range 86-366), EHPVO and cirrhosis (147 IU/dL, 95-242), lower-limb DVT (140 IU/dL, 64-400) and cirrhosis alone (160 IU/dL, 43-446) than in controls (112 IU/dL, 62-250, p<0.001). When factor VIII exceeded 129 IU/dL (66th percentile), the odds ratios were 10.5 (95%CI 3.3-33.4) for primary EHPVO, 6.0 (1.2-30.7) for EHPVO and cirrhosis, 5.0 (2.6-9.4) for lower-limb DVT. After exclusion of the effect of the acute phase reaction, the odds ratio for primary EHPVO was 4.2 (0.8-22.7), and was 8.7 (0.9-80.5) after exclusion also of patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorders. CONCLUSIONS High factor VIII levels are independently associated with an increased risk for EHPVO. The risk of EHPVO increased with increasing factor VIII levels and was only partially dependent on the acute phase reaction.

Type and location of venous thromboembolism in patients with factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A and in those with no thrombophilia

Summary.  Background: Patients with factor (F) V Leiden or the prothrombin G20210A polymorphism are at increased risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT). On the other hand, the risk of developing pulmonary embolism (PE) appears to be low in carriers of FV Leiden, perhaps because of a lower tendency to develop iliofemoral DVT than non‐carriers. For prothrombin G20210A, data are scanty and controversial. Methods: The clinical manifestations (isolated DVT, DVT and PE, and isolated PE), the extension of DVT, and the presence of transient risk factors were retrospectively investigated in 115 patients with heterozygous FV Leiden, 87 with prothrombin G20210A and 200 with no thrombophilia marker. Results: Isolated symptomatic PE was less prevalent in patients with FV Leiden (6%) than in those with prothrombin G20210A (21%) and no thrombophilia (23%) (P > 0.0001). The rate of distal DVT was higher in patients with no thrombophilia (16% vs. 7% for FV Leiden and 6% for prothrombin G20210A) (P = 0.02). No difference in the incidence of PE from distal and proximal DVT, the extension of proximal DVT and the type of transient risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) was found in the three groups. Patients with prothrombin G20210A had a younger age at their first VTE (24 years, P < 0.0001) and a higher rate of DVT accompanying PE (P = 0.04) than those with FV Leiden or no thrombophilia. Conclusions: Carriers of prothrombin G20210A, unlike those of FV Leiden, have an increased risk of developing isolated PE. This difference was not explained by a different rate of distal DVT, extension of proximal DVT, or distribution of transient risk factors in the two groups. Patients with prothrombin G20210A have more severe clinical manifestations than those with FV Leiden or no thrombophilia.

The risk of first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium in double heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A

Background: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy in double heterozygous carriers of factor (F) V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A is not established. Hence, whether or not these women deserve antithrombotic prophylaxis when pregnant is unknown.Patients and methods: In the frame of a multicenter family study, 52 double heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden and prothrombin G20210A who had remained pregnant at least once before knowledge of thrombophilia, were retrospectively investigated with respect to the occurrence of first VTE during pregnancy and puerperium. They were compared with 104 heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden, 104 of prothrombin G20210A and 104 women without thrombophilia. Results: Double heterozygotes were similar to single heterozygous carriers and non‐carriers for the age at first pregnancy, age at testing and rate of full‐term pregnancies. No VTE during pregnancy was observed in the four groups of women, whereas in the puerperium it occurred in two double carriers (1.8% of pregnancies, 95% CI: 0.5–6.3), three single FV Leiden carriers (1.5%, 0.5–4.3), two single prothrombin G20210A carriers (1%, 0.2–3.6) and one non‐carrier (0.4%, 0–2.5).Conclusions: The risk of first VTE during pregnancy and puerperium in double heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden and prothrombin G20210A is low and similar to that of single carriers. As for single heterozygotes, antithrombotic prophylaxis in asymptomatic double heterozygous carriers appears to be justified only in puerperium.

Hormone therapy and thromboembolic disease.

Purpose of reviewHormone therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). To reduce this risk, changes in dosage, composition and route of administration have been made over the years. This review provides a summary of the available evidence and an update on the most recent findings on the issue. Recent findingsContraceptives containing third-generation progestagens confer a higher risk of VTE than second-generation compounds. Little data are available on preparations containing less than 30 μg of estrogen, new progestagens or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices. Hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of VTE by 2 to 3-fold. Transdermal administration may be less thrombogenic than oral administration, while different estrogens and progestagens may carry a different risk. VTE risk is further increased in carriers of inherited thrombophilia. Despite a similar increase in relative risk of thrombosis associated with hormone therapy, absolute risk is lower in fertile women and higher in postmenopausal ones. Universal screening for thrombophilia before prescribing hormone replacement therapy might be cost-effective. SummaryCareful evaluation of individual risk factor is warranted before prescribing hormone therapy. Further investigations are needed to establish whether or not newer compounds are safer than older ones with respect to the risk of thrombosis.

Prothrombin A19911G polymorphism and the risk of venous thromboembolism

Summary.  Background: The A > G polymorphism at position 19911 of the prothrombin gene is associated with increased plasma prothrombin levels but its role as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not established. Objective: To investigate the role of prothrombin 19911 A > G polymorphism in the risk of VTE in patients with heterozygous prothrombin 20210GA or factor (F) V Leiden and in those without thrombophilia. Patients and methods: Case–control study of 793 patients with prothrombin 20210 GA (n = 167) or FV Leiden (n = 198), and without thrombophilia (n = 428), and of 795 healthy individuals with the corresponding coagulation profile, investigated for the presence of prothrombin 19911 A > G. Plasma prothrombin levels were measured in 342 individuals. Results: Prothrombin 19911 A > G did not increase the risk of VTE in carriers of prothrombin 20210 GA [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% CI (95% CI) 0.8–1.8] but significantly increased the risk in carriers of FV Leiden (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.4) and in patients without thrombophilia (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0–2.2). Higher plasma prothrombin levels in carriers of prothrombin 19911 A > G polymorphism than in non‐carriers were found among individuals without thrombophilia (P =0.05) and with FV Leiden (P = 0.07), but not in carriers of prothrombin 20210 GA (P = 0.2). Conclusions: Prothrombin 19911 A > G polymorphism was independently associated with a 1.5‐fold increased risk of VTE and increased 2‐fold the risk of VTE associated with FV Leiden, both increases statistically significant. No effect was observed in carriers of prothrombin 20210 GA, perhaps because this polymorphism has a stronger influence on plasma prothrombin levels than the prothrombin 19911 polymorphism.