Tuncay Kaner

The major complications of transpedicular vertebroplasty.

OBJECT Vertebroplasty is a well-known technique used to treat pain associated with vertebral compression fractures. Despite a success rate of up to 90% in different series, the procedure is often associated with major complications such as cord and root compression, epidural and subdural hematomas (SDHs), and pulmonary emboli, as well as other minor complications. In this study, the authors discuss the major complications of transpedicular vertebroplasty and their clinical implications during the postoperative course. METHODS Vertebroplasty was performed in 12 vertebrae of 7 patients. Five patients had osteoporotic compression fractures, 1 had tumoral compression fractures, and 1 had a traumatic fracture. Two patients had foraminal leakage, 1 had epidural leakage, 1 had subdural cement leakage, 2 had a spinal SDH, and the last had a split fracture after the procedure. RESULTS Three patients had paraparesis (2 had SDHs and 1 had epidural cement leakage), 3 had root symptoms, and 1 had lower back pain. Two of the 3 patients with paraparesis recovered after evacuation of the SDH and subdural cement; however, 1 patient with paraparesis did not recover after epidural cement leakage, despite cement evacuation. Two patients with foraminal leakage and 1 with subdural cement leakage had root symptoms and recovered after evacuation and conservative treatment. The patient with the split fracture had no neurological symptoms and recovered with conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS Transpedicular vertebroplasty may have major complications, such as a spinal SDH and/or cement leakage into the epidural and subdural spaces, even when performed by experienced spinal surgeons. Early diagnosis with CT and intervention may prevent worsening of these complications.

Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: two-year follow-up and comparison with fusion.

Background: A lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilization system (LPDSS) is an alternative to fusion for treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD). In this study, clinical and radiological results of one LPDSS (Saphinaz, Medikon AS, Turkey) were compared with results of rigid fixation after two-year follow-up. Methods: All patients had anteroposterior and lateral standing x-rays of the lumbar spine preoperatively and at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Lordosis of the lumbar spine, segmental lordosis and ratio of the height of the intervertebral disc spaces (IVS) measured preoperatively and at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. All patients underwent MRI and/or CT preoperatively, 3months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively. The ratio of intervertebral disc space to vertebral body height (IVS) and segmental and lumbar lordosis were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Pain scores were evaluated via Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: In both groups, the VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively. There was no difference in the scores between groups except that a lower VAS and ODI scores were observed after 3 months in the LPDSS group. In both groups, the IVS ratio remained unchanged between preoperative and postoperative conditions. The lumbar and segmental lordotic angles decreased insignificantly to preoperative levels in the months following surgery. Conclusions: Patients with LPDSS had equivalent relief of pain and maintenance of sagittal balance to patients with standard rigid screw-rod fixation. LPDSS appears to be a good alternative to rigid fixation.

Comparison of posterior dynamic and posterior rigid transpedicular stabilization with fusion to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis.

This article describes the clinical and radiological outcomes of a comparison of posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization and posterior rigid transpedicular stabilization with fusion after decompression in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. This prospective clinical and radiologic study was conducted between 2004 and 2007 and included 46 patients, of whom 33 were women (71.7%) and 13 were men (28.3%). Mean patient age was 61.67+/-10.80 years (range, 45-89 years). Twenty-six patients who underwent lumbar decompression and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization were followed for a mean of 38 months (range, 24-55 months). In the fusion group, 20 patients who underwent lumbar decompression and rigid stabilization with fusion were followed for a mean of 44 months (range, 26-64 months). The intervertebral space measurements of the dynamic group at the preoperative examination and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively were statistically significantly higher than the intervertebral space measurements of the fusion group (P<.05). In the dynamic group, complications occurred in 2 patients; the first was a screw malposition, which was improved with revision surgery within 1 month of the initial surgery, and the second was a fusion performed in the second year in 1 patient because the patient reported continued pain. In the fusion group, adjacent segment disease was observed in 1 patient, with subsequent reoperation. Lumbar decompression and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization yield satisfactory results in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and can be considered a valid alternative to fusion.

The Effect of Corticosteroid Administration on Soft-tissue Inflammation Associated With rhbmp-2 Use in a Rodent Model of Inflammation

Study Design. In vivo rodent model. Objective. Investigate the effect of systemic corticosteroid administration on soft-tissue inflammation after local delivery of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). Summary of Background Data. Corticosteroid use in cases of soft-tissue inflammation associated with the use of rhBMP-2 has been reported in clinical studies, but the effectiveness of its use and appropriate timing remain unclear. Methods. Absorbable collagen sponges were implanted with control or rhBMP-2 into the lumbar region of rats subcutaneously and intramuscularly. Four groups were studied: group I, control sponge only; group 2, BMP-2 sponge only; group III, BMP-2 sponge and preoperative intraperitoneal methylprednisolone (MPSS); group IV, BMP-2 sponge with MPSS given on day 2. Using magnetic resonance imaging, inflammation was assessed in terms of soft tissue edema volume at 0, 2, 4, and 7 days. Rats were sacrificed after 7 days for gross and histological analysis. Results. The peak mean intramuscular inflammatory volume occurred on day 2 in all groups. Group II (BMP-2 without MPSS) had a significantly higher peak mean inflammatory volume (405.46 mm3) on day 2 than that of groups I (266 mm3), III (278 mm3), and IV (291 mm3) (P = 0.001). No significant difference in intramuscular soft-tissue inflammation was observed between the control group and the groups receiving MPSS on day 0 or day 2 at any time point. No differences in the area of inflammatory cell infiltrate surrounding the sponge was observed histologically, after sacrificing them, in groups treated with BMP-2. Conclusion. Systemic MPSS administration reduced soft tissue edema associated with rhBMP-2 as measured by magnetic resonance imaging, but no effect was observed on the histological area of inflammation. Further studies are required to elucidate if there is any benefit to the use of corticosteroid administration in reducing the area of inflammation associated with the use of rhBMP-2.

Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system.

Fusion surgeries are still the gold standard in the treatment of the degenerative spine. Spinal fusion has some problems, however. Adjacent segment disease, donor place ailment, and the morbidity of the surgery has emerged as important problems over the years. As a consequence of such complications after fusion, the search for an alternative treatment for the degenerative spine widened. While trying to maintain the motion in the joint, dynamic stabilization aims to remove the pain by distributing the weight between anterior and posterior elements of the spine. Various new devices have now been developed for the dynamic stabilization of the spine. In this report, the dynamic stabilization devices of the spine are classified anew and, the authors explain briefly the historical evolution process, specialties, indications and contraindications of these dynamic stabilization devices.

Clinical Analysis of 21 Cases of Spinal Cord Ependymoma : Positive Clinical Results of Gross Total Resection

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical results of gross total resection in the surgical approach to spinal ependymoma. METHODS Between June 1995 and May 2009, 13 males and 8 females (mean age 34) diagnosed with intramedullary or extramedullary spinal ependymoma were surgically treated at our centre. The neurological and functional state of each patient were evaluated according to the modified McCormick scale. RESULTS The average follow-up duration was 54 months (ranging from 12 to 168 months). The locations of the lesions were: thoracic region (4, 19%), lumbar region (7, 34%), cervical region (4, 19%), cervicothoracic region (3, 14%) and conus medullaris (3, 14%). Four patients (19%) had deterioration of neurological function in the early postoperative period. The neurological function of three patients was completely recovered at the 6th postoperative month, while that of another patient was recovered at the 14th month. In the last assessment of neurological function, 20 patients (95%) were assessed as McCormick grade 1. No perioperative complications developed in any of our patients. In one patients 24-month assessment, tumour recurrence was observed. Re-operation was not performed and the patient was taken under observation. CONCLUSION Two determinants of good clinical results after spinal ependymoma surgery are a gross total resection of the tumour and a good neurological condition before the operation. Although neurological deficits in the early postoperative period can develop as a result of gross total tumour resection, significant improvement is observed six months after the operation.

The effects of human umbilical cord blood transplantation in rats with experimentally induced spinal cord injury.

OBJECT Even though there have been many efforts to recover neuronal dysfunction following spinal cord injuries, there are limitations to the treatment of these injuries. The purpose of this laboratory investigation was to determine the clinical and neurophysiological effects of human umbilical cord blood (HUCB) transplantation in a rat hemisection model of spinal cord injury. METHODS In this study, experimental hemisection of the thoracic spinal cord was performed in rats. The rats were divided into 4 groups (6 rats in each group). One group of rats (Group 1) underwent thoracic laminectomy only. Rats in Group 2 underwent laminectomy and right hemisection of the thoracic spinal cord. Rats in Group 3 underwent right hemisection and implantation of freshly obtained HUCB on Day 0 postinjury. Rats in Group 4 underwent hemisection and implantation of freshly obtained HUCB on Day 4 postinjury. Clinical evaluations of rat motor function included the following: neurological examination, Rotarod performance, and inclined plane tests. Rats also underwent reflex evaluation. RESULTS The neurological examinations revealed that the frequency of plegic rats was 70.8% at the beginning of the study across all 4 groups; this value decreased to 20.8% by the end of the study. The percentage of rats with a normal examination increased from 25% to 50%. The results of Rotarod performance and 8-week inclined plane performance tests showed statistical significance (p < 0.05) in an overall group comparison across all time points. At the end of the 8 weeks, a statistically significant difference was found in the inclined plane test results between rats in Groups 1 and 2. There were no statistically significant differences between Groups 1, 3, and 4 (p < 0.05). When the reflex responses of the hemisectioned sides were compared, statistically significant differences were detected between groups (p < 0.05). All groups were significantly different with regard to the right-side reflex response score (p < 0.05). Spinal cord preparations of rats in all groups were examined for histopathological changes. CONCLUSIONS Human umbilical cord blood is stem cell rich and easily available, and it carries less risk of inducing a graft-versus-host reaction in the recipient. Human umbilical cord blood serum is also noted to contain stem cell–promoting factors, which is why cell isolation was not used in this study. Freshly obtained cord blood was also used because storage of cord blood has been reported to have some negative effects on stem cells. Transplantation of freshly obtained HUCB into the hemisectioned spinal cord experimental model demonstrated clinical and neurophysiological improvement.

Clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated with lumbar decompression and the Cosmic "semi-rigid" posterior system.

Background Although some investigators believe that the rate of postoperative instability is low after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery, the majority believe that postoperative instability usually develops. Decompression alone and decompression with fusion have been widely used for years in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Nevertheless, in recent years several biomechanical studies have shown that posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization provides stabilization that is like the rigid stabilization systems of the spine. Recently, posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization has been more commonly used as an alternative treatment option (rather than rigid stabilization with fusion) for the treatment of degenerative spines with chronic instability and for the prevention of possible instability after decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Methods A total of 30 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (19 women and 11 men) were included in the study group. The mean age was 67.3 years (range, 40–85 years). Along with lumbar decompression, a posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization (dynamic transpedicular screw–rigid rod system) without fusion was performed in all patients. Clinical and radiologic results for patients were evaluated during follow-up visits at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results The mean follow-up period was 42.93 months (range, 24–66 months). A clinical evaluation of patients showed that, compared with preoperative assessments, statistically significant improvements were observed in the Oswestry and visual analog scale scores in the last follow-up control. Compared with preoperative values, there were no statistically significant differences in radiologic evaluations, such as segmental lordosis angle (α) scores (P = .125) and intervertebral distance scores (P = .249). There were statistically significant differences between follow-up lumbar lordosis scores (P = .048). There were minor complications, including a subcutaneous wound infection in 2 cases, a dural tear in 2 cases, cerebrospinal fluid fistulas in 1 case, a urinary tract infection in 1 case, and urinary retention in 1 case. We observed L5 screw loosening in 1 of the 3-level decompression cases. No screw breakage was observed and no revision surgery was performed in any of these cases. Conclusions Posterior dynamic stabilization without fusion applied to lumbar decompression leads to better clinical and radiologic results in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. To avoid postoperative instability, especially in elderly patients who undergo degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis surgery with chronic instability, the application of decompression with posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization is likely an important alternative surgical option to fusion, because it does not have fusion-related side effects, is easier to perform than fusion, requires a shorter operation time, and has low morbidity and complication rates.

The relation of matrix metalloproteinase 1, 2, 3 expressions with clinical and radiological findings in primary and recurrent lumbar disc herniations.

AIM In this study, our aim was to examine if matrix metalloproteinase expressions (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3) in patients operated with a lumbar disc hernia diagnosis are different in terms of clinical and neuroradiological findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 80 patients treated with micro discectomy for lumbar disc hernia. Degeneration was scored via magnetic resonance (MR) images. MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-3 antibodies were used for immunohistochemical evaluation of degenerated disc materials. MMP expressions were compared between primary and recurrent cases, and correlation analysis was conducted. RESULTS Discectomy material showed higher expression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 in cases of recurrent lumbar disc herniation than in primary herniation. There was no significant relationship between MMP expression and MR degeneration score. CONCLUSION MMP-1 and MMP-3 expressions were significantly higher in recurrent cases in terms of magnetic resonance degeneration score. We assume that the higher co-expression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 might be used in targeted treatment regiemens in patients with recurrent LDH.

Posterior Dynamic Stabilization in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND A prospective pilot study was designed to evaluate the role of a posterior dynamic stabilization technique in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease. Posterior dynamic stabilization with a hinged screw is a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. The traditional surgical treatment is to apply a fusion procedure. However, numerous reports showed unsatisfactory clinical outcomes even when patients have satisfactory radiological outcomes following fusion procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included patients who were surgically treated with a dynamic stabilization technique due to painful degenerative disc disease. Clinical and radiological findings for the 20 participating patients were analyzed in a 2-year follow-up study. Preoperative and postoperative data at the 3 (rd), 12 (th) and 24 (th) month were collected for both clinical and radiological outcomes. Statistical analyses between preoperative and postoperative data were performed using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS The clinical outcome measurements (VAS, ODI) showed significant improvement in all postoperative measurements compared to preoperative values. The mean preoperative visual analogue score (VAS, 7.9) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI 59.2) significantly decreased to 0.8 for VAS and 9.2 for ODI, at 2 years post-operation (p<0.05). The radiological studies showed no significant changes between pre- and postoperative values, in all parameters. There was no mortality or morbidity. CONCLUSIONS The results of this pilot study are encouraging. Dynamic stabilization may be an effective technique in the surgical treatment of painful degenerative disc disease. A larger series study, with longer follow-up periods and with control groups is needed to determine the success and safety of posterior dynamic stabilization in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease.