Ueli Schibler

A Serum Shock Induces Circadian Gene Expression in Mammalian Tissue Culture Cells

The treatment of cultured rat-1 fibroblasts or H35 hepatoma cells with high concentrations of serum induces the circadian expression of various genes whose transcription also oscillates in living animals. Oscillating genes include rper1 and rper2 (rat homologs of the Drosophila clock gene period), and the genes encoding the transcription factors Rev-Erb alpha, DBP, and TEF. In rat-1 fibroblasts, up to three consecutive daily oscillations with an average period length of 22.5 hr could be recorded. The temporal sequence of the various mRNA accumulation cycles is the same in cultured cells and in vivo. The serum shock of rat-1 fibroblasts also results in a transient stimulation of c-fos and rper expression and thus mimics light-induced immediate-early gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

The Orphan Nuclear Receptor REV-ERBα Controls Circadian Transcription within the Positive Limb of the Mammalian Circadian Oscillator

Mammalian circadian rhythms are generated by a feedback loop in which BMAL1 and CLOCK, players of the positive limb, activate transcription of the cryptochrome and period genes, components of the negative limb. Bmal1 and Per transcription cycles display nearly opposite phases and are thus governed by different mechanisms. Here, we identify the orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha as the major regulator of cyclic Bmal1 transcription. Circadian Rev-erbalpha expression is controlled by components of the general feedback loop. Thus, REV-ERBalpha constitutes a molecular link through which components of the negative limb drive antiphasic expression of components of the positive limb. While REV-ERBalpha influences the period length and affects the phase-shifting properties of the clock, it is not required for circadian rhythm generation.

Tissue-specific in vitro transcription from the mouse albumin promoter

Transcriptionally active nuclear extracts have been prepared from rat liver, brain, and spleen. The adenovirus-2 major late promoter directs efficient transcription by RNA polymerase II in all of these extracts, whereas the promoter of the mouse albumin gene is significantly used only in the liver extract. Albumin sequences located between -170 and -55 are required for this liver-specific in vitro transcription, since deletion of this region results in almost a 100-fold reduction in transcription. In addition, insertion of these sequences in either orientation upstream of the parotid-specific Amy-1 promoter, which is poorly transcribed in the liver extract, increases the activity of this promoter to a level comparable to that observed for the albumin promoter.

A Liver-Enriched Transcriptional Activator Protein, LAP, and a Transcriptional Inhibitory Protein, LIP, Are Translated from the Same mRNA

LAP, a transcriptional activator, and LIP, a transcriptional repressor, are translated from a single mRNA species by using two AUGs within the same reading frame. These two proteins share the 145 C-terminal amino acids that contain the basic DNA-binding domain and the leucine zipper dimerization helix. Probably owing to its higher affinity for its DNA cognate sequences, LIP can attenuate the transcriptional stimulation by LAP in substoichiometric amounts. As revealed by transient transfection experiments, a moderate increase in the LAP/LIP ratio results in a significantly higher transcriptional activation of an appropriate target gene. The LAP/LIP ratio increases about 5-fold during terminal rat liver differentiation and is thus likely to modulate the activity of LAP in the intact animal.

Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells.

The mammalian circadian timing system is composed of a central pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the brain and subsidiary oscillators in most peripheral cell types. While oscillators in SCN neurons are known to function in a self-sustained fashion, peripheral oscillators have been thought to damp rapidly when disconnected from the control exerted by the SCN. Using two reporter systems, we monitored circadian gene expression in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts in real time and in individual cells. In conjunction with mathematical modeling and cell co-culture experiments, these data demonstrated that in vitro cultured fibroblasts harbor self-sustained and cell-autonomous circadian clocks similar to those operative in SCN neurons. Circadian gene expression in fibroblasts continues during cell division, and our experiments unveiled unexpected interactions between the circadian clock and the cell division clock. Specifically, the circadian oscillator gates cytokinesis to defined time windows, and mitosis elicits phase shifts in circadian cycles.

A Web of Circadian Pacemakers

The mammalian circadian timing system is composed of almost as many individual clocks as there are cells. These countless oscillators have to be synchronized by a central pacemaker to coordinate temporal physiology and behavior. Recently, there has been some progress in understanding the relationship and communication mechanisms between central and peripheral clocks.

Multiple signaling pathways elicit circadian gene expression in cultured Rat-1 fibroblasts

In mammals, all overt circadian rhythms are thought to be coordinated by a central pacemaker residing in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) [1]. The phase of this pacemaker is entrained by photic cues via the retino-hypothalamic tract. Circadian clocks probably rely on a feedback loop in the expression of certain clock genes (reviewed in [2,3]). Surprisingly, however, such molecular oscillators are not only operative in pacemaker cells, such as SCN neurons, but also in many peripheral tissues and even in cell lines kept in vitro [4-7]. For example, a serum shock can induce circadian gene expression in cultured Rat-1 fibroblasts [5]. This treatment also results in a rapid surge of expression of the clock genes Per1 and Per2, similar to that observed in the SCNs of animals receiving a light pulse [8-10]. Serum induction of Per1 and Per2 transcription does not require ongoing protein synthesis [5] and must therefore be accomplished by direct signaling pathways. Here, we show that cAMP, protein kinase C, glucocorticoid hormones and Ca2+ can all trigger a transient surge of Per1 transcription and elicit rhythmic gene expression in Rat-1 cells. We thus suspect that the SCN pacemaker may exploit multiple chemical cues to synchronize peripheral oscillators in vivo.

Peripheral circadian oscillators in mammals: time and food.

Peripheral cells from mammalian tissues, while perfectly capable of circadian rhythm generation, are not light sensitive and thus have to be entrained by nonphotic cues. Feeding time is the dominant zeitgeber for peripheral mammalian clocks: Daytime feeding of nocturnal laboratory rodents completely inverts the phase of circadian gene expression in many tissues, including liver, heart, kidney, and pancreas, but it has no effect on the SCN pacemaker. It is thus plausible that in intact animals, the SCN synchronizes peripheral clocks primarily through temporal feeding patterns that are imposed through behavioral restactivity cycles. In addition, body temperature rhythms, which are themselves dependent on both feeding patterns and rest-activity cycles, can sustain circadian, clock gene activity in vivo and in vitro. The SCN may also influence the phase of rhythmic gene expression in peripheral tissues through direct chemical pathways. In fact, many chemical signals induce circadian gene expression in tissue culture cells. Some of these have been shown to elicit phase shifts when injected into intact animals and are thus candidates for physiologically relevant timing cues. While the response of the SCN to light is strictly gated to respond only during the night, peripheral oscillators can be chemically phase shifted throughout the day. For example, injection of dexamethasone, a glucocorticoid receptor agonist, resets the phase of circadian liver gene expression during the entire 24-h day. Given the bewildering array of agents capable of influencing peripheral clocks, the identification of physiologically relevant agents used by the SCN to synchronize peripheral clocks will clearly be an arduous undertaking. Nevertheless, we feel that experimental systems by which this enticing problem can be tackled are now at hand.

Glucocorticoid hormones inhibit food‐induced phase‐shifting of peripheral circadian oscillators

The circadian timing system in mammals is composed of a master pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus and slave clocks in most peripheral cell types. The phase of peripheral clocks can be completely uncoupled from the SCN pacemaker by restricted feeding. Thus, feeding time, while not affecting the phase of the SCN pacemaker, is a dominant Zeitgeber for peripheral circadian oscillators. Here we show that the phase resetting in peripheral clocks of nocturnal mice is slow when feeding time is changed from night to day and rapid when switched back from day to night. Unexpectedly, the inertia in daytime feeding‐induced phase resetting of circadian gene expression in liver and kidney is not an intrinsic property of peripheral oscillators, but is caused by glucocorticoid signaling. Thus, glucocorticoid hormones inhibit the uncoupling of peripheral and central circadian oscillators by altered feeding time.

The mammalian circadian timing system: from gene expression to physiology

Many physiological processes in organisms from bacteria to man are rhythmic, and some of these are controlled by self-sustained oscillators that persist in the absence of external time cues. Circadian clocks are perhaps the best characterized biological oscillators and they exist in virtually all light-sensitive organisms. In mammals, they influence nearly all aspects of physiology and behavior, including sleep-wake cycles, cardiovascular activity, endocrinology, body temperature, renal activity, physiology of the gastro-intestinal tract, and hepatic metabolism. The master pacemaker is located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, two small groups of neurons in the ventral part of the hypothalamus. However, most peripheral body cells contain self-sustained circadian oscillators with a molecular makeup similar to that of SCN (suprachiasmatic nucleus) neurons. This organization implies that the SCN must synchronize countless subsidiary oscillators in peripheral tissues, in order to coordinate cyclic physiology. In this review, we will discuss some recent studies on the structure and putative functions of the mammalian circadian timing system, but we will also point out some apparent inconsistencies in the currently publicized model for rhythm generation.