Ulla Lepola

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fixed-dose desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/day for major depressive disorder in a placebo-controlled trial.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) 50 and 100 mg/day for major depressive disorder (MDD). A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Europe and South Africa. Outpatients with MDD received fixed-dose desvenlafaxine (50 or 100 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score; secondary measures included Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scores. The intent-to-treat population included 483 patients: desvenlafaxine 50 mg (n=164), desvenlafaxine 100 mg (n=158), and placebo (n=161). At the last-observation-carried-forward analysis (final evaluation) using analysis of covariance, adjusted mean changes from baseline on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were significantly greater for both desvenlafaxine 50 mg (−13.2; P=0.002) and 100 mg (−13.7; P<0.001) versus placebo (−10.7). Significant differences on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scores were observed for desvenlafaxine 50 mg (P=0.002) and 100 mg (P<0.001) versus placebo. Both doses of desvenlafaxine were generally well tolerated. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, dizziness, insomnia, constipation, fatigue, anxiety, and decreased appetite. Fixed doses of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/day are safe, generally well tolerated, and effective at a clinically relevant level for the treatment of MDD.

Do equivalent doses of escitalopram and citalopram have similar efficacy? A pooled analysis of two positive placebo-controlled studies in major depressive disorder.

Escitalopram is the S-enantiomer of citalopram. In this study, we compared the efficacy of equivalent dosages of escitalopram and citalopram in the treatment of moderate to severe major depressive disorder (MDD), based on data from two, pooled, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of escitalopram in which citalopram was the active reference. The primary efficacy parameter was the mean change from baseline in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Significant differences in favour of escitalopram were observed for the MADRS [P<0.05, observed cases (OC)/last observation carried forward (LOCF)] and Clinical Global Improvement–Severity of Illness scores (CGI-S; P<0.05, OC/LOCF). Escitalopram separated from placebo at week 1 on the primary efficacy parameter, whereas citalopram first separated from placebo at week 6. An analysis of time to response showed that escitalopram-treated patients responded significantly faster to treatment than citalopram-treated patients (P<0.01). More patients responded to and achieved remission with escitalopram than to citalopram (P<0.05, OC). The HAMD scale was only used in the fixed-dose study, where escitalopram-treated patients had a significant reduction in HAMD-17 total score at week 8 compared to citalopram-treated patients (P<0.05, OC/LOCF). In the pooled subpopulation of severely ill patients (MADRS≥30), escitalopram-treated patients showed greater improvement than citalopram-treated patients (P<0.05, LOCF/OC). Escitalopram showed consistently superior efficacy compared to citalopram in the treatment of moderate to severe MDD on all efficacy parameters, and was similarly well tolerated.

Abnormal regional benzodiazepine receptor uptake in the prefrontal cortex in patients with panic disorder.

The neuroanatomical networks involved in the initiation of panic attack and the maintenance of panic disorder are poorly understood. This study aimed to elucidate the possible abnormalities in benzodiazepine receptor uptake in the brain of patients with panic disorder. Seventeen unmedicated patients with panic disorder were investigated using 123I-imoazenil single photon emission tomography (SPET). Seventeen healthy age- and sex-matched volunteers served as controls. The SPET scan was taken 90 min after injection of tracer. Eleven of 17 patients (65%) showed an increased (>2 S.D. higher than the mean of the controls) right-to-left ratio of benzodiazepine receptor uptake in the prefrontal cortex. Also, the mean right-to-left ratio of benzodiazepine receptor uptake in all 17 patients with panic disorder was higher than in the controls (P<0.001). Our SPET study demonstrated focally altered benzodiazepine receptor uptake in the prefrontal cortices in patients with panic disorder. Magnetic resonance imaging indicated that the affected region was located in the right middle and inferior frontal gyri. The deterioration in information processing in the right prefrontal cortex may be implicated in the generation of panic disorder.

Citalopram in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open pilot study

Obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common anxiety disorder, which often causes significant impairment of the affected individuals social, occupational or interpersonal functioning. Previous reports suggest that the disorder may be treated with the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine, and also with the more recently introduced selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline and paroxetine. The present 24‐week open pilot study was designed to examine the efficacy, appropriate dose range, side‐effects and clinical usefulness of citalopram in OCD. A total of 29 OCD patients were included in the study, of whom 76% showed alleviation of symptoms as evaluated by various self‐and observer‐rated scales, such as the Yale‐Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. In most cases the citalopram doses used were in most cases 40 or 60 mg daily, and the treatment was well tolerated. The most commonly experienced adverse events during the study were nausea, vomiting, increased dreaming and decreased sleep. Diminished sexual desire and orgasmic dysfunction were also reported. Despite having the limitations of an open study, our results suggest that citalopram may be effective in the treatment of obsessive‐compulsive disorder.

EEG and CT findings in patients with panic disorder

Fifty-four patients with panic disorder were investigated using extensive electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings and computerized tomography (CT). Fifteen (28%) of these patients had previously been treated for temporal lobe epilepsy or were considered to have another neurological disorder. EEG recordings showed increased slow-wave activity in 13 (24%) patients and CT scan revealed incidental abnormalities in 6 (20%) of the 30 patients investigated. Taking into account the limitations of the methods applied, the present results indicate that clear-cut epileptic EEG patterns only rarely occur in panic disorder: the vast majority of panic patients exhibit normal EEG and CT findings.

Fluvoxamine increases the clozapine serum levels significantly

In this case report we describe an interaction between clozapine and fluvoxamine in two physically healthy patients meeting the DSM-IIIR criteria for paranoid schizophrenia. The substantial rise of clozapine serum levels suggest that caution should be exercised when combining fluvoxamine with clozapine as the clozapine concentration may increase by a factor of 5-10.

Sleep in panic disorders.

Panic disorder is a common anxiety disorder, which has relatively often its onset during adolescence. Besides panic attacks and avoidance behavior the patients often have sleep disturbances. They suffer from insomnia, nocturnal panic attacks, fear of going to bed or falling asleep and drug- or alcohol-related symptoms such as withdrawal phenomena.

Efficacy and tolerability of flexibly-dosed adjunct TC-5214 (dexmecamylamine) in patients with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to prior antidepressant

This paper reports the efficacy and tolerability of the nicotinic channel modulator TC-5214 (dexmecamylamine) as adjunct therapy for patients with major depressive disorder who have an inadequate response to initial antidepressant treatment in 2 Phase III studies. These double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (NCT01157078, D4130C00002 [Study 002] conducted in the US and India; NCT01180400, D4130C00003 [Study 003] conducted in Europe) comprised 8 weeks of open-label antidepressant treatment followed by 8 weeks of active treatment during which patients were randomized to flexibly-dosed TC-5214 1-4 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo as an adjunct to ongoing therapy with SSRI/SNRI. The primary efficacy endpoint in both studies was change in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from randomization (week 8) to treatment end (week 16). Secondary endpoints included change in Sheehan Disability Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item scores. Study 002 randomized 319 patients and Study 003 randomized 295 patients to TC-5214 or placebo. At treatment end, no significant differences were seen for change in MADRS total score with TC-5214 versus placebo. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in any of the secondary endpoints. The most commonly reported (≥ 10%) adverse events with TC-5214 in these studies were constipation and headache. In these 2 flexibly-dosed studies, no specific therapeutic effects were observed for TC-5214 (1-4 mg BID) adjunct to antidepressant in the primary endpoint or any secondary endpoint; however, TC-5214 was generally well tolerated. In conclusion, no antidepressant effect of TC-5214 was observed in these studies.

A naturalistic 6-year follow-up study of patients with panic disorder.

Lepola U, Koponen H, Leinonen E. A naturalistic 6‐year follow‐up study of patients with panic disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996: 93: 181–183.

Three-year follow-up of patients with panic disorder after short-term treatment with alprazolam and imipramine

Fifty-five patients with moderate to severe panic disorder were treated for 9 weeks with alprazolam or imipramine and were then, except for one patient who had committed suicide, re-examined after on average 3 years of treatment. At follow-up most patients (74%) did not suffer from panic attacks at all. In the beginning of the study 87% exhibited phobic avoidance behaviour but after 3 years 68% no longer revealed phobic behaviour. At follow-up 28% of the patients were no longer having psychotropic drug treatment and 20% were completely free of overt psychopathology. No tolerance phenomena were associated with the long-term medication applied in the study.