Ulrich Leodolter
University of Vienna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ulrich Leodolter.
NeuroImage | 2001
Claus Lamm; Christian Windischberger; Ulrich Leodolter; Ewald Moser; Herbert Bauer
A strong correspondence has been repeatedly observed between actually performed and mentally imagined object rotation. This suggests an overlap in the brain regions involved in these processes. Functional neuroimaging studies have consistently revealed parietal and occipital cortex activity during dynamic visuospatial imagery. However, results concerning the involvement of higher-order cortical motor areas have been less consistent. We investigated if and when premotor structures are active during processing of a three-dimensional cube comparison task that requires dynamic visuospatial imagery. In order to achieve a good temporal and spatial resolution, single-trial functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and scalp-recorded event-related slow cortical potentials (SCPs) were recorded from the same subjects in two separate measurement sessions. In order to reduce inter-subject variability in brain activity due to individual differences, only male subjects (n = 13) with high task-specific ability were investigated. Functional MRI revealed consistent bilateral activity in the occipital (Brodmann area BA18/19) and parietal cortex (BA7), in lateral and medial premotor areas (BA6), the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA9), and the anterior insular cortex. The time-course of SCPs indicated that task-related activity in these areas commenced approximately 550-650 ms after stimulus presentation and persisted until task completion. These results provide strong and consistent evidence that the human premotor cortex is involved in dynamic visuospatial imagery.
International Journal of Psychophysiology | 1997
Oliver Vitouch; Herbert Bauer; Georg Gittler; M. Leodolter; Ulrich Leodolter
Whether essential processing of spatial information is lateralized asymmetrically in the human cortex is still a matter of debate. In this study, items of an Item Response Theory calibrated test for spatial ability were used to ensure stimulus homogeneity and validity. Subjects were preselected as extreme groups of good and poor spatializers. Mapping of true DC-recorded slow potential shifts (SPSs) resulted in distinctly discriminable topographies with spatial and verbal-analytic material as well as with spatial performance groups within the spatial block. Left fronto-central negativity maxima in the verbal condition clearly contrasted with occipito-parietal peak activity in the spatial condition. Poor spatializers showed higher amplitudes as well as a tendency to asymmetric activity in right parietal (parieto-temporal) areas, whereas in good spatializers the activity was localized symmetrically in occipital and occipito-parietal regions. The findings emphasize the importance of the right posterior cortex for spatial processing (negativity maxima at occipital and right parietal sites) and suggest a task-specific lower cortical efficiency or, seen from a processing perspective, a higher Investment of Cortical Effort (ICE) on the part of poor spatializers.
Brain Topography | 2001
Claus Lamm; Christian Windischberger; Ulrich Leodolter; Ewald Moser; Herbert Bauer
Accurate co-registration of MRI and EEG data is indispensable for the correct interpretation of EEG maps or source localizations in relation to brain anatomy derived from MRI. In this study, a method for the co-registration of EEG and MRI data is presented. The method consists of an iterative matching of EEG-electrode based reconstructions of the scalp surface to scalp-segmented MRIs. EEG-electrode based surface reconstruction is achieved via spline interpolation of individually digitized 3D-electrode coordinates. In contrast to other approaches, neither fiducial determination nor any additional provisions (such as bite bars, other co-registration devices or head shape digitization) are required, and co-registration errors associated with inaccurate fiducial determination are avoided. The accuracy of the method was estimated by calculating the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation of spline interpolated and MRI-segmented surface reconstructions in 20 subjects. In addition, the distance between co-registered and genuine electrode coordinates was assessed via a simulation study, in which surface reconstruction was based on virtual electrodes determined on the scalp surface of a high-resolution MRI data set. The mean RMS deviation of surface reconstructions was 2.43 mm, and the maximal distance between any two matched surface points was 5.06 mm. The simulated co-registration revealed a mean deviation of genuine and co-registered electrode coordinates of 0.61 mm. It is concluded that surface matching using spline interpolated reconstructions of scalp surfaces is a precise and highly practicable method to co-register EEG and MRI data.
International Journal of Psychophysiology | 1999
Eva Fretska; Herbert Bauer; M. Leodolter; Ulrich Leodolter
This study investigated cortical steady potential changes in 18 subjects while processing a series of solvable arithmetic items (induction of control) that became unsolvable (withdrawal of control). Two different phases of induction and withdrawal of control (early and late) were dealt with separately in the analyses. The DC EEG was recorded from 20 locations. In all experimental conditions the overall slow potential topographical pattern did not change. However, negative-going DC shifts at occipito-parietal and left posterior-frontal regions were observed during induction of control whereas a generalized positive-going DC shift developed during phases of withdrawal of control. This positive-going shift persisted for the duration of the item presentation, resulting in pronounced positive values at temporal sites. The authors assume that temporal lobe activity (inferior and/or ventral surface) correlated to emotional/motivational processes that was picked up via the linked mastoid reference locations contributed essentially to these observed phenomena.
Journal of Neuroscience Methods | 2010
Florian Ph.S. Fischmeister; Ulrich Leodolter; Christian Windischberger; C.H. Kasess; Veronika Schöpf; Ewald Moser; Herbert Bauer
Throughout recent years there has been an increasing interest in studying unconscious visual processes. Such conditions of unawareness are typically achieved by either a sufficient reduction of the stimulus presentation time or visual masking. However, there are growing concerns about the reliability of the presentation devices used. As all these devices show great variability in presentation parameters, the processing of visual stimuli becomes dependent on the display-device, e.g. minimal changes in the physical stimulus properties may have an enormous impact on stimulus processing by the sensory system and on the actual experience of the stimulus. Here we present a custom-built three-way LC-shutter-tachistoscope which allows experimental setups with both, precise and reliable stimulus delivery, and millisecond resolution. This tachistoscope consists of three LCD-projectors equipped with zoom lenses to enable stimulus presentation via a built-in mirror-system onto a back projection screen from an adjacent room. Two high-speed liquid crystal shutters are mounted serially in front of each projector to control the stimulus duration. To verify the intended properties empirically, different sequences of presentation times were performed while changes in optical power were measured using a photoreceiver. The obtained results demonstrate that interfering variabilities in stimulus parameters and stimulus rendering are markedly reduced. Together with the possibility to collect external signals and to send trigger-signals to other devices, this tachistoscope represents a highly flexible and easy to set up research tool not only for the study of unconscious processing in the brain but for vision research in general.
Journal of Psychophysiology | 2010
Peter Walla; Maria Richter; Stella Farber; Ulrich Leodolter; Herbert Bauer
NeuroImage | 2000
Herbert Bauer; Claus Lamm; Stefan Holzreiter; Igor Holländer; Ulrich Leodolter; M. Leodolter
NeuroImage | 2006
Juergen Pripfl; Simon Robinson; Ulrich Leodolter; Ewald Moser; Herbert Bauer
Journal of Neuroscience Methods | 2008
Sylvia Terbeck; Paul Chesterman; Florian Ph.S. Fischmeister; Ulrich Leodolter; Herbert Bauer
International Journal of Psychophysiology | 2008
F.Ph.S. Fischmeister; Ulrich Leodolter; E. Minarik; Herbert Bauer