Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher
Heidelberg University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher.
The Lancet | 2010
Js Vaidya; David Joseph; Jeffrey Tobias; Max Bulsara; Frederik Wenz; Christobel Saunders; Michael Alvarado; Henrik Flyger; Samuele Massarut; Wolfgang Eiermann; Mohammed Keshtgar; John Dewar; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Marc Sütterlin; Laura Esserman; Helle M R Holtveg; Mario Roncadin; Steffi Pigorsch; M Metaxas; Mary Falzon; April Matthews; Tammy Corica; Norman R. Williams; Michael Baum
BACKGROUND After breast-conserving surgery, 90% of local recurrences occur within the index quadrant despite the presence of multicentric cancers elsewhere in the breast. Thus, restriction of radiation therapy to the tumour bed during surgery might be adequate for selected patients. We compared targeted intraoperative radiotherapy with the conventional policy of whole breast external beam radiotherapy. METHODS Having safely piloted the new technique of single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy with Intrabeam, we launched the TARGIT-A trial on March 24, 2000. In this prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial, women aged 45 years or older with invasive ductal breast carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery were enrolled from 28 centres in nine countries. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive targeted intraoperative radiotherapy or whole breast external beam radiotherapy, with blocks stratified by centre and by timing of delivery of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy. Neither patients nor investigators or their teams were masked to treatment assignment. Postoperative discovery of predefined factors (eg, lobular carcinoma) could trigger addition of external beam radiotherapy to targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (in an expected 15% of patients). The primary outcome was local recurrence in the conserved breast. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 2.5% in the primary endpoint. All randomised patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00983684. FINDINGS 1113 patients were randomly allocated to targeted intraoperative radiotherapy and 1119 were allocated to external beam radiotherapy. Of 996 patients who received the allocated treatment in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy group, 854 (86%) received targeted intraoperative radiotherapy only and 142 (14%) received targeted intraoperative radiotherapy plus external beam radiotherapy. 1025 (92%) patients in the external beam radiotherapy group received the allocated treatment. At 4 years, there were six local recurrences in the intraoperative radiotherapy group and five in the external beam radiotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of local recurrence in the conserved breast at 4 years was 1.20% (95% CI 0.53-2.71) in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy and 0.95% (0.39-2.31) in the external beam radiotherapy group (difference between groups 0.25%, -1.04 to 1.54; p=0.41). The frequency of any complications and major toxicity was similar in the two groups (for major toxicity, targeted intraoperative radiotherapy, 37 [3.3%] of 1113 vs external beam radiotherapy, 44 [3.9%] of 1119; p=0.44). Radiotherapy toxicity (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3) was lower in the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy group (six patients [0.5%]) than in the external beam radiotherapy group (23 patients [2.1%]; p=0.002). INTERPRETATION For selected patients with early breast cancer, a single dose of radiotherapy delivered at the time of surgery by use of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy should be considered as an alternative to external beam radiotherapy delivered over several weeks. FUNDING University College London Hospitals (UCLH)/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, UCLH Charities, National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, Ninewells Cancer Campaign, National Health and Medical Research Council, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2008
Grit Welzel; Katharina Fleckenstein; Jörg Schaefer; Brigitte Hermann; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Sabine K. Mai; Frederik Wenz
PURPOSE To prospectively compare the effect of prophylactic and therapeutic whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) on memory function in patients with and without brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS Adult patients with and without brain metastases (n = 44) were prospectively evaluated with serial cognitive testing, before RT (T0), after starting RT (T1), at the end of RT (T2), and 6-8 weeks (T3) after RT completion. Data were obtained from small-cell lung cancer patients treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation, patients with brain metastases treated with therapeutic cranial irradiation (TCI), and breast cancer patients treated with RT to the breast. RESULTS Before therapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation patients performed worse than TCI patients or than controls on most test scores. During and after WBRT, verbal memory function was influenced by pretreatment cognitive status (p < 0.001) and to a lesser extent by WBRT. Acute (T1) radiation effects on verbal memory function were only observed in TCI patients (p = 0.031). Subacute (T3) radiation effects on verbal memory function were observed in both TCI and prophylactic cranial irradiation patients (p = 0.006). These effects were more pronounced in patients with above-average performance at baseline. Visual memory and attention were not influenced by WBRT. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study have shown that WBRT causes cognitive dysfunction immediately after the beginning of RT in patients with brain metastases only. At 6-8 weeks after the end of WBRT, cognitive dysfunction was seen in patients with and without brain metastases. Because cognitive dysfunction after WBRT is restricted to verbal memory, patients should not avoid WBRT because of a fear of neurocognitive side effects.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009
Frank Lohr; Mostafa El-Haddad; Barbara Dobler; Roland Grau; Hansjoerg Wertz; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Volker Steil; Yasser Abo Madyan; Frederik Wenz
PURPOSE Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning has reduced the cardiac dose in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer; however, the overall cardiac toxicity is still an issue because of more aggressive adjuvant treatment. Toxicity models have suggested that a reduction of the heart volume treated to high doses might be particularly advantageous. We compared aperture-based multifield intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans to 3D-planned tangent fields using dose-volume histograms, cardiac toxicity risk, and the robustness to positioning errors. METHODS AND MATERIALS For 14 computed tomography data sets of patients with left-sided breast cancer (unfavorable thoracic geometry), a 3D treatment plan and an IMRT plan were created. The dose-volume histograms were evaluated for the target and risk organs. Excess risk of cardiac mortality was calculated for both approaches using a relative seriality model. Positioning errors were simulated by moving the isocenter. RESULTS IMRT reduced the maximal dose to the left ventricle by a mean of 30.9% (49.14 vs. 33.97 Gy). The average heart volume exposed to >30 Gy was reduced from 45 cm(3) to 5.84 cm(3). The mean dose to the left ventricle was reduced by an average of 10.7% (10.86 vs. 9.7 Gy), and the mean heart dose increased by an average of 24% (from 6.85 to 8.52 Gy). The model-based reduction of the probability for excess therapy-associated cardiac death risk was from 6.03% for the 3D plans to 0.25% for the IMRT plans. CONCLUSION Aperture-based IMRT for left-sided breast cancer significantly reduces the maximal dose to the left ventricle, which might translate into reduced cardiac mortality. Biological modeling might aid in deciding to treat with IMRT but has to be validated prospectively.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011
Js Vaidya; Michael Baum; Jeffrey Tobias; Frederik Wenz; Samuele Massarut; Mohammed Keshtgar; Basil S. Hilaris; Christobel Saunders; Norman R. Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Tammy Corica; Mario Roncadin; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Marc Sütterlin; Max Bulsara; David Joseph
PURPOSE We have previously shown that delivering targeted radiotherapy to the tumour bed intraoperatively is feasible and desirable. In this study, we report on the feasibility, safety, and long-term efficacy of TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy (Targit), using the Intrabeam system. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 300 cancers in 299 unselected patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and Targit as a boost to the tumor bed. After lumpectomy, a single dose of 20 Gy was delivered intraoperatively. Postoperative external beam whole-breast radiotherapy excluded the usual boost. We also performed a novel individualized case control (ICC) analysis that computed the expected recurrences for the cohort by estimating the risk of recurrence for each patient using their characteristics and follow-up period. RESULTS The treatment was well tolerated. The median follow up was 60.5 months (range, 10-122 months). Eight patients have had ipsilateral recurrence: 5-year Kaplan Meier estimate for ipsilateral recurrence is 1.73% (SE 0.77), which compares well with that seen in the boosted patients in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study (4.3%) and the UK STAndardisation of breast RadioTherapy study (2.8%). In a novel ICC analysis of 242 of the patients, we estimated that there should be 11.4 recurrences; in this group, only 6 recurrences were observed. CONCLUSIONS Lumpectomy and Targit boost combined with external beam radiotherapy results in a low local recurrence rate in a standard risk patient population. Accurate localization and the immediacy of the treatment that has a favorable effect on tumour microenvironment may contribute to this effect. These long-term data establish the long-term safety and efficacy of the Targit technique and generate the hypothesis that Targit boost might be superior to an external beam boost in its efficacy and justifies a randomized trial.
Radiation Research | 2005
Carsten Herskind; Volker Steil; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Frederik Wenz
Abstract Herskind, C., Steil, V., Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U. and Wenz, F. Radiobiological Aspects of Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT) with Isotropic Low-Energy X Rays for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Radiat. Res. 163, 208–215 (2005). The purpose of this study was to model the distribution of biological effect around a miniature isotropic X-ray source incorporating spherical applicators for single-dose or hypofractionated partial-breast intraoperative radiotherapy. A modification of the linear-quadratic formalism was used to calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 50 kV X rays as a function of dose and irradiation time for late-reacting normal tissue and tumor cells. The response was modeled as a function of distance in the tissue based on the distribution of equivalent dose and published dose–response data for pneumonitis and subcutaneous fibrosis after single-dose conventional irradiation. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of tumor cell inactivation was assessed. The RBE for late reactions approached unity at the applicator surface but increased as the absorbed dose decreased with increasing distance from the applicator surface. The ED50 for pneumonitis was estimated to be reached at a depth of 6–11 mm in the tissue and that for subcutaneous fibrosis at 3–6 mm, depending on the applicator diameter and whether the effect of recovery was included. Thus lung tissue would be spared because of the thickness of the thorax wall. The RBE for tumor cells was higher than for late-reacting tissue. The applicator diameter is an important parameter in determining the range of tumor cell control in the irradiated tumor bed.
BMC Cancer | 2007
Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Lelia Bauer; Antonella Scheda; Carola Schoeber; Joerg Schaefer; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz
BackgroundFor patients suffering of recurrent breast cancer within the irradiated breast, generally mastectomy is recommended. The normal tissue tolerance does not permit a second full-dose course of radiotherapy to the entire breast after a second breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A novel option is to treat these patients with partial breast irradiation (PBI). This approach is based on the hypothesis that re-irradiation of a limited volume will be effective and result in an acceptable frequency of side effects. The following report presents a single center experience with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during excision of recurrent breast cancer in the previously irradiated breast.MethodsBetween 4/02 and 11/06, 15 patients were treated for in-breast recurrences at a median of 10 years (3–25) after previous EBRT (10 recurrences in the initial tumor bed, 3 elsewhere in-breast failures, 2 invasive recurrences after previous DCIS). Additional 2 patients were selected for IORT with new primary breast cancer after previous partial breast EBRT for treatment of Hodgkins disease. IORT with a single dose of 14.7 – 20 Gy 50 kV X-rays at the applicator surface was delivered with the Intrabeam™-device (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 26 months (1–60), no local recurrence occurred. 14 out of 17 patients are alive and free of disease progression. Two patients are alive with distant metastases. One patient died 26 months after BCS/IORT due to pulmonary metastases diagnosed 19 months after BCS/IORT. Acute toxicity after IORT was mild with no Grade 3/4 toxicities and cosmetic outcome showed excellent/good/fair results in 7/7/3 cases.ConclusionIORT for recurrent breast cancer using low energy X-rays is a valuable option for patients with recurrent breast cancer after previous radiotherapy.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2010
Frederik Wenz; Grit Welzel; Elena Blank; Brigitte Hermann; Volker Steil; Marc Sütterlin; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher
PURPOSE Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been recently introduced using different devices. We report the first 5 years of a single-center experience after introduction of a novel approach to deliver IORT as a tumor bed boost during BCS for breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 155 breast cancers in 154 women (median age, 63 years; range, 30-83 years; T1/T2 = 100/55; N0/N+ = 108/47) were treated between February 2002 and December 2007 at the University Medical Center Mannheim, in whom IORT as tumor bed boost was applied using 50-kV X-rays (20 Gy) followed by 46-50 Gy whole-breast external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Chemotherapy, if indicated, was given before EBRT. The median interval between BCS plus IORT and EBRT was 40 days. Median follow-up was 34 months (maximum 80 months, 1 patient lost to follow-up). Overall survival and local relapse-free survival were calculated at 5 years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Seventy-nine patients were evaluated at 3-year follow-up for late toxicity according to the Late Effects in Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic system. RESULTS Ten patients died, 2 had in-breast relapse, and 8 developed distant metastases (5-year overall survival = 87.0%; 5-year local relapse-free survival = 98.5%). Grade 3 fibroses of the tumor bed were detected in 5% of the patients after 3 years. Skin toxicity was mild (telangiectases and hyperpigmentations in approximately 6% each). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative radiotherapy as a tumor bed boost during BCS for breast cancer using low-kilovoltage X-rays followed by EBRT yields low recurrence and toxicity rates.
Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2008
Grit Welzel; Katharina Fleckenstein; Sabine K. Mai; Brigitte Hermann; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Frederik Wenz
Background and PurposeThe objective of the current study was to evaluate the acute effects of cranial radiation therapy (CNS-RT) using different radiation doses (0, 1.8, 2, 3, ≥ 20 Gy) on cognitive function with special emphasis on memory. We assessed patients with and without intracranial tumors to distinguish between direct and indirect radiation effects on brain tissue.Materials and MethodsEighty-two patients were evaluated with neuropsychological testing before and acutely after radiotherapy (RT). Sixty-four patients received RT to the brain (55 with, 9 without intracranial tumor). Eighteen patients treated with RT to the breast served as controls.ResultsPatients with intracranial tumor demonstrated attention (19–38th percentile) and verbal memory scores (34–46th percentile) below the population average at baseline. The average Verbal Memory score was significantly different between patients with intracranial tumor and controls both at baseline (38th vs. 58th percentile) and after irradiation (27th vs. 52th percentile). Patients with preexisting peritumoral edema performed worse than patients without edema and controls. Radiation dose-related deficits were seen for working memory performance in patients with intracranial tumor.ConclusionOur data indicate no measurable impairment of cognitive functioning acutely after prophylactic cranial irradiation. Patients with intracranial tumor show a deterioration of almost all memory functions with a dose-dependent impairment in working memory. Patients with preexisting peritumoral brain edema show the strongest deterioration.ZusammenfassungHintergrund und ZielDie vorliegende Arbeit untersucht Akuteffekte der kraniellen Strahlentherapie (ZNS-RT) nach unterschiedlichen Bestrahlungsdosen (0, 1.8, 2, 3, ≥ 20 Gy) auf die kognitive Funktion unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des verbalen Gedächtnisses. Wir haben Patienten mit und ohne Hirntumor untersucht, um zwischen direkten und indirekten Bestrahlungseffekten auf das Hirngewebe zu unterscheiden.Patienten und Methodik82 Patienten wurden vor und unmittelbar nach Beginn der Radiotherapie (RT) neuropsychologisch untersucht. 64 Patienten wurden am ZNS bestrahlt (55 mit, 9 ohne Hirntumor). 18 Patientinnen, die an der Mamma bestrahlt wurden, dienten als Kontrollgruppe.ErgebnisseVor RT-Beginn lagen Aufmerksamkeitsleistungen (Prozentränge von 19–38) und verbale Gedächtnisleistungen (Prozentränge von 34–46) der Patienten mit Hirntumor unterhalb des Mittelwertes für die Normalbevölkerung (Tabellen 4, 5). Die durchschnittliche verbale Gedächtnisleistung der Patienten mit Hirntumor unterschied sich vor (Prozentrang 38 vs. 58) und nach RT (Prozentrang 27 vs. 52) signifikant von der der Kontrollgruppe (Abbildung 1). Patienten mit einem peritumoralen Hirnödem vor ZNS-RT zeigen schlechtere Leistungen als Patienten ohne Hirnödem und Kontrollpatienten (Abbildung 3). Bestrahlungsdosisabhängige Effekte wurden für das Arbeitsgedächtnis bei Patienten mit ZNS-Tumor beobachtet (Abbildung 2).SchlussfolgerungUnsere Daten zeigen keine messbaren kognitiven Beeinträchtigungen unmittelbar nach Beginn einer prophylaktischen Ganzhirnbestrahlung. Patienten mit Hirntumor zeigen eine Verschlechterung der verbalen Gedächtnisfunktionen und eine dosisabhängige Beeinträchtigung im Arbeitsgedächtnis. Patienten mit einem peritumoralen Hirnödem vor ZNS-RT zeigen die größten Veränderungen.
The Breast | 2008
Frederik Wenz; Grit Welzel; A. Keller; Elena Blank; Fatemeh Vorodi; Carsten Herskind; Oliver Tomé; Marc Sütterlin; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher
BACKGROUND Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during breast-conserving surgery is increasingly used. We analyzed the influence of the interval between an IORT boost and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on late toxicity. METHODS Forty-eight patients received 20 Gy IORT (50 kV X-rays (Intrabeam, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) followed by 46-50 Gy EBRT with a median interval of 36 days (14-197). Late toxicity was assessed with the modified LENT SOMA score after a median of 36 months. RESULTS Twelve patients developed a higher grade fibrosis ( degrees II-III), three teleangiectases, one a breast edema grade degrees II, six retractions, four hyperpigmentations and five pain ( degrees II-III). The median interval between IORT and EBRT was significantly shorter in these patients (n=18) compared to the 30 patients without higher grade toxicity (29.5 days vs. 39.5 days, p=0.023, Mann-Whitney U-test). CONCLUSION Starting EBRT about 5-6 weeks after IORT appears to be associated with a decreased risk of chronic late toxicity compared with a shorter interval. The impact on local recurrence of prolonged gaps between IORT and EBRT is not known.
Radiation Oncology | 2010
Frederik Wenz; Frank Schneider; Christian Neumaier; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Tina Reis; René Schmidt; Udo Obertacke
BackgroundInstable and painful vertebral metastases in patients with progressive visceral metastases present a common therapeutic dilemma. We developed a novel approach to deliver intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during kyphoplasty and report the first treated case.Methods/Results60 year old patient with metastasizing breast cancer under chemotherapy presented with a newly diagnosed painful metastasis in the 12th thoracic vertebra. Under general anaesthesia, a bipedicular approach into the vertebra was chosen with insertion of specially designed metallic sleeves to guide the electron drift tube of the miniature X-ray generator (INTRABEAM, Carl Zeiss Surgical, Oberkochen, Germany). This was inserted with a novel sheet designed for this approach protecting the drift tube. A radiation dose of 8 Gy in 5 mm distance (50 kV X-rays) was delivered. The kyphoplasty balloons (KyphX, Kyphon Inc, Sunnyvale) were inflated after IORT and polymethylmethacrylate cement was injected. The whole procedure lasted less than 90 minutes.ConclusionIn conclusion, this novel, minimally invasive procedure can be performed in standard operating rooms and may become a valuable option for patients with vertebral metastases providing immediate stability and local control. A phase I/II study is under way to establish the optimal dose prescription.