Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Uttam Singh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Uttam Singh.


BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia | 2008

Evaluation of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin for attenuation of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Aarti Agarwal; S. Gautam; Devendra Gupta; S. Agarwal; P.K. Singh; Uttam Singh

BACKGROUND Postoperative pain is the dominating complaint and the primary reason for prolonged convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We have evaluated the efficacy of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin for attenuating postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS Sixty adults (16-60 yr), ASA physical status I and II, of either sex undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this prospective, randomized placebo controlled, double-blind study. Subjects were divided into two groups of 30 each to receive either a matching placebo or pregabalin 150 mg, administered orally 1 h before surgery. Postoperative pain (static and dynamic) was assessed by a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0, no pain; 100, worst imaginable pain. Subjects received patient-controlled i.v. fentanyl analgesia during the postoperative period. Results were analysed by Students t-test, chi(2) test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Fishers exact test. RESULTS Postoperative pain (static and dynamic) and postoperative patient-controlled fentanyl consumption were reduced in the pregabalin group compared with the placebo group (P<0.05). Side-effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS A single preoperative oral dose of pregabalin 150 mg is an effective method for reducing postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie | 2004

Preemptive use of gabapentin significantly decreases postoperative pain and rescue analgesic requirements in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Chandra Kant Pandey; Shio Priye; Surendra Singh; Uttam Singh; Ram Badan Singh; Prabhat K. Singh

PurposeTo evaluate the comparative preemptive effects of gabapentin and tramadol on postoperative pain and fentanyl requirement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsFour hundred fifty-nine ASA I and II patients were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg gabapentin, 100 mg tramadol or placebo in a double-blind manner two hours before laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Postoperatively, patients’ pain scores were recorded on a visual analogue scale every two hours for the initial 12 hr and thereafter every three hours for the next 12 hr. Patients received fentanyl 2μg·kg−1 intravenously on demand. The total fentanyl consumption for each patient was recorded.ResultsPatients in the gabapentin group had significantly lower pain scores at all time intervals (2.65 ± 3.00, 1.99 ± 1.48, 1.40 ± 0.95, 0.65 ± 0.61) in comparison to tramadol (2.97 ± 2.35, 2.37 ± 1.45, 1.89 ± 1.16, 0.87 ± 0.50) and placebo (5.53 ± 2.22, 3.33 ± 1.37, 2.41 ± 1.19, 1.19 ± 0.56). Significantly less fentanyl was consumed in the gabapentin group (221.16 ± 52.39 μg) than in the tramadol (269.60 ± 44.17 μg) and placebo groups (355.86 ± 42.04 μg;P < 0.05). Sedation (33.98%), nausea/retching/vomiting (24.8%) were the commonest side effects in the gabapentin group whereas respiratory depression (3.9%) was the commonest in the tramadol group and vertigo (7.8%) in the placebo group.ConclusionPreemptive use of gabapentin significantly decreases postoperative pain and rescue analgesic requirement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.RésuméObjectifÉvaluer et comparer les effets préventifs de la gabapentine et du tramadol sur la douleur postopératoire et les besoins de fentanyl lors d’une cholécystectomie laparoscopique.MéthodeQuatre cent cinquante-neuf patients d’état physique ASA I et II ont été répartis au hasard et ont reçu 300 mg de gabapentine, 100 mg de tramadol ou un placebo, en double aveugle, deux heures avant la cholécystectomie laparoscopique sous anesthésie générale. Après l’opération, les scores de douleur ont été notés sur l’échelle visuelle analogique toutes les deux heures pendant les 12 premières heures et toutes les trois heures pendant les 12 h suivantes. Les patients ont reçu 2 μg·kg−1 de fentanyl intraveineux sur demande et la consommation totale a été notée pour chacun.RésultatsLes patients du groupe gabapentine ont présenté des scores de douleur significativement plus bas pour tous les intervalles de mesures (2,65 ± 3,00; 1,99 ± 1,48; 1,40 ± 0,95; 0,65 ± 0,61) que ceux du groupe tramadol (2,97 ± 2,35; 2,37 ± 1,45; 1,89 ± 1,16; 0,87 ± 0,50) ou placebo (5,53 ± 2,22; 3,33 ± 1,37; 2,41 ± 1,19; 1,19 ± 0,56). La demande de fentanyl a été significativement plus basse avec la gabapentine (221,16 ± 52,39 μg) qu’avec le tramadol (269,60 ± 44,17 μg) ou le placebo (355,86 ± 42,04 μg; P < 0,05). La sédation (33,98 %), les nausées/haut-lec∁ur/vomissements (24,8 %) ont été les effets négatifs les plus fréquents avec la gabapentine tandis que la dépression respiratoire (3,9 %) a été plus fréquente avec le tramadol et le vertige (7,8 %) avec le placebo.ConclusionL’usage préventif de gabapentine diminue significativement la douleur postopératoire et la demande d’analgésique de secours lors de la cholécystectomie laparoscopique.


Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology | 2005

Evaluation of the optimal preemptive dose of gabapentin for postoperative pain relief after lumbar diskectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Chandra Kant Pandey; Deepa Vishwas Navkar; Pramod J. Giri; Mehdi Raza; Sanjay Behari; Roop Singh; Uttam Singh; Prabhat K. Singh

We evaluated the optimal preemptive dose of gabapentin for postoperative pain relief after single-level lumbar diskectomy and its effect on fentanyl consumption during the initial 24 hours in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study in 100 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II. Patients were divided into five groups to receive placebo or gabapentin 300, 600, 900, or 1200 mg 2 hours before surgery. After surgery, patients were transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). A blinded anesthesiologist recorded the pain scores at time points of 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours in the PACU on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 cm) at rest. Patients received patient-controlled analgesia (fentanyl 1.0 μg/kg on each demand with lockout interval of 10 minutes); total fentanyl consumption during initial 24 hours was recorded. Data were entered into the statistical software package SPSS 9.0 for analysis (one-way analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls test). Patients who received gabapentin 300 mg had significantly lower VAS score at all time points. They consumed less fentanyl (patients who received placebo processed 1217.5 ± 182.0 versus 987.5 ± 129.6 μg; P < 0.05). Patients who received gabapentin 600, 900, and 1200 mg had lower VAS scores at all time points than patients who received gabapentin 300 mg (P < 0.05). Increasing the dose of gabapentin from 600 to 1200 mg did not decrease the VAS score, nor did the increasing dose of gabapentin significantly decrease fentanyl consumption (702.5, 635, and 626.5 μg). Thus, gabapentin 600 mg is the optimal dose for postoperative pain relief following lumbar diskectomy.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2002

Gabapentin for the treatment of pain in guillain-barré syndrome: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Chandra Kant Pandey; Neeta Bose; Garima Garg; Namita Singh; Arvind Baronia; Anil Agarwal; Prabhat K. Singh; Uttam Singh

Pain syndromes of Guillain-Barré are neuropathic as well as nociceptive in origin. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of gabapentin in relieving the bimodal nature of pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 18 patients admitted to the intensive care unit for ventilatory support. Patients were assigned to receive either gabapentin (15 mg · kg−1 · d−1 in 3 divided doses) or matching placebo as initial medication for 7 days. After a 2-day washout period, those who previously received gabapentin received placebo, and those previously receiving placebo received gabapentin as in the initial phase. Fentanyl 2 &mgr;g/kg was used as a rescue analgesic on patient demand or when the pain score was >5 on a numeric rating scale of 0–10. The numeric rating score, sedation score, consumption of fentanyl, and adverse effects were noted, and these observed variables were compared. The numeric pain score decreased from 7.22 ± 0.83 to 2.33 ± 1.67 on the second day after initiation of gabapentin therapy and remained low during the period of gabapentin therapy (2.06 ± 0.63) (P < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the need for fentanyl from Day 1 to Day 7 during the gabapentin therapy period (211.11 ± 21.39 to 65.53 ± 16.17 [&mgr;g]) in comparison to the placebo therapy period (319.44 ± 25.08 to 316.67 ± 24.25 [&mgr;g]) (P < 0.001).


Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie | 2004

Preemptive gabapentin decreases postoperative pain after lumbar discoidectomy

Chandra Kant Pandey; Surabhi Sahay; Devendra Gupta; Sushil P. Ambesh; Ram Badan Singh; Mehdi Raza; Uttam Singh; Prabhat K. Singh

PurposeWe investigated whether the preemptive use of gabapentin, a structural analogue of gamma amino butyric acid could reduce postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption in patients after single-level lumbar discoidectomy.MethodsFifty-six ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups to receive either gabapentin 300 mg or placebo two hours before surgery. After surgery, the pain was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at intervals of 0–6, 6–12, 12–18, and 18–24 hr at rest. Total fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hr after surgery was also recorded. Fentanyl 2 μg·kg−1 intravenously was used to treat postoperative pain on patients’ demand.ResultsPatients in the gabapentin group had significantly lower VAS scores at all time intervals of 0–6, 6–12, 12–18,and 18–24 hr than those in the placebo group (3.5 ± 2.3, 3.2 ± 2.1, 1.8 ± 1.7, 1.2 ± 1.3 vs 6.1 ± 1.7, 4.4 ± 1.2, 3.3 ± 1.1, 2.1 ± 1.2; P < 0.05). The total fentanyl consumed after surgery in the first 24 hr in the gabapentin group (233.5 ± 141.9, mean + SD) was significantly less than in the placebo group (359.6 ± 104.1 ; P < 0.05).ConclusionPreemptive gabapentin 300 mg po significantly decreases the severity of pain postoperatively in patients who undergo single-level lumbar discoidectomy.RésuméObjectifVérifier si l’usage préventif de gabapentine, analogue structurel de l’acide gamma amino-butyrique, pouvait réduire la douleur postopératoire et la consommation de fentanyl dans les cas de discectomie lombaire à un seul niveau.MéthodeCinquante-six patients d’état physique ASA I et II, répartis au hasard en deux groupes égaux, ont reçu soit 300 mg de gabapentine, soit un placebo, deux heures avant l’opération. Après l’opération, la douleur a été évaluée selon une échelle visuelle analogique (EVA) de 0–6, 6–12, 12–18 et 18–24 h au repos. La consommation totale de fentanyl pendant les 24 premières heures postopératoires a aussi été notée. Une dose iv de 2 μg·kg−1 de fentanyl a été utilisée pour traiter la douleur postopératoire sur demande.RésultatsLes patients sous gabapentine ont eu des scores significativement plus bas à l’EVA, pour toutes les mesures aux intervalles de 0–6, 6–12, 12–18 et 18–24 h, que ceux du groupe placebo (3,5 ± 2,3 ; 3,2 ±2,1 ; 1,8 ± 1,7 ; 1,2 ± 1,3 vs 6,1 ± 1,7 ; 4,4 ± 1,2 ; 3,3 ± 1,1 ; 2,1 ± 1,2 ; P < 0,05). La consommation postopératoire totale de fentanyl pendant les 24 premières heures a été significativement plus faible avec la gabapentine (233,5 ± 141,9, moyenne + écart type) qu’avec le placebo (359,6 ± 104,1 ; P < 0,05).ConclusionL’administration préventive de 300 mg po de gabapentine diminue significativement la sévérité de la douleur postopératoire chez les patients qui subissent une discectomie lombaire à un seul niveau.


Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie | 2003

Salbutamol, beclomethasone or sodium chromoglycate suppress coughing induced byiv fentanyl

Anil Agarwal; Afzal Azim; Sushil P. Ambesh; Neeta Bose; Sanjay Dhiraj; Dinesh Sahu; Uttam Singh

PurposeFentanyl, a synthetic opioid, is a popular choice amongst anesthesiologists in the operating room. Preinductioniv fentanyl bolus is associated with coughing in 28–45% of patients. Coughing due to fentanyl is not always benign and at times may be explosive requiring immediate intervention. We have studied the role of aerosol inhalation of salbutamol, beclomethasone and sodium chromoglycate in preventing fentanyl induced coughing and have compared their efficacy.MethodsTwo hundred patients aged 18–60 yr, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into four groups of 50 each. Group I served as control, while Groups II, III and IV received an aerosol inhalation of salbutamol, beclomethasone or sodium chromoglycate 15 min prior to entering the operating room. Followingiv fentanyl (2 μg · kg−1) the incidence of cough was recorded and graded as mild (1–2), moderate (3–5) and severe (> 5) depending on the number of coughs observed. Results were analyzed using‘z’ and Fischer’s Exact test. AP value of < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThe incidence of cough was 28% in the control group, 6%, 0% and 4% in the salbutamol, beclomethasone and sodium chromoglycate groups respectively. Occurrence of cough was significantly low (P ≤ 0.05) in the treatment groups, however the difference amongst the groups was not significant (P ≥ 0.05).ConclusionThe use of salbutamol, beclomethasone or sodium chromoglycate aerosol 15 min prior toiv fentanyl administration minimizes fentanyl-induced coughing.ZusammenfassungObjectifLe fentanyl, un opioïde synthétique, est très utilisé par les anesthésiologistes en salle d’opération. L’administration iv d’un bolus de fentanyl avant l’induction de l’anesthésie est associée à de ia toux chez 28–45 % des patients. Cette toux, pas toujours bénigne, peut parfois même être expiosive et nécessiter une intervention immédiate. Nous avons étudié ie rôie de l’inhaiation de salbutamol, de béclométhasone et de chromoglycate de sodium en aérosols dans la prévention de la toux induite par le fentanyl et nous avons comparé leur efficacité.MéthodeDeux cents patients de 18 à 60 ans, devant subir une cholécystectomie laparoscopique réglée ont été répartis au hasard en quatre groupes de 50. Le groupe I a servi de témoin, tandis que les groupes II, III et IV ont inhalé du salbutamol, de la béclométhasone ou du chromoglycate de sodium en aérosol, 15 min avant d’entrer dans la salle d’opération. Après l’administration iv de 2 μg · kg−1 de fentanyl, l’incidence de toux a été enregistrée et cotée comme légère (1–2), modérée (3–5) et sévère (> 5) selon le nombre d’accès de toux observés. Les résultats ont été analysés selon le test“Z” et le test exact de Fischer. Une valeur de P ≤ 0,05 a été considérée significative.RésultatsLincidence de toux a été respectivement de 28 % dans le groupe témoin, 6 %, 0 % et 4 % dans les groupes de salbutamol, béclométhasone et chromoglycate de sodium. L’occurrence de toux a été signifcativement faible (P ≤ 0,05) dans les groupes expérimentaux, même si la différence intergroupe n’a pas été significative (P − > 0,05).ConclusionL’usage de salbutamol, de béclométhasone ou de chromoglycate de sodium en aérosol, 15 min avant l’administration iv de fentanyl, réduit la toux induite par le fentanyl.


Anaesthesia | 2005

Acupressure for prevention of pre-operative anxiety : a prospective, randomised, placebo controlled study

A. Agarwal; R. Ranjan; S. Dhiraaj; A. Lakra; M. Kumar; Uttam Singh

Pre‐operative anxiety is associated with many unwanted effects such as increased analgesic and anaesthetic requirement, postoperative pain and prolonged hospital stay. In the present study, we investigated the effects of acupressure on pre‐operative anxiety and bispectral index (BIS) values. Seventy‐six adults, ASA grade I and II, undergoing elective surgery, were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group 1 (control) received acupressure at an inappropriate site and group 2 (acupressure) received acupressure at extra 1 point. The study was conducted during the pre‐operative period and the duration of the study was 40 min (acupressure was applied for 10 min and thereafter patients were observed for another 30 min). Anxiety was recorded on a visual stress scale (VSS) at the start of the study and thereafter at 10 and 40 min. BIS was recorded at 0, 2, 5, 10, 12, 15, 30 and 40 min. The VSS decreased in both groups following pressure application for 10 min: median VSS (interquartile range) were 5 (1) vs. 8 (1) in the acupressure and 7 (0) vs. 8 (1) in the control groups (p < 0.001). Both pre‐operative anxiety and BIS decreased significantly during acupressure application at extra 1 point (p < 0.001). Acupressure is effective in decreasing both pre‐operative anxiety and BIS; however, these effects are not sustained 30 min following release of acupressure. Further studies are needed to elucidate the duration for which acupressure is effective.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2004

Intravenous lidocaine suppresses fentanyl-induced coughing: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study.

Chandra Kant Pandey; Mehdi Raza; Rajeev Ranjan; Archana Lakra; Anil Agarwal; Uttam Singh; Rajvinder Singh; Prabhat K. Singh

IV lidocaine is effective in suppressing the cough reflex of tracheal intubation, extubation, bronchography, bronchoscopy, and laryngoscopy. We investigated this effect of lidocaine on fentanyl-induced cough in 502 patients of ASA physical status I and II scheduled for elective surgery. The patients were assigned to 2 equal groups to receive either lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg or placebo (0.9% saline) over 5 s 1 min before the administration of fentanyl 3 &mgr;g/kg in a randomized and double-blind fashion. Coughs were classified as coughing and graded as mild (1–2), moderate (3–4), or severe (5 or more). The results of the study suggest that IV lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, when administered 1 min before fentanyl, is significantly effective in suppressing fentanyl-induced cough compared to placebo (0.9% saline) (218 versus 165 patients) (P < 0.002) but without affecting the severity of cough (P > 0.05).


Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie | 2005

Gabapentin provides effective postoperative analgesia whether administered pre-emptively or post-incision

Chandra Kant Pandey; Vinay Singhal; Mukesh Kumar; Archana Lakra; Rajeev Ranjan; Rashmi Pal; Mehdi Raza; Uttam Singh; Prabhat K. Singh

PurposeWe investigated the effects of pre-incision and postincision administration of gabapentin on postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption associated with open donor nephrectomy.MethodsSixty ASA I subjects were randomly allocated into three groups to receive gabapentin 600 mg two hours before surgery and placebo after surgical incision (pre-incision group), placebo two hours before surgery and gabapentin 600 mg after surgical incision (post-incision group), or placebo two hours before surgery and after surgical incision (placebo group). After surgery, pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), (1-10 cm) at time points 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hr. Subjects received patient-controlled-analgesia (fentanyl 1.0 μg·kg-1 subject activated dose). Total fentanyl consumption in each group was recorded.ResultsSubjects of pre-incision and post-incision groups had lower VAS scores at all time points (3.1 ± 1.8, 2.9 ± 1.3, 2.8 ± 1.3, 2.5 ± 0.9, 2.5 ± 1.5 and 3.6 ± 1.1, 3.0 ± 1.2, 3.2 ± 1.1, 2.9 ± 1.0, 2.6 ± 2.2) compared to placebo group (6.6 ± 1.3, 5.0 ± 1.0, 4.4 ± 0.7, 4.2 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.0). They also used less fentanyl (563.3 μg ± 252.8 and 624.0 μg ± 210.5 respectively) compared to placebo (924.7 μg ± 417.5), (P < 0.05). No difference in total fentanyl consumption and pain scores at any time points were observed between pre- and post-incision groups.ConclusionPre-incision administration of 600 mg gabapentin has no added benefit over post-incision administration in terms of pain scores and fentanyl consumption in subjects undergoing open donor nephrectomy.RésuméObjectifNous avons vérifié les effets de la gabapentine, administrée avant ou après ľincision, sur la douleur postopératoire de même que la consommation de fentanyl lors ďune néphrectomie chez un donneur vivant.MéthodeSoixante sujets ďétat physique ASA I, répartis au hasard en trois groupes, ont reçu 600 mg de gabapentine deux heures avant ľopération et un placebo après ľincision chirurgicale (groupe pré-incision), un placebo deux heures avant ľopération et 600 mg de gabapentine après ľincision (groupe post-incision) ou un placebo deux heures avant ľopération et après ľincision (groupe placebo). La douleur postopératoire a été évaluée par une échelle visuelle analogique (EVA), de 1 à 10 cm à 0, 6, 12, 18 et 24 h. Les sujets ont eu une analgésie auto-contrölée en doses de 1,0 μg·kg-1. La consommation totale de fentanyl de chaque groupe a été notée.RésultatsLes sujets des groupes pré-incision et post-incision ont présenté les scores les plus bas à ľEVA, pour toutes les mesures (3,1± 1,8; 2,9 ± 1,3; 2,8 ± 1,3; 2,5 ± 0,9; 2,5 ± 1,5 et 3,6 ± 1,1; 3,0± 1,2; 3,2 ± 1,1; 2,9 ± 1,0; 2,6 ± 2,2), comparativement au groupe placebo (6,6 ± 1,3; 5,0 ± 1,0; 4,4 ± 0,7; 4,2 ± 0,8; 3,9 ± 1,0). Ils ont aussi utilisé moins de fentanyl (563,3 μg ± 252,8 et 624,0 μg ± 210,5 respectivement) que le groupe placebo (924,7 μg ± 417.5), (P < 0,05). Aucune différence de consommation totale de fentanyl et de scores de douleur n’a été observée entre les groupes pré-incision et post-incision.ConclusionĽadministration pré-incision de 600 mg de gabapentine n’a pas ďavantage sur ľadministration post-incision quant aux scores de douleur et à la consommation de fentanyl chez des donneurs vivants qui subissent une néphrectomie.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2004

Pretreatment with thiopental for prevention of pain associated with propofol injection.

Anil Agarwal; Mohammad F. Ansari; Devendra Gupta; Ravindra Pandey; Mehdi Raza; Prabhat K. Singh; Shiopriye; Sanjay Dhiraj; Uttam Singh

Propofol causes pain on IV injection in 28%–90% of patients. A number of techniques have been tried to minimize propofol-induced pain, with variable results. We compared the efficacy of pretreatment with thiopental 0.25 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg and lidocaine 40 mg after venous occlusion for prevention of propofol-induced pain. One-hundred-twenty-four adult patients, ASA physical status I–II, undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned into 4 groups of 31 each. Group I received normal saline, group II received lidocaine 2% (40 mg), and groups III and IV received thiopental 0.25 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. All pretreatment drugs were made in 2 mL and were accompanied by manual venous occlusion for 1 min. Propofol was administered after release of venous occlusion. Pain was assessed with a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain at the time of propofol injection. Twenty-four patients (77%) complained of pain in the group pretreated with normal saline as compared with 12 (39%), 10 (32%), and 1 (3%) in the groups pretreated with lidocaine 40 mg, thiopental 0.25 mg/kg, and thiopental 0.5 mg/kg, respectively (P < 0.05). Thiopental 0.5 mg/kg was the most effective treatment. We therefore suggest routine pretreatment with thiopental 0.5 mg/kg along with venous occlusion for 1 min for prevention of pain associated with propofol injection.

Collaboration


Dive into the Uttam Singh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Prabhat K. Singh

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anil Agarwal

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Devendra Gupta

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sanjay Dhiraj

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sushil P. Ambesh

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mukesh Kumar

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neeta Bose

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sanjay Dhiraaj

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chandra M. Pandey

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hem Chandra

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge