V.G. Santos

Progesterone concentration when the future ovulatory follicle and corpus luteum are located in ipsilateral or contralateral ovaries in heifers.

Three studies were done on the effects of ipsilateral location (same ovary) versus contralateral location (opposite ovaries) of the future ovulatory follicle and CL in heifers. The numbers of heifers for the ipsilateral and contralateral groups, respectively, were: experiment (Exp) 1 (N = 4 and 4), Exp 2 (N = 6 and 4), and Exp 3 (N = 5 and 10). In the Exps with available data (Exp 2 and 3), the interval between ovulation and the end of luteolysis was significantly shorter in the ipsilateral group than in the contralateral group (Exp 2: 16.8 ± 0.3 vs. 19.8 ± 1.7 days; Exp 3: 16.9 ± 0.2 vs. 19.7 ± 0.9 days). In Exp 3, the interovulatory interval was shorter (P < 0.01) in the ipsilateral group (20.1 ± 0.4 days) than in the contralateral group (22.7 ± 0.7 days), but the interval from the end of luteolysis to ovulation was not altered significantly. Circulating progesterone (P4) concentration for 33 hours normalized to the beginning of luteolysis (Exp 1) and on Days 16 to 20 (Day 0 = ovulation; Exp 3) was significantly lower in the ipsilateral group than in the contralateral group (Exp 1: 3.7 ± 0.2 vs. 4.8 ± 0.3 ng/mL; Exp 3: 1.7 ± 0.4 vs. 5.9 ± 0.4 ng/mL). Area (cm(2)) of the CL and percentage of CL with color Doppler signals of blood flow were lower and resistance index for a CL arteriole was greater in the ipsilateral group (Exp 3). The decreased P4 concentration in the ipsilateral group began by Day 16, but the decreased luteal area and vascular perfusion were not detected until Days 17 or 18. Results supported the hypothesis that the ipsilateral location of the future ovulatory follicle and CL was associated with lower P4 production and a shorter interovulatory interval.

Contralateral ovarian location between the future ovulatory follicle and extant corpus luteum increases the length of the luteal phase and number of follicular waves in heifers

Location of the future ovulatory follicle and CL in the same ovary (ipsilateral) or opposite ovaries (contralateral) and number of major follicular waves (two or three) per interovulatory interval (IOI) was studied in 14 heifers. Follicle diameter and a blood sample for progesterone (P4) assay were obtained each day throughout an IOI. Heifers were partitioned into three groups: ipsilateral follicle/CL relationship and two follicular waves (Ipsi-2W, N = 5), contralateral relationship and two follicular waves (Contra-2W, N = 5), and contralateral relationship and three waves (Contra-3W, N = 4). Only one heifer had an ipsilateral relationship and three waves and was not included in the analyses. An unexpected observation was slower growth of the dominant follicle of Wave 1 in the Ipsi-2W group than in the Contra-2W and Contra-3W groups. Increased P4 production in the Contra-3W group compared with the Ipsi-2W and Contra-2W groups was indicated by significantly greater P4 concentration averaged over Days 0 to 20 (Day 0 = ovulation), longer interval from ovulation to the beginning of a decrease in P4 and to the beginning of postluteolysis (P4 <1 ng/mL), and longer IOI. The interval from the beginning of postluteolysis to ovulation was not different among groups, indicating that the prolonged IOI reflected the prolonged luteal phase. An effect of the follicle/CL relationship on length of the IOI was not detected in mares. Results supported the hypothesis that the prolonged luteal phase of the contralateral follicle/CL relationship favors the development of three follicular waves/IOI in heifers.

Adding a second prostaglandin F2α treatment to but not reducing the duration of a PRID-Synch protocol increases fertility after resynchronization of ovulation in lactating Holstein cows.

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a second PGF2α treatment and duration of an Ovsynch protocol that included a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) on progesterone (P4) concentrations and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) after resynchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination (TAI). Lactating Holstein cows (n=821) were assigned randomly at a nonpregnancy diagnosis (d 0) to 3 resynchronization protocols: (1) GnRH, d 0; PGF2α, d 7; GnRH, d 9.5 (7D1PGF); (2) GnRH, d 0; PGF2α, d 7; PGF2α, d 8; GnRH, d 9.5); (7D2PGF); or (3) GnRH, d 2; PGF2α, d 7; PGF2α, d 8; GnRH, d 9.5 (5D2PGF). All cows received a PRID at the first GnRH treatment of the resynchronization protocol, which was removed at the first PGF2α treatment, and all cows received TAI approximately 16h after the second GnRH treatment. Blood samples were collected from a subgroup of cows at each treatment of the resynchronization protocols. At 32 d after TAI, cows receiving a second PGF2α treatment (7D2PGF + 5D2PGF cows) had more P/AI (42.6 vs. 35.7%) than cows receiving a single PGF2α treatment (7D1PGF cows). For cows treated with a second PGF2α treatment, decreasing the duration of the protocol did not increase P/AI (41.4 vs. 43.8% for 7D2PGF vs. 5D2PGF cows). At 60 d after TAI, P/AI did not differ between cows treated with the 1 PGF2α (7D1PGF cows) or 2 PGF2α (7D2PGF + 5D1PGF cows) treatments (32.5 vs. 37.9%, respectively). In addition, reducing the duration of the protocol did not increase P/AI at 60 d after TAI (37.8 vs. 38.5% for 7D2PGF vs. 5D2PGF cows). Pregnancy loss from 32 to 60 d after TAI was not affected by the number of PGF2α treatments (8.5 vs. 10.6%, for 7D1PGF vs. 7D2PGF + 5D2PGF cows) or the duration of the protocol (9.1 vs. 12.1%, for 7D2PGF vs. 5D2PGF cows). The percentage of cows with incomplete luteal regression at the second GnRH treatment tended to differ among treatments and was lowest for 7D2PGF cows, intermediate for 5D2PGF cows, and greatest for 7D1PGF cows (1.9 vs. 6.9 vs. 11.0%, respectively). In conclusion, addition of a second PGF2α treatment tended to decrease the percentage of cows with incomplete luteal regression and increased P/AI 32 d after AI, whereas decreasing the duration of the Ovsynch protocol did not increase P/AI.

Role of LH in the progesterone increase during the bromocriptine-induced prolactin decrease in heifers.

The luteotrophic effect of bromocriptine in heifers was studied to determine if the reported posttreatment increase in progesterone (P4) just before or at the beginning of luteolysis was attributable to loss of a luteolytic effect of prolactin (PRL) or to the stimulation of LH, a known luteotropin. Four treatment groups (n = 7) were used: control (Ct), bromocriptine (Bc; 16 mg/heifer), acyline (Ac; 3 μg/kg), and bromocriptine and acyline combined (BcAc). Bromocriptine (inhibitor of PRL) and acyline (antagonist of GnRH and therefore blocker of LH) were given at Hour 0 on Day 16 postovulation, and blood samples were taken hourly at Hours 0 to 8. Concentration of P4 was greater (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the Ct group at each of Hours 1 to 8. Concentration of LH increased (P < 0.05) between Hours 0 to 2 in the Bc group but not in the other three groups. The peak of the first posttreatment LH pulse occurred earlier in the Bc group than in the Ct group. Average concentration of PRL was lower (P < 0.05) and number of PRL pulses was less (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the Ct group. Acyline inhibited LH in the Ac and BcAc groups as indicated by a decrease (P < 0.05) in concentration between Hours 0 and 2 and a decrease (P < 0.001) in number of pulses/heifer during the 8 h. A decrease in PRL but not an increase in P4 and LH occurred in the BcAc group. Results supported the hypothesis that the P4 increase associated with PRL suppression by bromocriptine treatment is attributable to an increase in LH.

Long-term characteristics of idiopathic persistent corpus luteum in the mare

Persistent CL (PCL; n = 10) in mares was studied daily from Day 20 (Day 0 = ovulation) to the ending ovulation. In addition, the 10 days before ovulation at the end of a PCL were compared with the end of an interovulatory interval (IOI; n = 28) during the same months. Concentration of P4, cross-sectional area of CL, and percentage of CL with Doppler signals of blood flow during PCLs remained constant from 64 to about 33 days before the end of luteolysis and then decreased linearly. Concentration of LH between Day 20 and beginning of the ovulatory LH surge increased linearly. A dominant follicle developed on average every 15 days throughout each PCL. Novel transient P4 depressions were detected with the P4 nadir at a day of maximal diameter of a dominant follicle. At the apparent beginning of luteolysis before the ending ovulation, P4 concentration in PCLs (5.0 ± 0.5 ng/mL) was less (P < 0.0001) than that in IOIs (9.3 ± 0.6 ng/mL). Concentration of LH began to increase 2 days before the end of luteolysis in each group, but concentration on the day of the ending ovulation in PCLs (3.7 ± 0.3 ng/mL) was less (P < 0.005) than that in IOIs (8.9 ± 1.8 ng/mL). In a separate survey of PCLs (n = 23) and IOIs (n = 352), frequency of PCL (6.1%) differed significantly among mares indicating repeatability. These original and critical comparisons between PCLs and IOIs should provide hypotheses for further study.

Role of PGF2α in luteolysis based on inhibition of PGF2α synthesis in the mare

The effects of inhibition of PGF2α synthesis on luteolysis in mares and on the incidence of prolonged luteal activity were studied in controls and in a group treated with flunixin meglumine (FM), a PGF2α inhibitor (n = 6/group). The FM was given every 8 hours (1.0 mg/kg) on each of Days 14.0 to 16.7. Concentration (pg/mL) of PGF2α metabolite averaged over 8 hours of hourly blood sampling at the beginning of each day, was lower in the FM group than in the controls on Day 14 after ovulation (6.7 ± 1.3 vs. 13.8 ± 2.9, P < 0.05), Day 15 (15.0 ± 3.9 vs. 35.2 ± 10.4, P < 0.10), and Day 16 (21.9 ± 5.7 vs. 54.7 ± 11.4, P < 0.03). Concentration (ng/mL) of progesterone (P4) was greater in the FM group than in the controls on Day 14 (10.1 ± 0.9 vs. 7.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.08), Day 15 (9.2 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.0, P < 0.008), and Day 16 (5.6 ± 1.6 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4, P < 0.02). The interval from ovulation to the beginning of a decrease in P4 and to the end of luteolysis (P4 < 1 ng/mL) was each delayed (P < 0.03) by ~1 day in the FM group. Intervals involving the luteal phase were long (statistical outliers, P < 0.05) in two mares in the FM group, indicating prolonged luteal activity. Results supported the hypotheses that (1) inhibition of PGF2α synthesis interferes with luteolysis in mares and (2) inhibition of PGF2α at the expected time of luteolysis may lead to prolonged luteal activity.

Interrelationships among progesterone, LH, and luteal blood flow during a pulse of a PGF2α metabolite and functional role of LH in the progesterone rebound in heifers

On Day 16 (Day 0 = ovulation) or before the expected transition into the luteolytic period, heifers were not treated (control group, N = 7) or were treated with a single 0.1-mg dose of estradiol (E2) (E2 group, N = 6) or E2 combined with the GnRH antagonist acyline (E2/Ac group, N = 5). Hourly blood samples were collected from hour of treatment (Hour 0) to Hour 20. Estradiol induced a pulse of PGFM, but the peak of the pulse occurred 2 hours later (P < 0.05) and mean PGFM concentrations during the descending portion of the pulse were lower (P < 0.05) in the E2/Ac group than in the E2 group. In the E2 group, concentration of progesterone (P4) decreased (P < 0.05) during the ascending portion of the PGFM pulse, and increased (rebounded; P < 0.05) along with an LH increase during the descending portion. In the E2/Ac group, a rebound in P4 and an increase in LH were not detected during the descending portion of the PGFM pulse. The percentage of CL with color Doppler signals of blood flow increased (P < 0.04) concurrently with the PGFM increase during Hours 0 to 5 and during the ascending portion of the PGFM pulse. Blood flow and PGFM decreased concurrently. The following hypotheses were supported: (1) LH has a positive effect on PGFM pulses; (2) the rebound in P4 and the increase in LH during the descending portion of a PGFM pulse are functionally related; and (3) the increase in luteal blood flow in association with a PGFM pulse represents a direct effect of PGF2α rather than an effect of P4 or LH.

Effect of dose and timing of prostaglandin F2α treatments during a Resynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating Holstein cows

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a second PGF2α treatment (25 mg of dinoprost) or a double dose of PGF2α (50 mg of dinoprost) during a Resynch protocol on luteal regression and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,100) were randomly assigned at a nonpregnancy diagnosis to receive (1) Ovsynch (control: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 25 mg of PGF2α; 56 h, 100 µg of GnRH), (2) Ovsynch with a second PGF2α treatment (GPPG: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 25 mg of PGF2α; 24 h, 25 mg of PGF2α; 32 h, 100 µg of GnRH), or (3) Ovsynch with a double dose of PGF2α (GDDP: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 50 mg of PGF2α; 56 h, 100 µg of GnRH). All cows received timed artificial insemination (TAI) approximately 16 h after the second GnRH treatment (G2). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal palpation 39 ± 3 d after TAI, and pregnancy status was reconfirmed 66 d after TAI. Blood samples collected from a subset of cows in each treatment at the first PGF2α treatment (n = 394) and at G2 (n = 367) were assayed for progesterone (P4). Data were analyzed by logistic regression using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). At 39 d after TAI, GPPG cows tended to have more P/AI than control cows [35% (137/387) vs. 31% (107/349)], whereas P/AI for GDDP cows [32% (118/364)] did not differ from that for control cows. Pregnancy loss from 38 to 66 d did not differ among treatments and was 8% (30/362). The percentage of cows with complete luteal regression (P4 <0.4 ng/mL at G2) tended to differ among treatments and was greater for GPPG cows than for GDDP and control cows (94% vs. 88% vs. 88%, respectively). Overall, cows with P4 <1 ng/mL at the first PGF2α treatment had fewer P/AI than cows with P4 ≥1 ng/mL (27% vs. 38%), whereas cows with P4 ≥0.4 ng/mL at G2 had fewer P/AI than cows with P4 <0.4 ng/mL (15% vs. 38%). We conclude that adding a second PGF2α treatment 24 h after the first within a Resynch protocol tended to increase the proportion of cows undergoing complete luteal regression and P/AI, whereas treatment with a double dose of PGF2α at a single time did not.

Defective secretion of Prostaglandin F2α during development of idiopathic persistent corpus luteum in mares

Five mares that developed idiopathic persistent corpus luteum (PCL) were compared with 5 mares with apparently normal interovulatory intervals (IOIs). Progesterone (P4) and a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α (PGFM) were assayed daily beginning on the day of ovulation (Day 0). Transition between the end of an initial progressive P4 increase and the beginning of a gradual decrease in P4 occurred on mean Day 6. The gradual decrease in P4 between Days 6 and 12 was less (approached significance, P < 0.06) in the PCL group than in the IOI group. The P4 concentration on Day 12 (before luteolysis in IOI group) was greater (P < 0.05) in the PCL group than in the IOI group. In a post hoc comparison, an interaction (P < 0.04) of group by day for Days 4 to 7 indicated that the end of the progressive increase in P4 was temporally associated with a transient increase in concentration of PGFM in IOI mares but not in PCL mares. Complete luteolysis (P4 < 1 ng/mL) occurred in the IOI mares on Days 13 to 15. Partial luteolysis (mean P4 decrease, 62%) occurred in 3 of the 5 PCL mares. Normalization to the day at the end of the most pronounced P4 decrease in the IOI mares and in the 3 PCL mares with partial luteolysis resulted in a day-by-group interaction (P < 0.05) for PGFM concentration. The interaction was partly from lower PGFM concentration on the day at the end of the pronounced P4 decrease in the 3 PCL mares than in the IOI mares. The peak of a transient PGFM increase and the day at the end of the most pronounced decrease in P4 were synchronized in each IOI mare but not in any of the 3 PCL mares. In the other 2 PCL mares, partial luteolysis did not occur, and a transient increase in PGFM was not apparent. Results tentatively indicated that the relationship between P4 and PGFM may be altered as early as Day 6 in PCL mares and supported the hypothesis that prostaglandin F2α secretion is defective in mares with idiopathic PCL.

Fertility of lactating Holstein cows submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and timed artificial insemination versus artificial insemination after synchronization of estrus at a similar day in milk range

Our objective was to compare the AI submission rate and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) at first service of lactating Holstein cows submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and timed artificial insemination (TAI) versus artificial insemination (AI) to a detected estrus after synchronization of estrus at a similar day in milk range. Lactating Holstein cows were randomly assigned to receive their first TAI after a Double-Ovsynch protocol (DO; n = 294) or to receive their first AI after a synchronized estrus (EST; n = 284). Pregnancy status was determined 33 ± 3 d after insemination and was reconfirmed 63 ± 3 d after insemination. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and logistic regression using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). By design, days in milk at first insemination did not differ between treatments (76.9 ± 0.2 vs. 76.7 ± 0.3 for DO vs. EST cows, respectively), but more DO cows were inseminated within 7 d after the end of the voluntary waiting period than EST cows (100.0 vs. 77.5%). Overall, DO cows had more P/AI than EST cows at both 33 d (49.0 vs. 38.6%) and 63 d (44.6 vs. 36.4%) after insemination, but pregnancy loss from 33 to 63 d after insemination did not differ between treatments. Primiparous cows had more P/AI than multiparous cows 33 and 63 d after insemination, but the treatment by parity interaction was not significant. Synchronization rate to the hormonal protocols was 85.3%, which did not differ between treatments; however, synchronized DO cows had more P/AI 33 d after insemination than synchronized EST cows (54.7 vs. 44.5%). In summary, submission of lactating Holstein cows to a Double-Ovsynch protocol and TAI for first insemination increased the percentage of cows inseminated within 7 d after the end of the voluntary waiting period and increased P/AI at 33 and 63 d after first insemination resulting in 64 and 58% more pregnant cows, respectively, than submission of cows for first AI after detection of estrus at a similar day in milk range. We conclude that, because the proportion of synchronized cows did not differ between treatments, DO cows had more P/AI than EST cows because of an intrinsic increase in fertility after submission to a fertility program.