V. Y. Chow
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by V. Y. Chow.
Tellus B | 2006
Daniel Michael Matross; Arlyn E. Andrews; Mahadevan Pathmathevan; Christoph Gerbig; John C. Lin; Steven C. Wofsy; Bruce C. Daube; Elaine W. Gottlieb; V. Y. Chow; John T. Lee; Conglong Zhao; Peter S. Bakwin; J. William Munger; David Y. Hollinger
We derive regional-scale (∼104 km2) CO2 flux estimates for summer 2004 in the northeast United States and southern Quebec by assimilating extensive data into a receptor-oriented model-data fusion framework. Surface fluxes are specified using the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM), a simple, readily optimized biosphere model driven by satellite data, AmeriFlux eddy covariance measurements and meteorological fields. The surface flux model is coupled to a Lagrangian atmospheric adjoint model, the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport Model (STILT) that links point observations to upwind sources with high spatiotemporal resolution. Analysis of CO2 concentration data from the NOAA-ESRL tall tower at Argyle, ME and from extensive aircraft surveys, shows that the STILT– VPRM framework successfully links model flux fields to regionally representative atmospheric CO2 data, providing a bridge between ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ methods for estimating regional CO2 budgets on timescales from hourly to monthly. The surface flux model, with initial calibration to eddy covariance data, produces an excellent a priori condition for inversion studies constrained by atmospheric concentration data. Exploratory optimization studies show that data from several sites in a region are needed to constrain model parameters for all major vegetation types, because the atmosphere commingles the influence of regional vegetation types, and even high-resolution meteorological analysis cannot disentangle the associated contributions. Airborne data are critical to help define uncertainty within the optimization framework, showing for example, that in summertime CO2 concentration at Argyle (107 m) is ∼0.6 ppm lower than the mean in the planetary boundary layer.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008
Elizabeth Hammond Pyle; Gregory W. Santoni; Henrique E. M. Nascimento; Lucy R. Hutyra; Simone A. Vieira; Daniel J. Curran; Joost van Haren; Scott R. Saleska; V. Y. Chow; Plinio B. Carmago; William F. Laurance; Steven C. Wofsy
(1) Amazon forests are potentially globally significant sources or sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide. In this study, we characterize the spatial trends in carbon storage and fluxes in both live and dead biomass (necromass) in two Amazonian forests, the Biological Dynamic of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP), near Manaus, Amazonas, and the Tapajos National Forest (TNF) near Santarem, Para´. We assessed coarse woody debris (CWD) stocks, tree growth, mortality, and recruitment in ground-based plots distributed across the terra firme forest at both sites. Carbon dynamics were similar within each site, but differed significantly between the sites. The BDFFP and the TNF held comparable live biomass (167 ± 7.6 MgCha � 1 versus 149 ± 6.0 MgCha � 1 , respectively), but stocks of CWD were 2.5 times larger at TNF (16.2 ± 1.5 MgCha � 1 at BDFFP, versus 40.1 ± 3.9 MgCha � 1 at TNF). A model of current forest dynamics suggests that the BDFFP was close to carbon balance, and its size class structure approximated a steady state. The TNF, by contrast, showed rapid carbon accrual to live biomass (3.24 ± 0.22 MgCha � 1 � a � 1 in TNF, 2.59 ± 0.16 MgCha � 1 � a � 1 in BDFFP), which was more than offset by losses from large stocks of CWD, as well as ongoing shifts of biomass among size classes. This pattern in the TNF suggests recovery from a significant disturbance. The net loss of carbon from the TNF will likely last 10-15 years after the initial disturbance (controlled by the rate of decay of coarse woody debris), followed by uptake of carbon as the forest size class structure and composition continue to shift. The frequency and longevity of forests showing such disequilibruim dynamics within the larger matrix of the Amazon remains an essential question to understanding Amazonian carbon balance.
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2010
Huilin Chen; J. Winderlich; C. Gerbig; A. Hoefer; Chris W. Rella; Eric Crosson; A. Van Pelt; J. Steinbach; Olaf Kolle; Veronika Beck; Bruce C. Daube; Elaine W. Gottlieb; V. Y. Chow; Gregory W. Santoni; Steven C. Wofsy
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2008
Pathmathevan Mahadevan; Steven C. Wofsy; Daniel Michael Matross; Xiangming Xiao; Allison L. Dunn; John C. Lin; Christoph Gerbig; J. William Munger; V. Y. Chow; E. W. Gottlieb
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2008
Scot M. Miller; Daniel M. Matross; Arlyn E. Andrews; Dylan B. Millet; Marcos Longo; E. W. Gottlieb; Adam I. Hirsch; Christoph Gerbig; John C. Lin; Bruce C. Daube; Rynda C. Hudman; Pedro Leite da Silva Dias; V. Y. Chow; Steven C. Wofsy
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2007
S. Park; R. Jimenez; Bruce C. Daube; Leonhard Pfister; T. J. Conway; E. W. Gottlieb; V. Y. Chow; D. J. Curran; D. M. Matross; A. Bright; E. Atlas; T. P. Bui; R. S. Gao; Cynthia H. Twohy; S. C. Wofsy
Tellus B | 2006
John C. Lin; C. Gerbig; S. C. Wofsy; Bruce C. Daube; Daniel Michael Matross; V. Y. Chow; E. W. Gottlieb; Arlyn Elizabeth Andrews; Mahadevan Pathmathevan; J. W. Munger
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007
John C. Lin; Christoph Gerbig; Steven C. Wofsy; V. Y. Chow; E. W. Gottlieb; Bruce C. Daube; Daniel Michael Matross
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2008
Pathmathevan Mahadevan; Steven C. Wofsy; Daniel Michael Matross; Xiangming Xiao; Allison L. Dunn; John C. Lin; Christoph Gerbig; J. William Munger; V. Y. Chow; Elaine W. Gottlieb
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008
Elizabeth Hammond Pyle; Gregory W. Santoni; Henrique E. M. Nascimento; Lucy R. Hutyra; Simone A. Vieira; Daniel J. Curran; Joost van Haren; Scott R. Saleska; V. Y. Chow; Plinio B. Carmago; William F. Laurance; Steven C. Wofsy