Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Valentina Lancellotta is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Valentina Lancellotta.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2013

Outcome of a phase II prospective study on partial breast irradiation with interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Cynthia Aristei; Giorgia Capezzali; A. Farneti; Vittorio Bini; Lorenzo Falcinelli; Manuela Margaritelli; Valentina Lancellotta; C. Zucchetti; Elisabetta Perrucci

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an alternative to whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in selected patients. Until the results of randomized phase III studies are available, phase II studies inform about PBI. We report the 5 year results of a phase II prospective study with PBI using interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00499057). METHODS Hundred patients received PBI (4 Gy, twice a day for 4 days, until 32 Gy). Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 40years, infiltrating carcinoma without lobular histology, ductal in situ carcinoma, tumor size ≤ 2.5 cm, negative surgical margins and axillary lymph nodes. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 60 months late toxicity occurred in 25 patients; the 5-year probability of freedom from late toxicity was 72.6% (95% CI: 63.7-81.7). Tamoxifen was the only significant risk factor for late toxicity. Cosmetic results, judged by physicians and patients, were good/excellent in 98 patients. Three local relapses (1 true, 2 elsewhere) and 1 regional relapse occurred. The 5-year probability of local or regional relapse-free survival was 97.7% (95% CI: 91.1-99.4) and 99.0% (95% CI: 92.9-99.8), respectively. CONCLUSION PBI with interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy is associated with low relapse and late toxicity rates.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017

Partial breast irradiation with interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Long-term results of a phase II prospective study

Cynthia Aristei; Ernesto Maranzano; Valentina Lancellotta; L. Chirico; C. Zucchetti; M. Italiani; P. Anselmo; C. Mariucci; Elisabetta Perrucci; F. Arcidiacono; Fabio Trippa; Gyã¶rgy Kovacs; Vittorio Bini

PURPOSE We report the long-term results of phase II prospective study with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy. METHODS 240 patients received APBI (4Gy, twice daily; total dose 32Gy). RESULTS Median follow-up was 96months. Recurrences in the treated breast developed in 8 patients (3.3%) at a median of 73months after APBI. The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences were respectively, 1.8% (95%CI: 0.6-4.3) and 6.6% (95%CI: 2.7-12.9). Regional recurrences developed in 5 patients (2%) at a median of 28months and distant metastases in 8 (3.3%) at a median of 32.5months. Breast cancer specific mortality occurred in 6 patients (2.5%) at a median of 60months. Acute toxicity developed in 71 (29.6%) patients (G1 in 60 and G2 in 11). Almost all were skin toxicity and hematomas. Late toxicity was observed in 90 patients (37.5%), G1 in 97 cases and G2 in 11. Some patients presented with more than one type of toxicity. Teleangectasia and fibrosis were the most common (48 and 44 cases respectively), followed by fat necrosis (in 18 patients) Tamoxifen emerged as the only risk factor for breast fibrosis (p=0.007). Cosmetic results were judged by the physicians as excellent in 174 (83.7%) patients, good in 25 (12%) fair in 8 (3.8%) and poor in 1 (0.5%); 174 patients (83.7%) judged outcomes as excellent, 26 (12.4%) as good, 7 (3.4%) as fair and 1 (0.5%) as poor. Physician/patient agreement was good (weighted k-value 0.72). CONCLUSIONS APBI with interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy was associated with good outcomes, low relapse and toxicity rates. Few events during this long-term follow-up preclude identifying specific features of patients at risk of relapse and illustrate the need for a large data-base.


Brachytherapy | 2016

Recurrences and toxicity after adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy in Stage I–II endometrial cancer: A monoinstitutional experience

Elisabetta Perrucci; Valentina Lancellotta; Vittorio Bini; C. Zucchetti; C. Mariucci; Giampaolo Montesi; Stefano Saccia; Cynthia Aristei

PURPOSE To evaluate the incidences of vaginal recurrence and toxicity after vaginal brachytherapy in Stage I-II endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2003 and 2012, 150 high-intermediate-risk Stage I and 7 Stage II patients, median age 64 years, underwent surgery, with or without lymphadenectomy, and 3D brachytherapy: 7 Gy, at 5 mm depth from applicator surface, for 3-week fractions. The effects of age, grading, number of excised lymph nodes and pathologic stage on loco-regional relapse (LRR), metastases, and tumor-related death were investigated. Vaginal toxicity was evaluated during followup visits. RESULTS At 83 months of median followup, 144 patients were disease free, 2 in relapse, 7 deceased from disease, and 4 from other causes. One vaginal (0.6%), five nodal (3.2%), three pelvic over the vaginal cuff (1.9%), and one distant recurrences were seen (0.6%). The 5-year probability of LRR-free, distant metastasis-free and cause-specific survivals for all patients were 93.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.1-96.7), 97.8% (95% CI: 93.2-99.3), and 96.5% (95% CI: 93.5-99.5) and for Stage I 95.7% (95% CI: 92.2-9.1), 99.3% (95% CI: 98.0-100), and 97.7% (95% CI: 95.2-100), respectively. At multivariate analysis, Stage II disease and more than 12 lymph nodes sampled were associated with LRR (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.88; 95% CI: 1.390-10.878; p = 0.010 and HR: 6.952; 95% CI: 1.591-30.385; p = 0.010) and Stage II with metastasis and tumor-related death (HR: 23.057; 95% CI: 2.296-231.485; p = 0.008 and HR: 4.324; 95% CI: 1.223-15.290; p = 0.023). Vaginal acute and chronic toxicity was 16% and 55.4%, respectively, all only Grades 1-2. CONCLUSIONS For high-to-intermediate-risk Stage I endometrial cancer, 3D vaginal brachytherapy achieved good local control and low toxicity. In Stage II, patients brachytherapy could be administered after complete surgical staging.


Tumori | 2016

Radiotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer in men under 70 years of age

Rita Bellavita; Melissa Scricciolo; Vittorio Bini; F. Arcidiacono; Giampaolo Montesi; Valentina Lancellotta; C. Zucchetti; Marco Lupattelli; Cynthia Aristei

Aims To demonstrate that radiotherapy (RT) is a valid alternative to surgery in men ≤70 years old with localized prostate cancer. Methods From 1988 to 2009, 214 patients with T1-2 N0 M0 prostate cancer were treated with RT. The effects of patient- and treatment-related risk factors on toxicity were investigated. Results Median follow-up was 105 months (range 14.2-180). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year biochemical relapse-free survival for all 214 patients was 80%, 61.9%, and 57.5%, respectively. In bivariate analysis, age (≤65 vs 65-70 years) was not a significant factor for biochemical relapse, while radiation dose was (p = 0.05) in multivariate analysis. Cancer-specific survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 98.4%, 93.2%, and 69.7%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 167 months (95% confidence interval 147.3-186.7). The OS rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 91.8%, 75.8%, and 42.5%, respectively. Acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities occurred in 105 (49%) and 98 patients (45.8%), respectively, with only 2 cases of grade III GI toxicity. Late GU and GI toxicities occurred in 17 (7.9%) and 20 (9.3%) patients, respectively, with 1 grade III GI toxicity and 2 grade III GU toxicities. Risk factors for late toxicity were age and RT dose and technique, which were unrelated to acute toxicity. Conclusions Age ≤70 years does not consistently confer a negative prognosis for localized prostate cancer. Radiotherapy appears to be a viable alternative to surgery, offering excellent long-term cancer control.


Acta Oncologica | 2017

Variability in axillary lymph node delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy in presence of guidelines on a multi-institutional platform

D. Ciardo; Angela Argenone; Genoveva Ionela Boboc; Francesca Cucciarelli; Fiorenza De Rose; Maria De Santis; Alessandra Huscher; Edy Ippolito; Maria Rosa La Porta; Lorenza Marino; Ilaria Meaglia; Francesca Rossi; Paolo Alpi; Mario Bignardi; Alessio Bonanni; Domenico Cante; Tino Ceschia; Letizia Fabbietti; Marco Lupattelli; E.D. Mantero; Alessia Monaco; P. Porcu; Vincenzo Ravo; S. Silipigni; A. Tozzi; Vincenza Umina; Dario Zerini; Luigi Bordonaro; Giorgia Capezzali; E. Clerici

Abstract Aim: To quantify the variability between radiation oncologists (ROs) when outlining axillary nodes in breast cancer. Material and methods: For each participating center, three ROs with different levels of expertise, i.e., junior (J), senior (S) and expert (E), contoured axillary nodal levels (L1, L2, L3 and L4) on the CT images of three different patients (P) of an increasing degree of anatomical complexity (from P1 to P2 to P3), according to contouring guidelines. Consensus contours were generated using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) method. Results: Fifteen centers and 42 ROs participated. Overall, the median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.66. Statistically significant differences were observed according to the level of expertise (better agreement for J and E, worse for S); the axillary level (better agreement for L1 and L4, worse for L3); the patient (better agreement for P1, worse for P3). Statistically significant differences in contouring were found in 18% of the inter-center comparison. Less than a half of the centers could claim to have a good agreement between the internal ROs. Conclusions: The overall intra-institute and inter-institute agreement was moderate. Central lymph-node levels were the most critical and variability increased as the complexity of the patient’s anatomy increased. These findings might have an effect on the interpretation of results from multicenter and even mono-institute studies.


Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology | 2018

Effects of topical polydeoxyribonucleotide on radiation-induced oral mucositis

Anna Maria Podlesko; Nicola Ramacciati; Serenella Panzolini; Simonetta Saldi; Serenella Fiorucci; Daniela Pierini; Marina Mancini; Maria S. Merolla; Valentina Lancellotta; Cynthia Aristei

Highlights • Oral mucositis (OM), the most common toxicity in patients with head and neck cancer.• Polideoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) is highly regenerative and anti-inflammatory drug.• OM lesions were attenuated to Grade 2 within the first week of PDRN treatment.• Pain was relieved about 2–3 days after starting treatment with PDRN spray.• All the patients completed Radiotherapy and chemotherapy without any interruptions.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018

A national multicenter study on 1072 DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast radiotherapy (COBCG-01 study)

Icro Meattini; Nadia Pasinetti; B. Meduri; Fiorenza De Rose; Maria Carmen De Santis; Pierfrancesco Franco; Valentina Lancellotta; Francesca Rossi; Calogero Saieva; Isacco Desideri; Camilla Delli Paoli; Elisa D'Angelo; Luca Triggiani; Paolo Bastiani; Filippo Alongi; L. Lozza; Cynthia Aristei; Umberto Ricardi; M. Scorsetti; Lorenzo Livi

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and whole breast radiation (RT) with or without endocrine therapy (ET) represent the standard of care for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The use of adjuvant treatments after surgery is still controversial in this setting. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis on a series of DCIS patients treated with BCS and adjuvant RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected clinical data from nine Italian centers on 1072 women having a diagnosis of DCIS and treated between 1997 and 2012. We reported on the 5- and 10-year local recurrence (LR) rates, overall survival, and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) employing the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 67 LR (6.3%) and 47 deaths (4.4%) were observed. LR rates at 5 and 10 years were 3.4% and 7.6%, respectively. BCSS rates at 5 and 10 years were 99.7% and 99.1%, respectively. At univariate regression analysis, postmenopausal state (p = 0.009), estrogen receptor (ER) (p = 0.0001) and progesterone receptor (p = 0.018) positivity and ET (p = 0.006) were inversely correlated with LR. Final surgical margins (FSM) status <1 mm was significantly correlated with higher LR (p = 0.003). At multivariate regression analysis postmenopausal state (p = 0.03), and ER positive (p = 0.045) maintained the significant favorable feature, while FSM <1 mm (p = 0.024) confirmed its negative impact on LR. CONCLUSIONS Our real-life study pointed out the significant favorable prognostic role of postmenopausal state and ER positive status on LR occurrence. FSM <1 mm was significantly correlated to a higher chance to experience LR.


Archive | 2018

Which Side Effects Should Be Described to Patients Before Neoadjuvant Radio-Chemotherapy Treatment?

Cynthia Aristei; Valentina Lancellotta; Marco Lupattelli

Chemotherapy and irradiation of organs adjacent to the target volumes are associated with significant acute gastrointestinal and genito-urinary toxicity and a high rate of post-operative complications and late toxicities. Assessing radiochemotherapy-related side-effects is hard because inter-study comparisons may be hampered by use of different toxicity scales, cohort sizes, study time-points, and study focus which may analyse, for example, only single side effects and their grades or all side-effects according to grade. Moreover, some side effects were under-analysed and under-reported. Finally, while increased early toxicity has been recognized in all trials, data are less clear about late toxicity. With the aim of improving the rectal cancer patient’s relationship with the radiation oncologist in the pre-treatment consultation this chapter answers the most common questions asked by a candidate for neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy.


Journal of Geriatric Oncology | 2018

The role of personalized Interventional Radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in the management of older patients with non-melanoma skin cancer

Valentina Lancellotta; G. Kovacs; Luca Tagliaferri; Elisabetta Perrucci; Agata Rembielak; Luca Stingeni; Marta Tramontana; Katharina Hansel; Giuseppe Colloca; Simonetta Saldi; Vincenzo Valentini; Cynthia Aristei

OBJECTIVE Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has been rapidly increasing in incidence over the past 30 years. Mainstays of treatment remain surgery and radiotherapy, particularly in older and/or frail patients (≥75 years old) that often require a personalized treatment strategy using innovative biotechnologies. High-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR-IRT) seems to be an excellent option for NMSC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Nineteen aged patients with advanced, biopsy proven NMSC were treated with exclusively HDR-IRT. A personalized double-layer mould of thermoplastic mask material was applied to the skin surface. Plastic tubes were fixed on the mould in appropriate geometry over the target area. Planning computed tomography (CT) images were acquired with 2.5 mm slice thickness and transmitted to the planning system. Treatment intention was to deliver ≥95% of the prescribed dose to the Planning Target Volume (PTV), accepting 90% as satisfactory. Toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale (CTCAE) v. 4.0. RESULTS Median age was 86 years. Acute toxicity: Grade 2 erythema appeared in all 19 patients. Towards the end of each treatment schedule, epidermolysis developed which was resolved within 6 weeks of completing HDR-IRT. Late toxicity: Grade 1 skin atrophy, pigmentation changes and alopecia in field were observed in all patients. At last follow-up, all patients were disease free. CONCLUSIONS Personalized HDR-IRT appears to be safe and effective for frail older patients and a valid alternative to supportive care for those with contraindication to surgery. Future investigations using also large database analysis seem to be advisory.


Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy | 2018

ENT COBRA ONTOLOGY: the covariates classification system proposed by the Head & Neck and Skin GEC-ESTRO Working Group for interdisciplinary standardized data collection in head and neck patient cohorts treated with interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy)

Luca Tagliaferri; Ashwini Budrukkar; Jacopo Lenkowicz; Mauricio Cambeiro; Francesco Bussu; Jose Luis Guinot; Guido Hildebrandt; Bengt Johansson; Jens E. Meyer; Peter Niehoff; Angeles Rovirosa; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy; L. Boldrini; N. Dinapoli; Vito Lanzotti; Andrea Damiani; Roberto Gatta; B. Fionda; Valentina Lancellotta; Tamer Soror; Rafael Martínez Monge; Vincenzo Valentini; György Kovács

Purpose Clinical data collecting is expensive in terms of time and human resources. Data can be collected in different ways; therefore, performing multicentric research based on previously stored data is often difficult. The primary objective of the ENT COBRA (COnsortium for BRachytherapy data Analysis) ontology is to define a specific terminological system to standardized data collection for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients treated with interventional radiotherapy. Material and methods ENT-COBRA is a consortium for standardized data collection for H&N patients treated with interventional radiotherapy. It is linked to H&N and Skin GEC-ESTRO Working Group and includes 11 centers from 6 countries. Its ontology was firstly defined by a multicentric working group, then evaluated by the consortium followed by a multi-professional technical commission involving a mathematician, an engineer, a physician with experience in data storage, a programmer, and a software expert. Results Two hundred and forty variables were defined on 13 input forms. There are 3 levels, each offering a specific type of analysis: 1. Registry level (epidemiology analysis); 2. Procedures level (standard oncology analysis); 3. Research level (radiomics analysis). The ontology was approved by the consortium and technical commission; an ad-hoc software architecture (“broker”) remaps the data present in already existing storage systems of the various centers according to the shared terminology system. The first data sharing was successfully performed using COBRA software and the ENT COBRA Ontology, automatically collecting data directly from 3 different hospital databases (Lübeck, Navarra, and Rome) in November 2017. Conclusions The COBRA Ontology is a good response to the multi-dimensional criticalities of data collection, retrieval, and usability. It allows to create a software for large multicentric databases with implementation of specific remapping functions wherever necessary. This approach is well-received by all involved parties, primarily because it does not change a single center’s storing technologies, procedures, and habits.

Collaboration


Dive into the Valentina Lancellotta's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge