Cynthia Aristei

EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum

BACKGROUND Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last 20years; however considerable variation still exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Large variation is also apparent between national guidelines and patterns of cancer care in Europe. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of Cancer Care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012, the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about cancer of the colon and rectum was held. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries. METHODS The expert panel had delegates of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Pathology (ESP), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and the European Colorectal Cancer Patient Organisation (EuropaColon), as well as delegates from national registries or audits. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. For the Delphi process, multidisciplinary experts were invited to comment and vote three web-based online voting rounds and to lecture on the subjects during the meeting (13th-15th December 2012). The sentences in the consensus document were available during the meeting and a televoting round during the conference by all participants was performed. This manuscript covers all sentences of the consensus document with the result of the voting. The consensus document represents sections on diagnostics, pathology, surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, and follow-up where applicable for treatment of colon cancer, rectal cancer and metastatic colorectal disease separately. Moreover, evidence based algorithms for diagnostics and treatment were composed which were also submitted to the Delphi process. RESULTS The total number of the voted sentences was 465. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the experts. Of the 465 sentences, 84% achieved large consensus, 6% achieved moderate consensus, and 7% resulted in minimum consensus. Only 3% was disagreed by more than 50% of the members. CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary consensus on key diagnostic and treatment issues for colon and rectal cancer management using the Delphi method was successful. This consensus document embodies the expertise of professionals from all disciplines involved in the care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms were developed to implement the current evidence and to define core treatment guidance for multidisciplinary team management of colon and rectal cancer throughout Europe.

Radiation therapy in metastatic spinal cord compression. A prospective analysis of 105 consecutive patients

One hundred thirty consecutive patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) were entered in a therapeutic protocol in which radiation therapy (RT) played the main role. When MSCC is diagnosed by clinical‐radiologic methods such as myelography with or without computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), steroids are given and RT treatment started within 24 hours. When diagnostic doubts exist or stabilization is necessary, surgery precedes RT. Chemohormonal potentially responsive tumors are also treated with chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Twelve patients (9.2%) underwent surgery plus RT, and 118 (90.8%) received RT alone. Thirteen (11%) early death patients were not evaluable. The 105 evaluable cases that received RT alone were analyzed. Median follow‐up was 15 months (range, 4 to 38 months). Response among patients with back pain was 80%. In cases with motor dysfunction, 48.6% improved, and in 33 of 105 patients (31.4%) without motor disability there was no deterioration. Forty percent of patients with autonomic dysfunction responded to RT. Median survival time was 7 months with a 36% probability of survival for 1 year. The median duration of improvement was 8 months. The most important prognostic factor was early diagnosis. Radiosensitivity of tumor was only important in paraparetic patients in predicting response to RT. Complete myelographic block significantly diminished response to RT. Vertebral collapse did not influence response or survival.

Improved Outcome With T-Cell–Depleted Bone Marrow Transplantation for Acute Leukemia

PURPOSE To eliminate the risk of rejection and lower the risk of relapse after T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplants in acute leukemia patients, we enhanced pretransplant immunosuppression and myeloablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Antithymocyte globulin and thiotepa were added to standard total-body irradiation/cyclophosphamide conditioning. Donor bone marrows were depleted ex vivo of T lymphocytes by soybean agglutination and E-rosetting. This approach was tested in 54 consecutive patients with acute leukemia who received transplants from HLA-identical sibling donors or, in two cases, from family donors mismatched at D-DR. No posttransplant immunosuppressive treatment was given as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. RESULTS Neither graft rejection nor GVHD occurred. Transplant-related deaths occurred in six (16.6%) of 36 patients in remission and in seven (38.8%) of 18 patients in relapse at the time of transplantation. The probability of relapse was .12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to .19) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and .28 (95% CI, .05 to .51) for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received transplants at the first or second remission. At a median follow-up of 6.9 years (minimum follow-up, 4.9 years), event-free survival for patients who received transplants while in remission was .74 (95% CI, .54 to .93) for acute myeloid leukemia patients and .59 (95% CI, .35 to .82) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. All surviving patients have 100% performance status. CONCLUSION Adding antithymocyte globulin and thiotepa to the conditioning regimen prevents rejection of extensively T-cell-depleted bone marrow. Even in the complete absence of GVHD, the leukemia relapse rate is not higher than in unmanipulated transplants.

Radiotherapy without steroids in selected metastatic spinal cord compression patients. A phase II trial.

A phase II trial was planned to investigate the feasibility of radiotherapy (RT) without steroids in 20 consecutive patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), no neurologic deficits, or only radiculopathy, and no massive invasion of the spine at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Aiming at an early diagnosis, MRI or CT was prescribed for all cancer patients with back pain and osteolysis, even when there were no signs of neurologic spinal compression. All patients were given 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks with no steroids. Back pain and motor capacity were the parameters adopted to verify response to RT. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) were able to walk without support, and 14 (70%) had no radiculopathy. Seventeen of 20 cases (85%) achieved relief from back pain. Regarding motor function, all patients (100%) responded to RT because the 16 patients able to walk without support at diagnosis did not deteriorate and the other 4, who needed support, became ambulatory without motor impairment. Median survival time was 14 months. Eight of 20 (40%) treated patients are still alive (14 to 36 months after end of RT), fully ambulatory, and free from relapse in the treated spine. Acute side effects were documented in only 2 patients (10%) and were managed without steroids. The results of this study suggest that RT without steroids is a feasible regimen for MSCC patients with good motor function. Elimination of steroids from the standard treatment for MSCC avoids cortisone side effects above all in those patients with diabetes, hypertension, peptic ulcer, and other steroid-sensitive medical problems.

No benefit of adjuvant Fluorouracil Leucovorin chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the rectum (LARC): Long term results of a randomized trial (I-CNR-RT).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACT-RT). The study was funded by the Italian National Research Council (CNR). METHODS From September 1992 to January 2001, 655 patients with LARC (clinically T3-4, any N) treated with NACT-RT and surgery, were randomized in two arms: follow-up (Arm A) or 6 cycles of ACT with 5 fluorouracil (5FU)-Folinic Acid (Arm B). NACT-RT consisted of 45Gy/28/ff concurrent with 5FU (350mg/sqm) and Folinic Acid (20mg/sqm) on days 1-5 and 29-33; surgery was performed after 4-6weeks. Median follow up was 63·7months. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS 634/655 patients were evaluable (Arm A 310, Arm B 324); 92·5% of Arm A and 91% of Arm B patients received the preoperative treatment as in the protocol; 294 patients of Arm A (94·8%) and 296 of Arm B (91·3%) underwent a radical resection; complete pathologic response and overall downstaging rates did not show any significant difference in the two arms. 83/297 (28%) patients in Arm B, never started ACT. Five year OS and DFS did not show any significant difference in the two treatment arms. Distant metastases occurred in 62 patients (21%) in Arm A and in 58 (19·6%) in Arm B. CONCLUSIONS In patients with LARC treated with NACT-RT, the addition of ACT did not improve 5year OS and DFS and had no impact on the distant metastasis rate.

EURECCA colorectal: Multidisciplinary Mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe

BACKGROUND Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last twenty years however still considerable variation exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of cancer care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012 the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about colon and rectum was held looking for multidisciplinary consensus. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries. METHODS The expert panel had delegates of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Pathology (ESP), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and the European Colorectal Cancer Patient Organisation (EuropaColon), as well as delegates from national registries or audits. Experts commented and voted on the two web-based online voting rounds before the meeting (between 4th and 25th October and between the 20th November and 3rd December 2012) as well as one online round after the meeting (4th-20th March 2013) and were invited to lecture on the subjects during the meeting (13th-15th December 2012). The sentences in the consensus document were available during the meeting and a televoting round during the conference by all participants was performed. All sentences that were voted on are available on the EURECCA website www.canceraudit.eu. The consensus document was divided in sections describing evidence based algorithms of diagnostics, pathology, surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, and follow-up where applicable for treatment of colon cancer, rectal cancer and stage IV separately. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. RESULTS The total number of the voted sentences was 465. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the experts. Of the 465 sentences, 84% achieved large consensus, 6% achieved moderate consensus, and 7% resulted in minimum consensus. Only 3% was disagreed by more than 50% of the members. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to achieve European Consensus on key diagnostic and treatment issues using the Delphi method. This consensus embodies the expertise of professionals from all disciplines involved in the care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms were developed to implement the current evidence and to define core treatment guidance for multidisciplinary team management of colon and rectal cancer throughout Europe.

Pharmacokinetics of vincristine in cancer patients treated with nifedipine

The pharmacokinetics of vincristine (VCR) after an intravenous bolus dose of 2 mg were studied in patients with cancer with and without a concomitant treatment with the calcium‐entry blocker nifedipine (NIF). VCR concentrations were determined by a sensitive radioimmunoassay. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by a nonlinear weighted least‐square regression program (SAS‐NLIN). A tri‐exponential model fitted the raw data better than a bi‐exponential model in five of 14 (35%) patients treated with VCR alone and in seven of 12 (58%) patients treated with VCR plus NIF (P = NS). The T1/2α was shorter in NIF‐treated patients, whereas the T 1/2γ was longer in the NIF‐treated group. The NIF‐treated group showed an increase in the AUC O‐∞ and AUC 1 to 96 hours, and a decrease in the AUC 0 to 1 hour. Total plasma clearance of VCR and 7‐day urinary excretion of VCR was reduced in the NIF‐treated patients. These data suggest that, when VCR is administered to NIF‐treated patients with cancer, there is a decrease in VCR clearance from the body. Theoretically, a greater cytotoxicity may be anticipated.

Radiation therapy of spinal cord compression caused by breast cancer: report of a prospective trial

Fifty-six breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression were consecutively treated with radiation therapy alone. All patients received steroids plus chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy. Emergency radiation therapy was administered using a split-course regimen: 5 Gy for 3 days, stopped for 4 days and, only in responders, a further 3 Gy for 5 days (time dose fractionation 68). Median follow-up was 22 months (range, 4 to 52 months). Response and survival were assessed on the basis of, pretreatment and posttreatment walking capacity, presence of vertebral body collapse or osteolysis, presence of other metastatic sites apart from bone and chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy. In 89% of patients with back pain the pain disappeared or lessened. Four of 6 cases (67%) with urinary dysfunction responded to radiation therapy. Of 35 cases with motor dysfunction at the time of diagnosis, 21 (60%) regained the ability to walk and another five (14%) who were able to walk with support at diagnosis did not deteriorate. All 21 cases without motor deficits before treatment maintained good motor performance after radiation therapy. Response to therapy was better in pretreatment walking than in nonwalking patients (97% vs 69%; p less than 0.02). Probability of duration of response at 1 year was 59% and 10% for posttreatment walking and nonwalking patients, respectively (p less than 0.0001). One year survival probability was 66% for posttreatment walking and 10% for posttreatment nonwalking patients, respectively (p less than 0.0001). Pretreatment and posttreatment ambulatory status were the most important prognostic factors.

EURECCA consensus conference highlights about rectal cancer clinical management: The radiation oncologist's expert review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although rectal and colon cancer management has progressed greatly in the last few decades clinical outcomes still need to be optimized. Furthermore, consensus is required on several issues as some of the main international guidelines provide different recommendations. The European Registration of Cancer Care (EURECCA) drew up documents to standardize management and care in Europe and aid in decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the present section the panel of experts reviews and discusses data from the literature on rectal cancer, focusing on recommendations for selecting between short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and long-course radio-chemotherapy (LCRTCT) as preoperative treatment as well as on the controversies about adjuvant treatment in patients who had received a pre-operative treatment. RESULTS The starting-point of the present EURECCA document is that adding SCRT or LCRTCT to TME improved loco-regional control but did not increase overall survival in any single trial which, in any case, had improved with the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) into clinical practice. Moderate consensus was achieved for cT3 anyNM0 disease. In this frame, agreement was reached on either SCRT followed by immediate surgery or LCRTCT with delayed surgery for mesorectal fascia (MRF) negative tumors at presentation. LCRTCT was recommended for tumor shrinkage in MRF+ at presentations but if patients were not candidates for chemotherapy, SCRT with delayed surgery is an option/alternative. LCRTCT was recommended for cT4 anycNM0. SCRT offers the advantages of less acute toxicity and lower costs, and LCRTCT tumor shrinkage and down-staging, with 13-36% pathological complete response (pCR) rates. To improve the efficacy of preoperative treatment both SCRT and LCRTCT have been, or are being, associated with diverse schedules of chemotherapy and even new targeted therapies but without any definitive evidence of benefit. Nowadays, standard treatment is fluoropyrimidine alone since alternative agents and regimens have not been shown to be more active, only more toxic. CONCLUSIONS The EURECCA panel summarized available evidence in an attempt to reduce variance in rectal cancer management. This is expected to benefit patients. Results from ongoing randomized trials will help clarify some of the issues that are still under debate.

Extended survival of a HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer patient with brain metastases also treated with intrathecal trastuzumab.

In 1991, a 38-year-old woman underwent a left mastectomy (Patey’s procedure) for stage IIA breast cancer. The histological diagnosis was ductal inWltrating carcinoma, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) negative, the grading and the HER-2 status unknown. She received six courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-Xuorouracil) i.v. on days 1, 8 every 4 weeks. In September 1998 a modest increase of CA15-3 was detected and a chest and abdomen CT scan visualized three liver and one lung lesions. A biopsy of one liver lesion diagnosed metastasis of breast cancer ER and PgR negative, HER-2 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC). At that time trastuzumab was not approved in Italy and the patient received a Wrst line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and doxorubicin given every 3 weeks, obtaining, after six courses, a complete remission (CR) that was consolidated with weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel [1]. Six months later, paclitaxel was stopped and trastuzumab continued. In July 2002, the patient complained of headaches, dizziness and gait disorder and multiple brain metastases were diagnosed by MRI without evidence of other lesions (PET-CT scan negative). Whole brain radiotherapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions) was administered using 4 MV photons produced by a linear accelerator with trastuzumab on a 3-weekly schedule obtaining a partial remission (PR) of the brain lesions. In April 2003, two new brain lesions in the cerebellar lobes were diagnosed by MRI without systemic progression. The patient underwent stereotaxic radio-surgery (22 Gy) and temozolamide was added to trastuzumab. After eight courses, a CR was documented by MRI and only temozolamide was discontinued. About 8 months later a new brain lesion in the left cerebellar lobe close to the meningeal layer was diagnosed without other metastases. Temozolamide was re-started along with trastuzumab, but progression of the brain lesions was documented after 3 months. Weekly cisplatin plus capecitabine were combined to trastuzumab but her neurological conditions began to deteriorate with gait apraxia and progressive dementia due to an increase of the brain lesions but also due to the development of late eVects of radiation therapy such as conXuent lesions involving much of the periventricular white matter and cerebral atrophy on MRI (Fig. 1). Corticosteroids were initiated. Since the liver and lung lesions never re-appeared, this disease was considered sensitive to trastuzumab, which due to its molecular weight does not seem to pass the blood-brain barrier although, recently, it has been reported that trastuzumab levels in the cerebrospinal Xuid can increase under conditions that alter the bloodbrain barrier such as meningeal carcinomatosis or radiotherapy [2] Therefore, in June 2005, following the suggestion of Doctor D. J. Slamon an Ommaya ventricular catheter was inserted and intrathecal injections of trastuzumab (12.5 mg every 3 weeks) were initiated combined with intravenous trastuzumab that had never been stopped since 1999. No tumour cells were found in the cerebrospinal Xuid. A M. Colozza (&) · E. Minenza · S. Gori S.C. Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera, Perugia, Italy e-mail: mariantonietta.colozza@tin.it