Vanessa Tassell

Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND In single-group studies, chromosomal rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) have been associated with marked clinical responses to crizotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting ALK. Whether crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy with respect to efficacy is unknown. METHODS We conducted a phase 3, open-label trial comparing crizotinib with chemotherapy in 347 patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive lung cancer who had received one prior platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral treatment with crizotinib (250 mg) twice daily or intravenous chemotherapy with either pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or docetaxel (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were permitted to cross over to crizotinib as part of a separate study. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months in the crizotinib group and 3.0 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for progression or death with crizotinib, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.64; P<0.001). The response rates were 65% (95% CI, 58 to 72) with crizotinib, as compared with 20% (95% CI, 14 to 26) with chemotherapy (P<0.001). An interim analysis of overall survival showed no significant improvement with crizotinib as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for death in the crizotinib group, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.54; P=0.54). Common adverse events associated with crizotinib were visual disorder, gastrointestinal side effects, and elevated liver aminotransferase levels, whereas common adverse events with chemotherapy were fatigue, alopecia, and dyspnea. Patients reported greater reductions in symptoms of lung cancer and greater improvement in global quality of life with crizotinib than with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00932893.).

Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure

AIMS To assess the antitumour activity, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous daily sunitinib dosing in patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) and to assess morning dosing versus evening dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label phase II study, patients were randomised to receive morning or evening dosing of sunitinib 37.5mg/day. The primary end-point was clinical benefit rate (CBR; percent complete responses+partial responses [PRs]+stable disease [SD] 24 weeks). Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, pharmacokinetic parameters and plasma biomarker levels. RESULTS Sixty of 61 planned patients received treatment (30 per dosing group); 26 completed the study. Overall, the CBR was 53% (95% exact CI, 40-66): eight patients (13%) achieved objective PRs; 24 (40%) achieved SD 24 weeks. Median PFS was 34 weeks (95% CI, 24-49); median OS was 107 weeks (95% CI, 72 - not yet calculable). Most adverse events (AEs) were of grade 1 or 2 in severity, and were manageable through dose modification or standard interventions. No new AEs were apparent compared with the approved intermittent dosing schedule. Antitumour activity and safety were generally similar with morning and evening dosing. Continuous daily sunitinib dosing achieved and sustained effective drug concentrations without additional accumulation across cycles. Decreases from baseline in plasma levels of soluble KIT after 20 and 24 weeks of dosing correlated with longer OS. CONCLUSION For patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant GIST, continuous daily sunitinib dosing appears to be an active alternative dosing strategy with acceptable safety.

Phase III Trial of Sunitinib in Combination With Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Monotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains an incurable illness in the majority of cases, despite major therapeutic advances. This may be related to the ability of breast tumors to induce neoangiogenesis, even in the face of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Sunitinib, an inhibitor of key molecules involved in neoangiogenesis, has an established role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell and other cancers and demonstrated activity in a phase II trial in MBC. We performed a randomized phase III trial comparing sunitinib plus capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2) with single-agent capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2) in patients with heavily pretreated MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility criteria included MBC, prior therapy with anthracyclines and taxanes, one or two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease or early relapse after a taxane plus anthracycline adjuvant regimen, and adequate organ function and performance status. The primary end point was progression-free survival, for which the study had 90% power to detect a 50% improvement (from 4 to 6 months). RESULTS A total of 442 patients were randomly assigned. Progression-free survival was not significantly different between the treatment arms, with medians of 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.5 to 6.0) for the sunitinib plus capecitabine arm and 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.6) for the capecitabine monotherapy arm (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.58; one-sided P = .941). There were no significant differences in response rate or overall survival. Toxicity, except for hand-foot syndrome, was more severe in the combination arm. CONCLUSION The addition of sunitinib to capecitabine does not improve the clinical outcome of patients with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Complete Longitudinal Analyses of the Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Trial of Sunitinib in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Following Imatinib Failure

Purpose: To analyze final long-term survival and clinical outcomes from the randomized phase III study of sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients after imatinib failure; to assess correlative angiogenesis biomarkers with patient outcomes. Experimental Design: Blinded sunitinib or placebo was given daily on a 4-week-on/2-week-off treatment schedule. Placebo-assigned patients could cross over to sunitinib at disease progression/study unblinding. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using conventional statistical methods and the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) method to explore cross-over impact. Circulating levels of angiogenesis biomarkers were analyzed. Results: In total, 243 patients were randomized to receive sunitinib and 118 to placebo, 103 of whom crossed over to open-label sunitinib. Conventional statistical analysis showed that OS converged in the sunitinib and placebo arms (median 72.7 vs. 64.9 weeks; HR, 0.876; P = 0.306) as expected, given the cross-over design. RPSFT analysis estimated median OS for placebo of 39.0 weeks (HR, 0.505, 95% CI, 0.262–1.134; P = 0.306). No new safety concerns emerged with extended sunitinib treatment. No consistent associations were found between the pharmacodynamics of angiogenesis-related plasma proteins during sunitinib treatment and clinical outcome. Conclusions: The cross-over design provided evidence of sunitinib clinical benefit based on prolonged time to tumor progression during the double-blind phase of this trial. As expected, following cross-over, there was no statistical difference in OS. RPSFT analysis modeled the absence of cross-over, estimating a substantial sunitinib OS benefit relative to placebo. Long-term sunitinib treatment was tolerated without new adverse events. Clin Cancer Res; 18(11); 3170–9. ©2012 AACR.

Complex renal cysts associated with crizotinib treatment

An apparent causal association between crizotinib treatment and renal cyst development emerged during clinical trials in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Serious adverse event (SAE) reports of renal cysts from a safety database of 1375 patients from four clinical trials were reviewed. A blinded, retrospective, independent radiologic review (IRR) was performed using scans from patients on study for ≥6 months in three clinical trials; risk factors for renal cyst development were assessed. Among 17 patients with renal cysts reported as SAEs, evidence of invasion into adjacent structures was noted in seven patients, with no evidence of malignancy found. These patients generally did not require dose reductions, none required permanent crizotinib discontinuation due to this AE, and most continued treatment with clinical benefit. In the blinded IRR, among 255 crizotinib‐treated patients, 22%, 3%, and 2% had preexisting simple cysts, complex cysts, or both, respectively. At the 6‐month tumor assessment, 9% of all patients had acquired new cysts, and 2% of patients with preexisting cysts had developed new cysts and enlargements (>50%) of preexisting simple cysts. Asians appeared to have an increased risk of developing new cysts on treatment; Koreans in particular had 5.18 times higher odds of developing cysts than non‐Asians (95% confidence interval, 1.51–17.78; P = 0.05). Crizotinib treatment appears to be associated with an increased risk of development and progression of renal cysts in patients with ALK‐positive NSCLC. While close monitoring is recommended, dosing modification was not generally necessary, allowing patients to remain on crizotinib treatment.

Glesatinib Exhibits Antitumor Activity in Lung Cancer Models and Patients Harboring MET Exon 14 Mutations and Overcomes Mutation-mediated Resistance to Type I MET Inhibitors in Nonclinical Models

Purpose: MET exon 14 deletion (METex14 del) mutations represent a novel class of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driver mutations. We evaluated glesatinib, a spectrum-selective MET inhibitor exhibiting a type II binding mode, in METex14 del–positive nonclinical models and NSCLC patients and assessed its ability to overcome resistance to type I MET inhibitors. Experimental Design: As most MET inhibitors in clinical development bind the active site with a type I binding mode, we investigated mechanisms of acquired resistance to each MET inhibitor class utilizing in vitro and in vivo models and in glesatinib clinical trials. Results: Glesatinib inhibited MET signaling, demonstrated marked regression of METex14 del-driven patient-derived xenografts, and demonstrated a durable RECIST partial response in a METex14 del mutation-positive patient enrolled on a glesatinib clinical trial. Prolonged treatment of nonclinical models with selected MET inhibitors resulted in differences in resistance kinetics and mutations within the MET activation loop (i.e., D1228N, Y1230C/H) that conferred resistance to type I MET inhibitors, but remained sensitive to glesatinib. In vivo models exhibiting METex14 del/A-loop double mutations and resistance to type I inhibitors exhibited a marked response to glesatinib. Finally, a METex14 del mutation-positive NSCLC patient who responded to crizotinib but later relapsed, demonstrated a mixed response to glesatinib including reduction in size of a MET Y1230H mutation-positive liver metastasis and concurrent loss of detection of this mutation in plasma DNA. Conclusions: Together, these data demonstrate that glesatinib exhibits a distinct mechanism of target inhibition and can overcome resistance to type I MET inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 23(21); 6661–72. ©2017 AACR.

Activity and safety of sunitinib in combination with trastuzumab for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: initial results from a phase II study.

CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2008 Abstracts Abstract #4115 Background: Sunitinib (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, FLT3, and CSF-1R, with proven single-agent activity in pts with advanced BC. Trastuzumab (T) is indicated as both monotherapy for second-line treatment and in combination with taxane-based therapies for first-line treatment of metastatic BC. This study investigates the activity and safety/tolerability of SU administered in combination with T in pts with advanced, HER2+ BC. Materials and methods: Eligible pts have unresectable, locally recurrent or metastatic HER2+ BC. Pts received SU at a starting dose of 37.5 mg/d po continuous daily dosing (CDD). T was administered iv wkly (loading 4 mg/kg then wkly 2 mg/kg) or q3w (loading 8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg q3w). Due to changes in standard of care, the trial was amended from a randomized, placebo controlled design, to a single-arm study, and eligibility criteria were changed to allow inclusion of pts who had previously received CT in the first-line setting. Previous treatment with T (± lapatinib) was also permitted. The planned sample size is 53 pts and the primary endpoint is ORR. Results: In this ongoing trial, a total of 49 pts have been enrolled to date (6 pts under the original protocol and 43 under the amendment). All 43 pts enrolled under the amendment were evaluable for safety/tolerability, and antitumor activity, measured by RECIST. As of May 2008, 25 pts continue on study and 18 have discontinued, 4 due to AEs. Pts started a total of 167 cycles of treatment with a median of 4 cycles/pt (range: 1–8). The planned dose of SU (37.5 mg/d) was maintained in 31/43 pts (72%). It was reduced to 25 mg/d in 12/43 pts (28%). One pt achieved a CR and 10 a PR. SD occurred in 20 pts and PD in 6 pts. This translated into an ORR of 26% (95% CI, 13.5–41.2) and a clinical benefit rate of 35% (95% CI, 21.0–50.9). Median PFS was 25.3 wks (95% CI, 19.3–32.0). The most common treatment-related AEs were diarrhea (55.8%), asthenia (48.8%) and hypertension (37.2%) of which most were G1 or 2. The most frequent G3 AEs were neutropenia (14%) and asthenia (11.6%). There were 2 treatment-related G4 events: thrombocytopenia (2.3%) and LVEF decline (2.3%). There was 1 treatment-related G5 AE (cardiogenic shock). Conclusions : SU 37.5 mg/d on a CDD schedule in combination with T (wkly or q3w) appears to have a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in pts previously treated for advanced HER2+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 4115.

Sunitinib in combination with trastuzumab for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: activity and safety results from a phase II study

Background: SU is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, FLT3, and CSF-1R, with single-agent activity in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated ABC (locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer). T is approved for 2nd-line monotherapy and in combination with taxane-based therapies for 1st-line ABC. The combination of SU + T in HER2+ ABC pts was investigated.Materials and methods: Eligible pts with HER2+ ABC received a starting dose of oral SU 37.5 mg/d (continuous daily dosing [CDD]) and either T administered wkly (iv loading 4 mg/kg then wkly 2 mg/kg) or q3w (loading 8 mg/kg then q3w 6 mg/kg). Due to changing standard of care, the trial was amended to include pts having prior chemotherapy in the 1st-line setting. Previous treatment (tx) with T (± lapatinib) was permitted. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), pharmacokinetics (PK) and quality of life (QoL).Results: As of April 2009, 60 pts were enrolled (6 on the original protocol and 54 under the amendment). Of 54 pts enrolled post-amendment, 6 pts continue on study and 48 have discontinued, 12 due to AEs. Most (n=31; 57%) pts received SU + T as 1st-line tx and 11/31 pts were completely tx-naive. Pts received a median of 5 cycles (range: 1–16) of SU and 4 cycles (range: 1–15) of T. SU was dose reduced from 37.5 mg/d to 25 mg/d in 39% of pts. All pts were evaluable for safety and 52 pts were evaluable for efficacy. ORR was 34.6% and clinical benefit rate was 48% (2 CR; 16 PR; 7 SD ≥24 wks). Of the 18 responders, 5 pts were completely tx-naive and 9 pts were 1st-line. Median PFS was 25.3 wks (95% CI, 19.3, 29.1). Most AEs were G1/2. G3 non-hematologic AEs in ≥10% pts were asthenia (17%) and hypertension (11%) and 3 G4 events occurred (LVEF decline, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis). Hematologic AEs (G3/4 in ≥10% pts) were neutropenia (22%) and thrombocytopenia (17%). One G5 event (cardiogenic shock) was reported. LVEF decline/LV dysfunction occurred in 21 pts (6 pts had ≥G3 AEs); 18/21 pts (86%) had received prior anthracycline and 12 pts (57%) prior T. There was no significant on-tx change from baseline in the QoL domain. Mean (SD) steady state level for SU was 46.1 (25.9) ng/mL in agreement with prior observations.Conclusions: The combination of SU (37.5 mg/d; CDD schedule) + T (wkly or q3w) showed acceptable tolerability and antitumor activity in HER2+ ABC pts without adversely affecting overall QoL. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 201.