Victor Biton

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults with Partial‐Onset Seizures

Summary:  Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide when added to 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures, and assess plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs to determine any potential for drug interactions.

Adjunctive perampanel for refractory partial-onset seizures: randomized phase III study 304.

Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of once-daily 8 or 12 mg perampanel, a noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, when added to concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of drug-resistant partial-onset seizures. Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00699972). Patients (≥12 years, with ongoing seizures despite 1–3 AEDs) were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily perampanel 8 mg, 12 mg, or placebo. Following baseline (6 weeks), patients entered a 19-week double-blind phase: 6-week titration (2 mg/week increments to target dose) followed by a 13-week maintenance period. Percent change in seizure frequency was the primary endpoint; 50% responder rate was the primary endpoint for EU registration. Results: Of 388 patients randomized and treated, 387 provided seizure frequency data. Using this intent-to-treat population over the double-blind phase, the median percent change in seizure frequency was −21.0%, −26.3%, and −34.5% for placebo and perampanel 8 and 12 mg, respectively (p = 0.0261 and p = 0.0158 for 8 and 12 mg vs placebo, respectively). Fifty percent responder rates during the maintenance period were 26.4%, 37.6%, and 36.1%, respectively, for placebo, perampanel 8 mg, and perampanel 12 mg; these differences were not statistically significant for 8 mg (p = 0.0760) or 12 mg (p = 0.0914). Sixty-eight (17.5%) patients discontinued, including 40 (10.3%) for adverse events. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, irritability, headache, fall, and ataxia. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated that once-daily, adjunctive perampanel at doses of 8 or 12 mg improved seizure control in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Doses of perampanel 8 and 12 mg were safe, and tolerability was acceptable. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that once-daily 8 and 12 mg doses of adjunctive perampanel are effective in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for partial‐onset seizures: A randomized controlled trial

Purpose:  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (400 and 600 mg/day) as adjunctive treatment in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

Brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled partial epilepsy in adults: a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a novel high‐affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand currently being investigated for the treatment of epilepsy. The purpose of this phase III study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of adjunctive BRV in adults with uncontrolled partial‐onset (focal) seizures.

Intravenous lacosamide as replacement for oral lacosamide in patients with partial-onset seizures.

Purpose: This multicenter, double‐blind, double‐dummy, randomized, inpatient trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous lacosamide as replacement for oral lacosamide in patients with partial‐onset seizures.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lamotrigine in primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy with PGTC seizures who were receiving one or two antiepileptic drugs at study entry were eligible. Patients with partial seizures were excluded on the basis of seizure history and screening EEGs. The study comprised a baseline phase, an escalation phase during which study medication was titrated to a target dose, and a 12-week maintenance phase during which doses of lamotrigine/placebo and concomitant antiepileptic drugs were maintained. Results: Of the 121 randomized patients ages 2 to 55 years, 117 (58 lamotrigine, 59 placebo) entered the escalation phase and received study medication. During the escalation and maintenance phases combined, median percent reduction in PGTC seizure frequency was 66.5% with lamotrigine compared with 34.2% with placebo (p = 0.006). The corresponding numbers for lamotrigine and placebo were 60.6% and 32.8% (p = 0.038) during the escalation phase and 81.9% and 43.0% (p = 0.006) during the maintenance phase. During the maintenance phase, 72% of lamotrigine-treated patients compared with 49% of placebo-treated patients experienced a ≥50% reduction in frequency of PGTC seizures (p = 0.014). A similar pattern of results was observed for all generalized seizures. The most common drug-related adverse events were dizziness (5% lamotrigine, 2% placebo), somnolence (5% lamotrigine, 2% placebo), and nausea (5% lamotrigine, 3% placebo). Conclusions: Adjunctive lamotrigine is effective in the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures and has a favorable tolerability profile.

Cognitive effects of lamotrigine compared with topiramate in patients with epilepsy

Objective: To compare the cognitive effects of lamotrigine vs topiramate as adjunctive therapy in adults with epilepsy. Methods: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, prospective study was conducted in adults with partial seizures. Lamotrigine or topiramate was introduced as an adjunctive therapy to carbamazepine or phenytoin and titrated over 8 weeks to target doses. These drugs were maintained another 8 weeks (maintenance phase) without dosage changes. The primary endpoint was change from screening to the end of the maintenance phase in a combined analysis of standardized measures of cognition (Controlled Oral Word Association Task [COWA]; Stroop Color–Word Interference; Digit Cancellation; Lafayette Grooved Pegboard, dominant hand; Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, delayed recall; and Symbol–Digit Modalities test). Results: For the primary endpoint, cognitive performance at the end of the maintenance phase was better with lamotrigine than with topiramate (415.3 vs 315.1; p < 0.001). On the individual cognitive tests, performance was better with lamotrigine than with topiramate in mean changes from screening on the COWA (p < 0.001), Stroop Color–Word Interference (p = 0.038), and Symbol–Digit Modalities tests (p < 0.001). The treatment effect exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for the COWA and the Symbol–Digit Modalities test. Mean changes from screening in the Performance-On-Line test simulating driving skills reflected better performance with lamotrigine than with topiramate (p = 0.021). The median percentage change from baseline in seizure frequency was lower with lamotrigine than with topiramate during the escalation phase (−80% vs −100%; p = 0.028) but not during the maintenance phase (−75% vs −100%; p = 0.062). The frequencies of cognitive adverse events and of premature withdrawals related to cognitive decline were higher with topiramate than with lamotrigine (6% vs 0%; p = 0.013). Conclusion: Lamotrigine had significantly less impact than topiramate on measures of cognition when used as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures.

Prolonged postictal encephalopathy

Eleven patients (6 males, 5 females; ages 7.5 to 40 years, mean 27.8) had prolonged postictal confusion lasting from 4 to 10 days. During that time, the EEG showed a typical encephalopathic pattern. Comprehensive evaluation ruled out the possibility of metabolic, toxic, drug-related, or ongoing nonconvulsive status epilepticus. We have designated this syndrome as prolonged postictal encephalopathy (PPIE). Nine of 11 patients were mildly to borderline mentally retarded. Ten had previous episodes of status epilepticus. Nine of 11 had minimal structural abnormalities (mainly diffuse cortical atrophy). Nine patients had multiple recurrent episodes of PPIE. All episodes occurred following a cluster of seizures: in 8 patients after a cluster of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, in 2 after complex partial seizures, and in 1 patient after a cluster of atypical absence seizures. This series suggests that vulnerability to develop PPIE exists in patients with diffuse structural abnormalities, mild to borderline mental retardation, a history of status epilepticus, and a tendency of seizures to cluster.

Nonfocal generalized tonic-clonic seizures : Response during long-term topiramate treatment

Purpose: A total of 131 adults and children (mean age, 27 years; range, 3–59 years) with generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS) of nonfocal origin resistant to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were treated with open‐label topiramate (TPM) after completing double‐blind placebo‐controlled trials.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of rufinamide as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures

Purpose:  Efficacy and safety of adjunctive rufinamide (3,200 mg/day) was assessed in adolescents and adults with inadequately controlled partial‐onset seizures receiving maintenance therapy with up to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).