Victoria G. Kolupaeva

Molecular mechanisms of translation initiation in eukaryotes

Translation initiation is a complex process in which initiator tRNA, 40S, and 60S ribosomal subunits are assembled by eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) into an 80S ribosome at the initiation codon of mRNA. The cap-binding complex eIF4F and the factors eIF4A and eIF4B are required for binding of 43S complexes (comprising a 40S subunit, eIF2/GTP/Met-tRNAi and eIF3) to the 5′ end of capped mRNA but are not sufficient to promote ribosomal scanning to the initiation codon. eIF1A enhances the ability of eIF1 to dissociate aberrantly assembled complexes from mRNA, and these factors synergistically mediate 48S complex assembly at the initiation codon. Joining of 48S complexes to 60S subunits to form 80S ribosomes requires eIF5B, which has an essential ribosome-dependent GTPase activity and hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP induced by eIF5. Initiation on a few mRNAs is cap-independent and occurs instead by internal ribosomal entry. Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and hepatitis C virus epitomize distinct mechanisms of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES)-mediated initiation. The eIF4A and eIF4G subunits of eIF4F bind immediately upstream of the EMCV initiation codon and promote binding of 43S complexes. EMCV initiation does not involve scanning and does not require eIF1, eIF1A, and the eIF4E subunit of eIF4F. Initiation on some EMCV-like IRESs requires additional noncanonical initiation factors, which alter IRES conformation and promote binding of eIF4A/4G. Initiation on the hepatitis C virus IRES is even simpler: 43S complexes containing only eIF2 and eIF3 bind directly to the initiation codon as a result of specific interaction of the IRES and the 40S subunit.

Translation Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4G Recognizes a Specific Structural Element within the Internal Ribosome Entry Site of Encephalomyocarditis Virus RNA

A complex of eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) 4A, 4E, and 4G (collectively termed eIF4F) plays a key role in recruiting mRNAs to ribosomes during translation initiation. The site of ribosomal entry onto most mRNAs is determined by interaction of the 5′-terminal cap with eIF4E; eIFs 4A and 4G may facilitate ribosomal entry by modifying mRNA structure near the cap and by interacting with ribosome-associated factors. eIF4G recruits uncapped encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) mRNA to ribosomes without the involvement of eIF4E by binding directly to the ∼450-nucleotide long EMCV internal ribosome entry site (IRES). We have used chemical and enzymatic probing to map the eIF4G binding site to a structural element within the J-K domain of the EMCV IRES that consists of an oligo(A) loop at the junction of three helices. The oligo(A) loop itself is not sufficient to form stable complexes with eIF4G since alteration of its structural context abolished its interaction with eIF4G. Addition of wild type ortrans-dominant mutant forms of eIF4A to binary IRES·eIF4G complexes did not further alter the pattern of chemical/enzymatic modification of the IRES.

An enzymatic footprinting analysis of the interaction of 40S ribosomal subunits with the internal ribosomal entry site of hepatitis C virus.

ABSTRACT Hepatitis C virus translation is initiated on a ∼330-nucleotide (nt)-long internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) at the 5′ end of the genome. In this process, a 43S preinitiation complex (comprising a 40S ribosomal subunit, eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3), and a ternary [eIF2-GTP-initiator tRNA] complex) binds the IRES in a precise manner so that the initiation codon is placed at the ribosomal P site. This binding step involves specific interactions between the IRES and different components of the 43S complex. The 40S subunit and eIF3 can bind to the IRES independently; previous analyses revealed that eIF3 binds specifically to an apical half of IRES domain III. Nucleotides in the IRES that are involved in the interaction with the 40S subunit were identified by RNase footprinting and mapped to the basal half of domain III and in domain IV. Interaction sites were identified in locations that have been found to be essential for IRES function, including (i) the apical loop residues GGG266-268 in subdomain IIId and (ii) the pseudoknot. Extensive protection from RNase cleavage also occurred downstream of the pseudoknot in domain IV, flanking both sides of the initiation codon and corresponding in length to that of the mRNA-binding cleft of the 40S subunit. These results indicate that the 40S subunit makes multiple interactions with the IRES and suggest that only nucleotides in domain IV are inserted into the mRNA-binding cleft of the 40S subunit.

Eukaryotic Initiation Factors 4G and 4A Mediate Conformational Changes Downstream of the Initiation Codon of the Encephalomyocarditis Virus Internal Ribosomal Entry Site

ABSTRACT Initiation of translation of encephalomyocarditis virus mRNA is mediated by an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) comprising structural domains H, I, J-K, and L immediately upstream of the initiation codon AUG at nucleotide 834 (AUG834). Assembly of 48S ribosomal complexes on the IRES requires eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), eIF3, eIF4A, and the central domain of eIF4G to which eIF4A binds. Footprinting experiments confirmed that eIF4G binds a three-way helical junction in the J-K domain and showed that it interacts extensively with RNA duplexes in the J-K and L domains. Deletion of apical hairpins in the J and K domains synergistically impaired the binding of eIF4G and IRES function. Directed hydroxyl radical probing, done by using Fe(II) tethered to surface residues in eIF4Gs central domain, indicated that it is oriented with its N terminus towards the base of domain J and its C terminus towards the apex. eIF4G recruits eIF4A to a defined location on the IRES, and the eIF4G/eIF4A complex caused localized ATP-independent conformational changes in the eIF4G-binding region of the IRES. This complex also induced more extensive conformational rearrangements at the 3′ border of the ribosome binding site that required ATP and active eIF4A. We propose that these conformational changes prepare the region flanking AUG834 for productive binding of the ribosome.

Position of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor eIF1A on the 40S Ribosomal Subunit Mapped by Directed Hydroxyl Radical Probing

The universally conserved eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF), eIF1A, plays multiple roles throughout initiation: it stimulates eIF2/GTP/Met-tRNAiMet attachment to 40S ribosomal subunits, scanning, start codon selection and subunit joining. Its bacterial ortholog IF1 consists of an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) domain, whereas eIF1A additionally contains a helical subdomain, N-terminal tail (NTT) and C-terminal tail (CTT). The NTT and CTT both enhance ribosomal recruitment of eIF2/GTP/Met-tRNAiMet, but have opposite effects on the stringency of start codon selection: the CTT increases, whereas the NTT decreases it. Here, we determined the position of eIF1A on the 40S subunit by directed hydroxyl radical cleavage. eIF1As OB domain binds in the A site, similar to IF1, whereas the helical subdomain contacts the head, forming a bridge over the mRNA channel. The NTT and CTT both thread under Met-tRNAiMet reaching into the P-site. The NTT threads closer to the mRNA channel. In the proposed model, the NTT does not clash with either mRNA or Met-tRNAiMet, consistent with its suggested role in promoting the ‘closed’ conformation of ribosomal complexes upon start codon recognition. In contrast, eIF1A-CTT appears to interfere with the P-site tRNA-head interaction in the ‘closed’ complex and is likely ejected from the P-site upon start codon recognition.

Mapping the binding interface between human eukaryotic initiation factors 1A and 5B: A new interaction between old partners

The translation initiation factors (IFs) IF1/eIF1A and IF2/eIF5B have been conserved throughout all kingdoms. Although the central roles of the bacterial factors IF1 and IF2 were established long ago, the importance of their eukaryotic homologs, eukaryotic IFs (eIFs) eIF1A and eIF5B, has only recently become evident. The translation machinery in eukaryotes is more complex and accordingly, eIF1A and eIF5B seem to have acquired a number of new functions while also retaining many of the roles of bacterial IF1 and IF2. IF1 and IF2 have been shown to interact on the ribosome but no binding has been detected for the free factors. In contrast, yeast eIF1A and eIF5B have been reported to interact in the absence of ribosomes. Here, we have identified the binding interface between human eIF1A and the C-terminal domain of eIF5B by using solution NMR. That interaction interface involves the C termini of the two proteins, which are not present in bacterial IF1 and IF2. The interaction is, therefore, unique to eukaryotes. A structural model for the interaction of eIF1A and eIF5B in the context of the ribosome is presented. We propose that eIF1A and eIF5B simultaneously interact at two sites that are >50 Å apart: through their C termini as reported here, and through an interface previously identified in bacterial IF1 and IF2. The binding between the C termini of eIF1A and eIF5B has implications for eukaryote-specific mechanisms of recruitment and release of translation IFs from the ribosome.

Efficient Translation Initiation Is Required for Replication of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus Subgenomic Replicons

ABSTRACT An internal ribosome entry site (IRES) mediates translation initiation of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) RNA. Studies have suggested that a portion of the Npro open reading frame (ORF) is required, although its exact function has not been defined. Here we show that a subgenomic (sg) BVDV RNA in which the NS3 ORF is preceded only by the 5′ nontranslated region did not replicate to detectable levels following transfection. However, RNA synthesis and cytopathic effects were observed following serial passage in the presence of a noncytopathic helper virus. Five sg clones derived from the passaged virus contained an identical, silent substitution near the beginning of the NS3 coding sequence (G400U), as well as additional mutations. Four of the reconstructed mutant RNAs replicated in transfected cells, and in vitro translation showed increased levels of NS3 for the mutant RNAs compared to that of wild-type (wt) MetNS3. To more precisely dissect the role of these mutations, we constructed two sg derivatives: ad3.10, which contains only the G400U mutation, and ad3.7, with silent substitutions designed to minimize RNA secondary structure downstream of the initiator AUG. Both RNAs replicated and were translated in vitro to similar levels. Moreover, ad3.7 and ad3.10, but not wt MetNS3, formed toeprints downstream of the initiator AUG codon in an assay for detecting the binding of 40S ribosomal subunits and 43S ribosomal complexes to the IRES. These results suggest that a lack of stable RNA secondary structure(s), rather than a specific RNA sequence, immediately downstream of the initiator AUG is important for optimal translation initiation of pestivirus RNAs.