Victoria Watson

Cerebrospinal fluid maraviroc concentrations in HIV-1 infected patients.

In order to assess the penetration of maraviroc to the central nervous system, we measured maraviroc concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (lower limit of quantitation 1.25 ng/ml) in seven paired CSF and plasma samples. The median plasma maraviroc concentration was 94.9 ng/ml (range 21.4–478.0) and the median CSF concentration was 3.63 ng/ml (range 1.83–12.2). CSF samples exceeded the median EC90 for maraviroc (0.57 ng/ml) by at least three-fold. The CSF levels of maraviroc found in this study likely contribute to viral suppression in the CSF.

Treatment intensification has no effect on the HIV-1 central nervous system infection in patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy.

Background:Antiretroviral treatment (ART) significantly reduces cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 RNA levels and residual viremia is less frequently found in CSF than in blood. However, persistent intrathecal immunoactivation is common, even after several years of ART. To investigate whether low-level CSF viremia and residual immunoactivation within the central nervous system (CNS) derive from ongoing local viral replication, we conducted a study of treatment intensification in patients on effective ART. Methods:Ten patients on ART with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter for >18 months were included. Intensification was given for in total 8 weeks: 4 weeks with maraviroc or lopinavir/ritonavir (good CNS penetration), and 4 weeks with enfuvirtide (poor CNS penetration). Lumbar punctures were performed 4 weeks before, at intensification commencement, at switchover after 4 weeks, at the conclusion of, and 4 weeks after the intensification period. Results:No significant changes in HIV RNA, neopterin, β2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin G index, albumin ratio, and CD4+ T-cell count were observed, either in CSF or blood, neither before, during, nor after the intensification periods. Conclusions:ART intensification did not reduce residual CSF HIV RNA levels or intrathecal immunoactivation in patients on ART. These findings do not support an ongoing viral replication in CNS.

Plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir once daily and raltegravir once and twice daily in HIV-infected individuals.

ObjectivesTo investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir, in HIV-infected subjects, in both plasma and at the intracellular (IC) site of action. MethodsHIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy received raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 21 days (period 1); darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily was added for 14 days (period 2), and patients were randomized to continue raltegravir twice daily (group 1) or to switch to 800 mg once daily (group 2), then they all stopped raltegravir intake and continued darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 14 days (period 3). Drug concentrations in plasma and cells (peripheral blood mononuclear cell) were measured, and differences in geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) between period 2 versus period 3 and period 2 versus period 1 were assessed. ResultsTwenty-four patients completed the study. Group 1 GMR (90% CI) of darunavir area under the curve (AUC) with and without raltegravir was 1.24 (1.13 to 1.45) for plasma and 1.24 (1.07 to 1.73) for cells and for group 2 was 1.14 (1.07 to 1.24) and 1.03 (0.94 to 1.16). GMR (90% CI) of raltegravir AUC without and with darunavir/ritonavir (plasma and cells) for group 1 was 0.90 (0.73 to 1.44) and 1.02 (0.81 to 1.67) and for group 2 was 1.21 (1.03 to 1.77) and 1.27 (1.07 to 1.94). Geometric mean IC to plasma AUC ratios were 5.3 and 4.9 for darunavir in groups 1 and 2 when darunavir/ritonavir was given alone and 4.9 and 5.6 for raltegravir when given alone. These ratios were not altered by the coadministered drug. ConclusionsNo remarkable interactions between darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir in plasma or cells were seen. Raltegravir IC concentrations are higher than previously reported; the difference being due to modified cell isolation procedures that reduced drug loss caused by washing.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Etravirine Administered Once or Twice Daily After 2 Weeks Treatment With Efavirenz in Healthy Volunteers

Objective:To assess the pharmacokinetics of etravirine once and twice daily without and with a preceding efavirenz intake period in healthy volunteers. Methods:Volunteers were randomized to receive etravirine 400 mg once daily (arm 1) or 200 mg twice daily (arm 2) for 14 days. All subjects underwent a washout period of 14 days and then took efavirenz 600 mg once daily for 14 days. Arm 1 and 2 restarted etravirine once and twice daily for 14 days. Etravirine pharmacokinetics was assessed for each phase (before and after efavirenz 14-day intake) on days 1 and 14. Efavirenz concentrations were measured daily for 14 days after intake withholding. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared (before and after efavirenz 14-day intake) by determining geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals. Results:Twenty-five subjects (9 female) completed the study. Steady-state etravirine pharmacokinetic parameters were significantly lower after efavirenz intake in the once-daily and twice-daily arms: geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals were 0.71 (0.62 to 0.81) for AUC 0-24, 0.78 (0.70 to 0.86) for Cmax, 0.67 (0.49 to 0.91) for Ctrough for once daily; and 0.72 (0.63 to 0.81) for AUC 0-12, 0.79 (0.70 to 0.90) for Cmax, and 0.63 (0.54 to 0.73) for Ctrough for twice daily. All subjects had detectable efavirenz concentrations 7 days after stopping efavirenz intake, 5 above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 1000 ng/mL. Conclusions:The induction effect of efavirenz persists for at least 2 weeks after stopping drug intake. The decrease in etravirine is not considered clinically significant. Further clinical data are warranted.

Plasma and Intracellular (Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells) Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Raltegravir (800 Milligrams) in HIV-Infected Patients

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in HIV-infected patients receiving once-daily raltegravir. Five HIV-infected patients on stable therapy with lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy whose HIV-1 RNA load was <50 copies/ml were included in this open-label, pilot study. Raltegravir was added to the antiretroviral regimen at a dose of 800 mg once daily from days 0 to 10. On day 10, a full pharmacokinetic profile was obtained for each participant. Raltegravir concentrations in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector and by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), respectively. The values of the raltegravir pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and PBMCs were calculated by noncompartmental analysis. Raltegravir was well tolerated, and all participants completed the study. No differences in the times to the maximum concentration of raltegravir in plasma or the raltegravir half-lives were observed between plasma and PBMCs. The geometric mean raltegravir maximum concentration, the concentration at the end of the dosing interval, and the area under the concentration-time curve during the dose interval in plasma versus PBMCs were 2,640 ng/ml (range, 887 to 10,605 ng/ml) versus 199 ng/ml (range, 82 to 857 ng/ml) (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 13.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.11 to 56.89; P = 0.003); 89 ng/ml (range, 51 to 200 ng/ml) versus 7 ng/ml (range, 2 to 15 ng/ml) (GMR, 13.21; 95% CI, 3.94 to 44.26; P = 0.001); and 12,200 ng·h/ml (range, 5,152 to 30,130 ng·h/ml) versus 909 ng·h/ml (range, 499 to 2,189 ng·h/ml) (GMR, 13.43; 95% CI, 5.13 to 35.16; P < 0.001), respectively. Raltegravir does not accumulate in PBMCs, with intracellular concentrations being about 1/10 of the concentrations in plasma. Despite once-daily dosing, mean raltegravir concentrations at the end of the dosing interval in plasma and PBMCs exceeded the reported protein-binding-adjusted 95% inhibitory concentration (IC95) and IC50 for wild-type viral strains, respectively.

Virological Efficacy in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Neurocognitive Status in Patients with Long-Term Monotherapy Based on Lopinavir/Ritonavir: An Exploratory Study

Background Data on suppression of HIV replication in the CNS and on the subsequent risk of neurocognitive impairment using monotherapy with boosted protease inhibitors are limited. Methods Ours was an exploratory cross-sectional study in patients on lopinavir/ritonavir-based monotherapy (LPV/r-MT) or standard triple therapy (LPV/r-ART) for at least 96 weeks who maintained a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL. HIV-1 RNA in CSF was determined by HIV-1 SuperLow assay (lower limit of detection, 1 copy/mL). Neurocognitive functioning was assessed using a recommended battery of neuropsychological tests covering 7 areas. Neurocognitive impairment (NCI) was determined and also a global deficit score (GDS) for study comparisons. Results Seventeen patients on LPV/r-MT and 17 on LPV/r-ART were included. Fourteen (82.4%) patients on LPV/r-MT and 16 (94.1%) on LPV/r-ART had HIV-1 RNA <1 copy/mL in CSF (p = 0.601). NCI was observed in 7 patients on LPV/r-MT and in 10 on LPV/r-ART (41% vs 59%; p = 0.494). Mean (SD) GDS was 0.22 (0.20) in patients on LPV/r-MT and 0.47 (0.34) in those on LPV/r-ART (p = 0.012). Conclusions Suppression of HIV in CSF is similar in individuals with durable plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression who are receiving LPV/r-MT or LPV/r-ART for at least 96 weeks. Findings for HIV-1 replication in CSF and neurocognitive status indicate that this strategy seems to be safe for CNS functioning.

CNS effects of a CCR5 inhibitor in HIV-infected subjects: a pharmacokinetic and cerebral metabolite study

BACKGROUND We conducted a pharmacokinetic and in vivo cerebral (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) study to assess CSF exposure and cerebral metabolite ratios (CMRs) following maraviroc intensification. METHODS HIV-infected neurologically asymptomatic adults receiving tenofovir, emtricitabine and lopinavir/ritonavir with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL were eligible and received intensified therapy with 150 mg of maraviroc twice daily. (1)H-MRS was performed in several cerebral locations, including the right basal ganglia (RBG), to assess CMRs, including N-acetyl aspartate/creatine (NAA/Cr), at baseline and after 14 days. Subsequently, on day 15, blood samples were obtained to determine plasma concentrations of maraviroc pre-dose (C(trough)) and then paired blood and CSF samples were collected at 4 or 6 h post-dose. Associations between maraviroc exposure, clinical parameters and changes to CMRs were evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00982878). RESULTS Twelve subjects (75% male) participated with a mean (SD) CD4+ cell count of 503 (199) cells/μL. Mean (SD) maraviroc plasma concentrations at pre-dose, 4 h post-dose and 6 h post-dose were 337 (74), 842 (174) and 485 (100) ng/mL and CSF concentrations at 4 h post-dose and 6 h post-dose were 7.5 (1.3) and 5.1 (1.2) ng/mL. The mean maraviroc CSF : plasma ratio (range) was 1.01% (0.57%-1.61%). An increase of 14.8% was observed for the RBG NAA/Cr ratio, which was significantly associated with higher maraviroc plasma C(trough) (P = 0.05, r = 0.61), but not CSF concentration (P = 0.16, r = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS After 14 days of maraviroc intensification, small increases in cerebral metabolite markers of neuronal integrity (NAA/Cr ratios) were observed and are associated with maraviroc plasma C(trough).

Co-administration of fluconazole increases nevirapine concentrations in HIV-infected Ugandans

Background Data from retrospective studies have suggested that there may be an interaction between fluconazole and nevirapine, increasing nevirapine concentrations and potentially leading to hepatotoxicity. Methods This study was nested within a large double-blind placebo-controlled study designed to determine if primary prophylaxis with fluconazole (200 mg three times per week) could reduce cryptococcal disease [CRYPTOPRO (ISRCTN 76481529)] in HIV-infected adults in rural south-western Uganda. Detailed pharmacokinetic studies were performed on 49 participants (22 on placebo and 27 on fluconazole) who had been on fluconazole or placebo with nevirapine for ≥4 weeks. Results The geometric mean pre-dose concentrations of nevirapine were 3865 ng/mL [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3452–4758 ng/mL] and 5141 ng/mL (95% CI 4760–6595 ng/mL) (P = 0.009) in the placebo and fluconazole arms, respectively. The change in the peak nevirapine concentration in plasma (Cmax) was also higher in the fluconazole arm compared with the placebo arm [median 6546 (95% CI 6040–7974) versus 5126 (95% CI 4739–5773) ng/mL, P = 0.012]. Fluconazole increased the nevirapine area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 8 h by 29% [geometric mean AUC0–8 46 135 (95% CI 42 432–57 173) versus 35 871 (95% CI 32 808–41 372) ng·h/mL, P = 0.016]. In the larger cohort from which the participants were drawn, co-administration of fluconazole did not increase the risk of hepatotoxicity. Conclusions Fluconazole led to significant increases in nevirapine exposure, but was not associated with evidence of increased hepatotoxicity.

Rilpivirine exposure in plasma and sanctuary site compartments after switching from nevirapine-containing combined antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES Pharmacokinetic parameters following modifications to antiretroviral therapy and sanctuary site exposure are often unknown for recently licensed antiretrovirals. We assessed plasma, CSF and seminal plasma (SP) exposure of rilpivirine after switching from nevirapine. METHODS HIV-infected male subjects receiving tenofovir/emtricitabine/nevirapine (245/200/400 mg) once daily switched to tenofovir/emtricitabine/rilpivirine (245/200/25 mg) once daily for 60 days when CSF and semen samples were collected. Mean and individual plasma concentrations of nevirapine and rilpivirine were compared with the proposed plasma target concentration for nevirapine (3000 ng/mL) and the protein binding-adjusted EC90 for rilpivirine (12.1 ng/mL). Mean rilpivirine CSF and SP concentrations were calculated and individual values compared with the EC50 and EC90 for wild-type virus (0.27 and 0.66 ng/mL, respectively). RESULTS Of 13 subjects completing study procedures including CSF examination, 8 provided seminal samples. By day 3, the mean plasma rilpivirine trough concentration was 29.7 ng/mL (95% CI: 23.8-37). No patient presented rilpivirine plasma concentrations under the proposed threshold. The mean rilpivirine concentration in CSF was 0.8 ng/mL (95% CI: 0.7-1.0), representing a CSF : plasma ratio of 1.4%, with concentrations above the EC90 in 85% (11/13) of patients. In SP, the mean rilpivirine concentration was 4.9 ng/mL (95% CI: 3.3-7.2), representing an SP : plasma ratio of 9.5%, with all concentrations above the EC90. CONCLUSIONS Switching from nevirapine- to rilpivirine-containing antiretroviral therapy was safe and well tolerated, with plasma rilpivirine concentrations above the protein binding-adjusted EC90 in all subjects. Rilpivirine concentrations were always above the EC50 in the CSF and the EC90 in SP.

Efavirenz Pharmacokinetics in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma over a 24-Hour Dosing Interval

ABSTRACT We determined the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) over a 24-h dosing interval in a patient who had undergone a lumbar drain because of cryptococcal meningitis. Drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in paired CSF (n = 24) and plasma (n = 25) samples. The median plasma efavirenz concentration was 3,718 ng/ml (range, 2,439 to 4,952), and the median CSF concentration was 16.3 ng/ml (range, 7.3 to 22.3). The CSF/plasma area-under-the-curve ratio was 0.0044 corresponding to a CSF penetration of 0.44% of plasma.