Vincent F.M. Segers
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Vincent F.M. Segers.
Nature | 2008
Vincent F.M. Segers; Richard T. Lee
Heart failure is the leading cause of death worldwide, and current therapies only delay progression of the disease. Laboratory experiments and recent clinical trials suggest that cell-based therapies can improve cardiac function, and the implications of this for cardiac regeneration are causing great excitement. Bone-marrow-derived progenitor cells and other progenitor cells can differentiate into vascular cell types, restoring blood flow. More recently, resident cardiac stem cells have been shown to differentiate into multiple cell types present in the heart, including cardiac muscle cells, indicating that the heart is not terminally differentiated. These new findings have stimulated optimism that the progression of heart failure can be prevented or even reversed with cell-based therapy.
Circulation | 2007
Vincent F.M. Segers; Tomotake Tokunou; Luke J. Higgins; Catherine MacGillivray; Joseph Gannon; Richard T. Lee
Background— Local delivery of chemotactic factors represents a novel approach to tissue regeneration. However, successful chemokine protein delivery is challenged by barriers including the rapid diffusion of chemokines and cleavage of chemokines by proteases that are activated in injured tissues. Stromal cell–derived factor-1 (SDF-1) is a well-characterized chemokine for attracting stem cells and thus a strong candidate for promoting regeneration. However, SDF-1 is cleaved by exopeptidases and matrix metalloproteinase-2, generating a neurotoxin implicated in some forms of dementia. Methods and Results— We designed a new chemokine called S-SDF-1(S4V) that is resistant to matrix metalloproteinase-2 and exopeptidase cleavage but retains chemotactic bioactivity, reducing the neurotoxic potential of native SDF-1. To deliver S-SDF-1(S4V), we expressed and purified fusion proteins to tether the chemokine to self-assembling peptides, which form nanofibers and allow local delivery. Intramyocardial delivery of S-SDF-1(S4V) after myocardial infarction recruited CXCR4+/c-Kit+ stem cells (46±7 to 119±18 cells per section) and increased capillary density (from 169±42 to 283±27 per 1 mm2). Furthermore, in a randomized, blinded study of 176 rats with myocardial infarction, nanofiber delivery of the protease-resistant S-SDF-1(S4V) improved cardiac function (ejection fraction increased from 34.0±2.5% to 50.7±3.1%), whereas native SDF-1 had no beneficial effects. Conclusions— The combined advances of a new, protease-resistant SDF-1 and nanofiber-mediated delivery promoted recruitment of stem cells and improved cardiac function after myocardial infarction. These data demonstrate that driving chemotaxis of stem cells by local chemokine delivery is a promising new strategy for tissue regeneration.
Circulation | 2009
M. Elena Padin-Iruegas; Yu Misao; Michael E. Davis; Vincent F.M. Segers; Grazia Esposito; Tomotake Tokunou; Konrad Urbanek; Toru Hosoda; Marcello Rota; Piero Anversa; Annarosa Leri; Richard T. Lee; Jan Kajstura
Background— Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) possess the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)-IGF-1 receptor system, and IGF-1 can be tethered to self-assembling peptide nanofibers (NF-IGF-1), leading to prolonged release of this growth factor to the myocardium. Therefore, we tested whether local injection of clonogenic CPCs and NF-IGF-1 potentiates the activation and differentiation of delivered and resident CPCs enhancing cardiac repair after infarction. Methods and Results— Myocardial infarction was induced in rats, and untreated infarcts and infarcts treated with CPCs or NF-IGF-1 only and CPCs and NF-IGF-1 together were analyzed. With respect to infarcts exposed to CPCs or NF-IGF-1 alone, combination therapy resulted in a greater increase in the ratio of left ventricular mass to chamber volume and a better preservation of +dP/dt, −dP/dt, ejection fraction, and diastolic wall stress. Myocardial regeneration was detected in all treated infarcts, but the number of newly formed myocytes with combination therapy was 32% and 230% higher than with CPCs and NF-IGF-1, respectively. Corresponding differences in the volume of regenerated myocytes were 48% and 115%. Similarly, the length density of newly formed coronary arterioles with both CPCs and NF-IGF-1 was 73% and 83% greater than with CPCs and NF-IGF-1 alone, respectively. Importantly, activation of resident CPCs by paracrine effects contributed to cardiomyogenesis and vasculogenesis. Collectively, CPCs and NF-IGF-1 therapy reduced infarct size more than CPCs and NF-IGF-1 alone. Conclusions— The addition of nanofiber-mediated IGF-1 delivery to CPC therapy improved in part the recovery of myocardial structure and function after infarction.
Circulation Research | 2011
Vincent F.M. Segers; Richard T. Lee
Transplantation of stem cells into the heart can improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction and in chronic heart failure, but the extent of benefit and of reproducibility of this approach are insufficient. Survival of transplanted cells into myocardium is poor, and new strategies are needed to enhance stem cell differentiation and survival in vivo. In this review, we describe how biomaterials can enhance stem cell function in the heart. Biomaterials can mimic or include naturally occurring extracellular matrix and also instruct stem cell function in different ways. Biomaterials can promote angiogenesis, enhance engraftment and differentiation of stem cells, and accelerate electromechanical integration of transplanted stem cells. Biomaterials can also be used to deliver proteins, genes, or small RNAs together with stem cells. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that the biophysical environment of stem cells is crucial for their proliferation and differentiation, as well as their electromechanical integration. Many approaches in regenerative medicine will likely ultimately require integration of molecularly designed biomaterials and stem cell biology to develop stable tissue regeneration.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B | 2008
Gilbert Dubois; Vincent F.M. Segers; Valérie Bellamy; Laurent Sabbah; Séverine Peyrard; Patrick Bruneval; Albert Hagège; Richard T. Lee; Philippe Menasché
Cell transplantation is currently limited by poor graft retention and survival in the postinfarction scar. Because this issue could potentially be addressed by embedding cells in bioinjectable scaffolds and boosting cell survival pathways, we induced a myocardial infarction in 72 rats to assess the effects of different self-assembling peptides with or without platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) on survival of transplanted skeletal myoblasts. Two weeks after coronary artery ligation, rats were randomized to receive in-scar injections of culture medium (controls, n = 11), self-assembling peptide (RAD16-I) nanofibers (NF, n = 9), skeletal myoblasts (n = 12), or skeletal myoblasts in combination with NF (n = 8). In separate experiments with different self-assembling peptides (RAD16-II), rats received in-scar injections of culture medium (controls, n = 6), skeletal myoblasts (n = 10), PDGF-loaded peptides (n = 7), or skeletal myoblasts (5 x 10(6)) in combination with PDGF-loaded peptides (n = 9). After 1 month, left ventricular function, as assessed by echocardiography, was not improved in either of the experimental groups compared with controls. This correlated with the failure of RAD16-I peptides or PDGF-loaded RAD16-II peptides to improve myoblast survival despite a greater angiogenesis. In vitro experiments confirmed that the number of myoblasts decreased over time when seeded on nanofiber gels. These data suggest that the optimal use of biomaterial scaffolds for survival of transplanted cells will require specific tailoring of the biomaterial to the cell type.
The FASEB Journal | 2008
Tomotake Tokunou; R.E. Miller; Parth Patwari; Michael E. Davis; Vincent F.M. Segers; Alan J. Grodzinsky; Richard T. Lee
Insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) is a small protein that promotes cell survival and growth, often acting over long distances. Although for decades IGF‐1 has been considered to have therapeutic poten tial, systemic side effects of IGF‐1 are significant, and local delivery of IGF‐1 for tissue repair has been a long‐standing challenge. In this study, we designed and purified a novel protein, heparin‐binding IGF‐1 (Xp‐ HB‐IGF‐1), which is a fusion protein of native IGF‐1 with the heparin‐binding domain of heparin‐binding epidermal growth factor‐like growth factor. Xp‐HB‐ IGF‐1 bound selectively to heparin as well as the cell surfaces of 3T3 fibroblasts, neonatal cardiac myocytes and differentiating ES cells. Xp‐HB‐IGF‐1 activated the IGF‐1 receptor and Akt with identical kinetics and dose response, indicating no compromise of biological activ ity due to the heparin‐binding domain. Because carti lage is a proteoglycan‐rich environment and IGF‐1 is a known stimulus for chondrocyte biosynthesis, we then studied the effectiveness of Xp‐HB‐IGF‐1 in cartilage. Xp‐HB‐IGF‐1 was selectively retained by cartilage ex plants and led to sustained chondrocyte proteoglycan biosynthesis compared to IGF‐1. These data show that the strategy of engineering a “long‐distance” growth factor like IGF‐1 for local delivery may be useful for tissue repair and minimizing systemic effects.— Tokunou, T., Miller, R., Patwari, P., Davis, M. E., Segers, V. F. M., Grodzinsky, A. J., Lee, R. T. Engineering insulin‐like growth factor‐1 for local delivery. FASEB J. 22, 1886–1893 (2008)
Nature Medicine | 2007
Patrick C.H. Hsieh; Vincent F.M. Segers; Michael E. Davis; Catherine MacGillivray; Joseph Gannon; Jeffery D. Molkentin; Jeffrey Robbins; Richard T. Lee
Drug Discovery Today | 2007
Vincent F.M. Segers; Richard T. Lee
Archive | 2007
Richard T. Lee; Vincent F.M. Segers
Cardiovascular Regeneration and Stem Cell Therapy | 2007
Vincent F.M. Segers; Richard T. Lee