Vincenzo Madonna

Ceramic Femoral Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty - Two Year Follow-Up Results of an International Prospective Multi-Centre Study

Background: Total knee arthroplasty can be considered as a reliable surgical procedure with a good long-term clinical result. However, implant failure due to particle induced aseptic loosening as well as the aspect of hypersensitivity to metal ions still remains an emerging issue. Methods: The purpose of this prospective international multi-centre study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes and the reliability of the unconstrained Multigen Plus Total Knee System with a new BIOLOX® delta ceramic femoral component. Cemented total knee arthroplasty was performed on 108 patients (110 knees) at seven hospitals in three countries. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed preoperatively, and after 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively using the HSS-, WOMAC-, SF-36-score and standardised X-rays. Results: The mean preoperative HSS-Score amounted to 55.5 ± 11.5 points and improved significantly in all postoperative evaluations (85.7 ± 11.7 points at 24 months). Furthermore, improvements in WOMAC- and SF-36-score were evaluated as significant at all points of evaluation. Radiolucent lines around the femoral ceramic component at 24 months were found in four cases. Progression of radiolucent lines was not seen and no implant loosening was observed. During the 24 month follow-up eight patients underwent subsequent surgery due to reasons unrelated to the implant material. Conclusions: The observed clinical and radiological results are encouraging for a long-term survival of the ceramic femoral component. Therefore, ceramic implants could be a promising solution not only for patients with allergies against metallic implant materials, but also for the osteoarthritic knee joint. Long-term follow-up is necessary to draw conclusions regarding the superiority of the ceramic knee implants concerning in vivo wear and long-term survivorship.

Meniscal Augmentation and Replacement (Menaflex, Actifit, and NUsurface)

In the last decades, the surgical treatment of meniscal injury or damage has shifted from a total meniscectomy to a partial meniscectomy or repair. Rather than a removal of meniscal tissue, the goal of novel surgical techniques is to preserve as much functional meniscal tissue as possible. Recently, attempts have been made to promote meniscal healing, as well as the replacement of damaged menisci with allografts, scaffolds, meniscal implants, or substitutes. This chapter will focus on meniscal augmentation and on three types of meniscal replacement devices. These substitutes are the biological Menaflex™ or collagen meniscal implant (CMI), the biomimetic Actifit™ meniscal scaffold, and the nonbiological NUsurface® meniscal substitute.

Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery

PurposeGraft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is debated, with considerable controversy and variability among surgeons. Autograft tendons are actually the most used grafts for primary surgery; however, allografts have been used in greater frequency for both primary and revision ACL surgery over the past decade. Given the great debate on the use of allografts in ACL-R, the “Allografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction” consensus statement was developed among orthopedic surgeons and members of SIGASCOT (Società Italiana del Ginocchio, Artroscopia, Sport, Cartilagine, Tecnologie Ortopediche), with extensive experience in ACL-R, to investigate their habits in the use of allograft in different clinical situations. The results of this consensus statement will serve as benchmark information for future research and will help surgeons to facilitate the clinical decision making.MethodsIn March 2017, a formal consensus process was developed using a modified Delphi technique method, involving a steering group (9 participants), a rating group (28 participants) and a peer-review group (31 participants). Nine statements were generated and then debated during a SIGASCOT consensus meeting. A manuscript has been then developed to report methodology and results of the consensus process and finally approved by all steering group members.ResultsA different level of consensus has been reached among the topics selected. Strong agreement has been reported in considering harvesting, treatment and conservation methods relevant for clinical results, and in considering biological integration longer in allograft compared to autograft. Relative agreement has been reported in using allograft as the first-line graft for revision ACL-R, in considering biological integration a crucial aspect for rehabilitation protocol set-up, and in recommending a delayed return to sport when using allograft. Relative disagreement has been reported in using allograft as the first-line graft for primary ACL-R in patients over 50, and in not considering clinical results of allograft superior to autograft. Strong disagreement has been reported in using allograft as the first-line graft for primary ACL-R and for skeletally immature patients.ConclusionsResults of this consensus do not represent a guideline for surgeons, but could be used as starting point for an international discussion on use of allografts in ACL-R.Level of evidenceIV, consensus of experts.

Medial vs lateral unicompartmental knee arthrroplasty: clinical results

Background and aim of the work : The international literature and analysis of the prosthetic registers highlight a significant relationship between the alignment of the components and the survival of prosthetic implants of the knee. The patient specific instrumentation (PSI) technology exploits the data obtained with the MRN for the production of cutting blocks (CB) useful to a TKA. Revisiting the recent international literature, comparing the results of the conventional method and PSI, numerous studies confirm a statistically significant difference of inliers (± 3 degrees) for HKA. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate whether these statistically significant difference is also present in our group. Methods : Postoperative radiographic measures of alignment based on a mechanical limb axis (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA) of 180° were sought. A range of 180° ± 3° varus/valgus was defined as optimal for mechanical axis. Results: The percentage of knees that had a HKA within ±3° of the desired value was 92.2. Conclusion: the CB did accurately produce the desired HKA. The PS system is an effective and reproducible, whose organizational effort is fully justified.

Minimally invasive load-sharing implant for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis

There is a distinct need for minimally invasive surgical options for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. This manuscript describes a minimally invasive implant that reduces the load carried by the medial compartment of the knee joint during the stance phase of gait. Implantation is achieved without resection of bone, muscle, or ligaments and without violation of the joint capsule. The procedure is completely reversible should the need arise, allowing for simple device removal without comprising future surgical options. The surgical techniques for implant and explant are explained in detail.