Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Vishal Hegde is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Vishal Hegde.


Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2016

Current management of aneurysmal bone cysts

Howard Y. Park; Sara K. Yang; William L. Sheppard; Vishal Hegde; Stephen D. Zoller; Scott D. Nelson; Noah Federman; Nicholas M. Bernthal

Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are benign bone lesions arising predominantly in the pediatric population that can cause local pain, swelling, and pathologic fracture. Primary lesions, which constitute roughly two thirds of all ABCs, are thought to be neoplastic in nature, with one third of ABCs arising secondary to other tumors. Diagnosis is made with various imaging modalities, which exhibit characteristic features such as “fluid-fluid levels,” although biopsy is critical, as telangiectatic osteosarcoma cannot be excluded based on imaging alone. Currently, the standard of care and most widely employed treatment is intralesional curettage. However, tumor recurrence with curettage alone is common and has driven some to propose a multitude of adjuvants with varying efficacy and risk profiles. Historically, therapies such as en bloc resection or radiation therapy were utilized as an alternative to decrease the recurrence rate, but these therapies imposed high morbidity. As a result, modern techniques now seek to simultaneously reduce morbidity and recurrence, the pursuit of which has produced preliminary study into minimally invasive percutaneous treatments and medical management.


Journal of Orthopaedic Research | 2017

Novel in vivo mouse model of implant related spine infection

Eric E M D Dworsky; Vishal Hegde; Amanda H. Loftin; Sherif S R Richman; Yan Y H Hu; Elizabeth L. Lord; Kevin P. Francis; Lloyd S. Miller; Jeffrey C. Wang; Anthony A. Scaduto; Nicholas M. Bernthal

Post‐operative spine infections are a challenge, as hardware must often be retained to prevent destabilization of the spine, and bacteria form biofilm on implants, rendering them inaccessible to antibiotic therapy, and immune cells. A model of posterior‐approach spinal surgery was created in which a stainless steel k‐wire was transfixed into the L4 spinous process of 12‐week‐old C57BL/six mice. Mice were then randomized to receive either one of three concentrations (1 × 102, 1 × 103, and 1 × 104 colony forming units (CFU)) of a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus or normal saline at surgery. The mice were then longitudinally imaged for bacterial bioluminescence to quantify infection. The 1 × 102 CFU group had a decrease in signal down to control levels by POD 25, while the 1 × 103 and 1 × 104 CFU groups maintained a 10‐fold higher signal through POD 35. Bacteria were then harvested from the pin and surrounding tissue for confirmatory CFU counts. All mice in the 1 × 104 CFU group experienced wound breakdown, while no mice in the other groups had this complication. Once an optimal bacterial concentration was determined, mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein in their myeloid cells (Lys‐EGFP) were utilized to contemporaneously quantify bacterial burden, and immune response. Neutrophil fluorescence peaked for both groups on POD 3, and then declined. The infected group continued to have a response above the control group through POD 35. This study, establishes a noninvasive in vivo mouse model of spine implant infection that can quantify bacterial burden and host inflammation longitudinally in real time without requiring animal sacrifice.


PLOS ONE | 2017

Combinatory antibiotic therapy increases rate of bacterial kill but not final outcome in a novel mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus spinal implant infection

Yan Hu; Vishal Hegde; Daniel Johansen; Amanda H. Loftin; Erik M. Dworsky; Stephen D. Zoller; Howard Y. Park; Christopher D. Hamad; George E. Nelson; Kevin P. Francis; Anthony A. Scaduto; Nicholas M. Bernthal

Background Management of spine implant infections (SII) are challenging. Explantation of infected spinal hardware can destabilize the spine, but retention can lead to cord compromise and biofilm formation, complicating management. While vancomycin monotherapy is commonly used, in vitro studies have shown reduced efficacy against biofilm compared to combination therapy with rifampin. Using an established in vivo mouse model of SII, we aim to evaluate whether combination therapy has increased efficacy compared to both vancomycin alone and infected controls. Methods An L-shaped, Kirschner-wire was transfixed into the L4 spinous process of 12-week-old C57BL/6 mice, and inoculated with bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus. Mice were randomized into a vancomycin group, a combination group with vancomycin plus rifampin, or a control group receiving saline. Treatment began on post-operative day (POD) 7 and continued through POD 14. In vivo imaging was performed to monitor bioluminescence for 35 days. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were cultured on POD 35. Results Bioluminescence peaked around POD 7 for all groups. The combination group had a 10-fold decrease in signal by POD 10. The vancomycin and control groups reached similar levels on POD 17 and 21, respectively. On POD 25 the combination group dropped below baseline, but rebounded to the same level as the other groups, demonstrating a biofilm-associated infection by POD 35. Quantification of CFUs on POD 35 confirmed an ongoing infection in all three groups. Conclusions Although both therapies were initially effective, they were not able to eliminate implant biofilm bacteria, resulting in a rebound infection after antibiotic cessation. This model shows, for the first time, why histologic-based, static assessments of antimicrobials can be misleading, and the importance of longitudinal tracking of infection. Future studies can use this model to test combinations of antibiotic therapies to see if they are more effective in eliminating biofilm prior to human trials.


Orthopedics | 2018

Preoperative Vitamin D Deficiency Is Associated With Higher Postoperative Complication Rates in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Vishal Hegde; Armin Arshi; Christopher Wang; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C. Wang; Andrew R. Jensen; John S. Adams; Erik N Zeegen; Nicholas M. Bernthal

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative incidence of postoperative complications in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D)-deficient and -sufficient patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients who were either serum 25D deficient (25D <20 ng/mL) or 25D sufficient (25D ≥20 ng/mL) 90 days prior to primary TKA from 2007 to 2016 were identified using the Humana administrative claims registry. The incidence of postoperative medical and surgical complications was determined by querying for relevant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Risk-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariate logistic regression with age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index as covariates. In total, 868 of 6593 patients who underwent TKA from 2007 to 2016 were 25D deficient, corresponding to a 13.2% prevalence rate. On adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, 25D-deficient patients had a higher incidence of postoperative stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia (OR, 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.04; P<.001), surgical site infection requiring irrigation and debridement (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.25-2.48; P=.001), and prosthesis explantation (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.04-4.31; P<.001) at 1 year. Patients who were 25D deficient also had higher rates of postoperative deep venous thrombosis (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.36-2.38; P<.001), myocardial infarction (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41-3.15; P<.001), and cerebrovascular accident (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.57; P=.006). Thus, serum 25D levels below 20 ng/mL are associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications and may be a perioperative modifiable risk factor in TKA. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e489-e495.].


Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2018

Long-term outcomes of cement in cement technique for revision endoprosthesis surgery

Nicholas M. Bernthal; Vishal Hegde; Stephen D. Zoller; Howard Y. Park; Jason H. Ghodasra; Daniel Johansen; Frederick R. Eilber; Fritz C. Eilber; Chandhanarat Chandhanayingyong; Jeffrey J. Eckardt

Cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of primary bone sarcomas has been a standard‐of‐care option for decades. With increased patient survival, the incidence of failed endoprostheses requiring revision surgery has increased. Revision of cemented endoprotheses by cementing into the existing cement mantle (CiC) is technically demanding.


Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 2018

Is Core Needle Biopsy Reliable in Differentiating Between Aggressive Benign and Malignant Radiolucent Bone Tumors

Vishal Hegde; Zachary D. C. Burke; Howard Y. Park; Stephen D. Zoller; Daniel Johansen; Benjamin V. Kelley; Ben Levine; Kambiz Motamedi; Noah Federman; Leanne L. Seeger; Scott D. Nelson; Nicholas M. Bernthal

Background Although there is widespread acceptance of core needle biopsy (CNB) for diagnosing solid tumors, there is reluctance by some clinicians to use CNB for aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) as a result of concerns of safety (bleeding, nerve injury, fracture, readmission, or infection) and reliability, particularly to rule out malignant diagnoses like telangiectatic osteosarcoma. This is especially true when CNB tissue is sent from an outside hospital, where the technique used to obtain the tissue may be spurious. Questions/purposes (1) Is CNB effective (provided adequate information to indicate appropriate surgical treatment without further open biopsy) as an initial diagnostic test for ABC? (2) Is CNB accurate (pathology consistent with the subsequent definitive surgical pathologic diagnosis) in differentiating between benign lesions such as primary or secondary ABCs and malignant radiolucent lesions such as telangiectatic osteosarcoma? (3) What are the complications of CNB? (4) Is there any difference in the effectiveness or accuracy of CNB performed at outside institutions when compared with a referral center? Methods A retrospective study of our musculoskeletal tumor board pathology database (1990-2016) was performed using search criteria “aneurysmal bone cyst” or “telangiectatic osteosarcoma.” Only patients undergoing a CNB who proceeded to definitive surgical resection with final pathology were included. Excluding outside CNBs, CNB was performed after presentation at a musculoskeletal tumor board as a result of atypical features on imaging or history concerning for malignancy. Outside CNB tissue was reviewed by our pathologists. If there was sufficient tissue for diagnosis, the patient proceeded to definitive surgery. If not, the patient underwent open biopsy. CNB diagnosis, open biopsy results, and open surgical resection pathology were reviewed. Complications, including bleeding, infection, nerve injury, readmission, or fracture, between the CNB and definitive open surgical procedure (mean 1.6 months) were documented. CNBs were considered “effective” if they yielded pathology considered sufficient to proceed with appropriate definitive surgery without additional open biopsy. CNBs were considered “accurate” if they were effective and yielded a pathologic diagnosis that matched the subsequent definitive surgical pathology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of obtaining a malignant diagnosis using CNB were also calculated. Results A total of 81% (59 of 73) of CNBs were effective. Ninety-three percent (55 of 59) of CNBs were classified as accurate. Diagnostic CNBs had a sensitivity and specificity of 89% (eight of nine) and 100% (51 of 51), respectively. The PPV was 1.00 and the NPV was 0.82. There were no complications. With the numbers available, there was no difference in efficacy (90% [37 of 41 versus 14 of 15]; odds ratio, 0.97 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.41-2.27], p = 0.94) or accuracy (92% [34 of 37 versus 13 of 14]; odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.08-9.16], p = 0.91) between CNBs performed in house and those referred from outside. Conclusions These data suggest that CNBs are useful as an initial diagnostic test for ABC and telangiectatic osteosarcoma. Tissue from outside CNBs can be read reliably without repeat biopsy. If confirmed by other institutions, CNB may be considered a reasonable approach to the diagnosis of aggressive, radiolucent lesions of bone. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.


Archive | 2016

Metastatic Bone Disease: Pelvis

Vishal Hegde; Nicholas M. Bernthal

Metastatic disease to the pelvis can lead to structural instability and debilitating pain. Lesions are often quite large at the time of diagnosis, as the size of the pelvis and elastic nature of the peri-pelvic organs often result in few symptoms of mass effect for smaller lesions. Lesions are classified by biologic subtype and location based on the system of Enneking—iliac (Type I), periacetabular (Type II), rami (Type III), and sacrum (Type IV) [1]. Advanced 3-dimensional imaging of the lesion is essential to adequately assess the anatomy and structural stability of the pelvis. Only posterior column Type I and Type II lesions typically lead to issues with structural stability. The majority of cases of pelvic metastatic disease can be managed nonoperatively with pain management and radiation therapy, as most are at least moderately sensitive to radiation. Occasionally, however, due to intractable pain, compromised pelvic stability, or (rarely) for the reduction of oncologic disease burden, surgical intervention is indicated. These interventions are divided into intralesional procedures such as curettage with or without adjuvant therapies and possible cemented reconstruction; and wide, extralesional procedures including internal and external hemipelvectomies. The extended ilioinguinal approach can be used for most lesions, in addition to the anterolateral or posterior approaches to the hip for periacetabular lesions. As most Type I, III, and IV lesions do not compromise the structural integrity or weight-bearing capacity of the patient, intralesional and extralesional resections are typically followed with no attempt at reconstruction. Conversely, there has been much debate over reconstruction methods after resection of Type II lesions and many options exist, ranging from custom arthroplasty implants to allograft reconstructions to cement-rebar constructs to simply leaving a flail hip. Type IV lesions that require resection of greater than 50 % of the sacroiliac joint compromise pelvic stability and therefore often require hardware to prevent dissociation and limb length discrepancy. In all cases, wound closure with adequate soft tissue coverage is critical, as complications such as dehiscence, infection and herniation can be devastating. If the wound cannot be closed without significant tension, a flap should be used. While morbidity for these surgeries is significant, treatment of these lesions has been shown to improve patient quality of life. The benefits of surgery should always be weighed against the risks and life expectancy of the patient prior to proceeding with surgery. As medical advances have increased patient survival for many types of metastatic cancer, orthopedic oncologists must now evaluate and hone our resection and reconstruction techniques to achieve longer lasting, commensurate results.


Arthroscopy | 2018

The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma

Jason H. Ghodasra; Dean Wang; Rohit Jayakar; Andrew R. Jensen; Kent T. Yamaguchi; Vishal Hegde; Kristofer J. Jones


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2016

In Vivo Efficacy of a “Smart” Antimicrobial Implant Coating

Alexandra I. Stavrakis; Suwei Zhu; Vishal Hegde; Amanda H. Loftin; Alyssa G. Ashbaugh; Jared A. Niska; Lloyd S. Miller; Tatiana Segura; Nicholas M. Bernthal


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2017

Single-Dose, Preoperative Vitamin-D Supplementation Decreases Infection in a Mouse Model of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Vishal Hegde; Erik M. Dworsky; Alexandra I. Stavrakis; Amanda H. Loftin; Stephen D. Zoller; Howard Y. Park; Sherif S R Richman; Daniel Johansen; Yan Hu; Julie A. Taylor; Christopher D. Hamad; Rene F. Chun; Weixian Xi; John S. Adams; Nicholas M. Bernthal

Collaboration


Dive into the Vishal Hegde's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Howard Y. Park

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge