Vittorio Franciosi

Predictors of gefitinib outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): study of a comprehensive panel of molecular markers.

A number of different clinical characteristics and molecular markers related to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation have been reported to singly correlate with therapeutic activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to evaluate the predictive value on gefitinib outcomes of a comprehensive panel of molecular parameters in advanced NSCLC patients. EGFR and K-ras mutations were detected by direct sequencing on tumor DNA from paraffin embedded samples. EGFR and HER2 gene copy number was assessed by FISH. EGFR protein expression was quantified by immunohistochemistry. EGFR gene intron 1 polymorphism was assessed on genomic DNA isolated from venous whole blood samples. Ninety-one patients were prospectively enrolled and the overall gefitinib response rate was 18.7% (2 complete and 15 partial responses). Sex (p=0.005), non-smoking status (p=0.010), skin toxicity (p=0.020), EGFR gene mutations (p<0.001) and EGFR FISH positivity (p=0.016) were found to be associated with gefitinib response. K-ras mutation was detected in only seven non-responder patients. The median overall survival was of 10 months. Only non-smoking status and EGFR intron 1 polymorphism showed a statistically significant correlation with survival (p=0.031 and 0.044, respectively). In conclusion, we have confirmed the role of EGFR gene mutation as predictor of response to EGFR TKIs. Moreover, EGFR gene copy number and, potentially, also EGFR intron 1 polymorphism could aid in better prediction of EGFR TKI responsiveness in advanced NSCLC.

High curative resection rate with weekly cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgastrim in patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of a weekly preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer. In all, 82 patients with an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group PS ⩽2 and normal cardiac function were enrolled onto the study. Surgical unresectability was confirmed in 52 patients (63%) at laparotomy, and in 30 (27%) cases by CT scan of the abdomen and endoscopic ultrasonography. Chemotherapy treatment was: cisplatin 40 mg m−2; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m−2; epidoxorubicin 35 mg m−2; 6S-leucovorin 250 mg m−2 and glutathione 1.5 g m−2 (PELF). One cycle consisted of 8 weekly treatments. Response to chemotherapy was observed in 40 of 82 patients (49%): six (7%) complete and 34 (41%) partial responses, and in four (5%) cases a complete pathological response was confirmed. Of the 40 responding patients, 37 (45%) had potentially curative surgery. Grade 3/4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in three and two patients. At a median follow-up of 48 months, 25 of the 37 resected patients (68%) were alive and 24 (65%) were disease free. The median and 4-year survival for the whole group was 17 months and 31%, respectively. The median survival was 12 months for inoperable patients and it was not reached in resected patients.

Comparison Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Gene Expression in Primary Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and in Fine-Needle Aspirates from Distant Metastatic Sites

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number obtained by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been recently found to predict treatment outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, it is still unknown whether EGFR status differs in metastases compared with primary NSCLC. In all studies FISH have been performed on histologic material. The possibility to perform FISH analysis on cytologic material obtained by fine-needle aspiration from superficial and visceral metastases would allow us to know the real EGFR status avoiding invasive diagnostic procedures. Methods: EGFR gene copy number was analyzed by FISH on fine-needle aspirates obtained from 31 patients with metastatic NSCLC and the results were compared with those obtained on corresponding paraffin histologic sections from the primary tumor. Results: The feasibility of EGFR FISH on cytology was 90% (28 of 31 patients). EGFR FISH was positive in 61% (17 of 28 patients) of the metastases and in 36% (10 of 28 patients) of the primary tumors. Nine of the 28 cases (32%) were EGFR positive on both primary tumor and metastatic site and 10 (36%) were negative on both primary tumor and metastasis. Nine of the 28 cases (32%) showed discordance of primary tumor versus metastasis (McNemar test; p = 0.041). Conclusions: EGFR FISH can be reliably assessed on fine-needle aspirates obtained from NSCLC metastases. We found that EGFR gene copy number is discordant between primary NSCLC and the corresponding distant metastatic sites in a significant proportion of cases. These findings should be considered in future studies designed to elucidate the predictive role of EGFR FISH in NSCLC.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Intron-1 Polymorphism Predicts Gefitinib Outcome in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene intron 1 contains a polymorphic single sequence dinucleotide repeat (CA)n whose length has been found to inversely correlate with transcriptional activity. This study was designed to assess the role of (CA)n polymorphism in predicting the outcome of gefitinib treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Blood and tumor tissue from 58 patients with advanced NSCLC submitted to gefitinib were collected. EGFR intron 1 gene polymorphism, along with EGFR gene mutation, gene copy number and immunohistochemistry expression were determined. Moreover, a panel of lung cancer cell lines characterized for EGFR intron 1 polymorphism was also studied. Results: EGFR intron 1 polymorphism showed a statistically significant correlation with the gefitinib response (response rate 25 versus 0%, for patients with a (CA)16 and with a (CA)else genotype, respectively; p = 0.044). Patients with a (CA)16 genotype had a longer survival compared with those with a (CA)else genotype (11.4 versus 4.8 months, respectively; p = 0.037). In addition, cell lines lacking the (CA)16 allele showed a statistically significant higher IC50 compared with cell lines bearing at least one (CA)16 allele (p = 0.003). Conclusions: This study supports a potential role of EGFR intron 1 polymorphism in predicting the outcome of gefitinib treatment in advanced NSCLC.

The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is an active regimen as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines: a phase I-II study.

AbstractPurpose. To evaluate the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GemVin), in patients with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anthracyclines alone or with taxanes. Patients and methods. Nine patients were entered into the phase I and 50 patients were entered into the phase II study. Gemcitabine was administered beginning with the dose of 800 mg/m2 and vinorelbine was given at the fixed dose of 25 mg/m2, both on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. Escalated dose levels of gemcitabine were planned by increments of 200 mg/m2 per level. The median age of the 50 assessable patients for the phase II study was 56.5 years (range 30–70) and median performance status (PS, ECOG score), 1 (range 0–2). The dominant sites of metastases were viscera in 40, bone in five and soft tissue in five patients. First-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease with taxanes and anthracyclines or with anthracyclines alone was administered in 36 and 14 patients, respectively. Results. The optimal schedule for the combination was gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 1000 mg/m2, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in two cases at this dose level. Overall, 267 cycles were given to the 50 patients enrolled into the phase II (mean 5.3; range 3–9). The schedule was well tolerated: three patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and another four patients experienced grade 3 anemia. Non-hematological toxicities were moderate. A major objective response was observed in 42% of patients (95% confidence interval (CI), 28–57%), with complete remission in four (8%) and partial response in 17 (34%) patients. The median time to progression was 6 months. Activity as well as toxicity were similar in the subgroups of the patients pretreated either with combinations of taxanes and anthracyclines or anthracyclines alone. Conclusions. The optimal GemVin schedule is an effective and well tolerated second-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer pre-treated with anthracycline – based schedules or with combinations of anthracyclines and taxanes.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin: a safe and active regimen in poor prognosis advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cannot tolerate a cisplatin-based chemotherapy because of old age, general conditions, and/or multiorgan metastatic sites. Oxaliplatin is active in NSCLC, offers advantage in terms of toxicity, and shows synergism with gemcitabine. The aims of this phase II study were to evaluate the response rate and toxicity of the gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination in patients with advanced NSCLC and poor prognosis. METHODS Patients were given a gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1 and 8) followed by oxaliplatin (65 mg/m(2) over 120 min on days 1 and 8) every 21 days for six cycles. RESULTS Thirty-two patients with poor-prognosis advanced NSCLC received 136 cycles. There were 25 males and seven females, and the median age was 65 years (range 29-76). Fifty-six percent of patients had adenocarcinoma, and 31% had squamous cell carcinoma. Sixty-six percent of patients had stage IV disease, and 34% had stage IIIB disease. Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status was 2-3 in 50%, 1 in 44%, and 0 in 6% of patients. Eight patients (25%) had been previously treated with cisplatin or carboplatin. All patients were symptomatic. Of the 32 patients who received study drug, five (16%) achieved partial response, six (19%) had minor response, three (9%) had stable disease, and 15 (47%) progressed. The median overall survival was 27 weeks. Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity: seven patients (23%) had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia with no bleeding; four patients (13%) had grade 3-4 neutropenia with no febrile neutropenia, and three patients (10%) had grade 3 anemia. Two patients (6%) had grade 3, and six patients (19%) had grade 1-2 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin seems to be well tolerated and active in patients with poor prognosis advanced NSCLC and deserves further evaluation in phase II clinical trials.

Activity and Safety of Dose-Adjusted Infusional Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone Chemotherapy With Rituximab in Very Elderly Patients With Poor-Prognostic Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the activity and safety of dose‐adjusted infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy with rituximab (DA‐POCH‐R) in elderly patients with poor‐prognostic untreated diffuse large B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: From April 2006 to November 2009, 23 patients, aged ≥70 years, with an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 2 or 3, were enrolled. Only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% were allowed. The DA‐POCH‐R regimen was administered every 3 weeks for a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 8 cycles. RESULTS: Median patient age was 77 years (range, 70‐90 years); 83% of patients had Ann Arbor stage III to IV disease. Median LVEF at baseline was 62%. Four (17%) patients had a history of abnormal cardiovascular conditions. Twenty‐one (91%) patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 90%, with a complete response rate of 57%. The 3‐year overall survival and event‐free survival rates were 56% and 54%, respectively. Neutropenia (48%) was the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse event (AE); no grade 3 to 4 cardiac AEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: DA‐POCH‐R was an active and safe combination therapy for patients aged ≥70 years with poor‐prognostic untreated DLBCL. This regimen was a reasonable alternative for elderly patients who were not considered to tolerate standard R‐CHOP treatment. Cancer 2011.

Low-dose aminoglutethimide with and without hydrocortisone replacement as a first-line endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

PURPOSE A randomized study comparing low-dose aminoglutethimide (AG) with and without hydrocortisone (HC) was performed to investigate whether corticosteroid replacement contributes to the therapeutic effects of the drug administered as a front-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Postmenopausal patients who had not had prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease and with estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PgR) status positive or unknown were eligible. AG was administered at a dose of 250 mg twice a day orally (125 mg twice a day during the first month) with or without HC (20 mg twice a day orally). Seventy-nine and 74 patients were assessable for response on the AG plus HC arm and on the AG arm, respectively. The two treatment groups were well balanced and patients were largely untreated. Approximately 60% had not received any adjuvant treatment, and approximately 75% had not received any medical treatment after relapse. RESULTS The overall responses (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) were 44% and 41% for the AG plus HC and the AG arm, respectively, showing no significant difference. Time to progression (median, 8.1 and 6.3 months), duration of response (median, 15.8 and 13.7 months), and duration of survival (median, 34.2 and 36.3 months) were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. Side effects were infrequent and mild in both arms, with no significant differences. CONCLUSION We conclude that half of the conventional daily dose of AG has optimal therapeutic activity as a front-line endocrine treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer and that HC does not significantly contribute to the therapeutic effects.

Buccal mucosa cells as in vivo model to evaluate gefitinib activity in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate the role of pretreatment and posttreatment expression in buccal mucosa cells of signal transduction proteins activated by epidermal growth factor receptor, including phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (p-EGFR), phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (p-MAPK), and phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT), in predicting gefitinib activity in advanced non–small cell lung cancer patients. Expression of the same proteins was also assessed on corresponding tissue samples for comparison. Moreover, EGFR gene mutations and copy number were analyzed. Experimental Design: Protein expression was evaluated by standard immunocytochemistry in buccal smears, obtained by scraping immediately before and after 2 weeks of gefitinib treatment, and in the available archival tumor specimens. EGFR gene mutations were evaluated by direct sequencing and gene copy number was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Data were correlated with gefitinib toxicity and objective response. Results: Fifty-eight patients with pretreated advanced non–small cell lung cancer were enrolled and nine of these patients (15%) showed an objective response to gefitinib (including two complete responses). Toxicity (P = 0.025) and baseline p-AKT expression in buccal mucosa cells (P = 0.061) showed a potential predictive role. On the contrary, the probability of achieving an objective response was not affected by pretreatment expression of EGFR, p-EGFR, and p-MAPK, either in buccal mucosa or in tumor tissue. Responders showed a nonstatistically significant trend toward a more pronounced reduction in the expression of p-EGFR, p-MAPK, and p-AKT after gefitinib treatment. Among responders, five of six (83%) tumors showed EGFR gene mutation, whereas none of the tumors from patients with stable or progressive disease did (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Epithelial cells obtained from buccal mucosa may be used to assess the pharmacodynamic effect of EGFR-targeted agents, and pretreatment p-AKT expression may be a possible predictive biomarker of in vivo gefitinib activity.

Capecitabine and mitomycin C may be an effective treatment option for third-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Aims and Background We evaluated the activity in terms of time to progression (TTP) of mitomycin C and capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy. Methods Patients with advanced colorectal cancer undergoing third-line chemotherapy after failure of 5-FU with CPT-11 or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens were treated with capecitabine and mitomycin C. Results Sixty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 55 years (range, 26-78 years) and the male:female ratio 21: 40. We observed partial remissions in 5 patients (8%), stable disease in 25 patients (40%) and progression of disease in 31 patients (52%). Median TTP was 3 months and median survival was 6 months. Global toxicity was mild and entirely acceptable. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity occurred in 12 patients and grade 3-4 nonhematological toxicity in 5 patients. Conclusions The combination of capecitabine and mitomycin C could represent an effective and manageable treatment option for colorectal cancer patients failing previous chemotherapy regimens.