W. McDowell Anderson

Gastric Bypass is an Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Clinically Significant Obesity

Background: We have demonstrated that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in 60% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. A study was conducted to determine whether weight loss following bariatric surgery ameliorates OSA. Methods: All 100 consecutive patients with symptoms of OSA were prospectively evaluated by polysomnography before gastric bypass. Preoperative and postoperative scores of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI), and other parameters of sleep quality were compared using t-test. Results: Preoperative RDI was 40±4 (normal 5 events/hour, n=100). 13 patients had no OSA, 29 had mild OSA, while the remaining 58 patients were treated preoperatively for moderate-severe OSA. At a median of 6 months follow-up, BMI and ESS scores improved (38±1 vs 54±1 kg/m2, 6±1 vs 12±0.1, P<0.001, postoperatively vs preoperatively). To date, 11 patients have completed postoperative polysomnography (3-21 months) after losing weight (BMI 40±2 vs 62±3 kg/m2, P<0.001).There was significant improvement in ESS (3±1 vs 14±2), minimum O2 saturation (SpO2 86±2 vs 77±5), sleep efficiency (85±2% vs 65±5%), all P<0.001, postop vs preop; and RDI (56±13 vs 23±7, P=0.041). Regression analysis demonstrated no correlation between preoperative BMI, ESS score and the severity of OSA; and no correlation between % excess body weight loss and postoperative RDI. Conclusion: Weight loss following gastric bypass results in profound improvement in OSA. The severity of apnea cannot be reliably predicted by preoperative BMI and ESS; therefore, patients with symptoms of OSA should undergo polysomnography.

Three-Year Outcomes of Cranial Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea The STAR Trial

Objective To describe the 36-month clinical and polysomnography (PSG) outcomes in an obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) cohort treated with hypoglossal cranial nerve upper airway stimulation (UAS). Study Design A multicenter prospective cohort study. Setting Industry-supported multicenter academic and clinical setting. Subjects Participants (n = 116) at 36 months from a cohort of 126 implanted participants. Methods Participants were enrolled in a prospective phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of UAS for moderated to severe OSA. Prospective outcomes included apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, other PSG measures, self-reported measures of sleepiness, sleep-related quality of life, and snoring. Results Of 126 enrolled participants, 116 (92%) completed 36-month follow-up evaluation per protocol; 98 participants additionally agreed to a voluntary 36-month PSG. Self-report daily device usage was 81%. In the PSG group, 74% met the a priori definition of success with the primary outcomes of apnea-hypopnea index, reduced from the median value of 28.2 events per hour at baseline to 8.7 and 6.2 at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Similarly, self-reported outcomes improved from baseline to 12 months and were maintained at 36 months. Soft or no snoring reported by bed partner increased from 17% at baseline to 80% at 36 months. Serious device-related adverse events were rare, with 1 elective device explantation from 12 to 36 months. Conclusion Long-term 3-year improvements in objective respiratory and subjective quality-of-life outcome measures are maintained. Adverse events are uncommon. UAS is a successful and appropriate long-term treatment for individuals with moderate to severe OSA.

Delirium prevention in critically ill adults through an automated reorientation intervention – A pilot randomized controlled trial

Objectives Explore the effect of an automated reorientation intervention on ICU delirium in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Background Delirium is common in ICU patients, and negatively affects outcomes. Few prevention strategies have been tested. Methods Thirty ICU patients were randomized to 3 groups. Ten received hourly recorded messages in a family members voice during waking hours over 3 ICU days, 10 received the same messages in a non‐family voice, and 10 (control) did not receive any automated reorientation messages. The primary outcome was delirium free days during the intervention period (evaluated by CAM‐ICU). Groups were compared by Fishers Exact Test. Results The family voice group had more delirium free days than the non‐family voice group, and significantly more delirium free days (p = 0.0437) than the control group. Conclusions Reorientation through automated, scripted messages reduced incidence of delirium. Using identical scripted messages, family voice was more effective than non‐family voice.