W. S. Watkins
University of Utah
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by W. S. Watkins.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 2000
Lynn B. Jorde; W. S. Watkins; Michael J. Bamshad; Missy Dixon; C. E. Ricker; Mark Seielstad; Mark A. Batzer
We report a comparison of worldwide genetic variation among 255 individuals by using autosomal, mitochondrial, and Y-chromosome polymorphisms. Variation is assessed by use of 30 autosomal restriction-site polymorphisms (RSPs), 60 autosomal short-tandem-repeat polymorphisms (STRPs), 13 Alu-insertion polymorphisms and one LINE-1 element, 611 bp of mitochondrial control-region sequence, and 10 Y-chromosome polymorphisms. Analysis of these data reveals substantial congruity among this diverse array of genetic systems. With the exception of the autosomal RSPs, in which an ascertainment bias exists, all systems show greater gene diversity in Africans than in either Europeans or Asians. Africans also have the largest total number of alleles, as well as the largest number of unique alleles, for most systems. GST values are 11%-18% for the autosomal systems and are two to three times higher for the mtDNA sequence and Y-chromosome RSPs. This difference is expected because of the lower effective population size of mtDNA and Y chromosomes. A lower value is seen for Y-chromosome STRs, reflecting a relative lack of continental population structure, as a result of rapid mutation and genetic drift. Africa has higher GST values than does either Europe or Asia for all systems except the Y-chromosome STRs and Alus. All systems except the Y-chromosome STRs show less variation between populations within continents than between continents. These results are reassuring in their consistency and offer broad support for an African origin of modern human populations.
Genetics | 2007
David J. Witherspoon; Stephen Wooding; A. R. Rogers; Elizabeth E. Marchani; W. S. Watkins; Mark A. Batzer; Lynn B. Jorde
The proportion of human genetic variation due to differences between populations is modest, and individuals from different populations can be genetically more similar than individuals from the same population. Yet sufficient genetic data can permit accurate classification of individuals into populations. Both findings can be obtained from the same data set, using the same number of polymorphic loci. This article explains why. Our analysis focuses on the frequency, ω, with which a pair of random individuals from two different populations is genetically more similar than a pair of individuals randomly selected from any single population. We compare ω to the error rates of several classification methods, using data sets that vary in number of loci, average allele frequency, populations sampled, and polymorphism ascertainment strategy. We demonstrate that classification methods achieve higher discriminatory power than ω because of their use of aggregate properties of populations. The number of loci analyzed is the most critical variable: with 100 polymorphisms, accurate classification is possible, but ω remains sizable, even when using populations as distinct as sub-Saharan Africans and Europeans. Phenotypes controlled by a dozen or fewer loci can therefore be expected to show substantial overlap between human populations. This provides empirical justification for caution when using population labels in biomedical settings, with broad implications for personalized medicine, pharmacogenetics, and the meaning of race.
Human Heredity | 2000
Lynn B. Jorde; W. S. Watkins; Juha Kere; D. Nyman; Aldur W. Eriksson
Population isolates are increasingly being used in attempts to map genes underlying complex diseases. To further explore the utility of isolates for this purpose, we explore linkage disequilibrium patterns in polymorphisms from two regions (VWF and NF1) in three isolated populations from Finland. At the NF1 locus, the Finnish populations have greater pairwise disequilibrium than populations from Africa, Asia, or northern Europe. However, populations from ‘New Finland’ and ‘Old Finland’ do not differ in their disequilibrium levels at either the NF1 or the VWF locus. In addition, disequilibrium patterns and haplotype diversity do not differ between a sample from the Åland Islands, Finland, and a collection of outbred Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain families. These results show that linkage disequilibrium patterns sometimes differ among populations with different histories and founding dates, but some putative isolated populations may not significantly differ from larger admixed populations. We discuss factors that should be considered when using isolated populations in gene-mapping studies.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 1999
W. S. Watkins; Michael J. Bamshad; Missy Dixon; B. B. Rao; J. M. Naidu; P.G. Reddy; B.V.R. Prasad; P.K. Das; P.C. Reddy; P.B. Gai; A. Bhanu; Y.S. Kusuma; J.K. Lum; Philip R. Fischer; Lynn B. Jorde
The origins and genetic affinities of the more than 500 tribal populations living in South Asia are widely disputed. This may reflect differential contributions that continental populations have made to tribal groups in South Asia. We assayed for the presence of the intergenic COII/tRNALys 9-bp deletion in human mtDNA in 646 individuals from 12 caste and 14 tribal populations of South India and compared them to individuals from Africa, Europe, and Asia. The 9-bp deletion is observed in four South Indian tribal populations, the Irula, Yanadi, Siddi, and Maria Gond, and in the Nicobarese. Length polymorphisms of the 9-bp motif are present in the Santal, Khonda Dora, and Jalari, all of whom live in a circumscribed region on the eastern Indian coast. Phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA control region sequence from individuals with the 9-bp deletion indicate that it has arisen independently in some Indian tribal populations. Other 9-bp deletion haplotypes are likely to be of Asian and African origin, implying multiple origins of the 9-bp deletion in South India. These results demonstrate varying genetic affinities of different South Indian tribes to continental populations and underscore the complex histories of the tribal populations living in South Asia.
Human Heredity | 2006
David J. Witherspoon; Elizabeth E. Marchani; W. S. Watkins; Christopher T. Ostler; Stephen Wooding; Bridget A. Anders; Justin D. Fowlkes; Stéphane Boissinot; A. V. Furano; David A. Ray; Alan R. Rogers; Mark A. Batzer; Lynn B. Jorde
Background/Aims: The L1 retrotransposable element family is the most successful self-replicating genomic parasite of the human genome. L1 elements drive replication of Alu elements, and both have had far-reaching impacts on the human genome. We use L1 and Alu insertion polymorphisms to analyze human population structure. Methods: We genotyped 75 recent, polymorphic L1 insertions in 317 individuals from 21 populations in sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia, Europe and the Indian subcontinent. This is the first sample of L1 loci large enough to support detailed population genetic inference. We analyzed these data in parallel with a set of 100 polymorphic Alu insertion loci previously genotyped in the same individuals. Results and Conclusion: The data sets yield congruent results that support the recent African origin model of human ancestry. A genetic clustering algorithm detects clusters of individuals corresponding to continental regions. The number of loci sampled is critical: with fewer than 50 typical loci, structure cannot be reliably discerned in these populations. The inclusion of geographically intermediate populations (from India) reduces the distinctness of clustering. Our results indicate that human genetic variation is neither perfectly correlated with geographic distance (purely clinal) nor independent of distance (purely clustered), but a combination of both: stepped clinal.
BMC Genetics | 2008
W. S. Watkins; Rangaswamy Thara; Bryan J. Mowry; Yuhua Zhang; David J. Witherspoon; Whitney L. Tolpinrud; Michael J. Bamshad; Sujit Tirupati; R Padmavati; Hj Smith; Derek J. Nancarrow; Cheryl Filippich; Lynn B. Jorde
BackgroundMajor population movements, social structure, and caste endogamy have influenced the genetic structure of Indian populations. An understanding of these influences is increasingly important as gene mapping and case-control studies are initiated in South Indian populations.ResultsWe report new data on 155 individuals from four Tamil caste populations of South India and perform comparative analyses with caste populations from the neighboring state of Andhra Pradesh. Genetic differentiation among Tamil castes is low (RST = 0.96% for 45 autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) markers), reflecting a largely common origin. Nonetheless, caste- and continent-specific patterns are evident. For 32 lineage-defining Y-chromosome SNPs, Tamil castes show higher affinity to Europeans than to eastern Asians, and genetic distance estimates to the Europeans are ordered by caste rank. For 32 lineage-defining mitochondrial SNPs and hypervariable sequence (HVS) 1, Tamil castes have higher affinity to eastern Asians than to Europeans. For 45 autosomal STRs, upper and middle rank castes show higher affinity to Europeans than do lower rank castes from either Tamil Nadu or Andhra Pradesh. Local between-caste variation (Tamil Nadu RST = 0.96%, Andhra Pradesh RST = 0.77%) exceeds the estimate of variation between these geographically separated groups (RST = 0.12%). Low, but statistically significant, correlations between caste rank distance and genetic distance are demonstrated for Tamil castes using Y-chromosome, mtDNA, and autosomal data.ConclusionGenetic data from Y-chromosome, mtDNA, and autosomal STRs are in accord with historical accounts of northwest to southeast population movements in India. The influence of ancient and historical population movements and caste social structure can be detected and replicated in South Indian caste populations from two different geographic regions.
Annals of Human Genetics | 2005
W. S. Watkins; B. V. R. Prasad; J. M. Naidu; B. B. Rao; B. A. Bhanu; P.K. Das; P.B. Gai; P.C. Reddy; P.G. Reddy; M. Sethuraman; Michael J. Bamshad; Lynn B. Jorde
Tribal populations of the Indian subcontinent have been of longstanding interest to anthropologists and human geneticists. To investigate the relationship of Indian tribes to Indian castes and continental populations, we analyzed 45 unlinked autosomal STR loci in 9 tribal groups, 8 castes, and 18 populations from Africa, Europe and East Asia. South Indian tribal populations demonstrate low within‐population heterozygosity (range: 0.54 – 0.69), while tribal populations sampled further north and east have higher heterozygosity (range: 0.69 – 0.74). Genetic distance estimates show that tribal Indians are more closely related to caste Indians than to other major groups. Between‐tribe differentiation is high and exceeds that for eight sub‐Saharan African populations (4.8% vs. 3.7%). Telugu‐speaking populations are less differentiated than non‐Telugu speakers (FST: 0.029 vs. 0.079), but geographic distance was not predictive of genetic affinity between tribes. South Indian tribes show significant population structure, and individuals can be clustered statistically into groups that correspond with their tribal affiliation. These results are consistent with high levels of genetic drift and isolation in Indian tribal populations, particularly those of South India, and they imply that these populations may be potential candidates for linkage disequilibrium and association mapping.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2018
Tracy A. Manuck; W. S. Watkins; Esplin; Joseph Biggio; Radek Bukowski; Samuel Parry; H Zhan; Hao Huang; William W. Andrews; George R. Saade; Yoel Sadovsky; Uma M. Reddy; John Ilekis; Mark Yandell; Michael W. Varner; Lynn B. Jorde
To compare maternal genotypes between women with and without significant prolongation of pregnancy in the setting of 17‐alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17‐P) administration for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth (PTB).
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1995
Lynn B. Jorde; Michael J. Bamshad; W. S. Watkins; R. Zenger; Alexander E. Fraley; Patrycja A. Krakowiak; K. D. Carpenter; H. Soodyall; T. Jenkins; Alan R. Rogers
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1999
Michael J. Bamshad; Trung Le; W. S. Watkins; Missy Dixon; B.E. Kramer; Amy D. Roeder; John C. Carey; S. Root; Albert Schinzel; L. Van Maldergem; R. J. M. Gardner; Robert C. Lin; Christine E. Seidman; Jonathan G. Seidman; R. Wallerstein; E. Moran; R. Sutphen; Christine E. Campbell; Lynn B. Jorde