Walter Raasch

Biological significance of agmatine, an endogenous ligand at imidazoline binding sites

British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 133, 755 ± 780

Angiotensin II Induces Catecholamine Release by Direct Ganglionic Excitation

Angiotensin II (ANG) is known to facilitate catecholamine release from peripheral sympathetic neurons by enhancing depolarization-dependent exocytosis. In addition, a direct excitation by ANG of peripheral sympathetic nerve activity has recently been described. This study determined the significance of the latter mechanism for angiotensin-induced catecholamine release in the pithed rat. Rats were anesthetized and instrumented for measuring either hemodynamics and renal sympathetic nerve activity or plasma catecholamine concentrations in response to successively increasing doses of angiotensin infusions. Even during ganglionic blockade by hexamethonium (20 mg/kg), angiotensin dose-dependently elevated sympathetic nerve activity, whereas blood pressure–equivalent doses of phenylephrine were ineffective. Independently of central nervous sympathetic activity and ganglionic transmission, angiotensin (0.1 to 1 &mgr;g/kg) also induced an up-to 27-fold increase in plasma norepinephrine levels, reaching 2.65 ng/mL. Preganglionic electrical stimulation (0.5 Hz) raised basal norepinephrine levels 11-fold and further enhanced the angiotensin-induced increase in norepinephrine (4.04 ng/mL at 1 &mgr;g/kg ANG). Stimulation of sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine release were suppressed by candesartan (1 mg/kg) or tetrodotoxin (100 &mgr;g/kg), respectively. Angiotensin enhanced plasma norepinephrine, heart rate, and sympathetic nerve activity at similar threshold doses (0.3 to 1 &mgr;g/kg), but raised blood pressure at a significantly lower dose (0.01 &mgr;g/kg). It is concluded that direct stimulation of ganglionic angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors arouses electrical activity in sympathetic neurons, leading to exocytotic junctional catecholamine release. In both the absence and presence of preganglionic sympathetic activity, this mechanism contributes significantly to ANG-induced enhancement of catecholamine release.

Interactions between the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the sympathetic system

Abstract Angiotensin II is able to modulate both the presynaptic sympathetic system and the adrenal medulla resulting in an enhanced release of noradrenaline and adrenaline. Consequently, the inhibition of the converting enzyme by ACE inhibitors resulting in a lower concentration of angiotensin II or blockade of the specific AT1 receptors by AT1 receptor blocking agents should lead to a decrease in both noradrenaline and adrenaline release. It has been demonstrated that ACE inhibition did not influence the net catecholamine overflow during stimulation of the sympathetic nerves in contrast to AT1 antagonists which can specifically and dose dependently diminish noradrenaline and adrenaline release, an effect that could be explained by a compensating mechanism of bradykinin. Bradykinin may accumulate during ACE inhibition and is able to stimulate catecholamine release via B2 receptors. To verify the class effect of AT1 antagonists on presynaptic AT1 receptors, the AT1 antagonist candesartan was investigated regarding its presynaptic effect in pithed spontaneously hypertensive rats. As could be demonstrated with losartan and HR 720, candesartan lowered AT1 receptor mediated angiotensin II-induced noradrenaline release in a dose-dependent manner.It is concluded that AT1 antagonists inhibit angiotensin II mediated catecholamine release on presynaptic sympathetic nerves and the adrenal medulla at the specific AT1 receptor site. The effect can be described as a class effect of these imidazole derivatives.

Toxicity of kava pyrones, drug safety and precautions: a case study

Kava pyrones have been sold in Germany as OTC anxiolytics until June 2002, when all preparations with a kava pyrone content of more than 10(-4) of a homeopathic stock solution were withdrawn. Other countries in which kava pyrones have been used as anxiolytics, namely GB and the USA, have not followed suit. Kava pyrone anxiolytics have been positively reviewed by the Cochrane Collaboration; also newer German clinical studies have indicated pharmacological anxiolysis at the recommended doses. To use the first choice of treatment, psychotherapy, for all uncomplicated cases of pathological fear does not appear to be realistic. Current data about kava pyrone toxicity are unclear. Judging from the few well documented cases of kava pyrone hepatotoxicity (appr. 2 out of 36) in Germany and Switzerland, an immunologically mediated idiosyncratic mechanism appears to be most likely, especially at higher doses, whereas a direct toxic mechanism is much less likely. No direct results are available for the incidence of kava pyrone-related adverse drug effects. From spontaneously reported cases the incidences of adverse drug reactions cannot be obtained, a rough estimation indicates the incidence of hepatotoxicity to be comparable to those of benzodiazepines. Taken together, the withdrawal of kava pyrone-based anxiolytics appears to be an ill founded over-reaction given the lack of superior therapeutic alternatives. Neither the case evaluations presented by the BfArM (Bundesamt für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte = Federal Office for Drugs and Medical Products) nor the complete rejection of proof for therapeutic efficacy of kava pyrone anxiolytics are scientifically well founded.

Agmatine, an endogenous ligand at imidazoline binding sites, does not antagonize the clonidine‐mediated blood pressure reaction

Since agmatine has been identified as a clonidine displacing substance (CDS), the aim of this study was to investigate whether agmatine can mimic CDS‐induced cardiovascular reactions in organ bath experiments, pithed spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and anaesthetized SHR. Intravenously‐administered agmatine significantly reduced the blood pressure and heart rate of anaesthetized SHR at doses higher than 1 and 3 mg kg−1, respectively. These effects are probably mediated via central mechanisms, since there was an approximate 8 fold rightward shift of the dose‐response curve in the pithed SHR (indicating a weakened cardiovascular effect). Moreover, in organ bath experiments, agmatine failed to alter the contractility of intact or endothelium‐denuded aortal rings. When agmatine was administered i.c.v. to anaesthetized SHR, blood pressure was increased without any alteration of heart rate, whereas blood pressure was unchanged and heart rate was increased after injection into the 4th brain ventricle. This suggests that haemodynamic reaction patterns after central application are related to distinct influences on central cardiovascular mechanisms. Agmatine reduces noradrenaline release in pithed SHR while α2‐adrenoceptors are irreversibly blocked with phenoxybenzamine, but not while I1‐binding sites are selectively blocked with AGN192403. This suggests that agmatine may modulate noradrenaline release in the same way that clonidine does, i.e. via imidazoline binding sites; this involves a reduction in sympathetic tone which in turn reduces blood pressure and heart rate. Finally, CDS‐like cardiovascular activity appears not to be due to agmatine, since (i) blood pressure in anaesthetized SHR is decreased by agmatine and clonidine, and (ii) agmatine did not antagonize the blood pressure reaction to clonidine in pithed or anaesthetized SHR.

Development of Novel Potent Orally Bioavailable Oseltamivir Derivatives Active against Resistant Influenza A

With the emergence of oseltamivir-resistant influenza viruses and in view of a highly pathogenic flu pandemic, it is important to develop new anti-influenza agents. Here, the development of neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors that were designed to overcome resistance mechanisms along with unfavorable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties is described. Several 5-guanidino- and 5-amidino-based oseltamivir derivatives were synthesized and profiled for their anti-influenza activity and in vitro and in vivo PK properties. Amidine 6 and guanidine 7 were comparably effective against a panel of different A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains and also inhibited mutant A/H1N1 neuraminidase. Among different prodrug strategies pursued, a simple amidoxime ethyl ester (9) exhibited a superior PK profile with an oral bioavailability of 31% (rats), which is comparable to oseltamivir (36%). Thus, bioisosteric replacement of the 5-guanidine with an acetamidine-in the form of its N-hydroxy prodrug-successfully tackled the two key limitations of currently used NA inhibitors, as exemplified with oseltamivir.

Overfeeding-Induced Obesity in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats: An Animal Model of the Human Metabolic Syndrome

Background/Aims: The metabolic syndrome (MS) has become an epidemiological problem in Western countries. We developed a diet-induced obese rat model that mimics all the symptoms of MS in humans, but whose insulin resistance, hyperphagia and hyperleptinemia are caused by nutrition rather than genetic modifications. Methods: Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were allowed for 12 weeks to choose between a cafeteria diet (CD, 20.3 kJ/g) and standard rat chow (11.7 kJ/g). Controls received rat chow. Results: Body weight (BW) exceeded control levels when SHR were fed with CD. The increase in BW was attributed to enhanced energy intake. The abundance of abdominal fat as well as the plasma levels of leptin and triglycerides increased concomitant with glucose, insulin and C-peptide. This prediabetic condition was further confirmed by a markedly increased insulin response following glucose challenge and by impaired glucose utilization after insulin tolerance tests. Conclusion: Increases in food intake and BW despite hyperleptinemia indicate leptin resistance following CD feeding. CD-fed SHR feature leptin and insulin resistance, hypertension and obesity, thus mimicking the situation of MS patients. As such, our model is more suitable than the genetically modified rat models used to study human MS.

Comparison of the vascular and antiadrenergic activities of four angiotensin II type 1 antagonists in the pithed rat

Background Angiotensin II is known to facilitate the release of catecholamines from peripheral sympathetic neurons by stimulating presynaptically located receptors. Although inhibitor studies have revealed these to be angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors, they do in fact appear to display peculiar susceptibilities to various AT1 receptor antagonists, which might correspond to different neuronal and vascular receptor subtypes. Objective A direct comparison of the pre- and postsynaptic potencies of four AT1 antagonists was performed to characterize these receptors further. Design We studied angiotensin II-induced catecholamine release and vasoconstriction in pithed, spontaneously hypertensive rats under the influence of candesartan, eprosartan, EXP 3174, and irbesartan. The effect of AT1 blockade on postsynaptic vascular sensitivity to noradrenaline (NA) was also determined. Methods Pithed rats received repeated intravenous applications of either angiotensin II or NA, preceded by cumulatively increasing doses of the AT1 antagonists. Vasoconstriction and catecholamine release were quantified by the measurement of acute increases in blood pressure and plasma NA, respectively. Results All AT1 antagonists dose-dependently suppressed angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction and release of NA. Although the antagonists differed greatly in their inhibitory potencies (ID50 range 7–445 μg/kg), each displayed a similar potency at both neuronal and vascular angiotensin receptors. In a higher dose range, all AT1 antagonists attenuated the blood pressure increase in response to NA by up to 70%. The order of potencies for all inhibitory effects was: candesartan > eprosartan > EXP 3174 > irbesartan. Conclusion The AT1 antagonists tested do not discriminate between presynaptic neuronal and postsynaptic vascular angiotensin II receptors – a fact that refutes the existence of tissue-specific AT1 receptor subtypes. A marked reduction in vascular sensitivity to NA may contribute to the antihypertensive and cardioprotective mechanisms of AT1 antagonists.

Gene expression of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in the limbic system is related to type-2 like diabetes in leptin-resistant rats

Diabetes is often accompanied by a dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis which is regulated centrally via glucocorticoid (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptors (MR). Here, we compared the expression of both receptor subtypes in the brain of Zucker fatty and Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats together with their respective control rats. Both strains are primarily leptin resistant due to a mutated leptin receptor; ZDF rats, however, develop type-2 like diabetes. Using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) we found increased hypothalamic corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) levels in rats with the genetic ZDF background independently from leptin resistance. This was accompanied by elevated plasma corticosterone levels and by a higher reactivity of the HPA axis in response to CRH. Rats with the genetic ZDF background showed increased mRNA levels of GR in the amygdala and hypothalamus and increased mRNA levels of MR in the hippocampus and hypothalamus compared to rats with the Zucker fatty background. In leptin resistant ZDF rats but not in Zucker fatty rats, the mRNA levels of MR were selectively increased in the amygdala compared to nondiabetic control rats. No differences in the GR mRNA levels were found between leptin resistant Zucker fatty rats and lean control rats. Thus, an increased drive of the HPA axis in rats with ZDF background is associated with a differential expression of GR and MR in the limbic system. This dysregulation of the HPA axis may eventually lead, in combination with leptin resistance, to the development of diabetes in ZDF rats.

Elevation of sympathetic activity by eprosartan in young male subjects

BACKGROUND Selective blockade of the type 1 angiotensin II receptors (AT1 receptors) reduced blood pressure (BP) elevation caused by sympathetic stimulation in the pithed rat model. This has been attributed to blockade of AT1 receptors located presynaptically on sympathetic nerve endings normally facilitating norepinephrine release. We examined the effects of AT1 receptor blockade on the sympathetic nervous system in humans. METHODS Twenty-nine young white men with normal to mildly hypertensive BP values participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized cross-over protocol receiving 600 mg/d of eprosartan or placebo for 1 week. At the last day of intake we measured hemodynamic parameters, muscle sympathetic nerve activity by microneurography, and plasma levels of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and angiotensin II during rest and cardiovascular stress. RESULTS Eprosartan lowered resting mean arterial pressure (73.6 +/- 11.0 v 78.0 +/- 10.3 mm Hg, P <.05; Finapres, Ohmeda, Englewood, CO), and elevated heart rate (64.4 +/- 7.6 v 61.1 +/- 6.8 beats/min, P =.01), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (14.1 +/- 10.4 v 9.8 +/- 6.3 bursts/min, P <.05) and plasma angiotensin II (37.0 +/- 33.7 v 6.9 +/- 2.8 ng/L, P <.01), as well as norepinephrine levels (234.2 +/- 87.6 v 187.8 +/- 59.3 ng/L, P <.01). Eprosartan did not blunt sympathetic activation caused by lower body negative pressure or mental stress. CONCLUSIONS These results contrast with animal data showing antiadrenergic properties of this drug. If any, it appeared, that eprosartan causes augmented central neural vasoconstrictor outflow paralleled by increased plasma levels of norepinephrine, which casts doubt on its ability to dampen norepinephrine release from peripheral sympathetic nerve endings in humans. We hypothesize that eprosartan leads to a resetting of the baroreflex, presumably by the markedly elevated circulating angiotensin II.