Ward M. Glasoe

First ray dorsal mobility in relation to hallux valgus deformity and first intermetatarsal angle

The hypermobile first ray has been implicated as contributing to the cause and progression of hallux valgus deformity. Deformity of the hallux is often accompanied by an enlarged first intermetatarsal (IM 1-2) angle. It has been hypothesized that subjects having an abnormally large IM 1-2 angle have laxity of the first ray. Objectives of this study were to compare dorsal mobility of the first ray in subjects with hallux valgus to asymptomatic controls, and to investigate the relationship between dorsal mobility and the IM 1-2 angle. Fourteen subjects (age 23–81) with hallux valgus were matched by gender and age to control subjects. The IM 1-2 angle was measured from radiographs. A load-cell device measured dorsal mobility of the first ray under a standard load of 55 N. Pearsons correlation coefficient identified a marginal correlation (r = .51) between IM 1-2 angle and dorsal mobility. An independent t-test showed a statistically (P < 0.01) larger amount of dorsal mobility in the group of subjects having an hallux valgus. Mobility of the first ray was increased in subjects with hallux valgus and a large IM 1-2 angle may be an indicator of increased dorsal mobility.

Hallux Valgus and the First Metatarsal Arch Segment: A Theoretical Biomechanical Perspective

Hallux valgus is a progressive foot deformity characterized by a lateral deviation of the hallux with corresponding medial deviation of the first metatarsal. Late-stage changes may render the hallux painful and without functional utility, leading to impaired gait. Various environmental, genetic, and anatomical predispositions have been suggested, but the exact cause of hallux valgus is unknown. Evidence indicates that conservative intervention for hallux valgus provides relief from symptoms but does not reverse deformity. Part 1 of this perspective article reviews the literature describing the anatomy, pathomechanics, and etiology of hallux valgus. Part 2 expands on the biomechanical initiators of hallux valgus attributed to the first metatarsal. Theory is advanced that collapse of the arch with vertical orientation (tilt) of the first metatarsal axis initiates deformity. To counteract the progression of hallux valgus, we use theory to discuss a possible mechanism by which foot orthoses can bolster the arch and reorient the first metatarsal axis horizontally.

Comparison of two methods used to assess first-ray mobility

Mobility of the first-ray is associated with several common lower extremity disorders. However, the reliability and validity of clinical measurement remains unclear. In this study we examined first-ray mobility by using one hand to stabilize the lesser metatarsals while the clinicians other hand applied a displacement force to the head of the first metatarsal. The amount of mobility was graded as stiff, normal or hypermobile. We then used a well-validated mechanical device to perform similar tests and assessed validity, intrarater reliability and interrater reliability. Three clinicians having varied levels of experience graded first-ray mobility on 15 subjects. A separate investigator measured dorsal mobility with a mechanical device. Both methods of testing were repeated to assess measurement reliability. Reliability was estimated by kappa (K) statistics. Spearman correlation assessed the relationship between mobility graded manually and dorsal mobility measured by device. Manual examination intrarater K values ranged from 0.50 to 0.85, and interrater agreement from 0.09 to 0.16. Manual grading was not related (r = −0.21) to the absolute measure of total dorsal mobility made by device. This brings into question the validity and reliability of manual estimates of first-ray mobility.

Measuring first ray mobility with a new device

First ray hypermobility has been linked to many abnormal conditions in the foot. First metatarsal vertical displacement is proportional to the measurement of first ray dorsiflexion. A new device that measures first ray mobility has been built and tested. The device applies a dorsiflexing force to the head of the first metatarsal and measures the amount of vertical displacement that results. The design and instrumentation of the device is described. A safe and reliable testing procedure for measuring maximal first ray displacement is discussed. Clinicians could use this measure when selecting treatment options for patients who suffer foot pathologies resulting from faulty mechanics of the first ray.

The reliability and validity of a first ray measurement device.

The need for measuring the mobility of the first ray has been identified. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a device built to measure the relative vertical displacement of the first ray. Twenty fresh frozen cadaver feet were sampled (mean age of donor was 70 ± 13 years). Dorsal mobility of the first ray was measured by device over three trials of repeated loading using 20 N, 35 N, 55 N and 85 N of force. Radiographs served as the criterion standard for validation of the device. Vertical displacement was measured from x-ray by a digitizing procedure that recorded movement of the first ray during loading. Reliability of the device assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) was .98 with standard errors of the measurement calculated to be 0.35 mm. A correlation of agreement value of .97 was determined for the two methods of measurement. Analysis of variance testing found a significant interaction between force and method of measurement. Tukey post-hoc analysis found no difference (F < 1.70) between the two methods of measuring first ray displacement in cadaver specimens when the force applied did not exceed 55 N. At 85 N of force (F = 10.05), unwanted movement of the second metatarsal caused the device to overestimate the amount of displacement that occurred specific to the first ray. This measure of first ray mobility should help clinicians and researchers to better investigate foot pathology resulting from faulty mechanics of the first ray.

Measurement of Dorsal Mobility in the First Ray: Elimination of Fat Pad Compression as a Variable

Previous designs for a device to measure first ray mobility have included compression of the first metatarsal fat pad as part of the measurement of displacement or have failed to standardize the force applied to the head of the first metatarsal. In this investigation, assessment of vertical mobility of the first ray of both feet in 14 volunteers was determined using a device that applied dorsiflexing force to the first metatarsal. First ray displacement was measured initially from the plantar surface and then from the dorsal aspect of the head of the first metatarsal. The difference between plantar- and dorsal-surface-measured vertical displacement was highly significant. This study suggests that mobility of the first ray measured from the dorsal aspect of the first metatarsal head eliminated compression of the plantar fat pad from being interpreted as part of the measurement of displacement.

Relationship between Static Mobility of the First Ray and First Ray, Midfoot, and Hindfoot Motion during Gait

The relationship between a static measure of dorsal first ray mobility and dynamic motion of the first ray, midfoot, and hindfoot during the stance phase of walking was investigated in healthy, asymptomatic subjects who represented the spectrum of static flexibility. Static first ray mobility of 15 subjects was measured by a load cell device and ranged from stiff (3.1 mm) to lax (8.0 mm). Using three-dimensional motion analysis, mean first ray dorsiflexion/eversion and mid-/hindfoot eversion peak motion, time-to-peak, and eversion excursion were evaluated. Subjects with greater static dorsal mobility of the first ray demonstrated significantly greater time-to-peak hindfoot eversion and eversion excursion (p >.01), and midfoot peak eversion and eversion excursion (p > .01). No significant association was found between static first ray mobility and first ray motion during gait. This research provides evidence that the dynamic response of the foot may modulate the consequences of first ray mobility and that compensory strategies are most effective when static measures of dorsal mobility are most extreme.

Dorsal mobility and first ray stiffness in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Background: Limited joint mobility in diabetic patients has been identified as a risk factor in the development of plantar ulcers. We examined dorsal mobility and passive first ray stiffness in patients with diabetes and investigated the relationship between first ray mobility and ankle joint dorsiflexion. Methods: Forty individuals were studied: 20 with diabetes (mean estimated duration of 16 ± 10 years) and 20 matched controls. Dorsal first ray mobility was measured using a mechanical device. Force-vs-dorsal mobility displacement values were collected at 10 N increments to a load limit of 55 N. Ankle joint dorsiflexion motion was measured with a goniometer. The “prayer sign,” a clinical indicator of limited joint mobility, was evaluated in each patient. Subjects were separated into the two groups for data analysis. Results: Patients in the diabetic group had more stiffness and less dorsal first ray mobility than the control group (p <.05). In particular, patients with a positive prayer sign had significant first ray stiffness (p <.05). Patients with diabetes also had less ankle dorsiflexion (p <.05). Conclusion: Patients with diabetes have more stiffness and less first ray mobility and less ankle dorsiflexion than those without diabetes. The presence of a positive prayer sign correlates with stiffness and loss of first ray mobility. Soft-tissue stiffness may contribute to the development of foot ulcers in diabetic patients with neuropathy.

A Comparison of Device Measures of Dorsal First Ray Mobility

Background: Devices built by Glasoe and Klaue have been used in several studies to measure first ray mobility. Both devices measure sagittal motion of the first ray in a dorsal direction. The primary difference in the devices is the method of the load imposed. This study investigates whether first ray mobility measured with the Glasoe device is similar to the amount of mobility measured with the Klaue device. Methods: Using the devices described by Glasoe and Klaue, dorsal first ray mobility was measured in 39 patients who had foot and ankle problems. Paired t-tests were computed to assess for differences between device measures of dorsal mobility. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and absolute difference values were computed to further assess the agreement in measures. Results: Dorsal mobility measured with the Glasoe device averaged 4.9 mm (1.8 to 9.3 mm). Dorsal mobility measured with the Klaue device averaged 5.2 mm (2.5 to 8.5 mm). Paired t-tests (p = 0.12) revealed no significant difference in measures. An ICC of 0.70 and a mean absolute difference of 0.9 mm (SD 0.8) were found between the two clinical measures further suggesting agreement. Conclusion: Results indicated that the two devices possess similar diagnostic accuracy in the measurement of dorsal first ray mobility.

Arch Height and First Metatarsal Joint Axis Orientation as Related Variables in Foot Structure and Function

Background: This study investigated the association of arch height combined with first metatarsal joint axis vertical (V) orientation to the size of the 1–2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and first metatarsal adduction/abduction position simulating foot postures during gait, kinematics commonly affected by bunion. Materials and Methods: Nine cadaver specimens were mounted in a loading frame. Measures of arch height ratio and IMA were made. With the foot placed in positions seen during normal gait cycle an electromagnetic device measured displacement of the relative angle of rotations between the first metatarsal and navicular, and helical axis (HA) parameters. Canonical correlation analysis assessed the relationship among the variables. Results: A negative relationship (r = −0.73) was found between arch height and first metatarsal HA V-orientation. When considered as combined variables, arch height and metatarsal HA V-orientation accounted for 69% of the variance of IMA and change in first metatarsal adduction/abduction position. Conclusion: Orientation of the first metatarsal joint axis was highly variable between specimens but correlated with arch height. The conjoined factors of arch height and first metatarsal HA V-orientation accounted for most of the variance of IMA and change in first metatarsal adduction/abduction position during the sequence of foot position during simulated gait. Clinical Relevance: These findings suggest that orthotic arch support could reorient the metatarsal joint axis out-of-vertical and in effect, limit the first metatarsal from displacing into an adducted bunion deformity. These findings could help to explain the pathogenesis of bunions.