Wasim Akhtar

The therapeutic voyage of pyrazole and its analogs: A review

Pyrazole, a five membered heteroaromatic ring with two nitrogen atoms is of immense significance. Presence of this nucleus in the pharmacological agents of diverse therapeutic categories viz. antianxiety, anti-inflammatory, antipsychotic, anticancer, antiobesity, analgesic, antipyretic etc. has made it an indispensable anchor for design and development of new pharmacological agents. Owing to the development of novel and new pyrazole based therapeutic agents at a faster pace, there is a need to couple the latest information with previously available information to understand status of this moiety in medicinal chemistry research. The review herein highlights the therapeutic worth of pyrazole derivatives. Several therapeutically active pyrazole based derivatives developed by numerous scientists across the globe are reported here.

Piperazine scaffold: A remarkable tool in generation of diverse pharmacological agents

Piperazine is one of the most sought heterocyclics for the development of new drug candidates. This ring can be traced in a number of well established, commercially available drugs. Wide array of pharmacological activities exhibited by piperazine derivatives have made them indispensable anchors for the development of novel therapeutic agents. The review herein highlights the therapeutic significance of piperazine derivatives. Various therapeutically active piperazine derivatives developed by several chemists are reported here.

Therapeutic evolution of benzimidazole derivatives in the last quinquennial period

Benzimidazole, a fused heterocycle bearing benzene and imidazole has gained considerable attention in the field of contemporary medicinal chemistry. The moiety is of substantial importance because of its wide array of pharmacological activities. This nitrogen containing heterocycle is a part of a number of therapeutically used agents. Moreover, a number of patents concerning this moiety in the last few years further highlight its worth. The present review covers the recent work published by scientists across the globe during last five years.

The therapeutic journey of pyridazinone.

Pyridazinones have drawn a substantial attention within the field of research analysis and development. The moiety is a subject matter of intensive research because of its wide spectrum of biological activities and therapeutic applications. The synthesis of pyridazinone and investigation of their chemical and biological activities have gained additional importance in recent years. In this review, we have compiled and discussed various biological and therapeutic potential of pyridazinone derivatives.

Molecular interactions of dioxins and DLCs with the xenosensors (PXR and CAR): An in silico risk assessment approach

Dioxins and dioxin‐like compounds (DLCs) are known to cause endocrine disruption in humans and animals. Being lipophilic xenobiotic chemicals, they can be easily absorbed into the biological system from the surrounding environments, thereby causing various health dysfunctions. In the present study, a total of 100 dioxins and DLCs were taken, and their binding pattern was assessed with the xenosensors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in comparison with the corresponding known inhibitors and a well‐studied endocrine disrupting xenobiotic, bisphenol A (BPA). The nuclear receptors CAR and PXR are known to play a significant role in handling potential toxins by coordinating cellular transport and metabolic functions of the same. Among different endocrine‐disrupting chemicals used in the present study, DLCs (PCDFs and PCBs) elicited better interactions in comparison with the parent dioxin (polychlorinated dibenzodioxins) compounds. On comparing D scores of all the compounds against both the receptors, PCDF 8‐hydroxy‐3,4‐dichlorodibenzofuran (8‐OH‐DCDF) and PCB tetrachlorobenzyltoluene (TCBT) exhibited significant molecular interactions against PXR (−7.633 kcal mol−1) and CAR (−8.389 kcal mol−1), respectively. Predominant interactions were found to be H‐bonding, π‐π stacking, hydrophobic, polar, and van der Waals. By contrast, BPA and some natural ligands tested in this study showed lower binding affinities with these receptors than certain DLCs reported herein, ie, certain DLCs might be more toxic than the proven toxic agent, BPA. Such studies play a pivotal role in the risk assessment of exposure to dioxins and DLCs on human health.

Molecular Interactions of Bisphenols and Analogs with Glucocorticoid Biosynthetic Pathway Enzymes: An in silico Approach

Abstract Glucocorticoids are known to have vital effects on metabolism, behavior and immunity. Any sort of impairment in their synthesis may lead to the generation of numerous ill health effects. Different environmental toxicants, including bisphenols and their analogs pose deleterious effect on the biosynthesis of glucocorticoids, thereby leading to endocrine disruption. In order to assess the effect of these environmental toxicants on gluocorticoid biosynthetic pathway, an in silico study was performed. This involved molecular docking studies of 18 ligands with the selected participating enzymes of the pathway. These enzymes were CYP11A1, CYP11B2, CYP19A1, CYP17A1, 3α/20β-HSD, 3β/17β-HSD and CYP21A2. Comparison of their binding affinity was made with the known inhibitors of these enzymes. In case of CYP11A1, Bisphenol M (BP M) had the lowest docking score (D score) of −8.699 kCal/mol, and was better than that of the standard, Metyrapone. Bisphenol PH (BP PH) was found to have significant affinity with CYP11B2. In case CYP19A1, results were found to be comparable with the standards, Exemestane and Letrozole. BP PH elicited better results than the standard Abiraterone acetate against CYP17A1. BP M had a D score of −7.759 against 3α/20β-HSD, again better results than the standard, Trilostane. Upon molecular docking of BP PH against CYP21A2, it was seen that amongst all the analogs, it had maximum interactions along with the lowest D score. From all the above instances mentioned, it is quite evident that certain BPA analogs have more potential to modulate the enzymes involved in comparison to the known inhibitors.

Synthesis of Hybrids of Dihydropyrimidine and Pyridazinone as potential Anti-Breast Cancer Agents

BACKGROUND Different 3-aroylpropionic acids and dihydropyrimidine hydrazine derivatives were condensed together to yield a series of dihydropyrimidine and pyridazinone hybrids (5a-u). OBJECTIVE This was done in order to develop therapeutic agents for the treatment of breast cancer with improved Cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2) selectivity. In-vitro anticancer evaluation for these compounds was done against human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231) and normal human keratinocytes (HaCaT). CONCLUSION Amongst all the developed analogs, compound 5l emerged as the most potent agent against both these cell lines with IC50 values of 3.43 and 2.56 µM respectively. The synthesized compounds were also evaluated for COX-2 selectivity. To observe the binding pattern of the compounds with COX-2, a docking study was performed using PDB ID: 1CX2.

A Review Exploring Therapeutic Worth of 1,3,4-Oxadiazole Tailored Compounds

1,3,4-Oxadiazole, a five-membered aromatic ring can be seen in a number of synthetic molecules. The peculiar structural feature of 1,3,4-oxadiazole ring with pyridine type of nitrogen atom is beneficial for 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives to have effective binding with different enzymes and receptors in biological systems through numerous weak interactions, thereby eliciting an array of bioactivities. Research in the area of development of 1,3,4-oxadiazole-based derivatives has become an interesting topic for the scientists. A number of 1,3,4-oxadiazole based compounds with high therapeutic potency are being extensively used for the treatment of different ailments, contributing to enormous development value. This work provides a systematic and comprehensive review highlighting current developments of 1,3,4-oxadiazole based compounds in the entire range of medicinal chemistry such as anticancer, antifungal, antibacterial, antitubercular, anti-inflammatory, antineuropathic, antihypertensive, antihistaminic, antiparasitic, antiobesity, antiviral, and other medicinal agents. It is believed that this review will be of great help for new thoughts in the pursuit for rational designs for the development of more active and less toxic 1,3,4-oxadiazole based medicinal agents.

Molecular Interactions of Dioxins and DLCs with the Ketosteroid Receptors: An in silico Risk Assessment Approach

Abstract Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) are the ones with poor water solubility and low volatility, resistant to physical, chemical and biological processes, persistent in the environment even under extreme conditions. Due to lipophilic nature, they get adhered to the fatty material and concentrate through biomagnification and bioaccumulation, thereby easily getting incorporated into food chains, paving the way to endocrine disruption via modulation of various human receptors. This in turn leads to certain adverse health effects. In the present study, a total of 100 dioxins and DLCs were taken and their binding pattern was assessed with the ketosteroid receptors, i.e. androgen (hAR), glucocorticoid (hGR), progesterone (hPR) and mineralocorticoid (hMR) in comparison to the corresponding natural steroids and a known endocrine disrupting xenobiotic, Bisphenol A (BPA). Most of the DLCs, particularly those bearing hydroxyl (-OH) group showed considerable affinities with ketosteroid receptors. On comparing D scores of all the dioxins and DLCs against all four receptors, compound 8-hydroxy-3,4-dichlorodibenzofuran(8-OH-DCDF) exhibited least D score of -9.549 kcal mol−1 against hAR. 3,8-Dihydroxy-2-chlorodibenzofuran(3,8-DiOH-CDF), 4′-hydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrachlorobiphenyl (4′-OH-TCB) and 4-hydroxy-2,2′,5′-trichlorobiphenyl(4-OH-TCB) also showed comparable molecular interactions with the ketosteroid receptors. These interactions mainly include H-bonding, π–π stacking, hydrophobic, polar and van der Waals’ interactions. In contrast, BPA and some natural ligands tested in this study showed lower binding affinities with these receptors than certain DLCs reported herein, i.e. certain DLCs might be more toxic than the proven toxic agent, BPA. Such studies play a pivotal role in the risk assessment of exposure to dioxins and DLCs on human health.