Wei-Lih Lee

Motor- and Tail-Dependent Targeting of Dynein to Microtubule Plus Ends and the Cell Cortex

BACKGROUND Cytoplasmic dynein mediates spindle positioning in budding yeast by powering sliding of microtubules along the cell cortex. Although previous studies have demonstrated cortical and plus-end targeting of dynein heavy chain (Dyn1/HC), the regulation of its recruitment to these sites remains elusive. RESULTS Here we show that separate domains of Dyn1/HC confer differential localization to the dynein complex. The N-terminal tail domain targets Dyn1/HC to cortical Num1 receptor sites, whereas the C-terminal motor domain targets Dyn1/HC to microtubule plus ends in a Bik1/CLIP-170- and Pac1/LIS1-dependent manner. Surprisingly, the isolated motor domain blocks plus-end targeting of Dyn1/HC, leading to a dominant-negative effect on dynein function. Overexpression of Pac1/LIS1, but not Bik1/CLIP-170, rescues the dominant negativity by restoring Dyn1/HC to plus ends. In contrast, the isolated tail domain has no inhibitory effect on Dyn1/HC targeting and function. However, cortical targeting of the tail construct is more robust than full-length Dyn1/HC and occurs independently of Bik1/CLIP-170 or Pac1/LIS1. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the cortical association domain is normally masked in the full-length dynein molecule. We propose that targeting of dynein to plus ends unmasks the tail, priming the motor for off-loading to cortical Num1 sites.

Cytoskeletal dynamics: A view from the membrane

Many aspects of cytoskeletal assembly and dynamics can be recapitulated in vitro; yet, how the cytoskeleton integrates signals in vivo across cellular membranes is far less understood. Recent work has demonstrated that the membrane alone, or through membrane-associated proteins, can effect dynamic changes to the cytoskeleton, thereby impacting cell physiology. Having identified mechanistic links between membranes and the actin, microtubule, and septin cytoskeletons, these studies highlight the membrane’s central role in coordinating these cytoskeletal systems to carry out essential processes, such as endocytosis, spindle positioning, and cellular compartmentalization.

Cell cycle–regulated cortical dynein/dynactin promotes symmetric cell division by differential pole motion in anaphase

Evidence is presented for dynamic cortical association of dynein and dynactin in mammalian cells and its regulation by Plk1, astral microtubules, and the cell cycle. The asymmetric spindle positioning in LLC-Pk1 cells and its correction by dynein and dynactin provide a new system for analysis of spindle position and symmetric cell division.

Quantitative analysis of Pac1/LIS1-mediated dynein targeting: Implications for regulation of dynein activity in budding yeast†

LIS1 is a critical regulator of dynein function during mitosis and organelle transport. Here, we investigated how Pac1, the budding yeast LIS1 homologue, regulates dynein targeting and activity during nuclear migration. We show that Pac1 and Dyn1 (dynein heavy chain) are dependent upon each other and upon Bik1 (budding yeast CLIP‐170 homologue) for plus end localization, whereas Bik1 is independent of either. Dyn1, Pac1 and Bik1 interact in vivo at the plus ends, where an excess amount of Bik1 recruits approximately equal amounts of Pac1 and Dyn1. Overexpression of Pac1 enhanced plus end targeting of Dyn1 and vice versa, while affinity‐purification of Dyn1 revealed that it exists in a complex with Pac1 in the absence of Bik1, leading us to conclude that the Pac1‐Dyn1 complex preassembles in the cytoplasm prior to loading onto Bik1‐decorated plus ends. Strikingly, we found that Pac1‐overexpression augments cortical dynein activity through a mechanism distinct from loss of She1, a negative regulator of dynein‐dynactin association. While Pac1‐overexpression enhances the frequency of cortical targeting for dynein and dynactin, the stoichiometry of these complexes remains relatively unchanged at the plus ends compared to that in wild‐type cells (∼3 dynein to 1 dynactin). Loss of She1, however, enhances dynein‐dynactin association at the plus ends and the cell cortex, resulting in an apparent 1:1 stoichiometry. Our results reveal differential regulation of cortical dynein activity by She1 and Pac1, and provide a potentially new regulatory step in the off‐loading model for dynein function.

A novel patch assembly domain in Num1 mediates dynein anchoring at the cortex during spindle positioning

An N-terminal BAR-like domain in Num1 mediates its assembly into patches and its interaction with dynein to promote spindle translocation into the mitotic yeast bud.

A CAAX motif can compensate for the PH domain of Num1 for cortical dynein attachment

During mitosis in budding yeast, cortically anchored dynein exerts pulling forces on cytoplasmic microtubules, moving the mitotic spindle into the mother-bud neck. Anchoring of dynein requires the cortical patch protein Num1, which is hypothesized to interact with PI(4,5)P2 via its C-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. Here we show that the PH domain and PI(4,5)P2 are required for the cortical localization of Num1, but are not sufficient to mediate the cortical assembly of Num1 patches. A GFP fusion to the PH domain localizes to the cortex in foci containing ~2 molecules, whereas patches of full-length Num1-GFP contain ~14 molecules. A membrane targeting sequence containing the CAAX motif from the yeast Ras2 protein can compensate for the PH domain to target Num1 to the plasma membrane as discrete patches. The CAAX-targeted Num1 exhibits overlapping but largely distinct localization from wild-type Num1. However, it is fully functional in the dynein pathway. More importantly, cortical PI(4,5)P2 is dispensable for the localization and function of the CAAX-targeted Num1. Together, these results demonstrate that cortical assembly of Num1 into functional dynein-anchoring patches is independent of its interaction with PI(4,5)P2.

Microtubule-dependent path to the cell cortex for cytoplasmic dynein in mitotic spindle orientation.

During animal development, microtubules (MTs) play a major role in directing cellular and subcellular patterning, impacting cell polarization and subcellular organization, thereby affecting cell fate determination and tissue architecture. In particular, when progenitor cells divide asymmetrically along an anterior-posterior or apical-basal axis, MTs must coordinate the position of the mitotic spindle with the site of cell division to ensure normal distribution of cell fate determinants and equal sequestration of genetic material into the two daughter cells. Emerging data from diverse model systems have led to the prevailing view that, during mitotic spindle positioning, polarity cues at the cell cortex signal for the recruitment of NuMA and the minus-end directed MT motor cytoplasmic dynein.1 The NuMA/dynein complex is believed to connect, in turn, to the mitotic spindle via astral MTs, thus aligning and tethering the spindle, but how this connection is achieved faithfully is unclear. Do astral MTs need to search for and then capture cortical NuMA/dynein? How does dynein capture the astral MTs emanating from the correct spindle pole? Recently, using the classical model of asymmetric cell division—budding yeast S. cerevisiae—we successfully demonstrated that astral MTs assume an active role in cortical dynein targeting, in that astral MTs utilize their distal plus ends to deliver dynein to the daughter cell cortex, the site where dynein activity is needed to perform its spindle alignment function. This observation introduced the novel idea that, during mitotic spindle orientation processes, polarity cues at the cell cortex may actually signal to prime the cortical receptors for MT-dependent dynein delivery. This model is consistent with the observation that dynein/dynactin accumulate prominently at the astral MT plus ends during metaphase in a wide range of cultured mammalian cells.

Photoactivatable GFP tagging cassettes for protein‐tracking studies in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast cell biologists use a variety of fluorescent protein tags for determining protein localization and for measuring protein dynamics using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Although many modern fluorescent proteins, such as those with photoactivatable and photoconvertible characteristics, have been developed, none has been exploited for studies in budding yeast. We describe here the construction of yeast‐tagging vectors containing photoactivatable green fluorescent protein (PA–GFP) for analysis of protein behaviour. We tagged two yeast proteins, Erg6p and Num1p, with PA–GFP and demonstrated specific photoactivation of the fusion proteins in live cells. Fluorescence intensity measurements showed that a short 5 s exposure to 413 nm light is sufficient to produce the maximum level of activated GFP fluorescence. Local photoactivation of cortical Num1p‐PA–GFP showed movement of the marked proteins, providing new insights into the behaviour of Num1p at the cell cortex. Since photoactivation can be achieved using standard mercury arc illumination, the PA–GFP tag represents a convenient and economical way to determine protein dynamics in the cell. Thus, the tagging modules should facilitate protein‐tracking studies in a wide variety of cell biological processes in yeast. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Astral microtubule asymmetry provides directional cues for spindle positioning in budding yeast

Cortical force generators play a central role in the orientation and positioning of the mitotic spindle. In higher eukaryotes, asymmetrically localized cortical polarity determinants recruit or activate such force generators, which, through interactions with astral microtubules, position the mitotic spindle at the future site of cytokinesis. Recent studies in budding yeast have shown that, rather than the cell cortex, the astral microtubules themselves may provide polarity cues that are needed for asymmetric pulling on the mitotic spindle. Such asymmetry has been shown to be required for proper spindle positioning, and consequently faithful and accurate chromosome segregation. In this review, we highlight results that have shed light on spindle orientation in this classical model of asymmetric cell division, and review findings that may shed light on similar processes in higher eukaryotes.

Variations on theme: spindle assembly in diverse cells.

The mitotic spindle faithfully separates the genetic material, and has been reverently observed for well over a century. Across eukaryotes, while the mechanisms for moving chromosomes seem quite conserved, mechanisms for assembling the spindle often seem distinct. Two major pathways for spindle assembly are known, one based on centrosomes and the other based on chromatin, and these pathways are usually considered to be fundamentally different. We review observations of spindle assembly in animals, fungi, and plants, and argue that microtubule assembly at a particular location, centrosomes, or chromatin, reflects contingent, cell-type specific factors, rather than reflecting a fundamental distinction in the process of spindle building. We hypothesize that the essential process for spindle assembly is the motor-driven organization of microtubules that accumulate in the form of dense bundles at or near the chromosomes.