William C. Gerth

Four-year persistence patterns among patients initiating therapy with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan versus other antihypertensive drug classes☆

BACKGROUND It has been reported that a statistically greater percentage of patients initially treated with losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (AIIA), stayed on therapy at 1 year compared with patients treated with antihypertensive drugs from other classes. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether the stay-on-therapy (persistence) patterns observed in the previous analysis were maintained over a 4-year period. METHODS We investigated a subgroup of 15,175 hypertensive patients from an earlier studied cohort who were continuously eligible for benefits over a 4-year follow-up period. A linear regression model was developed to test the statistical significance of differences in the percentage of patients staying on therapy from 12 months to 48 months for the different antihypertensive classes. RESULTS From 12 to 48 months, there was a slow continuous decline in persistence that was similar across all classes of antihypertensive medications. A greater percentage of patients treated with an AIIA (losartan) stayed on therapy from 12 to 48 months compared with patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (67.4% vs 60.7% at 12 months, P < 0.01; 50.9% vs 46.5% at 48 months, P = 0.095), calcium antagonists (67.4% vs 54.1% at 12 months, P < 0.01; 50.9% vs 40.7% at 48 months, P < 0.03), beta-blockers (67.4% vs 45.6% at 12 months, P < 0.01; 50.9% vs 34.7% at 48 months, P < 0.03), or thiazide diuretics (67.4% vs 20.8% at 12 months, P < 0.01; 50.9% vs 16.4% at 48 months, P < 0.03). The percentage of patients staying on AIIA therapy from 12 months to 48 months was statistically greater (P < 0.001) than the percentage of patients staying on therapy with other antihypertensive drug classes. CONCLUSIONS This analysis supports the observation that initiation of antihylertensive therapy with an AIIA such as losartan results in a greater persistence rate over a 4-year period than does therapy with any other antihypertensive class. These findings may have important implications for blood pressure control, reduction of cardiovascular risks, and health care resource utilization.

Costs and effects of enalapril therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure: An economic analysis of the studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD) treatment trial

The clinical results of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial have been published previously, but no evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on the primary data has been reported. The authors used a decision analytic model based on primary data from SOLVD to estimate years of survival (overall, by New York Heart Association Class, and quality-adjusted) and to estimate costs of nonfatal hospitalizations, ambulatory care, therapy with enalapril, and deaths. Clinical and resource utilization data were derived from participants in SOLVD, and cost data were derived from the United States. Therapy with enalapril during the approximate 48-month follow-up period in SOLVD resulted in a gain of 0.16 year of life and savings of dollars 718. During the patients lifetime, a survival benefit of 0.40 year, a cost per year of life saved of dollars 80, and a cost per quality-adjusted life year of dollars 115 with the use of enalapril were projected. The results indicated a net savings and gain in life expectancy during the SOLVD treatment trial. The lifetime projection suggests that therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, such as enalapril, is extremely attractive when compared with many commonly used interventions in patients with cardiovascular disease or heart failure.

The Multinational Impact of Migraine Symptoms on Healthcare Utilisation and Work Loss

AbstractObjective: To compare self-reported healthcare resource utilisation, paid work loss, unpaid work loss and loss of effectiveness at work due to migraine in a clinic-based adult migraine population. Methods: The Migraine Background Questionnaire© (MBQ) was translated and pilot-tested for use in 25 countries. The questionnaire was then self-administered by patients at a screening visit for 3 phase III clinical trials of rizatriptan [a selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT1B/1Dreceptor agonist] in 23 US and 78 non-US sites. Participants: Persons 18 to 65 years of age with at least a 6-month history of moderate to severe migraines prior to the screening visit were surveyed. Results: A total of 2670 persons (54.7% Europe, 16.5% Latin America, 23.1% North America, 5.5% other countries) completed the MBQ and had responses which could be analysed. On average, each patient reported 2.78 doctor visits, 0.53 emergency room visits and 0.06 hospitalisations related to migraine per year. Patients self-reported being only 46% effective while on the job with migraine symptoms. Extrapolation of patient self-reported work and productivity loss for the last 4 weeks to an annual basis suggested that clinic-based patients with migraine lose 19.5 workday equivalents (8.3 days due to absenteeism, 11.2 days due to reduced workday equivalents) due to migraine per year. In the US, the annual employer cost of this total migraine-related work loss is estimated to be

Prospective Study of Amphotericin B Formulations in Immunocompromised Patients in 4 European Countries

US3309 (2000 values) per patient with migraine. The levels of self-reported healthcare resources utilised for migraine and work loss were generally consistent across geographic regions. Conclusions: The impact of migraine symptoms on healthcare resource utilisation and work loss was similar across most measures in Europe, Latin America, North America and other countries. Total migraine-related work loss due to absenteeism and reduced workday equivalents accounts for most of the economic burden of migraine, regardless of country, in a clinic-based migraine population.

Work and Productivity Loss in the Rizatriptan Multiple Attack Study

BACKGROUND Amphotericin B is a widely used broad-spectrum antifungal agent, despite being associated with significant adverse events, including nephrotoxicity. METHODS The present prospective study collected data on outcomes for 418 adult patients treated consecutively with polyenes in hematology and oncology wards in 20 hospitals in Europe. RESULTS Patients initially received amphotericin B deoxycholate (62% of patients), liposomal amphotericin B (27%), or other lipid formulations of amphotericin B (11%). Of the patients initially treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate, 36% had therapy switched to lipid formulations of amphotericin B, primarily because of increased serum creatinine levels (in 45.7% of patients) or other amphotericin B-attributable adverse events (in 41.3% of patients). Nephrotoxicity, which was defined as a > or = 50% increase in the serum creatinine level, developed in 57% of patients with normal kidney function at baseline. Predictors of nephrotoxicity included formulation type and duration of treatment. Compared with patients without nephrotoxicity, patients with nephrotoxicity had a higher mortality rate (24%), and their mean length of stay in the hospital was prolonged by 8.6 days. Slight increases in the serum creatinine level (i.e., > or = 50%) were associated with a significantly longer stay in the hospital. Severe nephrotoxicity (i.e., a > or = 200% increase in the serum creatinine level) was a significant predictor of death, as were severe underlying medical conditions and documented fungal infection. CONCLUSION This prospective study confirmed that, in European hospitals, amphotericin B formulations have a major influence on the length of stay in the hospital and nephrotoxicity-associated mortality.

The cost and cardioprotective effects of enalapril in hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

The objective of this study was to measure the self-reported effect of acute migraine and its treatment on paid work and productivity loss. Patients self-administered a questionnaire in which the impact of a recent migraine on paid work and productivity activities was assessed. We included the questionnaire in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, out-patient study designed to examine the safety and efficacy of rizatriptan (5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist) 10 mg p.o. in patients treating four separate migraine attacks. A total of 407 patients, aged 18–65 years, suffering from moderate to severe migrainous headaches was studied. Patients receiving rizatriptan compared with placebo reported 0.7 fewer hours (P < 0.01) of paid worked missed due to absenteeism, 0.4 fewer hours (P < 0.05) of productive time lost on the job, and 1.1 fewer total hours (P < 0.01) of work loss per migraine attack. Rizatriptan compared with placebo significantly reduced migraine-related work loss associated with absenteeism and decreased effectiveness on the job.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Losartan versus Captopril in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure

This study examined the effect of enalapril on survival, resource use, and cost of care in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and hypertension using a retrospective analysis of patients who participated in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Among the 6797 SOLVD participants, 1917 patients had either elevated systolic (> or = 140 mm Hg) or diastolic (> or = 90 mm Hg) blood pressure. Therapy with enalapril was associated with a significant relative risk reduction for mortality (RR = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.98; P = .03). This resulted in a gain of 0.11 years (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.20 years) of survival during the average 2.8 year follow-up for this subgroup and was projected to result in a gain of 2.14 years (95% CI: 0.05 to 4.21 years) during the patients lifetime. Enalapril significantly reduced the risk of first hospitalization for heart failure by 37%. For all types of hospitalizations, there was an average reduction of 32 hospitalizations per 100 patients treated with enalapril during the trial period (95% CI: 11.8 to 52.2 hospitalizations avoided per 100 patients), resulting in an estimated net savings of

The Impact of Losartan on the Lifetime Incidence of End-Stage Renal Disease and Costs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

1656 per patient during the trial period (95% CI: increased cost of

Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life with Rizatriptan 10mg Compared with Standard Migraine Therapy

191 to savings of

Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge?

3502). Although the projected lifetime net savings of