William D. Ritts
Oregon State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by William D. Ritts.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2006
Warren B. Cohen; Thomas K. Maiersperger; David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; Dirk Pflugmacher; Robert E. Kennedy; Alan Kirschbaum; Steven W. Running; Marcos Heil Costa; Stith T. Gower
Global maps of land cover and leaf area index (LAI) derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) reflectance data are an important resource in studies of global change, but errors in these must be characterized and well understood. Product validation requires careful scaling from ground and related measurements to a grain commensurate with MODIS products. We present an updated BigFoot project protocol for developing 25-m validation data layers over 49-km2 study areas. Results from comparisons of MODIS and BigFoot land cover and LAI products at nine contrasting sites are reported. In terms of proportional coverage, MODIS and BigFoot land cover were in close agreement at six sites. The largest differences were at low tree cover evergreen needleleaf sites and at an Arctic tundra site where the MODIS product overestimated woody cover proportions. At low leaf biomass sites there was reasonable agreement between MODIS and BigFoot LAI products, but there was not a particular MODIS LAI algorithm pathway that consistently compared most favorably. At high leaf biomass sites, MODIS LAI was generally overpredicted by a significant amount. For evergreen needleleaf sites, LAI seasonality was exaggerated by MODIS. Our results suggest incremental improvement from Collection 3 to Collection 4 MODIS products, with some remaining problems that need to be addressed
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2006
David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; Maosheng Zhao; Shirley A. Kurc; Allison L. Dunn; Steven C. Wofsy; Eric E. Small; Steven W. Running
Global estimates of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) are now operationally produced from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) imagery at the 1-km spatial resolution and eight-day temporal resolution. In this study, MODIS GPP products were compared with ground-based GPP estimates over multiple years at three sites-a boreal conifer forest, a temperate deciduous forest, and a desert grassland. The ground-based estimates relied on measurements at eddy covariance flux towers, fine resolution remote sensing, and modeling. The MODIS GPP showed seasonal variation that was generally consistent with the in situ observations. The sign and magnitude of year-to-year variation in the MODIS products agreed with that of the ground observations at two of the three sites. Examination of the inputs to the MODIS GPP algorithm-notably the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) that is absorbed by the canopy), minimum temperature scalar, and vapor pressure deficit scalar-provided explanations for cases of disagreement between the MODIS and ground-based GPP estimates. Continued evaluation of interannual variation in MODIS products and related climate variables will aid in assessing potential biospheric feedbacks to climate change
Tellus B | 2006
David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; J. M. Styles; Zhiqiang Yang; Warren B. Cohen; Beverly E. Law; Peter E. Thornton
Net ecosystem production (NEP) was estimated over a 10.9 × 104 km2 forested region in western Oregon USA for 2 yr (2002–2003) using a combination of remote sensing, distributed meteorological data, and a carbon cycle model (CFLUX). High spatial resolution satellite data (Landsat, 30 m) provided information on land cover and the disturbance regime. Coarser resolution satellite imagery (MODIS, 1 km) provided estimates of vegetation absorption of photosynthetically active radiation. A spatially distributed (1 km) daily time step meteorology was generated for model input by interpolation of meteorological station data. The model employed a light use efficiency approach for photosynthesis. It was run over a 1 km grid. This approach captured spatial patterns in NEP associated with climatic gradients, ecoregional differences in NEP generated by different management histories, temporal variation in NEP associated with interannual variation in climate and changes in NEP associated with recovery from disturbances such as the large forest fire in southern Oregon in 2002. Regional NEP averaged 174 gC m-2 yr-1 in 2002 and 142 gC m-2 yr-1 in 2003. A diagnostic modelling approach of this type can provide independent estimates of regional NEP for comparison with results of inversion or boundary layer budget approaches.
Tellus B | 2011
David P. Turner; Mathias Göckede; Beverly E. Law; William D. Ritts; Warren B. Cohen; Zhiqiang Yang; Tara W. Hudiburg; Robert E. Kennedy; Maureen V. Duane
We applied and compared bottom-up (process model-based) and top-down (atmospheric inversion-based) scaling approaches to evaluate the spatial and temporal patterns of net ecosystem production (NEP) over a 2.5 × 10 5 km 2 area (the state of Oregon) in the western United States. Both approaches indicated a carbon sink over this heterogeneous region in 2003 (a relatively warm, dry year in western Oregon) and 2007 (near normal), with carbon uptake primarily in forested and agricultural areas. The statewide mean NEP for 2007 using the bottom-up approach was 80 gC m -2 yr -1 , which compares with 145 gC m -2 yr -1 for the top-down approach. Seasonality of daily NEP at the ecoregion scale showed similar patterns across the two approaches, but with less sensitivity to seasonal drought in the top-down model. In 2003, simulated annual NEP was lower than in 2007 for both scaling approaches, but the reduction was stronger with the bottom-up approach. Estimates of mean NEP on forested lands from a forest inventory approach, and from the CarbonTracker inversion scheme, bracketed that of our bottom-up approach (ratios to bottom-up estimates were 1.3 and 0.3, respectively). These results support the need for a multiple constraint approach to evaluation of regional trace gas budgets. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00525.x
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2006
David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; Warren B. Cohen; Stith T. Gower; Steve Running; Maosheng Zhao; Marcos Heil Costa; Al A. Kirschbaum; Jay M. Ham; Scott R. Saleska; Douglas E. Ahl
Global Change Biology | 2005
David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; Warren B. Cohen; Thomas K. Maeirsperger; Stith T. Gower; Al A. Kirschbaum; Steve Running; Maosheng Zhao; Steven C. Wofsy; Allison L. Dunn; Beverly E. Law; John Campbell; Walter Oechel; Hyo Jung Kwon; Tilden P. Meyers; Eric E. Small; Shirley A. Kurc; John A. Gamon
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2003
David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; Warren B. Cohen; Stith T. Gower; Maosheng Zhao; Steve Running; Steven C. Wofsy; Shawn Peter Urbanski; Allison L. Dunn; J. W. Munger
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2003
Warren B. Cohen; Thomas K. Maiersperger; Zhiqiang Yang; Stith T. Gower; David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; Mercedes Berterretche; Steven W. Running
Biogeosciences | 2007
David P. Turner; William D. Ritts; Beverly E. Law; Warren B. Cohen; Zhiqiang Yang; Tara W. Hudiburg; John L. Campbell; Maureen V. Duane
Environmental Management | 2004
David P. Turner; Michael Guzy; Michael A. Lefsky; William D. Ritts; Steve Van Tuyl; Beverly E. Law