William J. Killoy
University of Missouri–Kansas City
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by William J. Killoy.
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine | 1996
Daniel Tucker; Charles M. Cobb; John W. Rapley; William J. Killoy
The purpose of this study was to compare morphologic changes following CO2 laser or manual curette treatment of calculus‐ladened tooth root surfaces.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1991
Donald B. Wilcoxon; Richard J. Ackerman; William J. Killoy; John W. Love; Joseph S. Sakumura; Daniel E. Tira
This study compared counterrotational-action power toothbrushing with manual toothbrushing in effectiveness on plaque control and gingival health in 20 randomly selected orthodontic patients at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. A blind two-group crossover design was used. Gingival and plaque scores were recorded, and a prophylaxis was given to bring the plaque score to zero. Ten subjects received counterrotational power brushes, and ten subjects received manual brushes. Instructions appropriate to each brushing method were given by a hygienist. At 30 and 60 days, plaque and gingival scores were recorded and a prophylaxis was given. At 60 days the subjects who were using power brushes were switched to manual brushes, and the subjects who were using manual brushes were switched to power brushes. At 30 and 60 days, plaque and gingival scores were recorded and a prophylaxis was given. Plaque and gingival scores were significantly less (p less than 0.01) after brushing 2 months with the counterrotational power brush than with the manual brush. This finding was irrespective of the sequence in which the brushes were used.
Journal of Periodontology | 1989
Mary Patterson; J. David Eick; Adele B Eberhart; Karen B. Williams Gross; William J. Killoy
This study compared the effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic sealer tips on artificial calculus removal from the furcations of mandibular first and second molars. Twenty-four extracted mandibular molars were cleaned and randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Teeth were split buccal lingually, artificial calculus was placed in the furcation areas, and the teeth were photographed with a stereo camera. Teeth were reconnected with bonding material and mounted in a typodont with simulated gingiva and attached to a dental chair. Teeth were instrumented with either a Cavitron TFI10 tip, Cavitron EWPP tip, Titan-S Universal tip, or Titan-S Sickle tip by a licensed dental hygienist until each tooth was judged calculus free to the touch with a CH3 explorer. Time for each instrumentation period was recorded. Following instrumentation, the teeth were again split and photographed. Stereophotogrammetry was used to produce tracings of the teeth with initial calculus and remaining calculus. Pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation amounts of calculus on the surface area were computed using the Bloquant system. A two factor analysis of variance was conducted followed with a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Technique to test for within and between differences. Significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) were found between pre- and post-amounts of calculus for all tips. No significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were found between the four instrument tips with respect to percentage of furcation surface with calculus remaining. No differences were found between tips with regard to the time required to clean the test surfaces.
Journal of Endodontics | 1996
Susan Arakawa; Charles M. Cobb; John W. Rapley; William J. Killoy; Paulette Spencer
The purpose of this in vitro study was to use scanning electron microscopy and polarized light microscopy to evaluate the feasibility of using either the CO2 laser or an Nd:YAG laser in combination with air/water surface cooling to effect fusion of fractured tooth roots. The experimental unit consisted of 81 single-rooted teeth, each with an induced root fracture. Fifty-six teeth that had been reapproximated in dental stone and 25 teeth that had been reapproximated with C-clamps were assigned to untreated control groups or groups for treatment using CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers. Laser treatment consisted of multiple passes along the line of fracture, which was inspected using a dissecting microscope after each pass until a visual indication of fusion or irreparable damage resulted. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the treated lines revealed heat-induced fissures and cracks, areas of cementum meltdown and resolidification, crater formation, and separation of cementum from underlying dentin. In no instance-regardless of reapproximation technique, laser type, energy, and other parameters-did the treatment effect fusion of the fractured root halves.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1999
Paul A. Hansen; William J. Killoy; Kristi Masterson c
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with both a sonic and mechanical counter rotary power toothbrush on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Forty-five extracted teeth were divided into three random groups and had orthodontic brackets bonded to them. One group was brushed with a counterrotational toothbrush, the Interplak, one group with a sonic toothbrush, the Sonicare, and a third group was not brushed and was held as a control. After the equivalent of 2 years brushing, the teeth were placed in an Instron machine and the shear force to remove the brackets was recorded. Group 1, the counter rotary power brush, had a mean of 107.5 kg/cm2, the second group, the sonic brush, had a mean of 79.7 kg/cm2, and the control group had a mean of 125. 4 kg/cm2. Single factor analysis of variance followed by the Fisher-Hayter Multiple Comparison Procedure showed a statistically significant difference between the sonic power brush and the control (P <.01), but no significant difference between the counter rotary and the control (P >.05). There was no significant difference between the two power brushes (P >.05).
Journal of Periodontal Research | 1991
J. M. Goodson; M. A. Cugini; Ralph Kent; Gary C. Armitage; Charles M. Cobb; D. H. Fine; M. E. Fritz; M. J. Imoberdorf; William J. Killoy; C. Mendieta; Richard Niederman; S. Offenbacher; E. J. Taggart; M. Tonetti
Journal of Periodontology | 1998
Marjorie K. Jeffcoat; Bray Ks; Ciancio Sg; Dentino Ar; Daniel H. Fine; Gordon Jm; John C. Gunsolley; William J. Killoy; Roxanne A. Lowenguth; Magnusson Ni; Offenbacher S; Palcanis Kg; Proskin Hm; Finkelman Rd; Flashner M
Journal of Periodontology | 1992
Charles M. Cobb; Thomas K. McCawley; William J. Killoy
Journal of Periodontology | 1999
Steven Garrett; Lonnie R. Johnson; Connie Hastings Drisko; Donald F. Adams; Carl L. Bandt; Bradley Beiswanger; Gary Bogle; Kevin J. Donly; William W. Hallmon; E. Brady Hancock; Philip J. Hanes; Charles E. Hawley; Robert Kiger; William J. Killoy; James T. Mellonig; Alan M. Polson; Frank J. Raab; Mark I. Ryder; Norman H. Stoller; Hom Lay Wang; Lawrence E. Wolinsky; Gerald H. Evans; Charles Q. Harrold; Ralph M. Arnold; David F. Atack; Bryan Fitzgerald; Margaret Hill; Roger L. Isaacs; Hisham F. Nasi; Donald H. Newell
Journal of Clinical Periodontology | 2002
William J. Killoy