Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William J. Peplinski is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William J. Peplinski.


Journal of Contaminant Hydrology | 2002

Bench-scale visualization of DNAPL remediation processes in analog heterogeneous aquifers: surfactant floods and in situ oxidation using permanganate.

Stephen H. Conrad; Robert J. Glass; William J. Peplinski

We have conducted well-controlled DNAPL remediation experiments within a 2-D, glass-walled, sand-filled chamber using surfactants (Aerosol MA and Tween 80) to increase solubility and an oxidant (permanganate) to chemically degrade the DNAPL. Initial conditions for each remediation experiment were created by injecting DNAPL as a point source at the top of the chamber and allowing the DNAPL to migrate downward through a water-filled, heterogeneous, sand-pack designed to be evocative of a fluvial depositional environment. This migration process resulted in the DNAPL residing as a series of descending pools. Lateral advection across the chamber was used to introduce the remedial fluids. Photographs and digital image analysis illustrate interactions between the introduced fluids and the DNAPL. In the surfactant experiments, we found that DNAPL configured in a series of pools was easily mobilized. Extreme reductions in DNAPL/water interfacial tension occurred when using the Aerosol MA surfactant, resulting in mobilization into low permeability regions and thus confounding the remediation process. More modest reductions in interfacial tension occurred when using the Tween 80 surfactant resulting in modest mobilization. In this experiment, capillary forces remained sufficient to exclude DNAPL migration into low permeability regions allowing the excellent solubilizing properties of the surfactant to recover almost 90% of the DNAPL within 8.6 pore volumes. Injection of a potassium permanganate solution resulted in precipitation of MnO2, a reaction product, creating a low-permeability rind surrounding the DNAPL pools. Formation of this rind hindered contact between the permanganate and the DNAPL, limiting the effectiveness of the remediation. From these experiments, we see the value of performing visualization experiments to evaluate the performance of proposed techniques for DNAPL remediation.


Geophysical Research Letters | 1995

Laboratory investigation of matrix imbibition from a flowing fracture

Vincent Carroll Tidwell; Robert J. Glass; William J. Peplinski

Predicting fluid flow and transport behavior in unsaturated, fractured rock is greatly simplified where matrix imbibition can be modeled as a linear function of the square root of time (t1/2); however, such treatment implicitly assumes homogenous matrix properties. To investigate matrix heterogeneity effects, we perform a simple experiment in which x-ray imaging is used to measure the imbibition of water from a flowing fracture into a slab of volcanic tuff. Experimental results show matrix imbibition to follow a linear t1/2 relationship even though the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the tuff varies by over four orders of magnitude.


International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection | 2017

Framework for Shared Drinking Water Risk Assessment.

Thomas Stephen Lowry; Vincent Carroll Tidwell; William J. Peplinski; Roger Mitchell; David Binning; Jenny Meszaros

Abstract Risk assessment plays a vital role in protecting our nations critical infrastructure. Traditionally, such assessments have been conducted as a singular activity confined to the boarders of a particular asset or utility with little external sharing of information. In contrast other domains, e.g., disaster preparedness, cyber security, food-borne hazards, have demonstrated the benefits of sharing data, experiences and lessons learned in assessing and managing risk. Here we explore the concept of a Shared Risk Framework (SRF) in the context of critical infrastructure assessments. In this exploration, key elements of an SRF are introduced and initial instantiations demonstrated by way of three water utility assessments. Results from these three demonstrations were then combined with results from four other risk assessments developed using a different risk assessment application by a different set of analysts. Through this comparison we were able to explore potential challenges and benefits from implementation of a SRF. Challenges included both the capacity and interest of local utilities to conduct a shared risk assessment; particularly, wide scale adoption of any SRF will require a clear demonstration that such an effort supports the basic mission of the utility, adds benefit to the utility, and protects utility data from unintended access or misuse. In terms of benefits, anonymous sharing of results among utilities could provide the added benefits of recognizing and correcting bias; identifying ‘unknown, unknowns’; assisting self-assessment and benchmarking for the local utility; and providing a basis for treating shared assets and/or threats across multiple utilities.


Archive | 2006

Integrated system dynamics toolbox for water resources planning.

Marissa Devan Reno; Howard David Passell; Leonard A. Malczynski; William J. Peplinski; Vincent Carroll Tidwell; Don Coursey; Hanson, Jason (University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, Nm); Kristine M. Grimsrud; Jennifer A. Thacher; Broadbent, Craig (University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, Nm); David S. Brookshire; Janie Chemak; Kristan Cockerill; Jesse D. Roach


Journal of Hydrology | 2008

Experimental observation of the drift shadow effect using X-ray absorption imaging

Susan Jeanne Altman; Aleeca A. Forsberg; William J. Peplinski; Clifford K. Ho


Archive | 2017

Institutional Transformation Version 2.5 Modeling and Planning.

Daniel Villa; Jack H. Mizner; Howard David Passell; Gerald R. Gallegos; William J. Peplinski; Douglas Walter Vetter; Christopher A. Evans; Leonard A. Malczynski; Marlin Addison; Matthew A. Schaffer; Matthew W. Higgins


Archive | 2009

Models for evaluation of energy technology and policy options to maximize low carbon source penetration in the United States energy supply.

Paul S. Pickard; Dawn Kataoka; Marissa Devan Reno; Leonard A. Malczynski; William J. Peplinski; Jesse D. Roach; James Robert Brainard; Todd H. West; David Alan Schoenwald


Archive | 2007

Collaborative Modeling in New Mexico's Upper Gila and San Francisco River Basin

Vincent Carroll Tidwell; Amy Cha-Tien Sun; Geoffrey Taylor Klise; William J. Peplinski; James Robert Brainard; Carlos A. Aragon


Archive | 2006

X-Ray Absorption Imaging of Diffusion in Diatomaceous Mudstone and Hard Shale from the Horonobe, Japan site

William J. Peplinski; Thomas Stephen Lowry; Sean Andrew McKenna; David Hart


Archive | 2001

Use of Computed Microtomography to Visualize and Quantify Pore-Scale Transport Processes

Susan Jeanne Altman; Mark L. Rivers; William J. Peplinski; Daniel A. Lucero

Collaboration


Dive into the William J. Peplinski's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Howard David Passell

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jesse D. Roach

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marissa Devan Reno

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert J. Glass

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Jeanne Altman

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Stephen Lowry

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aleeca A. Forsberg

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge