William Kielbasa

Exploratory Translational Modeling Approach in Drug Development to Predict Human Brain Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacologically Relevant Clinical Doses

The central nervous system (CNS) pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs that have pharmacological targets in the brain are not often understood during drug development, and this gap in knowledge is a limitation in providing a quantitative framework for translating nonclinical pharmacologic data to the clinical patient population. A focus of translational sciences is to improve the efficiency of clinical trial design via a more judicious selection of clinical doses on the basis of nonclinical data. We hypothesize that this can be achieved for CNS-acting drugs based on knowledge of CNS PK and brain target engagement obtained in nonclinical studies. Translating CNS PK models from rat to human can allow for the prediction of human brain PK and the human dose-brain exposure relationship, which can provide insight on the clinical dose(s) having potential brain activity and target engagement. In this study, we explored the potential utility of this translational approach using rat brain microdialysis and PK modeling techniques to predict human brain extracellular fluid PK of atomoxetine and duloxetine. The results show that this translational approach merits consideration as a means to support the clinical development of CNS-mediated drug candidates by enhancing the ability to predict pharmacologically relevant doses in humans in the absence of or in association with other biomarker approaches.

Development of the 2nd generation neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist LY686017 for social anxiety disorder.

The neurokinin-1 (NK-1) antagonist LY686017 showed activity in preclinical anxiety models. The clinical development of LY686017 included a PET study and a proof-of-concept in social anxiety disorder (SAD). [(11)C]GR205171 was used healthy volunteers receiving 1-100mg/d LY686017 for 28 days to determine brain receptor occupancy (RO). The mean NK-1 RO increased ranged from 25% with 1mg to 93% with 100mg. Subsequently, a 12-week randomized clinical trial tested LY686017 vs. paroxetine, or placebo in SAD. Pharmacokinetic (PK)/RO modeling based on the PET results predicted that once daily dosing of >30mg LY686017 led to sustained trough RO of over 80%. 189 outpatients(1) suffering from SAD were randomly assigned to 12-weeks treatment with 50mg/d LY686017 (N=77), placebo (N=74), or 20mg/d paroxetine (N=38). There was no significant difference between LY686017 and placebo as measured with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety scale (LSAS). The active comparator paroxetine showed positive trends on primary and secondary measures. The plasma concentrations were above the level expected to produce maximal brain NK-1 RO based on the PK/RO relationship obtained in the human PET investigation. Thus, further evaluation of LY686017 for the treatment of SAD does not seem warranted.

Microdialysis Evaluation of Atomoxetine Brain Penetration and Central Nervous System Pharmacokinetics in Rats

A comprehensive in vivo evaluation of brain penetrability and central nervous system (CNS) pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine in rats was conducted using brain microdialysis. We sought to determine the nature and extent of transport at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) and to characterize brain extracellular and cellular disposition. The steady-state extracellular fluid (ECF) to plasma unbound (uP) concentration ratio (CECF/CuP = 0.7) and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to plasma unbound concentration ratio (CCSF/CuP = 1.7) were both near unity, indicating that atomoxetine transport across the BBB and BCB is primarily passive. On the basis of the ratios of whole brain concentration to CECF (CB/CECF = 170), brain cell (BC) concentration to CECF (CBC/CECF = 219), and unbound brain cell concentration to CECF (CuBC/CECF = 2.9), we conclude that whole brain concentration does not represent the concentration in the biophase and atomoxetine primarily partitions into brain cells. The distributional clearance at the BBB (QBBB = 0.00110 l/h) was estimated to be 12 times more rapid than that at the BCB (QBCB = 0.0000909 l/h) and similar to the clearances across brain parenchyma (CLECF-BC = 0.00216 l/h; CLBC-ECF = 0.000934 l/h). In summary, the first detailed examination using a quantitative microdialysis technique to understand the brain disposition of atomoxetine was conducted. We determined that atomoxetine brain penetration is high, movements across the BBB and BCB occur predominantly by a passive mechanism, and rapid equilibration of ECF and CSF with plasma occurs.

A study of the effects of LY2216684, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in the treatment of major depression

The current study sought to test the efficacy and safety of the novel selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor LY2216684 compared to placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Escitalopram was used as a control for assay sensitivity. Adult outpatients with MDD, confirmed at screening by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, a Self-Rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) score of at least 12 and a Clinical Global Impression-Severity Score of at least 4, were randomly assigned to LY2216684 (N=269), placebo (N=138), or escitalopram (N=62). Efficacy, safety, and tolerability outcomes were compared during 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. LY2216684 plasma concentrations were measured. LY2216684 did not show statistically significant improvement from baseline compared to placebo in the primary analysis of the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D(17)) total score. Escitalopram demonstrated significant improvement compared to placebo on the HAM-D(17) total score, suggesting adequate assay sensitivity. Both LY2216684 and escitalopram showed statistically significant improvement from baseline on the patient-rated QIDS-SR total score compared to placebo. Headache, nausea, constipation, dry mouth, and insomnia were the most frequently reported adverse events in the LY2216684 group. A 3-6 beats per minute mean increase from baseline in pulse rate was observed in the LY2216684 group. LY2216684 plasma concentrations increased as the dose increased from 3 mg to 12 mg. The results of this initial investigation of LY2216684s efficacy suggest that it may have antidepressant potential. More definitive data to confirm this is necessary. Its safety profile does not preclude further clinical development.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Edivoxetine (LY2216684), a Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor, in Pediatric Patients with Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

OBJECTIVE Edivoxetine (LY2216684) is a selective and potent norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NERI). The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of edivoxetine were assessed in children and adolescent patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) following single and once-daily oral doses of edivoxetine. METHODS During a phase 1 open-label safety, tolerability, and PK study, pediatric patients were administered edivoxetine at target doses of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg, and blood samples were collected to determine plasma concentrations of edivoxetine for PK assessments and plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) concentrations for PD assessments. Edivoxetine plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection, and DHPG was measured using liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. RESULTS Edivoxetine PK was comparable between children and adolescents. The time to maximum concentration (t(max)) of edivoxetine was ∼2 hours, which was followed by a mono-exponential decline in plasma concentrations with a terminal elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of ∼6 hours. Dose-dependent increases in area under the edivoxetine plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) were observed, and there was no discernable difference in the apparent clearance (CL/F) or the apparent volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)/F) across the dose range. In adolescents, edivoxetine caused a maximum decrease in plasma DHPG concentrations from baseline of ∼28%, most notably within 8 hours of edivoxetine administration. CONCLUSION This initial study in pediatric patients with ADHD provides new information on the PK profile of edivoxetine, and exposures that decrease plasma DHPG consistent with the mechanism of action of a NERI. The PK and PD data inform edivoxetine pharmacology and can be used to develop comprehensive population PK and/or PK-PD models to guide dosing strategies.

A Randomized Trial of Edivoxetine in Pediatric Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of edivoxetine (LY2216684), a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in pediatric patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD A fixed-dose, randomized, double-blind, 8 week study was conducted in patients 6-17 years of age, who were randomized by two strata: 1) Patients with prior stimulant use randomized to placebo, edivoxetine 0.1 mg/kg/day, 0.2 mg/kg/day, or 0.3 mg/kg/day arms in a 1:1:1:1 ratio; 2) Stimulant-naïve patients randomized to placebo, edivoxetine 0.1mg/kg/day, 0.2 mg/kg/day, 0.3 mg/kg/day, or osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS MPH) (18-54 mg/day based on body weight) arms in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary efficacy measure was baseline-to-week 8 change of ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) total score for edivoxetine 0.2 mg/kg/day and 0.3 mg/kg/day. RESULTS A total of 340 patients were randomized to placebo (n=78); edivoxetine 0.1 mg/kg/day (n=76), 0.2 mg/kg/day (n=75), or 0.3 mg/kg/day (n=75); or OROS MPH (n=36). In the stimulant-naïve stratum, the positive control, OROS MPH, was significantly superior to placebo in mean ADHD-RS total score change at end-point (-19.46, p=0.015). The edivoxetine 0.2 mg/kg/day and 0.3 mg/kg/day arms had statistically significantly greater improvement than the placebo arm in mean ADHD-RS total score change at end-point (placebo -10.35; edivoxetine 0.2 mg/kg/day -16.09, p<0.010; edivoxetine 0.3 mg/kg/day -16.39, p<0.010) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score (placebo 3.05; edivoxetine 0.1 mg/kg/day 3.01, p=0.860; edivoxetine 0.2 mg/kg/day 2.54, p=0.013; edivoxetine 0.3 mg/kg/day 2.53, p=0.013). In the overall efficacy-analyses data set (n=270), the effect size estimates for edivoxetine doses 0.1 mg/kg/day, 0.2 mg/kg/day and 0.3 mg/kg/day at the week 8 time point were 0.17, 0.51, and 0.54, respectively (for the stimulant-naïve stratum, the effect size estimate for OROS MPH was 0.69). Compared with placebo, edivoxetine treatment was associated with statistically significant increases in blood pressure and pulse (p<0.050), and a smaller increase or slight decrease in weight. CONCLUSIONS Edivoxetine at doses of 0.2 mg/kg/day and 0.3 mg/kg/day demonstrated efficacy in ADHD treatment, despite the presence of a sizeable placebo response. No unexpected adverse events were identified. Clinical Trial Registry identifier: NCT00922636.

Clinical Outcomes from an Open-Label Study of Edivoxetine Use in Pediatric Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes from an open label study of edivoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in pediatric patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS This was a multi-cohort open-label study of edivoxetine consisting of a single-dose administration period (Part 1) and an open-label once daily (QD) dose long-term period (Part 2). Adolescents ages 12-17 years and children ages 6-11 years were enrolled in Part 1 and continued to Part 2 where they received 0.05 to 0.3 mg/kg edivoxetine QD for ≤12 months. Safety was assessed by adverse events, vital signs, weight, electrocardiograms, and laboratory tests. In Part 2, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Version IV-Parent Reported: Investigator Scored (ADHDRS-IV) and Clinical Global Impressions-ADHD-Severity (CGI-ADHD-S) scores were determined. RESULTS Fifty-three patients enrolled in Part 1, and 49 continued to Part 2 with a mean exposure duration of 22 weeks. The 31 patients completing Part 2 then entered another long-term open-label study. One serious adverse event of mania was reported; all other treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Nausea, decreased appetite, somnolence, increased blood pressure, and upper respiratory tract infection were most frequently reported (three events each). No clinically relevant changes were noted in the laboratory parameters. ADHDRS-IV total score, inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity subscores, and CGI-ADHD-S scores were statistically significantly improved at endpoint compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS This study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that edivoxetine at doses ≤0.3 mg/kg/day is safe and may improve ADHD symptoms in pediatric patients. These results require confirmation in larger, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigation: Assessment of edivoxetine and atomoxetine on systemic and central 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, a biochemical marker for norepinephrine transporter inhibition

Inhibition of norepinephrine (NE) reuptake into noradrenergic nerves is a common therapeutic target in the central nervous system (CNS). In noradrenergic nerves, NE is oxidized by monoamine oxidase to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG). In this study, 40 healthy male subjects received the NE transporter (NET) inhibitor edivoxetine (EDX) or atomoxetine (ATX), or placebo. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of these drugs in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was assessed. In Part A, subjects received EDX once daily (QD) for 14 or 15 days at targeted doses of 6mg or 9mg. In Part B, subjects received 80mg ATX QD for 14 or 15 days. Each subject received a lumbar puncture before receiving drug and after 14 or 15 days of dosing. Plasma and urine were collected at baseline and after 14 days of dosing. Edivoxetine plasma and CSF concentrations increased dose dependently. The time to maximum plasma concentration of EDX was 2h, and the half-life was 9h. At the highest EDX dose of 9mg, DHPG concentrations were reduced from baseline by 51% at 8h postdose in CSF, and steady-state plasma and urine DHPG concentrations decreased by 38% and 26%, respectively. For 80mg ATX, the decrease of plasma, CSF, or urine DHPG was similar to EDX. Herein we provide clinical evidence that EDX and ATX decrease DHPG concentrations in the periphery and CNS, presumably via NET inhibition. EDX and ATX concentrations measured in the CSF confirmed the availability of those drugs in the CNS.

Pharmacodynamics of norepinephrine reuptake inhibition: Modeling the peripheral and central effects of atomoxetine, duloxetine, and edivoxetine on the biomarker 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylglycol in humans

Norepinephrine, a neurotransmitter in the autonomic sympathetic nervous system, is deaminated by monoamine oxidase to 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG). Inhibition of the NE transporter (NET) using DHPG as a biomarker was evaluated using atomoxetine, duloxetine, and edivoxetine as probe NET inhibitors. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were obtained from healthy subjects (n = 160) from 5 clinical trials. An indirect response model was used to describe the relationship between drug plasma concentration and DHPG concentration in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The baseline plasma DHPG concentration (1130–1240 ng/mL) and Imax (33%–37%) were similar for the 3 drugs. The unbound plasma drug IC50 (IC50U) based on plasma DHPG was 0.973 nM for duloxetine, 0.136 nM for atomoxetine, and 0.041 nM for edivoxetine. The baseline CSF DHPG concentration (1850–2260 ng/mL) was similar for the 3 drugs, but unlike plasma DHPG, the Imax for DHPG was 38% for duloxetine, 53% for atomoxetine, and75% for edivoxetine. The IC50U based on CSF DHPG was 2.72 nM for atomoxetine, 1.22 nM for duloxetine, and 0.794 nM for edivoxetine. These modeling results provide insights into the pharmacology of NET inhibitors and the use of DHPG as a biomarker.

Safety of galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: A randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging Phase 2b study:

Background Safety findings from a Phase 2b study of galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide, for prevention of migraine (NCT02163993) are reported here. Methods Patients aged 18–65 years with episodic migraine were evaluated in this multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. After randomization, 410 patients were administered 5, 50, 120 or 300 mg of galcanezumab or placebo subcutaneously once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by a post-treatment off-drug period lasting 12 weeks. Results Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were primarily rated as mild to moderate. Serious adverse events reported in galcanezumab dose groups were appendicitis, Crohn’s disease, suicidal ideation, and congenital ankyloglossia in an infant of a paternal pregnancy; each of these were reported by one patient. Adverse events leading to discontinuation with galcanezumab treatment were abdominal pain, visual impairment, and upper limb fracture, each reported by one patient. Treatment-emergent injection-site reactions were reported significantly more frequently (p = 0.013) with galcanezumab (13.9%) than with placebo (5.8%). Injection-site pain was the most common injection-site reaction (galcanezumab 11.4%; placebo 2.9%, p = 0.004). Upper respiratory tract infection (galcanezumab 10.0%; placebo 8.8%) and nasopharyngitis (galcanezumab 7.0%; placebo 2.2%) also occurred more frequently with galcanezumab treatment. Potential hypersensitivity events were reported at similar frequencies in galcanezumab (3.3%) and placebo (5.1%) groups. Incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies in galcanezumab dose groups (4.6% of patients during treatment period) did not appear to have any meaningful effects on safety, the pharmacokinetics of galcanezumab, or its ability to bind to the target ligand. Conclusion The results from this 3-month Phase 2b study support the initiation of larger Phase 3 trials of longer duration.