Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William M. O'Barr is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William M. O'Barr.


Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | 1978

Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech

Bonnie Erickson; E. Allan Lind; Bruce C. Johnson; William M. O'Barr

Abstract On the basis of a previous empirical analysis of speech patterns in court trials, speech styles were identified that covaried with speaker social status and power. The “powerless” style is characterized by the frequent use of such linguistic features as intensifiers, hedges, hesitation forms, and questioning intonations, whereas the “powerful” style is marked by less frequent use of these features. Male and female introductory psychology students heard the testimony of a male or female witness who used either a powerful or a powerless style to deliver the same substantive evidence. The testimony was presented either on audio tape or in written transcripts. Use of the powerful style resulted in greater attraction to the witness, regardless of the sex of the witness, the sex of the subject, or the mode of presentation of the testimony. The powerful style also resulted in greater perceived credibility of the witness than did the powerless style; however, this effect was stronger when the subject and the witness were of the same sex than when they were of the opposite sex. In all but the male witness-written presentation condition, the powerful style produced more acceptance of the position advocated in the testimony than did the powerless style. The results are discussed with regard to possible relations between speech style and person perception and persuasion processes and with regard to the social psychology of legal issues.


The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets | 2000

When Cultures Collide: Social Security and the Market

William M. O'Barr; John M. Conley

In his 1999 State of the Union address, President Clinton raised the possibility of investing social security funds in the equities market. In this article, two anthropologists who have studied the culture of the financial world assess the Presidents proposal. The analysis focuses on the vast cultural gap between the private-sector participants in the equities market and the federal bureaucrats who would inevitably manage social security investments. The authors examine similar arrangements at the state level, the cultural differences among the entities involved, and how those differences interfere with fiduciary decision-making. They conclude that the gap is simply too wide for the proposal to be workable, and as a result, the adverse consequences likely outweigh the potential benefits. Although some consequences are foreseeable, more threatening consequences can be envisioned only in the most general terms.


Journal of Language and Social Psychology | 1983

The Study of Language in Institutional Contexts

William M. O'Barr

Studies relating language and institutions have emerged independently in several disciplines, including social psychology, social anthropology, sociology, linguistics, and others, as researchers have questioned conventional boundaries of concern. Language and law is examined as an indicative case for language-institu tion studies. The field shows vitality in research relating language to education, medicine, commerce, etc., but very little agreement upon priorities in topic, method, or theory. Rather, research tends to be informed by questions and approaches that reflect disciplinary concerns. It is suggested that researchers investigating language-institution relations do share many issues arising out of the hybrid origins and the non-conventionality of issues considered. The particular experiences of the author are discussed to show how his own interests in language in institutional contexts developed and to provide a specific opportunity to analyse the general issues facing researchers in language-instruction contexts. In conclu sion, it is argued that language-institution studies must go beyond merely noticing language in institutional contexts by attempting to speak to important and signifi cant questions about language, institutions, or both.


Reviews in Anthropology | 1982

Conversational analysis is alive, well, and prospering in England

William M. O'Barr

J. Maxwell Atkinson and Paul Drew. Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. Atlantic Highlands, N. J.: Humanities Press, 1979. ix + 275 pp. Notes, references, and index. (Published in Oxford Socio‐Legal Studies Series, J. Maxwell Atkinson, Donald R. Harris, and R. M. Hartwell, general eds.)


Linguistic Evidence#R##N#Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom | 1982

THE NATURE OF LEGAL LANGUAGE

William M. O'Barr

30.00.


The Geographical Journal | 1976

Tradition and identity in changing Africa

K. M. Barbour; Mark Tessler; William M. O'Barr; David H. Spain

This chapter discusses the nature of legal language. This chapter focuses primarily on American legal language. It explores legal language as it differs from ordinary English, and discusses the way in which its written and spoken varieties differ from one another. A number of important studies of language and law are reviewed to facilitate an understanding of the basic issues that have attracted practical and scholarly attention, the conclusions that have been reached, and the questions that remain. It is perhaps reasonable to suggest that anthropologists should have devoted more attention to spoken than written language. This interest is largely because of the types of societies and legal systems they have traditionally studied.


Archive | 1982

Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom

William M. O'Barr

Downloading the book in this website lists can give you more advantages. It will show you the best book collections and completed collections. So many books can be found in this website. So, this is not only this tradition and identity in changing africa. However, this book is referred to read because it is an inspiring book to give you more chance to get experiences and also thoughts. This is simple, read the soft file of the book and you get it.


Contemporary Sociology | 1991

Rules versus relationships : the ethnography of legal discourse

John M. Conley; William M. O'Barr


Archive | 1998

Just Words : Law, Language, And Power

John M. Conley; William M. O'Barr


Archive | 1994

Culture and the Ad: Exploring Otherness in the World of Advertising

William M. O'Barr

Collaboration


Dive into the William M. O'Barr's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John M. Conley

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Martin Conley

Loyola Marymount University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Goldman

Hobart and William Smith Colleges

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce C. Johnson

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge