William Munger
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by William Munger.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2001
Dennis D. Baldocchi; Eva Falge; Lianhong Gu; R. J. Olson; David Y. Hollinger; Steven W. Running; Peter M. Anthoni; Ch. Bernhofer; Kenneth J. Davis; Robert H. Evans; Jose D. Fuentes; Allen H. Goldstein; Gabriel G. Katul; Beverly E. Law; Xuhui Lee; Yadvinder Malhi; Tilden P. Meyers; William Munger; Walter Oechel; Kim Pilegaard; Hans Peter Schmid; Riccardo Valentini; Shashi B. Verma; Timo Vesala; Kell B. Wilson; S. C. Wofsy
FLUXNET is a global network of micrometeorological flux measurement sites that measure the exchanges of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy between the biosphere and atmosphere. At present over 140 sites are operating on a long-term and continuous basis. Vegetation under study includes temperate conifer and broadleaved (deciduous and evergreen) forests, tropical and boreal forests, crops, grasslands, chaparral, wetlands, and tundra. Sites exist on five continents and their latitudinal distribution ranges from 70°N to 30°S. FLUXNET has several primary functions. First, it provides infrastructure for compiling, archiving, and distributing carbon, water, and energy flux measurement, and meteorological, plant, and soil data to the science community. (Data and site information are available online at the FLUXNET Web site, http://www-eosdis.ornl.gov/FLUXNET/.) Second, the project supports calibration and flux intercomparison activities. This activity ensures that data from the regional networks are intercomparable. And third, FLUXNET supports the synthesis, discussion, and communication of ideas and data by supporting project scientists, workshops, and visiting scientists. The overarching goal is to provide information for validating computations of net primary productivity, evaporation, and energy absorption that are being generated by sensors mounted on the NASA Terra satellite. Data being compiled by FLUXNET are being used to quantify and compare magnitudes and dynamics of annual ecosystem carbon and water balances, to quantify the response of stand-scale carbon dioxide and water vapor flux densities to controlling biotic and abiotic factors, and to validate a hierarchy of soil–plant–atmosphere trace gas exchange models. Findings so far include 1) net CO 2 exchange of temperate broadleaved forests increases by about 5.7 g C m −2 day −1 for each additional day that the growing season is extended; 2) the sensitivity of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange to sunlight doubles if the sky is cloudy rather than clear; 3) the spectrum of CO 2 flux density exhibits peaks at timescales of days, weeks, and years, and a spectral gap exists at the month timescale; 4) the optimal temperature of net CO 2 exchange varies with mean summer temperature; and 5) stand age affects carbon dioxide and water vapor flux densities.
Nature | 2011
Xuhui Lee; Michael L. Goulden; David Y. Hollinger; Alan G. Barr; T. Andrew Black; Gil Bohrer; Rosvel Bracho; Bert G. Drake; Allen H. Goldstein; Lianhong Gu; Gabriel G. Katul; Thomas E. Kolb; Beverly E. Law; Hank A. Margolis; Tilden P. Meyers; Russell K. Monson; William Munger; Ram Oren; Kyaw Tha Paw U; Andrew D. Richardson; Hans Peter Schmid; Ralf M. Staebler; Steven C. Wofsy; Lei Zhao
Deforestation in mid- to high latitudes is hypothesized to have the potential to cool the Earth’s surface by altering biophysical processes. In climate models of continental-scale land clearing, the cooling is triggered by increases in surface albedo and is reinforced by a land albedo–sea ice feedback. This feedback is crucial in the model predictions; without it other biophysical processes may overwhelm the albedo effect to generate warming instead. Ongoing land-use activities, such as land management for climate mitigation, are occurring at local scales (hectares) presumably too small to generate the feedback, and it is not known whether the intrinsic biophysical mechanism on its own can change the surface temperature in a consistent manner. Nor has the effect of deforestation on climate been demonstrated over large areas from direct observations. Here we show that surface air temperature is lower in open land than in nearby forested land. The effect is 0.85 ± 0.44 K (mean ± one standard deviation) northwards of 45° N and 0.21 ± 0.53 K southwards. Below 35° N there is weak evidence that deforestation leads to warming. Results are based on comparisons of temperature at forested eddy covariance towers in the USA and Canada and, as a proxy for small areas of cleared land, nearby surface weather stations. Night-time temperature changes unrelated to changes in surface albedo are an important contributor to the overall cooling effect. The observed latitudinal dependence is consistent with theoretical expectation of changes in energy loss from convection and radiation across latitudes in both the daytime and night-time phase of the diurnal cycle, the latter of which remains uncertain in climate models.
Environmental Research Letters | 2014
Soumaya Belmecheri; R. Stockton Maxwell; Alan H. Taylor; Kenneth J. Davis; Katherine H. Freeman; William Munger
We investigated relationships between tree-ring δ13C and growth, and flux tower estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP) at Harvard Forest from 1992 to 2010. Seasonal variations of derived photosynthetic isotope discrimination (Δ13C) and leaf intercellular CO2 concentration (c i ) showed significant increasing trends for the dominant deciduous and coniferous species. Δ13C was positively correlated to growing-season GPP and is primarily controlled by precipitation and soil moisture indicating that site conditions maintained high stomatal conductance under increasing atmospheric CO2 levels. Increasing Δ13C over the 1992–2010 period is attributed to increasing annual and summer water availability identified at Harvard Forest and across the region. Higher Δ13C is coincident with an enhancement in growth and ecosystem-level net carbon uptake. This work suggests that tree-ring δ13C could serve as a measure of forest GPP and be used to improve the calibration and predictive skill of ecosystem and carbon cycle models.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2017
J. Kim; Taehee Hwang; Crystal L. Schaaf; David A. Orwig; Emery R. Boose; William Munger
Over the past few decades, a hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) infestation has significantly affected eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) in the eastern U.S., and warmer winters are expected to promote a continued northward expansion in the future. Here we report a water yield increase due to the HWA infestation in New England, U.S. Since the first observation in 2002, peak growing season evapotranspiration over a hemlock-dominated area has decreased by 24–37% in 2012 and 2013. Over the same time period, the water yield from the study catchment significantly increased as compared to an adjacent catchment with less hemlock cover. The net increase was estimated to be as much as 15.6% of annual water yield in 2014 based on an ecohydrological modeling analysis. This study indicates that the ongoing hemlock decline is also largely altering hydrological regimes in the northeastern U.S.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2002
Beverly E. Law; Eva Falge; Lianhong Gu; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Peter S. Bakwin; Paul Berbigier; K Davis; A.J. Dolman; Matthias Falk; Jose D. Fuentes; Allen H. Goldstein; André Granier; Achim Grelle; David Y. Hollinger; Ivan A. Janssens; P. G. Jarvis; Niels Otto Jensen; Gabriel G. Katul; Y Mahli; Giorgio Matteucci; Tilden P. Meyers; Russell K. Monson; William Munger; Walter Oechel; R. J. Olson; Kim Pilegaard; Halldor Thorgeirsson; Riccardo Valentini; Shashi B. Verma; Timo Vesala
Global Change Biology | 2012
Trevor F. Keenan; Eric A. Davidson; Antje M. Moffat; William Munger; Andrew D. Richardson
Environmental Science & Technology | 2003
J. M. Sigler; Xuhui Lee; William Munger
Archive | 2002
Beverly E. Law; Eva Falge; Lianhong Gu; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Peter S. Bakwin; Paul Berbigier; Kenneth J. Davis; A. Johannes Dolman; Matthias Falk; Jose D. Fuentes; Allen H. Goldstein; André Granier; Achim Grelle; David Y. Hollinger; Ivan A. Janssens; Paul Jarvis; Niels Otto Jensen; Gabriel G. Katul; Y. Mahli; Giorgio Matteucci; Russell K. Monson; William Munger; Walter C. Oechel; R. J. Olson; Kim Pilegaard; U. K. T. Paw; Haukur Thorgeirsson; Riccardo Valentini; Shashi B. Verma; Timo Vesala
Global Change Biology | 2016
X. Yue; Trevor F. Keenan; William Munger; Nadine Unger
Biogeosciences | 2017
Dan Lu; Daniel M. Ricciuto; Anthony P. Walker; Cosmin Safta; William Munger