William P. Sisk
Biogen Idec
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by William P. Sisk.
The FASEB Journal | 2014
Graham K. Farrington; Nadia L. Caram-Salas; Arsalan S. Haqqani; Eric Brunette; John K. Eldredge; Blake Pepinsky; Giovanna Antognetti; Ewa Baumann; Wen Ding; Ellen Garber; Susan Jiang; Christie Delaney; Eve Boileau; William P. Sisk; Danica B. Stanimirovic
The blood‐brain barrier (BBB) prevents the access of therapeutic antibodies to central nervous system (CNS) targets. The engineering of bispecific antibodies in which a therapeutic “arm” is combined with a BBB‐transcytosing arm can significantly enhance their brain delivery. The BBB‐permeable single‐domain antibody FC5 was previously isolated by phenotypic panning of a naive llama single‐domain antibody phage display library. In this study, FC5 was engineered as a mono‐ and bivalent fusion with the human Fc domain to optimize it as a modular brain delivery platform. In vitro studies demonstrated that the bivalent fusion of FC5 with Fc increased the rate of transcytosis (Papp) across brain endothelial monolayer by 25% compared with monovalent fusion. Up to a 30‐fold enhanced apparent brain exposure (derived from serum and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetic profiles) of FC5‐compared with control domain antibody‐Fc fusions after systemic dosing in rats was observed. Systemic pharmacological potency was evaluated in the Hargreaves model of inflammatory pain using the BBB‐impermeable neuropeptides dalargin and neuropeptide Y chemically conjugated with FC5‐Fc fusion proteins. Improved serum pharmacokinetics of Fc‐fused FC5 contributed to a 60‐fold increase in pharmacological potency compared with the single‐domain version of FC5; bivalent and monovalent FC5 fusions with Fc exhibited similar systemic pharmacological potency. The study demonstrates that modular incorporation of FC5 as the BBB‐carrier arm in bispecific antibodies or antibody‐drug conjugates offers an avenue to develop pharmacologically active biotherapeutics for CNS indications.—Farrington, G. K., Caram‐Salas, N., Haqqani, A. S., Brunette, E., Eldredge, J., Pepinsky, B., Antognetti, G., Baumann, E., Ding, W., Garber, E., Jiang, S., Delaney, C., Boileau, E., Sisk, W. P., Stanimirovic, D. B., A novel platform for engineering blood‐brain barrier‐crossing bispecific biologics. FASEB J. 28, 4764–4778 (2014). www.fasebj.org
Biotechnology Progress | 2007
Holly Prentice; Barbara Ehrenfels; William P. Sisk
The amount of recombinant product obtained from mammalian cells grown in a bioreactor is in part limited by achievable cell densities and the ability of cells to remain viable over extended periods of time. In an attempt to generate cell lines capable of better bioreactor performance, we subjected the DG44 Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) host cell line and a recombinant production cell line to an iterative process whereby cells capable of surviving the harsh conditions in the bioreactor were selected. This selective process was termed “bioreactor evolution”. Following the selective process, the “evolved” host cells attained a 2‐fold increase in peak cell density and a 72% increase in integral cell area. Transient transfection experiments demonstrate that the evolved cells have the same transfection efficiency and the same secretory potential as the initial cells. The “evolved” host was also found to contain a large subpopulation of cells that did not require insulin for growth. From this, a new population of growth‐factor‐independent cells was obtained. These improvements in host properties should prove beneficial in the expression of recombinant proteins in fed‐batch processes. The selective process was also applied to a recombinant production cell line. The evolved cells from this selection exhibited a 38% increase in peak cell density, a 30% increase in integral cell area, and a 36% increase in product titer. These increases were obtained without any appreciable impact on product quality, demonstrating the usefulness of this simple approach to improve the performance of recombinant cell lines.
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism | 2017
Arsalan S. Haqqani; Christie Delaney; Eric Brunette; Ewa Baumann; Graham K. Farrington; William P. Sisk; John K. Eldredge; Wen Ding; Tammy-Lynn Tremblay; Danica B. Stanimirovic
Current methods for examining antibody trafficking are either non-quantitative such as immunocytochemistry or require antibody labeling with tracers. We have developed a multiplexed quantitative method for antibody ‘tracking’ in endosomal compartments of brain endothelial cells. Rat brain endothelial cells were co-incubated with blood-brain barrier (BBB)-crossing FC5, monovalent FC5Fc or bivalent FC5Fc fusion antibodies and control antibodies. Endosomes were separated using sucrose-density gradient ultracentrifugation and analyzed using multiplexed mass spectrometry to simultaneously quantify endosomal markers, receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) receptors and the co-incubated antibodies in each fraction. The quantitation showed that markers of early endosomes were enriched in high-density fractions (HDF), whereas markers of late endosomes and lysosomes were enriched in low-density fractions (LDF). RMT receptors, including transferrin receptor, showed a profile similar to that of early endosome markers. The in vitro BBB transcytosis rates of antibodies were directly proportional to their partition into early endosome fractions of brain endothelial cells. Addition of the Fc domain resulted in facilitated antibody ‘redistribution’ from LDF into HDF and additionally into multivesicular bodies (MVB). Sorting of various FC5 antibody formats away from late endosomes and lysosomes and into early endosomes and a subset of MVB results in increased antibody transcytosis at the abluminal side of the BBB.
Biotechnology and Bioengineering | 2005
Gisela G. Chiang; William P. Sisk
Archive | 2004
William P. Sisk; Holly Prentice
Archive | 2004
Nels E. Pederson; William P. Sisk
Archive | 2004
Lars Ulrik Wahlberg; Mette Grønborg; Philip Kusk; Jens Tornøe; Nels E. Pederson; William P. Sisk
Journal of Biotechnology | 2007
Holly Prentice; Christopher J. Tonkin; Louisa Caamano; William P. Sisk
Archive | 1996
William P. Sisk; Shirley Vui Yen Cheng; David R Buckler; Holly Prentice
Archive | 2013
Graham K. Farrington; William P. Sisk