Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William T. Peake is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William T. Peake.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1982

Input impedance of the cochlea in cat

Thomas J. Lynch; Victor Nedzelnitsky; William T. Peake

Tones were delivered directly to the stapes in anesthetized cats after removal of the tympanic membrane, malleus, and incus. Measurements were made of the complex amplitudes of the sound pressure on the stapes PS, stapes velocity VS, and sound pressure in the vestibule PV. From these data, acoustic impedance of the stapes and cochlea ZSC delta equal to PS/US, and of the cochlea alone ZC delta equal PV/US were computed (US delta equal to volume velocity of the stapes = VS X area of the stapes footplate). Some measurements were made on modified preparations in which (1) holes were drilled into the vestibule and scala tympani, (2) the basal end of the basilar membrane was destroyed, (3) cochlear fluid was removed, or (4) static pressure was applied to the stapes. For frequencies between 0.5 and 5 kHz, ZSC approximately equal to ZC; this impedance is primarily resistive ([ZC] approximately equal to 1.2 X 10(6) dyn-s/cm5) and is determined by the basilar membrane and cochlear fluids. For frequencies below 0.3 kHz, [ZSC] greater than [ZC] and ZSC is primarily determined by the stiffness of the annular ligament; drying of the ligament or changes in the static pressure difference across the footplate can produce large changes in [ZSC]. For frequencies below 30 Hz, ZC is apparently controlled by the stiffness of the round-window membrane. All of the results can be represented by an network of eight lumped elements in which some of the elements can be associated with specific anatomical structures. Computations indicate that for the cat the sound pressure at the input to the cochlea at behavioral threshold is constant between 1 and 8 kHz, but increases as frequency is decreased below 1 kHz. Apparently, mechanisms within the chochlea (or more centrally) have an important influence on the frequency dependence of behavioral threshold at low frequencies.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1979

Basilar membrane motion in the alligator lizard: Its relation to tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity

William T. Peake; Alexander Ling

In the alligator lizard the entire basilar membrane is accessible for measurements of its velocity by the Mössbauer method. Tests of the method indicate (1) the Mössbauer source can be placed on the basilar membrane without altering the signal-transmission properties of the cochlea, and (2) the source adheres to the basilar membrane. Isovelocity curves (IVCs) were constructed by plotting (as a function of tone frequency) the sound-pressure level at the tympanic membrane required to produce a specified velocity amplitude. IVCs from 21 lizards for source locations spanning the length of the basilar membrane indicate that basilar-membrane velocity does not vary systematically with longitudinal location as it does in mammalian cochleas. Measurements of velocity waveforms in two lizards do not indicate substantial nonlinearity in the inner-ear mechanical system. The frequency dependence of the basilar-membrane velocity is similar to that of the extrastapes velocity over the range 0.4 to 2 kHz. Thus, the tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity, which have been previously demonstrated in this species in responses of both auditory-nerve fibers and cells of the receptor organ, are apparently not primarily determined by basilar-membrane motion.


Hearing Research | 1992

Middle-ear transmission : acoustic versus ossicular coupling in cat and human

William T. Peake; John J. Rosowski; Thomas J. Lynch

Otologic surgeons consider the action of sound pressure on the cochlear windows to be of major importance in certain cases of middle-ear pathology, yet previously published network models of mammalian middle ears do not include such a mechanism. A unified middle-ear model is developed in which it is assumed that the difference of acoustic pressures acting on the windows adds to the ossicular-chain pressure to produce cochlear input. From a network model of the cat middle-ear cavities we estimate the contributions of pressures on the cochlear windows for both normal and abnormal cat ears. For the human ear we use the model of Kringlebotn (1988) and measurements of Békésy (1947). We determine that the pressure difference across the cochlear windows is negligibly small in normal cat and human ears. Thus, it is a reasonable approximation to ignore this mechanism in normal ears. For ears with a drastically altered tympanic membrane and/or ossicular chain, acoustic coupling to the cochlear windows can--to a considerable extent--explain residual hearing in human. The model predicts hearing levels for type IV tympanoplastic reconstructions that agree with the best results obtained surgically.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1996

Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea

Susan E. Voss; John J. Rosowski; William T. Peake

The assumption that the pressure difference between the cochlear windows is the stimulus that produces cochlear responses is tested experimentally in the ears of anesthetized cats. Cochlear potential is used as a measure of cochlear response. The sound pressures at the oval and round windows are individually controlled with both pressures at the same frequency and amplitude. When the angle difference between the two pressures is varied over one cycle, cochlear-potential magnitude varies by about 40 dB, with a sharp minimum occurring with the angle difference near zero. A linear model of the response to the two input pressures estimates a complex common-mode gain C and a complex difference-mode gain D; magnitude of D is about 35 dB greater than magnitude of C over the frequency range that was tested (75 to 1000 Hz). Thus, except for conditions that make the common-mode input much larger than the difference-mode input, the pressure difference between the oval and round windows is, to a good approximation, the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1967

Shapes of Tuning Curves for Single Auditory‐Nerve Fibers

Nelson Y. S. Kiang; Murray B. Sachs; William T. Peake

When threshold for single auditory‐nerve fibers are plotted in terms of stapes displacement, the tuning curves rise monotonically on both sides of the characteristic frequency.


Laryngoscope | 2005

Experimental and Clinical Studies of Malleus Fixation

Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Michael E. Ravicz; John J. Rosowski; William T. Peake; Saumil N. Merchant

Objectives/Hypothesis: Preoperative clinical diagnosis of malleus fixation can be difficult. “Fixation” of the malleus can be caused by various disorders or diseases: fibrous tissue, bony spurs, and neo‐osteogenesis around the malleus head or stiffening of the anterior malleal ligament. The conductive hearing loss produced by these disorders or diseases has not been well characterized. The study goals were 1) to determine the effects of various types of malleus fixation using a cadaveric temporal bone preparation and 2) to assess the clinical utility of umbo velocity measurements in preoperative differential diagnosis of malleus fixation and stapes fixation.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2001

Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms

Susan E. Voss; John J. Rosowski; Saumil N. Merchant; William T. Peake

Sound transmission through ears with tympanic-membrane (TM) perforations is not well understood. Here, measurements on human-cadaver ears are reported that describe sound transmission through the middle ear with experimentally produced perforations, which range from 0.5 to 5.0 mm in diameter. Three response variables were measured with acoustic stimulation at the TM: stapes velocity, middle-ear cavity sound pressure, and acoustic impedance at the TM. The stapes-velocity measurements show that perforations cause frequency-dependent losses; at low frequencies losses are largest and increase as perforation size increases. Measurements of middle-ear cavity pressure coupled with the stapes-velocity measurements indicate that the dominant mechanism for loss with TM perforations is reduction in pressure difference across the TM; changes in TM-to-ossicular coupling generally contribute less than 5 dB to the loss. Measurements of middle-ear input impedance indicate that for low frequencies, the input impedance with a perforation approximates the impedance of the middle-ear cavity; as the perforation size increases, the similarity to the cavitys impedance extends to higher frequencies. The collection of results suggests that the effects of perforations can be represented by the path for air-volume flow from the ear canal to the middle-ear cavity. The quantitative description of perforation-induced losses may help clinicians determine, in an ear with a perforation, whether poor hearing results only from the perforation or whether other pathology should be expected.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1994

Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10 Hz to 20 kHz

Thomas J. Lynch; William T. Peake; John J. Rosowski

The acoustic input impedence of the ear is a useful measure of the behavior of the middle ear and of its effect on the acoustics of the external ear. A high-impedance acoustic source with an integral microphone was designed for acoustic-impedance measurements. The sources Norton equivalent circuit was determined from measurements of the sound pressure it generated in known acoustic loads. Tests on simple acoustic configurations show errors in impedance measurements of less than 10% in magnitude and 7 degrees in angle over a frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 kHz with increasing errors at higher frequencies. Measurements at the tympanic membrane (TM) on five cat ears with widely opened middle-ear cavities show an impedance that is compliance-like below 0.3 kHz and approximately resistive above 2 kHz. With the cavities intact the impedance magnitude is somewhat larger for low frequencies, has a sharp maximum near 4 kHz, and at the highest frequencies is little affected by the state of the cavities. Impedance magnitude varies among ears by a factor of 3. The pressure reflection-coefficient that is determined from the impedance is frequency dependent with magnitude between 0.2 and 1. To characterize the motion transformation of the TM we calculate the ratio of tympanic-membrane volume velocity to the velocity of the mallear umbo, called here the kinematic area ATK. This complex quantity is constant with an angle of zero for frequencies below 0.6 kHz, but at higher frequencies both magnitude and angle of ATK vary with frequency.


Acta Oto-laryngologica | 2001

How do Tympanic-membrane Perforations Affect Human Middle-ear Sound Transmission?

Susan E. Voss; John J. Rosowski; Saumil N. Merchant; William T. Peake

Although tympanic-membrane (TM) perforations are common sequelae of middle-ear disease, the hearing losses they cause have not been accurately determined, largely because additional pathological conditions occur in these ears. Our measurements of acoustic transmission before and after making controlled perforations in cadaver ears show that perforations cause frequency-dependent loss that: (1) is largest at low frequencies; (2) increases as perforation size increases; and (3) does not depend on perforation location. The dominant loss mechanism is the reduction in sound-pressure difference across the TM. Measurements of middle-ear air-space sound pressures show that transmission via direct acoustic stimulation of the oval and round windows is generally negligible. A quantitative model predicts the influence of middle-ear air-space volume on loss; with larger volumes, loss is smaller.Although tympanic-membrane (TM) perforations are common sequelae of middle-ear disease, the hearing losses they cause have not been accurately determined, largely because additional pathological conditions occur in these ears. Our measurements of acoustic transmission before and after making controlled perforations in cadaver ears show that perforations cause frequency-dependent loss that: (1) is largest at low frequencies; (2) increases as perforation size increases; and (3) does not depend on perforation location. The dominant loss mechanism is the reduction in sound-pressure difference across the TM. Measurements of middle-ear air-space sound pressures show that transmission via direct acoustic stimulation of the oval and round windows is generally negligible. A quantitative model predicts the influence of middle-ear air-space volume on loss; with larger volumes, loss is smaller.


Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1966

Efferent inhibition of auditory-nerve responses - Dependence on acoustic-stimulus parameters.

Michael L. Wiederhold; William T. Peake

Electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle in anesthetized cats reduces auditory‐nerve responses (N1) if the acoustic stimuli are at low sound‐pressure levels but does not produce detectable changes in neural responses for click stimuli more than 60 to 70 dB above visual‐detection level for N1. When the sound‐pressure levels of high‐frequency (10 000‐Hz) and low frequency (400‐Hz) transient acoustic stimuli were matched according to a physiological criterion, the neural response to the high‐ frequency stimulus was reduced more by olivocochlear bundle stimulation than the response to the low‐frequency stimulus. These result, suggest certain characteristics for the mechanisms which influence the activity of single auditory‐nerve fibers.

Collaboration


Dive into the William T. Peake's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John J. Rosowski

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas J. Lynch

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory T. Huang

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael E. Ravicz

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas F. Weiss

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher A. Shera

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge