Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William Tillett is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William Tillett.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2013

Smoking and delay to diagnosis are associated with poorer functional outcome in psoriatic arthritis

William Tillett; Deepak Jadon; Gavin Shaddick; Charlotte Cavill; Eleanor Korendowych; Corinne S de Vries; Neil McHugh

Objective To identify predictors of poorer physical function in established psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods PsA patients with disease duration of ≥10 years were identified from the Bath longitudinal cohort. Physical function was assessed using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Sex, age at diagnosis, duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis, smoking, treatment and year of diagnosis were included in a multivariable regression analysis to identify associations with HAQ. Results 267 patients were identified for inclusion. The median age was 56 years (IQR 45–63), median disease duration was 13 years (IQR 10–18) and median HAQ score was 0.63 (IQR 0.13–1.25). The model predicted significant increases in HAQ related to smoking (0.23, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.42), age >50 years at diagnosis (0.27, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.51), symptom duration of ≥1 year before diagnosis (0.22, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.42), female sex (0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.57) and history of treatment with an anti-TNF agent (0.63, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.93) at follow-up. Conclusions Smoking, delay to diagnosis, older age at diagnosis, female sex and a history of anti-TNF treatment are associated with worse physical function in established PsA.


Rheumatology | 2013

The 2012 BSR and BHPR guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis with biologics

Laura C. Coates; William Tillett; David Chandler; Philip S. Helliwell; Eleanor Korendowych; Stuart Kyle; Iain B. McInnes; Susan Oliver; A.D. Ormerod; Catherine Smith; Deborah Symmons; Nicola Waldron; Neil McHugh

The last British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines for the treatment of PsA were published in 2005 when antiTNF therapy was not widely available. At that time only one of the anti-TNF therapies was licensed for the treatment of PsA. Since then, their use in PsA has become more widespread, with multiple anti-TNF drugs licensed for the treatment of PsA and approved for therapy by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). However, despite these advances, there are still patients


Rheumatology | 2012

Work disability in psoriatic arthritis—a systematic review

William Tillett; Corinne de-Vries; Neil McHugh

OBJECTIVE Work disability (WD) is an important functional outcome measure in arthritis. There is a large body of information on WD in rheumatic diseases such as RA and AS; however, until now factors that influence WD in PsA have not been systematically reviewed. Our objective was to perform a systematic and critical review of the current literature on WD and its measurement in PsA. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. The search strategy was supplemented by a manual search of cited articles. All original English language publications in the form of meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies and publications in abstract form were included. A quality assessment was made of the articles published in full form. RESULTS Nineteen publications (nine in abstract form) were identified. There is intermediate quality evidence that levels of unemployment (20-50%) and WD (16-39%) are high and associated with longer disease duration, worse physical function, high joint count, low educational level, female gender, erosive disease and manual work. There is sparse low-quality evidence that WD is worse in those with PsA than psoriasis alone. CONCLUSIONS Disability at work in those with PsA is high; however, data on its associations are limited by the small number of reports and heterogeneity of data collected. Future work should focus on the validation of WD data collection tools for use in PsA.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2012

The ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) Criteria – A Retrospective Feasibility, Sensitivity, and Specificity Study

William Tillett; Luisa Costa; Deepak Jadon; Dinny Wallis; Charlotte Cavill; Jessica McHugh; Eleanor Korendowych; Neil McHugh

Objective. To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) to retrospectively classify an existing research cohort. Methods. In total, 480 patient records were reviewed from the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) cohort and for 100 consecutive controls with inflammatory arthritis from a general rheumatology clinic. The CASPAR score was modified for retrospective use; both “inflammation” and “current psoriasis” were recorded as present if they had ever been confirmed in the rheumatology clinic. Sensitivity and specificity of the CASPAR criteria were compared with expert clinical diagnosis. Results. A total of 480 database records were identified. Nine sets of records had been lost or destroyed. The diagnoses had changed in 15 cases, which were transferred to the control arm, leaving 456 patients with an expert diagnosis of PsA. Of 115 controls, 96 had rheumatoid arthritis, 5 osteoarthritis, 3 reactive arthritis, 3 seronegative arthritis, 3 undifferentiated arthralgia, 2 ankylosing spondylitis, 1 spondyloarthritis, and 2 systemic sclerosis. Sensitivity (99.7%) and specificity (99.1%) were both high and equivalent to previous reports. Sensitivity remained high even after inclusion of 7 PsA patients with insufficient data to complete the CASPAR assessment (sensitivity 98.2%, specificity 99.1%). The criteria were found to be easy and practical to apply to case records. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that the feasibility, specificity, and sensitivity of the CASPAR are maintained when adapted for retrospective use to classify an established research cohort.


Rheumatology | 2013

Exploring ankylosing spondylitis-associated ERAP1, IL23R and IL12B gene polymorphisms in subphenotypes of psoriatic arthritis

Deepak Jadon; William Tillett; Dinny Wallis; Charlotte Cavill; John Bowes; Nicola Waldron; Anna Dixon; Raj Sengupta; Anne Barton; Eleanor Korendowych; Neil McHugh

OBJECTIVE To ascertain whether AS-associated polymorphisms of ERAP1, IL23R and IL12B genes associate with subphenotypes of PsA, particularly axial radiographic disease once stratified by HLA-B27 and HLA-Cw*0602 status. METHODS rs30187 (ERAP1 gene), rs6887695 (IL12B gene), rs11209026 and rs7530511 (IL23R gene) single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped in 263 PsA cases from a prospective cohort and compared with data from healthy controls (n = 3266-5422). ERAP1 results were stratified according to HLA-B27 and HLA-Cw*0602 status. Investigation of association with age at onset of psoriasis/PsA, arthritic joint count, axial radiographic disease, peripheral radiographic erosions, Psoriasis Area Severity Index, nail score and HAQ was made. RESULTS There was a strong association between rs6887595 (IL12B) and PsA, with homozygosity for the major allele being more frequent in PsA than controls (odds ratio 1.70; 95% CI 1.3, 2.2; P < 0.001). A trend was demonstrated for the minor allele of rs11209026 (IL23R) to be less frequent in patients with erosive joint disease than in those without erosions or controls (7%, 14% and 12%, respectively). None of the polymorphisms associated with the presence of axial radiographic disease or other clinical parameters. CONCLUSION We have confirmed a strong association between rs6887595 (IL12B) and PsA. A trend has been demonstrated between an IL23R variant and peripheral erosive disease. ERAP1 was not associated with axial radiographic disease in PsA. Spinal involvement in PsA may be genetically different from that in AS, which is in keeping with previous observations that the clinical and radiographic pattern of axial disease also differs.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2015

Enhanced Patient Involvement and the Need to Revise the Core Set — Report from the Psoriatic Arthritis Working Group at OMERACT 2014

William Tillett; Lihi Eder; Niti Goel; Maarten de Wit; Dafna D. Gladman; Oliver FitzGerald; Willemina Campbell; Philip S. Helliwell; L. Gossec; Ana Maria Orbai; Alexis Ogdie; V. Strand; N McHugh; Philip J. Mease

Objective. To discuss the need for revision of the “core set” of domains to be included for assessment in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) randomized controlled trials and longitudinal observational studies, review work undertaken since the 2012 meeting of Outcome Measures for Rheumatology 11 (OMERACT 11) to include patient perspectives in this revision, and reassess proposed composite measures in the context of new research data and the OMERACT Filter 2.0 framework. Methods. The OMERACT 12 (2014) PsA working group presented work completed over the last 2 years to incorporate patient involvement in PsA outcomes research, review the endorsed PsA core set based on the patient perspective as well as new research findings, and further develop PsA responder indices. Breakout groups then discussed 2 topics: (1) the need to revise the PsA core set, and opportunities to add, move, or merge existing domains to improve existing redundancy; and (2) how to incorporate the core set in a composite index. Breakout groups fed back to the working group before participant voting. Results. Meeting participants endorsed the need to revise the PsA core set according to the OMERACT Filter 2.0 framework (100%), and the inclusion of disease impact (94%) and fatigue (72%) in the inner circle. Breakout group feedback suggested the core set revision was an opportunity to consolidate pathophysiologic aspects such as arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, spondylitis as “inflammatory musculoskeletal disease,” and nail and skin psoriasis as “psoriasis activity.” Conclusion. Future work will focus on updating the PsA core set and development of responder indices with ongoing, meaningful involvement of patient research partners.


Current Rheumatology Reports | 2014

Patient Involvement in Outcome Measures for Psoriatic Arthritis

William Tillett; Ade Adebajo; Mel Brooke; Willemina Campbell; Laura C. Coates; Oliver FitzGerald; Laure Gossec; Philip S. Helliwell; Sarah Hewlett; Jana James; Patricia Minnock; Aisling Reast; Dennis O’Sullivan; Maarten de Wit; Neil McHugh

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous inflammatory arthritis with a varied clinical phenotype. There has been considerable international collaboration over recent years to develop and prioritise appropriate disease domains and outcome measures to capture all aspects of this complex disease. It has been recognised that patient-reported measures and physician assessments are complementary and, when used together, allow an improved reflection of disease burden. Taking this concept one step further, the experience in rheumatoid arthritis has demonstrated benefits of incorporating the patient perspective in the development of outcome measures. We report a systematic review demonstrating (1) that there has been little incorporation of the patient perspective in the development of outcome measures and domains in PsA, (2) the proceedings from the preliminary patient involvement in outcome measures for PsA (PIOMPSA) meetings, and (3) a proposed roadmap for improving patient involvement.


Rheumatology | 2015

Factors influencing work disability in psoriatic arthritis: first results from a large UK multicentre study

William Tillett; Gavin Shaddick; Ayman Askari; Annie Cooper; Paul Creamer; Gavin Clunie; Philip S. Helliwell; Lesley Kay; Eleanor Korendowych; Suzanne Lane; Jonathan Packham; Ragai Shaban; Lyn Williamson; Neil McHugh

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which structural damage, clinical disease activity, demographic and social factors are associated with work disability (WD) in PsA. METHODS Four hundred patients fulfilling CASPAR (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria for PsA were recruited from 23 hospitals across the UK. Demographic, socio-economic, work, clinical and radiographic data were collected. WD was assessed with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) questionnaire reporting WD as a percentage of absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced effectiveness) and work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism). Logistic and linear regressions were conducted to investigate associations with WD. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-six participants of any age were in work. Absenteeism, presenteeism and productivity loss rates were 14% (s.d. 29.0), 39% (s.d. 27.2) and 46% (s.d. 30.4), respectively. Ninety-two (26%) participants of working age were unemployed. Greater age, disease duration of 2-5 years and worse physical function were associated with unemployment. Patients reported that employer awareness and helpfulness exerted a strongly positive influence on remaining in employment. Higher levels of global and joint-specific disease activity and worse physical function were associated with greater levels of presenteeism and productivity loss among those who remained in work. CONCLUSION Reduced effectiveness at work was associated with measures of disease activity, whereas unemployment, considered the endpoint of WD, was associated with employer factors, age and disease duration. A longitudinal study is under way to determine whether treatment to reduce disease activity ameliorates WD in the real-world setting.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2017

Updating the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Domain Set: A Report from the PsA Workshop at OMERACT 2016

Ana Maria Orbai; Maarten de Wit; Philip J. Mease; Kristina Callis Duffin; Musaab Elmamoun; William Tillett; Willemina Campbell; Oliver FitzGerald; Dafna D. Gladman; Niti Goel; L. Gossec; Pil Hoejgaard; Ying-Ying Leung; Chris A. Lindsay; Vibeke Strand; Désirée van der Heijde; Bev Shea; Robin Christensen; Laura C. Coates; Lihi Eder; Neil McHugh; Umut Kalyoncu; Ingrid Steinkoenig; Alexis Ogdie

Objective. To include the patient perspective in accordance with the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 in the updated Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Domain Set for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and longitudinal observational studies (LOS). Methods. At OMERACT 2016, research conducted to update the PsA Core Domain Set was presented and discussed in breakout groups. The updated PsA Core Domain Set was voted on and endorsed by OMERACT participants. Results. We conducted a systematic literature review of domains measured in PsA RCT and LOS, and identified 24 domains. We conducted 24 focus groups with 130 patients from 7 countries representing 5 continents to identify patient domains. We achieved consensus through 2 rounds of separate surveys with 50 patients and 75 physicians, and a nominal group technique meeting with 12 patients and 12 physicians. We conducted a workshop and breakout groups at OMERACT 2016 in which findings were presented and discussed. The updated PsA Core Domain Set endorsed with 90% agreement by OMERACT 2016 participants included musculoskeletal disease activity, skin disease activity, fatigue, pain, patient’s global assessment, physical function, health-related quality of life, and systemic inflammation, which were recommended for all RCT and LOS. These were important, but not required in all RCT and LOS: economic cost, emotional well-being, participation, and structural damage. Independence, sleep, stiffness, and treatment burden were on the research agenda. Conclusion. The updated PsA Core Domain Set was endorsed at OMERACT 2016. Next steps for the PsA working group include evaluation of PsA outcome measures and development of a PsA Core Outcome Measurement Set.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2016

Report of the GRAPPA-OMERACT Psoriatic Arthritis Working Group from the GRAPPA 2015 Annual Meeting

Ana Maria Orbai; Philip J. Mease; Maarten de Wit; Umut Kalyoncu; Willemina Campbell; William Tillett; Lihi Eder; Musaab Elmamoun; Oliver FitzGerald; Dafna D. Gladman; Niti Goel; L. Gossec; Chris A. Lindsay; Ingrid Steinkoenig; Philip S. Helliwell; Neil McHugh; Vibeke Strand; Alexis Ogdie

The GRAPPA-OMERACT psoriatic arthritis (PsA) working group is in the process of updating the PsA core domain set to improve and standardize the measurement of PsA outcomes. Work streams comprise literature reviews of domains and outcome measurement instruments, an international qualitative research project with PsA patients to generate domains important to patients, outcome measurement instrument assessment, conduct of domain consensus panels with patients and physicians, and evidence-based selection of instruments. Patient research partners are involved in each of the projects. The working group will present findings and seek endorsement for the new PsA core domain set, outcome measurement set, and research agenda at the OMERACT meeting in May 2016.

Collaboration


Dive into the William Tillett's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil McHugh

Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eleanor Korendowych

Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexis Ogdie

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge